Abstract
The focus of the article is on the ideal of using dialogue to promote contact between school and home. The aim was to explore this ideal by taking into account both an observed interaction session and how the participants perceive this interaction. The study draws on data from observation of a meeting about a pupil with special needs and his transition from lower to upper secondary school. The participants were the pupil, the mother and father, the special needs teacher, the school counsellor, the school psychology counsellor and the special needs coordinator. Additionally, interviews with the parents and the special needs coordinator have been conducted. Using sociological theory, more specifically the theory of communicative action (Habermas, in The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society, 1984; in The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason, 1987) as the point of departure, the observations show that the participants are having a dialogue, using arguments, negotiating common understanding and showing an orientation towards agreement. But during the interviews, it becomes apparent that at least one of the professionals might be acting strategically, that challenges may arise when participants do not present their view, that the conclusion is vague and that there are power differences between the participants. The elaboration of the participants’ own views on the interaction demonstrates that the difference between acting communicatively and strategically is related to the interlocutors’ attitudes and that this is not easily discerned through observation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubert, V. (1972). Det skjulte samfunn. Oslo: Pax forlag.
Bæck, U.D. K. (2007). Foreldreinvolvering i skolen. Delrapport fra forskningsprosjektet “Culture encounters in school. A study of parental involvement in lower secondary school”. Rapport nr. 06/2007: Norut Samfunn.
Bagley, C., & Ackerly, C. L. (2006). “I am much more than just a mum”. Social capital, empowerment and Sure Start. Jounal of Education Policy, 21(6), 717–734.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performity. Jounal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Barnes, M. (2002). Bringing difference into deliberation? Disabled people, surviviors and local governance. The Policy Press, 30(3), 319–331.
Bråten, S. (1998). Kommunikasjon og samspill: fra fødsel til alderdom [Communication and interaction: from birth to old age]. Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cardini, A. (2006). An analysis of rethoric and practice of educational partnerships in the UK: an arena of complexities, tensions and power. Journal of Education Policy, 21(4), 393–415.
Cederstrøm, J. (1991). Samtalen i skolen en undersøgelse af forestillinger om og forventninger til lærerens kommunikative rolle. København: Unge Pædagoger.
Chalmers, A. F. (1995). Hvad er videnskab? En indføring i moderne videnskabsteori. København: Gyldendal.
Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jacobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining Society. Critial realism in the social sciences. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Dom, L., & Verhoeven, J. C. (2006). Partnership and conflict between parents and school: how are schools reacting to the new participation law in Flanders (Belgium)? Jounal of Education Policy, 21(5), 567–597.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. XIX, 1210s). Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1998). Some further Clarifications of the Concept of Communicative Rationality. In M. Cooke (Ed.), On the Pragmatics of Communication (pp. VIII, 454 s.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harris, S. (2005). Professionals, partnerships and Learning in changing times. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 15(1), 71–86.
Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.
Knowledge Promotion (2006). Ministry of Education and Research.
Lidén, H. (1997). Det er jo tross alt oss, elevene, det dreier seg om. Samarbeid mellom hjem og skole med fokus på barnet. Trondheim: Norsk senter for barneforskning.
Linell, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). Asymmetries in dialogue: some conceptual preliminaries. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue. Hampstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, Barnes & Noble books.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Maclure, M., & Walker, B. M. (2000). Disenchanted Evenings: The social organization of talk in parent-teacher consultations in UK secondary schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 5–25.
Nordahl, T. (2000). Samarbeid mellom hjem og skole: en kartleggingsundersøkelse. Oslo: NOVA rapport 8/00.
Nordahl, T. (2003). Makt og avmakt i samarbeidet mellom hjem og skole. En evaluering innenfor Reform 97. Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring (NOVA).
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Pinkus, S. (2005). Bridging the gap between policy and practice: adopting a strategic vision for partnership working in special education. British Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 184–187.
Popkewitz, T., & Lindblad, S. (2000). Educational Governance and Social Inclusion and Exclusion: Some conceptual difficulties and problematics in policy and research. Discourse: studies in the culture politics of education, 21(1), 5–44.
Report to the Storting number 29 (1994–1995). Principles and guidelines for the 10-year primary school–new curriculum. In Norwegian: Om prinsipper og retningslinjer for 10-årig grunnskole -ny læreplan: Ministry of Education and Research.
Report to the Storting number 31 (2007–2008). Quality in School. In Norwegian: Kvalitet i skolen: Ministry of Education and Research.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Stengers, I. (1999). For en demokratisering av vitenskapene. Oslo: Spartacus.
Todd, E. S., & Higgins, S. (1998). Powerlessness in professional and parent partnerships. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(2), 227–236.
Turner, B. S. (1990). Theories of modernity and postmodernity. London: Sage.
Vincent, C. (2001). Social class and parental agency. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 347–364.
Waggoner, K., & Griffith, A. (1998). Parent involvement in education. Ideology and experience. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 4(1), 65–77.
Weininger, E. B., & Lareau, A. (2003). Translating Bourdieu into the American context: the question of social class and family-school relations. Poetics, 31, 375–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tveit, A.D. Exploring the Ideal of Dialogue by Taking into Account Both an Observed Interaction Session and the Participants’ Views on the Interaction. Interchange 45, 59–73 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-014-9221-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-014-9221-7