Abstract
A novel “Whiteheadean” science program was initiated in England and Wales in September 2006. Following a critical House of Commons report in 2002, the government altered the National Curriculum targets and thus forced the Examination Boards to alter their specifications in order to come in line. Assessment at GCSE level (i.e., the 14-16 year cohort) was criticised for: a) failing to inspire students to continue with science, b) discouraging students from thinking for themselves, c) neglecting contemporary science, d) lacking flexibility, and e) making practical work into a tedious and dull activity.
The British government has insisted that all pupils in state funded schools must know the names of some modern scientists and their work. They must discuss some current scientific problems. History and philosophy of science is included under the topic heading “How Science Works.” In Chemistry these objectives have destroyed the traditional linear top-down sequential approach of teaching into an approach based more closely on Whiteheadean lines (cf., the ideas expressed in The Aims of Education, 1926, Chapters 1-3).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akeroyd F.M. (1983). Chemical education and the year 2000. Journal of Chemical Education 61: 559-560
Akeroyd, F.M. (1989). Philosophy of science in a national curriculum. In D.E. Herget (Ed.), Proceedings of the first international conference on the history and philosophy of science and science teaching, 15-22. Tallahassee, FL: University of Florida Press.
Akeroyd, F.M. (1992). Theoretical applied chemistry. Canadian Chemical News, March issue, 23-24.
Birch C. (1988). Whitehead and science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 20(2): 33-41
Gibson, I. (2002). Government report. Summarized in Science and Technology Committee Press Notice No. 37, dated 9 July, 2002, p. 1.
Gibson, I. (2004). Lighting the fire. Fabian Society document dated 23/09/2004. Retrieved from www.fabian-society.org.uk
Greener, Sir A. (2005). Moving towards a modernised curriculum. QCA Futures. Retrieved from www.qca.org.uk
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2002). Science education from 14-19. Third report of session 2001-2002. Volume I. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2006). GCE and a level subject criteria for science (paragraph 3.6. QCA/06/2864. Retrieved from www.qca.org.uk
Riffert F. (2005). Whitehead’s dynamic cyclic theory of learning. In Riffert F. (ed). Alfred North Whitehead on learning and education. Durham, UK, Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 89-119
Whitehead A.N. (1926). The aims of education and other essays. New York, E. Benn
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akeroyd, M. A Novel Whiteheadean Science Program for 14-16 Year Olds in England and Wales. Interchange 38, 167–173 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-007-9021-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-007-9021-4