Skip to main content
Log in

Monoidal Categories, Symmetries, and Compound Physical Systems

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conceptually non-trivial problem of relating the notion of a compound physical system and the mathematical descriptions of its constituent parts is dramatically illustrated in standard quantum physics by the use of the Hilbert tensor product of the spaces representing the subsystems, instead of the more familiar cartesian product, as it is the case for classical physical systems. Aspects of the general structure of this relationship can be explained by endowing suitable categories that arise in the mathematical descriptions of classical systems and of quantum systems with their natural monoidal structures, and constructing a monoidal functor, relating the monoidal structures of the domain and codomain categories in a coherent way. To highlight some of the structural aspects involved, I will confine myself in this paper to the simple case of finite sets or finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, on which finite groups act.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramsky, S., Coecke, B.: A categorical semantics of quantum protocols. Log. Comput. Sci. (2004). Also available at quant-ph/0402130

  2. Aerts, D.: Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 12, 1131–1170 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Aerts, D., Daubechies, I.: Physical justification for using the tensor product to describe two quantum systems as one joint system. Helv. Phys. Acta 51, 661–675 (1978)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Borceux, F.: Handbook of Categorical Algebra. Volume 1: Basic Category Theory; Volume 2: Categories and Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

  5. Foulis, D.J., Wilce, A.: Free extensions of group actions, induced representations, and the foundations of physics. In: Coecke, B., Moore, D., Wilce, A. (eds.) Current Research in Operational Quantum Logic, pp. 139–165. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gudder, S.P.: Representations of groups as automorphisms on orthomodular lattices and posets. Can. J. Math. 23, 659–673 (1971)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gudder, S.P., Piron, C.: Observables and the field in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 12, 1583–1588 (1971)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mackey, G.W.: Induced Representations of Groups and Quantum Mechanics. Benjamin, New York (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer, New York (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, D.: On state spaces and property lattices. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 30, 61–83 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Piron, C.: Axiomatique quantique. Helv. Phys. Acta 37, 439–468 (1964)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Piron, C.: Foundations of Quantum Physics. Benjamin, Reading (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Piron, C.: Mécanique Quantique. Bases et Applications. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Valckenborgh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valckenborgh, F. Monoidal Categories, Symmetries, and Compound Physical Systems. Int J Theor Phys 47, 149–167 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-007-9547-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-007-9547-3

Keywords

Navigation