Abstract
This study serves two purposes. The first purpose is the development and validation of a Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs Scale (MTBS). In addition to providing a valid and reliable MTBS instrument, this study provides information on the process of developing and validating the instrument, which shall be useful for the development and validation of similar instruments. The second purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their teaching experience. Using a validated MTBS, this study assessed the beliefs of four groups of Chinese high school mathematics teachers with varying years of professional teaching experience: 1–5 years (n = 25), 6–10 years (n = 70), 11–20 years (n = 48), and 21+ years (n = 28). The MTBS is composed of 26 items distributed across five subscales spanning beliefs about mathematics, learning, teaching, students, and teachers. Among the four groups, the results of this study indicate that there were no significant differences in scores on beliefs about mathematics, mathematics learning, mathematics teaching, students, and teachers. Further item analysis revealed that longer teaching experience does not necessarily mean that a teacher holds reform-oriented views. However, teachers with 6–10 years of experience were most likely to hold a more dialectic view of mathematics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Barkatsas, A. T., & Malone, J. (2005). A typology of mathematics teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics and instructional practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 69–90.
Black, A., & Ammon, P. (1992). A developmental-constructivist approach to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487192043005002.
Berk, D., & Cai, J. (2019). Mathematics teacher beliefs. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_236-1.
Bolden, D. S., & Newton, L. D. (2008). Primary teachers’ epistemological beliefs: Some perceived barriers to investigative teaching in primary mathematics. Educational Studies, 34(5), 419–432.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. L. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D., & Raizen, S. (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cabrera-Nyugen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the journal of society for social work and research. Journal of Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99–103.
Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Exploring the impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 135–167.
Cai, J. & Wang, T. (2010). Conceptions of effective mathematics teaching within a cultural context: Perspectives of teachers from China and the United States. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 265–287.
Cai, J., & Ding, M. (2017). On mathematical understanding: Perspectives of experienced Chinese mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(1), 5–29.
Cai, J., Ding, M. & Wang, T. (2014). How do exemplary Chinese and U.S. mathematics teachers view instructional coherence? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 265–280.
Cai, J., Kaiser, G., Perry, R., & Wong, N-Y. (2009). (Eds.). Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives: National and international studies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
Caleon, I. S., Tan, Y. S. M., & Cho, Y. H. (2018). Does teaching experience matter? The beliefs and practices of beginning and experienced physics teachers. Research in Science Education, 48, 117–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9562-6
Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 457–470.
Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Edcuational Research, 102(1), 65–75.
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471–492.
Clark, L. M., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Nishio, M., Campbell, P. F., Smith, T. M., & Choi, Y. (2014). Teacher characteristics associated with mathematics teachers’ beliefs and awareness of their students’ mathematical dispositions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45, 246–284.
Clarke, D. J., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (Eds.). (2006). Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-Century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.
Drechsler, M., & Van Driel, J. (2008). Experienced teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of teaching acid-base chemistry. Research Science Education, 38, 611–631.
Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249–254). New York, NY: The Flamer Press.
Feyzioglu, E. Y. (2012). Science teachers’ beliefs as barriers to implementation of constructivist-based education reform. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), 302–317.
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2014). Exploring differences in practicing teachers’ valuing of pedagogical knowledge based on teaching ability beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 435–448.
Gabriele, A. J., & Joram, E. (2007). Teachers’ reflections on their reform-based teaching in mathematics: Implications for the development of teacher self-efficacy. Action in Teacher Education, 29(3), 60–74.
Hatisaru, V. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about knowledge of teaching and their impact on teaching practices. In B. Rott, G. Törner, J. Peters-Dasdemir, A. Möller, Safrudiannur (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education: The role of beliefs in the classroom (pp. 147–159). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concept, issues and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91, 31–57.
Hudson, R. A., Kloosterman, P., & Galindo, E. (2012). Assessing preservice teachers’ beliefs about the teaching and learning of mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 433–442.
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756.
Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Leung, F. K. S., Graf, K. D., & Lopez-Real, F. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West. New York, NY: Springer.
Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22.
Li, X., Liu, S., DeBey, M., McFadden, K., & Pan, Y.-J. (2018). Investigating Chinese preschool teachers’ beliefs in mathematics teaching from a cross-cultural perspective. Early Years, 38(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1228615
Liljedahl, P., Oesterle, S., & Bernèche, C. (2012). Stability of beliefs in mathematics education: A critical analysis. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(3-4), 101–118.
Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 807–828.
Lin, H.-L., Gorrell, J., & Taylor, J. (2010). Influence of culture and education on U.S. and Taiwan preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 37–46.
Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230–1275.
Mevarech, Z. R., & Maskit, D. (2015). The teaching experience and the emotions it evokes. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 18, 241–253.
Miller, R. G. (1966). Simultaneous statistical inference (pp. 68–69). New York, NY: Springer.
Ministry of Education. (2011). Curriculum standards for primary education and junior secondary education: Mathematics. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
Ng, W., Nicholas, H., & Williams, A. (2010). School experience influences on pre-service teachers’ evolving beliefs about effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 278–289.
Organization for Economic and Co-Operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris, France: Author.
Ovens, A., & Tinning, R. (2009). Reflection as situated practice: A memorywork study of lived experience in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1125–1131.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Patrick, H., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). Conceptual change in teachers’ intuitive conceptions of learning, motivation, and instruction: The role of motivational and epistemological beliefs. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Student and teacher learning (pp. 117–143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age Publishing.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947.) Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Savasci, F., & Berlin, D. F. (2012). Science teacher beliefs and classroom practice related to constructivism in different school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(1), 65–86.
Saylor, L. L., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). The role of reflection in elementary mathematics and science teachers’ training and development: A meta-synthesis. School Science and Mathematics, 114(1), 30–39.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.
Schommer, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.
Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 435–443.
Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 344–355.
Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis: Concepts and Theory. Paper presented at International Conference on Mathematical-Computational and Statistical Sciences, Gdansk-Wrzeszcz, Poland.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Wang, N., Young, T., Wilhite, S. C., & Marczyk, G. (2011). Assessing students’ emotional learning in higher education: Development and validation of the widener emotional learning scale. Journal of Psycoeducational Assessment, 29(1), 47–62.
Wilcox-Herzog, A. (2002). Is there a link between teachers’ beliefs and behaviors? Early Education and Development, 13(1), 81–106.
Wu, D., & Luo, B. (2001). A study on the structure and cultivation of teachers’ reflection capability. Educational Review, 17(1), 33–35. [in Chinese]
Wong, N. Y., Ding, R., & Zhang, Q. P. (2016). From classroom environment to conception of mathematics. In R. B. King & A. B. I. Bernardo (Eds.), The psychology of Asian learners (pp. 541–557). Singapore: Springer.
Xenofontos, C., & Andrews, P. (2012). Prospective teachers’ beliefs about problem-solving: Cypriot and English cultural constructions. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 69–85.
Xie, S. (2014). Compilation of epistemological beliefs system scale for high school mathematics teacher and its test for reliability and validity. Journal of Mathematics Education, 23(4), 47–54. [in Chinese]
Xie, S. (2017). Study on teaching year deference of high school mathematics teachers about their epistemological beliefs system. Journal of Mathematics Education, 26(6), 67–71. [in Chinese]
Zhang, Q., & Morselli, F. (2016). Teacher beliefs. In G. Goldin, M. S. Hannula, E. Heyd-Metzuyanim, A. Jansen, R. Kaasila, S. Lutovac, et al. (Eds.), Attitudes, beliefs, motivation and identity in mathematics education: An overview of the field and future directions (pp. 11–13). Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.
Acknowledgments
This paper was finished during my post-doctoral research in University of Delaware with Jinfa Cai, and its research plan was made in my Ph. D study under the direction of Ping Yu. I would like to thank Jinfa Cai and Ping Yu for their intellectual guidance and much encouragement. I also gratefully acknowledge the feedback and editorial assistance from Victoria Robison, Stephen Hwang, which contributed to the paper’s improvement. Of course, any errors are solely the responsibility of the author.
Disclaimer
Any opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province or the China Scholarship Council.
Funding
The research reported in this paper was partly supported by grants from the Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 14YBA280) and China Scholarship Council (No.201606725016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs Scale (MTBS)
Directions: There is no right or wrong answer for the following questions. The goal is to find out your real beliefs. For each statement below, indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree with it.
Strongly Disagree | Strongly Agree | ||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
M1 Mathematics knowledge is generated only by mathematicians.
M2 Once a mathematical theory has been established, it becomes the infallible law.
M3 Mathematics knowledge is static and unchangeable.
M4 The only value of mathematics knowledge is servicing in production, living, and other science.
M5 The true value of mathematical knowledge embody the ability to improve one’s thinking skills, i.e. learning mathematics will make you more intelligent.
ML1 The essence of mathematics learning is transferring knowledge into the learner’s mind.
ML2 Mastering mathematics means remembering formulas, theorems and operational rules, and using them to solve mathematical problems.
ML3 Practice makes perfect, i.e. drilling is the most important method for learning mathematics.
ML4 Mathematics learning should be as rapid and intense as possible. Students can digest the ideas later, albeit some cannot understand everything immediately.
ML5 Students’ disposition such as motivations, attitudes, social relationships and perseverance play a decisive role in learning mathematics.
MT1 Teachers should always prove the conclusions in teaching mathematics.
MT2 In teaching mathematics, one should mainly use experimental methods to prove propositions or make conclusions.
MT3 Mathematics should be taught strictly in accordance with pre-designed aims and procedures.
MT4 The key for teaching mathematics is to help students acquire knowledge; it does not really matter whether or not they understand the process of knowledge production.
MT5 When being taught mathematical concepts, the students should be allowed to generalize the common features through observations and analysis of several examples.
MT6 Mathematical propositions should first be presented to the students directly, and then the students may analyze and prove them under the teacher’s guidance.
MT7 Teaching mathematical problem solving is mainly about helping students master problem-solving models as many as possible.
MT8 In the mathematics classroom, the teacher should be the only authority or referee.
MT9 The examination results are the most effective criteria to assess teaching quality.
S1 Students’ mathematical thinking abilities develop gradually in stages.
S2 Students’ disposition factors such as motivations, attitudes, social relationships and perseverance can be improved by cultivation.
S3 There are individual differences exist in the students’ mathematics learning abilities. Mathematics might be difficult for some students.
T1 When I am confident with teaching in a class, I often get better results in teaching.
T2 Compared with pre-service teacher education, teachers’ self-reflection during their career is more helpful for them to improve teaching.
T3 Each mathematics teacher has his or her own teaching style.
T4 Outstanding mathematics teachers tend to show democracy in their classroom.
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, S., Cai, J. Teachers’ Beliefs about Mathematics, Learning, Teaching, Students, and Teachers: Perspectives from Chinese High School In-Service Mathematics Teachers. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 747–769 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10074-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10074-w