Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

MOOCs: Origins, Concept and Didactic Applications: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2012–2019)

  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, learning and teaching processes cannot be understood without technology. Among all digital resources available for education, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) stand as great online tools that can facilitate the learning process of any type of content. In this sense, literature about MOOCs’ implications in education has increased exponentially in recent years. This paper presents the results of a systematic literature review on MOOCs’ origins and definition, their typologies and platforms, their strengths and limitations, the concept of specialization courses, and their didactic applications for Foreign Language Learning. The review followed a four-stage methodology for the analysis and synthesis of a total of 55 studies published between the years 2012 and 2019. Findings revealed that, although MOOCs have great potential for education, few studies have addressed neither the possibilities of these courses for Foreign Language Learning nor the potential of specialization courses. Main conclusions entail the need to face MOOCs’ limitations to get the most out of them as well as more research on their potential for Foreign Language Learning and the possibilities of brand-new typologies such as nanoMOOCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Own elaboration

Fig. 2

Source: Own elaboration

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguaded, I. (2013). The MOOCs revolution: A new form of education from the technological paradigm? Comunicar, 21(41), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-a1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ávila, J. F. (2014). Importancia actual y ventajas de los MOOC [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/1mhBgCr.

  • Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does NOT fit all. Technovation, 76(1), 51–63. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JXPTZr.

  • Bárcena, E., & Martín-Monje, E. (2014). Introduction. Language MOOCs: An emerging field. In E. Martín-Monje & E. Bárcena (Eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 1–10). Berlin: De Gruyter Open. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/30ZWQjV.

  • Bardin, L. (2013). L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brouns, F., Bohuschke, F., Pedrosa, R., Fueyo, A., García, V. Pelayo, C., & Fano, S. (2015). D2.6 Web 2.0 Requirements Analysis. ECO project.

  • Brouns, F., Mota, J., Morgado, L., Jansen, D., Fano, S., Silva, A., & Teixeira, A. (2014). A networked learning framework for effective MOOC design: The ECO project approach. In A. M. Teixeira, & A. Szücs (Eds.), 8th EDEN research workshop. Challenges for research into open and distance learning: Doing things better—Doing better things. Oxford: EDEN.

  • Buhl, M., & Andreasen, L. B. (2018). Learning potentials and educational challenges of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in lifelong learning. International Review of Education, 64(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-018-9716-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabero, J. (2015). Visiones educativas sobre los MOOC. RIED, 18(2), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.18.2.13718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callejo-Gallego, J., & Agudo-Arroyo, Y. (2018). MOOC: Valoración de un futuro. RIED, 21(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, M. A., Rodríguez, C., & Fernández, E. (2016). ¿Cómo son los MOOC sobre educación? Un análisis de cursos de temática pedagógica que se ofertan en castellano. Digital Education Review, 29, 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2016.29.298-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaño, C., & Cabero, J. (2013). Enseñar y aprender en entornos m-learning. Madrid: Síntesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Cardoso, G. (2005). The network society. From knowledge to policy. Washington: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2017). The role of MOOCs in the learning of languages: Lessons from a Beginners’ English Course. Porta Linguarum, (28), 23–35. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2O8UuNK.

  • Chiappe-Laverde, A., Hine, N., & Martínez-Silva, J. A. (2015). Literature and practice: A critical review of MOOCs. Comunicar, 22(44), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. (2013). MOOCs: Taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2DDvB6i.

  • Cortés, J. A., & Lozano, J. O. (2014). Social networks as learning environments for higher education. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 2(7), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300030881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1998). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durall, E., Gros, B., Maina, M., Johnson, L., & Adams, S. (2012). Perspectivas tecnológicas: Educación superior en Iberoamérica 2012–2017. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.878352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escudero, A., & Núñez, A. A. (2017). Impacto del fenómeno MOOC: La personalización en la educación superior. RIDE: Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 8(15), 279–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2018). European digital competence framework for citizens (DigComp). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2SSvQCr.

  • Fano, S., Fueyo, A., & Osuna, S. (2016). MOOC development policies: The ECO project in the European and Spanish Context. In D. Jansen (Ed.), European policy response on MOOC opportunities (pp. 83–93). Brussels: EADTU. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2fex60B.

  • Fernández, J., & Webster, S. (2014). From OCW to MOOC: Deployment of OERs in a massive open online course—The experience of Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Open Praxis, 6(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.6.2.115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, L. (2015). ¿…y antes de los MOOC? Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 26, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.26.2015.14483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, J., & Martínez, J. (2018). El empoderamiento del alumnado en los sMOOC. Revista Complutense de Educación, 29(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.51932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Jaurena, I., & Domínguez, D. (2012). Open social learning y educación superior: Oportunidades y retos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 60, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie600452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, P., García, A., & Monge, C. (2016a). La cultura de los MOOC para la innovación en educación superior desde contextos iberoamericanos. Madrid: Síntesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, P., Monge, C., & Sebastián, E. (2016b). Calidad de un MOOC sobre inclusión educativa: aplicación de varios instrumentos e indicadores. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Em Educação, 11(25), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.21723/RIAEE.v11.esp.1.p342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2018). E-teaching in higher education: An essential prerequisite for e-learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. (2013). The four student archetypes emerging in MOOCs. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2NB5qDl.

  • ICETFC. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/1ysRWHM.

  • INTEF. (2016). ¿Qué es un NOOC? Retrieved from https://bit.ly/36ct3ah.

  • Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing. In P. Runeson, M. Höst, E. Mendes, A. Andrews, & R. Harrison (Eds.), ESEM ’12 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement Lund, Sweden – September 19–20, 2012 (pp. 29–38). New York: ACM. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JGulll.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jitpaisarnwattana, N., Reinders, H., & Darasawang, P. (2019). Language MOOCs: An expanding field. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 1(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v1n1.142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., & Estrada, V. (2012). Technology Outlook for STEM + Education 2012–2017: An NMC Horizon Report Sector Analysis. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2LSN6mZ.

  • Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013a). NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2XVbnjt.

  • Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., Freeman, A., Ifenthaler, D., & Vardaxis, N. (2013b). Technology outlook for Australian tertiary education 2013–2018: An NMC horizon project regional analysis. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2y3DoG8.

  • Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering—A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Hatala, M. (2015). What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202–227. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/32pV0u0.

  • Mailhes, V., & Raspa, J. (2015). MOOC: De la devolución educativa a la supervivencia MOOC: from educational feedback to survival. Letra. Imagen. Sonido: Ciudad Mediatizada, 7(14), 75–91. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2XVSlcT.

  • Matías, H., & Pérez, A. (2014). Los Cursos en Línea Masivos y Abiertos (MOOC) como alternativa para la educación a distancia. GECONTEC: Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología, 2(2), 41–49. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2GkVx7a.

  • Medina-Salguero, R., & Aguaded, I. (2014). Los MOOC en la plataforma educativa MiriadaX. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 18(1), 137–153. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2xzE3Q5.

  • Moya, M. (2013). Los MOOC/COMA: Un nuevo reto educativo para el siglo XXI. Una metodología didáctica para el aprendizaje en línea. Virtualis, 4(8), 84–103. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YgF4uQ.

  • Munari, F., Sobrero, M., & Toschi, L. (2018). The university as a venture capitalist? Gap funding instruments for technology transfer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2017.07.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, R., & Neves, L. (2016). sMOOC. Necessidades educativas especiais—uma experiência em língua portuguesa integrada num modelo de aprendizagem colaborativa europeu. In R. Roig-Vila (Ed.), Tecnología, innovación e investigación en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(43), 879–910. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QXmvFn.

  • Onah, D., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: Behavioural patterns. In L. Gómez, A. López, & I. Candel (Eds.), 6th International conference on education and new learning technologies (pp. 5825–5834). Barcelona: IATED Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • OpenupEd. (2014). Definition massive open online courses (MOOCs). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/1DrMxXy.

  • Osuna-Acedo, S., Marta-Lazo, C., & Frau-Meigs, D. (2018). From sMOOC to tMOOC, learning towards professional transference: ECO European Project. Comunicar, 27(55), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, F. J. (2018). Los MOOC como instrumentos para la formación en lengua inglesa del alumnado de sexto curso de Educación Primaria. In M. I. Amor, M. Osuna, & E. Pérez (Eds.), Fundamentos de enseñanza y aprendizaje para una educación universal, intercultural y bilingüe (pp. 155–160). Barcelona: Octaedro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, F. J., & Huertas, C. A. (2016). MOOCs y formación del profesorado de segundas lenguas: propuesta de evaluación. Skopos, 7, 151–167. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Ye2IYN.

  • Pérez, L., Jordano, M., & Martín-Cuadrado, A. M. (2017). Los NOOC para la formación en competencias digitales del docente universitario. Una experiencia piloto en la Universidad Nacional de Educación a distancia (UNED). RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia, 55, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/55/1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perifanou, M. A., & Economides, A. A. (2014). MOOCs for foreign language learning: An effort to explore and evaluate the first practices. In L. Gómez, A. López, & I. Candel (Eds.), Proceedings of INTED2014 conference 10th–12th March 2014, Valencia, Spain (pp. 3561–3570). Valencia: IATED Academy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2LIFaWr.

  • Pernías, P., & Luján, S. (2013). Los MOOC: Orígenes, historia y tipos. Comunicación y Pedagogía, (269–270), 41–48. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2FdAH9M.

  • Poy, R., & Gonzales-Aguilar, A. (2014). Factores de éxito de los MOOC: Algunas consideraciones críticas. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas y Tecnologías de Información, (E1), 105–118. http://www.doi.org/10.4304/risti.e1.105-118.

  • Ramírez-Fernandez, M. B. (2015a). Propuesta de certificación de calidad de la oferta española educativa de cursos MOOC realizada por el Instituto Nacional de Tecnologías Educativas y de Formación del Profesorado. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (3), 121–133. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2cxTJLj.

  • Ramírez-Fernández, M. B. (2015). La valoración de MOOC: Una perspectiva de calidad. RIED, 18(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.18.2.13777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinatovna, G., Vladimirovna, E., Bizyanova, F., & Haidar, I. (2017). Moosle-ee: Massive open online social learning environment for english elearning system. Revista San Gregorio, (Extra 20), 6–13. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/32FT94r.

  • Rolfe, V. (2015). A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of massive online open courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 18(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2015-0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, P. (2013). Presente y futuro de los Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC): Análisis de la oferta completa de cursos de las plataformas Coursera, EdX, Miríada X y Udacity (Master’s Thesis). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, C. (2016). TICs y aprendizaje de idiomas: ¿existe algún sistema existe de aprendizaje digital y conectado? In R. Roig-Vila (Ed.), Tecnología, innovación e investigación en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje (pp. 1840–1847). Barcelona: Octaedro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Research challenges in accessible MOOCs: A systematic literature review 2008–2016. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(4), 775–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0531-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrà, A., González-Sanmamed, M., & Anderson, T. (2015). Meta-analysis of the research about MOOC during 2013–2014. Educación XXI, 18(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.14808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Hermosa, G., Ferrán-Ferrer, N., & Abadal, E. (2012). Recursos educativos abiertos: repositorios y uso. El profesional de la información, 21(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, M., & Pantoja, A. (2015). Formación permanente del profesorado en las comunidades de práctica. Aula de encuentro, 1(17), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3946.9925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sclater, N. (2016). MOOCs, open educational resources and social networking: Bridging the gap between informal and formal learning. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 7(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2016.7.2.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCOPEO. (2013). Scopeo report 2. MOOC: Estado de la situación actual, posibilidades, retos y futuro. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca-Centro Internacional de Tecnologías Avanzadas.

  • Shah, D. (2018). Year of MOOC-based degrees: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2018. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YjzPKZ.

  • Shen, C.-W., & Kuo, C.-J. (2015). Learning in massive open online courses: Evidence from social media mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2012a). What is the theory that underpins our MOOCs? Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2gfhmXh.

  • Siemens, G. (2012b). MOOCs are really a platform? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/1rPRHDt.

  • Tafazoli, D., Gómez, M. E., & Huertas, C. A. (2018). A cross-cultural study on the attitudes of english language students towards computer-assisted language learning. Teaching English with Technology, 18(2), 34–68. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2q9YNtB.

  • Tejada, J., & Fernández, K. V. (2018). Nuevos escenarios y competencias digitales docentes. Hacia la profesionalización docente con TIC. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(1), 25–51. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2GQmv7H.

  • Teplechuk, E. (2013). Emergent models of massive open online courses: An exploration of sustainable practices for MOOC institutions in the context of the launch of MOOCs at the University of Edinburgh (Master’s Thesis). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Z5CbKo.

  • Vadillo, G., & Bucio, J. (2018). Un MOOC, muchos MOOC: Diseño multinivel en cursos masivos del área de la salud. Revista Investigación en Educación Médica, 7(26), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.22201/facmed.2007865x.2018.26.03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, M. J., & Burbat, R. (2017). Foreign language learning with MOOC: Back to the future? Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 12, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.6564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliou, A., & Šemeta, A. (2012). Prólogo. In Agencia Ejecutiva en el ámbito Educativo Audiovisual y Cultural (EACEA) (Ed.), Cifras clave de la enseñanza de lenguas en los centros escolares de Europa—Edición 2012 (pp. 3–4). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 1–17. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2O9XLfW.

  • Vorobyeva, A. A. (2018). Language acquisition through massive open online courses (MOOCs): Opportunities and restrictions in educational university environment. XLinguae, 11(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata-Ros, M. (2014). MOOCs, una visión crítica y una alternativa complementaria: La individualización del aprendizaje y de la ayuda pedagógica. Campus Virtuales, 2(1), 20–38. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2DC70i8.

  • Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2018.01.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegements

This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education (Resolución de 5 de diciembre de 2017, de la Secretaría de Estado de Educación, Formación Profesional y Universidades, por la que se convocan ayudas para la formación de profesorado universitario, de los Subprogramas de Formación y de Movilidad incluidos en el Programa Estatal de Promoción del Talento y su Empleabilidad, en el marco del Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013–2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Córdoba, Av. San Alberto Magno, n/n, 14071, Córdoba, Spain

    Francisco Javier Palacios Hidalgo, Cristina A. Huertas Abril & M.ª Elena Gómez Parra

Authors
  1. Francisco Javier Palacios Hidalgo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina A. Huertas Abril
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M.ª Elena Gómez Parra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Javier Palacios Hidalgo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palacios Hidalgo, F.J., Huertas Abril, C.A. & Gómez Parra, M.E. MOOCs: Origins, Concept and Didactic Applications: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2012–2019). Tech Know Learn 25, 853–879 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09433-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09433-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation