Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of health facility births on newborn mortality in Malawi

  • Research article
  • Published:
International Journal of Health Economics and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the effect of health facility delivery on newborn mortality in Malawi using data from a survey of mothers in the Chimutu district, Malawi. The study exploits labour contraction time as an instrumental variable to overcome endogeneity of health facility delivery. The results show that health facility delivery does not reduce 7-day and 28-day mortality rates. In a low-income country like Malawi where the healthcare quality is severely compromised, we conclude that encouraging health facility delivery may not guarantee positive health outcomes for newborn births.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Neonatal sepsis, one of the leading causes for newborn births in low income countries, which is less likely to be managed in low-resource settings like Malawi, only accounts for about 5% of the neonatal mortality (Perin et al, 2022).

  2. If labour start timing is exogenous, then we would get a uniform distribution. However, the number of observations in each category in our sample is not uniformly distributed after considering that the length of each labour timing category is different. If we categorize mothers into two groups, such as 5 pm–5am and 5am-5 pm, the proportion of responses are 53.9% and 46.1% respectively, where we still do not obtain a balanced distribution but the difference becomes smaller. It is possible that the measurement of labor timing may confront recall bias. Although we recognize some limits of the use of labor timing as an instrument variable, we validate our instrument variable in the empirical strategy section by examining the orthogonality condition.

References

  • Adam, T., Lim, S., & Mehta, S. (2005). Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ, 331, 1107–1110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Adhvaryu, A., & Nyshadham, A. (2015). Returns to treatment in the formal health care sector: Evidence from Tanzania. American Economic Journal. Economic Policy, 7(3), 29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2014). Method for estimating due date. Committee Opinion No. 611. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 124(4), 863–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselmi, L., Lagarde, M., & Hanson, K. (2015). Health service availability and health seeking behaviour in resource poor settings: evidence from Mozambique. Health Economics Review, 5(1), 26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Atuoye, K. N., et al. (2017). Utilization of skilled birth attendants over time in Nigeria and Malawi. Global Public Health, 12, 728–743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutta, Z. A., Darmstadt, G. L., Hasan, B. S., & Haws, R. A. (2005). Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: A review of the evidence. Pediatrics, 115, 519–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. E., et al. (2010). Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: A systematic analysis. The Lancet, 375, 1969–1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowblis, J. R., & McHone, H. S. (2013). An instrumental variables approach to post- acute care nursing home quality: Is there a dime’s worth of evidence that continuing care retirement communities provide higher quality? Journal of Health Economics, 32(5), 980–996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darmstadt, G. L., et al. (2005). Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: How many newborn babies can we save? The Lancet, 365, 977–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darmstadt, G. L., Lee, A. C. C., Cousens, S., Sibley, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Donnay, F., Osrin, D., Bang, A., Kumar, V., Wall, S. N., et al. (2009). 60million non-facility births: Who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths? International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 107, S89–S112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daysal, N. M., Trandaftr, M., & Van Ewijk, R. (2015). Saving lives at birth: The impact of home births on infant outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(3), 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahani, M., Subramanian, S. V., & Canning, D. (2009). The effect of changes in health sector resources on infant mortality in the short-run and the long-run: A longitudinal econometric analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 68(11), 1918–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, G., Ross, R., & Hill, K. (2015). Institutional de- liveries weakly associated with improved neonatal survival in developing countries: evidence from 192 Demographic and Health Surveys. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(6), 1879–1888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fullman, et al. (2018). Measuring performance on the healthcare access and quality index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: A systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet, 391(10136), 2236–2271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, P., Locay, L., & Sanderson, W. (1987). Are user fees regressive?: The welfare implications of health care financing proposals in Peru. Journal of Econometrics, 36(1–2), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godlonton, S., & Okeke, E. (2016). Does a ban on informal health providers save lives? Evidence from Malawi. Journal of Development Economics, 118, 112–132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gortmaker, S. L. (1979). The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn. American Journal of Public Health, 69(7), 653–660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goudar, S. S., Goco, N., Somannavar, M. S., Vernekar, S. S., Mallapur, A. A., Moore, J. L., Wallace, D. D., Sloan, N. L., Patel, A., Hibberd, P. L., et al. (2015). Institutional deliveries and perinatal and neonatal mortality in Southern and Central India. Reproductive Health, 12(Suppl 2), S13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gowrisankaran, G., & Town, R. J. (1999). Estimating the quality of care in hospitals using instrumental variables. Journal of Health Economics, 18(6), 747–767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (2000). The human capital model. Handbook of Health Economics, 1, 347–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, R. A., Thomas, A. L., Bhutta, Z. A., & Darmstadt, G. (2007). Impact of packaged interventions on neonatal health: A review of the evidence. Health Policy and Planning, 22, 193–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iams, J. D. (2003). Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 101(2), 402–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D., & Kim, B. (2023). A replication file for the effect of health facility births on newborn mortality in Malawi. Mendeley Data, V3. https://doi.org/10.17632/ktcv7skgdw.3

  • Kumar, S., Dansereau, E. A., & Murray, C. J. L. (2014). Does distance matter for institutional delivery in rural India? Applied Economics, 46(33), 4091–4103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbani, L., Bjune, G., Chirwa, E., Odland, J. Ø., et al. (2013). Why some women fail to give birth at health facilities: A qualitative study of women’s perceptions of perinatal care from rural Southern Malawi. Reproductive Health, 10(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, J. E., Cousens, S., & Zupan, J. (2005). 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? The Lancet, 365(9462), 891–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, H. H., Fink, G., Nsona, H., & Kruk, M. E. (2016). Obstetric facility quality and newborn mortality in Malawi: A cross-sectional study. PLOS Medicine, 13(10), e1002151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maitra, P. (2004). Parental bargaining, health inputs and child mortality in India. Journal of Health Economics, 23(2), 259–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, M., McNeil, B. J., & Newhouse, J. P. (1994). Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality?: Analysis using instrumental variables. JAMA, 272(11), 859–866.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, E. S., James, S. R., Murray, S. S., Nelson, K. (2013). Maternal-child nursing. Elsevier Health Sciences.

  • Perin, J., et al. (2022). Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–19: An updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet. Child and Adolescent Health., 6, 106–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okeke, E., & Chari, A. V. (2018). Health care at birth and infant mortality. Social Science and Medicine, 196, 86–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, S. (2015). Impact of hospital delivery on child mortality: An analysis of adolescent mothers in Bangladesh. Social Science and Medicine, 143, 194–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panis, C. W. A., & Lillard, L. A. (1994). Health inputs and child mortality: Malaysia. Journal of Health Economics, 13(4), 455–489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarelin, A. (2014). Modernisation of maternity care in Malawi. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 32(4), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2016). World Health Statistics 2016: Monitoring Health for the SDGs Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization.

  • Witter, F. R., Rocco, L. E., & Johnson, T. R. B. (1992). A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 in a controlled-release vaginal pessary for cervical ripening at term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 166(3), 830–834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimba, E., et al. (2012). Newborn survival in Malawi: A decade of change and future implications. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We received helpful suggestions from seminar participants at the Pacific Conference for Development Economics and Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Workshop in Sustainable Development in Columbia University, Yonsei University and KDI School of Public Policy and Management. We thank Africa Future Foundation (AFF) and Hyuncheol Bryant Kim for making the data available and AFF staff in Malawi for their fieldwork. This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A3A2075117). We are also grateful to KDI School of Public Policy and Management for financial support. The IRB for this research project was approved by Malawi National Health Science Research Committee (Malawi NHSRC-903) and Cornell University Office of Research Integrity and Assurance (Protocol ID#: 1310004204).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Booyuel Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, D., Kim, B. The effect of health facility births on newborn mortality in Malawi. Int J Health Econ Manag. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-023-09348-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-023-09348-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation