Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Traditional Lifeways and Storytelling: Tools for Adaptation and Resilience to Ecosystem Change

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We collected data through three focus groups conducted with Wabanaki citizens (members of the Penobscot Nation, Passamaquoddy Tribe, Maliseet, and Micmac Nations) residing in Maine, USA, and the Canadian Maritime region. These sessions used a collective storytelling and discussion approach consistent with Wabanaki cultural practices to explore environmental knowledge, information on environmental change, and its impact on traditional lifeways (TLW) over time. Wild foods such as fiddleheads (Matteucia strutiopteris (L.) Tod.), berries such as blackberries (Rubus allegheniensis & R. Canadensis) and strawberries (Fragaria x ananasa), deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimmerman), fish, and seafood provide not only physical nourishment, but also cultural connections through storytelling, harvesting, processing, and sharing of resources. It is this strong and multifaceted dependence on natural resources and systems that makes Wabanaki citizens particularly “vulnerable” to climate change, but also potentially resilient because of stories and other cultural traditions that help process and understand environmental change. We suggest storytelling continues to remain relevant as a way to connect the generations and for continued adaptation to ecosystem change and sustaining traditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., Diduck, A. P., Doubleday, N. C., Johnson, D. S., Marschke, M., McConnery, P., Pinkerton, E. W., and Wollenberg, E. K. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology 7(2): 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athayde, S., Silva-Lugo, J., Schmink, M., and Heckenberger, M. (2017). The same, but different: Indigenous knowledge retention, erosion, and innovation in the Brazilian amazon. Human Ecology 45: 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley, D., and Edwards-Jones, G. (2006). Stakeholders’ perception of the impacts of invasive exotic plant species in the Mediterranean region. GeoJournal 65(3): 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., Tyler, S., and Ban, N. C. (2016). Communities and change in the anthropocene: understanding socio-ecological vulnerability and planning adaptations to multiple interacting exposures. Regional Environmental Change 16: 907–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett T. M. B., Maynard N. G., Cochran P., Gough R., Lynn K., Maldonado J., Voggesser G., Wotkyns S., and Cozzetto K. (2014). Indigenous Peoples, Lands, and Resources. In Melillo J. M., Terese T., Richmond C., and Yohe G. W. (eds.), Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp. 297–317.

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. T., and Brooks, C. M. (2010). The reciprocity principle and traditional ecological knowledge: understanding the significance of Indigenous protest on the Presumpscot River. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies: 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. T. (2018). Our beloved kin: a new history of the King Philip's War, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chief, K., Daigle, J., Lynn, K., and Whyte, K. P. (2014). Indigenous Experiences in the U.S. with Climate Change and Environmental Stewardship in the Anthropocene. In Sample, V. A., and Bixler, P. (eds.), Forest Conservation and Management in the Anthropocene: Conference Proceedings, RMRS-P-71, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design; choosing among five approaches, 3rd edn., Sage, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1983). Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists and the Ecology of New England, Hill and Wang, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, M. J. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with non-expert audiences. PNAS 111(Suppl 4): 13614–13620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, J. J., and Putnam, D. (2009). The meaning of a changed environment: initial assessment of climate change impacts in Maine—indigenous peoples. In Jacobson, G. L., Fernandez, I. J., Mayewski, P. A., and Schmitt, C. V. (eds.), Maine’s climate future: an initial assessment, University of Maine, Orono, pp. 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, J. J., Utley, L., Chase, L., Kuentzel, W., and Brown, T. (2012). Does new large private landownership and their management priorities influence public access in the northern forest? Journal of Forestry 110(2): 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Hunt, I. J. (2006). Adaptive learning networks: Developing resource management knowledge through social learning forums. Human Ecology 34(4): 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Hunt, I., and Berkes, F. (2003). Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of social-ecological environments and adaptive learning. Conservation Ecology 8(1): 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the common. Science 302(5652): 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endter-Wada, J. (1998). A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecological Applications: 891–904.

  • Fawcett, D., Pearce, T., Notaina, R., Ford, J. D., and Collings, P. (2018). Inuit adaptability to changing environmental conditions over an 11-year period in Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories. Polar Record 54(275): 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. A., Reo, N. J., Turner, D. A., Cook, J., Ditruri, F., Fessell, B., Junkins, J., Johnson, A., Rakena, T. A., Riley, C., Turner, W. J., Williams, J., and Wilson, M. (2016). "The river is us; the river is in our veins": redefining river restoration in three Indigenous communities. Sustainability Science 11(3).

  • Ginger, C., Emery, M., Baumflek, M., and Putnam, D. (2012). Access to natural resources on private property: Factors beyond right of entry. Society and Natural Resources 25: 700–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardison, P., and Williams, T. (2013). Culture, law, risk and governance: the ecology of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation. Climatic Change 120: 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, S. C., Marino, E., Whyte, K. P., Dello, K. D., and Mote, P. W. (2018). Indian time: time, seasonality, and culture in Traditional Ecological Knowledge of climate change. Ecological Processes 7(1): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houde N. (2007). The six faces of traditional ecological knowledge: Challenges and opportunities for Canadian co-management arrangements. Ecology and Society, On-line URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol2/iss2/art34/.

  • Houser, S., Teller, V., MacCracken, M., Gough, R., and Spears, P. (2001). Potential consequences of climate variability and change for native peoples and their homelands. In National Assessment Synthesis Team (ed.), Climate Change Impacts in the United States, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 351–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R. (2014). Returning the gift. Minding Nature 7(2): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, K., Daigle, J., Hoffman, J., Lake, F., Michelle, N., Ranco, D., Viles, C., Voggesser, G., and Williams, P. (2013). The impacts of climate change on tribal traditional foods. Climatic Change 120: 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society and Natural Resources 23(5): 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. M., and Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research, 3rd edn., Sage, Thousand Oakes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima, D. J., Galloway, M. L. K., Thulstrup, H. D., Ramos, C. A., and Rubis, J. T. (2012). Weathering uncertainty: traditional knowledge for climate change assessment and adaptation. Paris: UNESCO, and Darwin: UNU.: 120p.

  • Pearce, T., Wright, H., Notaina, R., Kudlak, A., Smit, B., Ford, J. D., and Furgal, C. (2011). Transmission of environmental knowledge and land skills among Inuit men in Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories, Canada. Human Ecology 39: 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Galaz, V., and Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecology and Society 19(4): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranco, D. (2006). Toward a Native Anthropology: Hermeneutics, Hunting Stories, and Theorizing from Within. Wicazo Sa Review 21(2): 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reo, N. J., and Parker, A. K. (2013). Re-thinking colonialism to prepare for the impacts of rapid environmental change. Climatic Change 120(3): 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedlinger, D., and Berkes, F. (2001). Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record 37: 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, M., and Kant, S. (2009). The influence of context on deliberation and cooperation in community-based forest management in Ontario, Canada. Human Ecology 37: 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, C. (2008). Our home is drowning: Inupiat storytelling and climate change in Point Hope, Alaska. Geographical Review 98(4): 456–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonds, V., and Christopher, S. (2013). Adapting western research methods to Indigenous ways of knowing. American Journal of Public Health 103(12): 2185–2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speck, F. (1940). Penobscot Man, University of Maine Press, Orono.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. G. (1996). Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Artic: 278–291.

  • Sundin, A., Andersson, K., and Watt, R. (2018). Rethinking communication: integrating storytelling for increased stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis. Environmental Evidence 7: 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (Swinomish). (2010). Swinomish climate change initiative: climate adaptation action plan. La Conner, WA: Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. http://www.swinomish-nsn.gov/climate_change/climate_main.html

  • Te Aho, L. (2009). Negotiating co-management of the Waikato River. Resource Management Journal: 14–18.

  • Turner, A. G., and Clifton, H. (2009). “It’s so different today”: climate change and indigenous lifeways in British Columbia, Canada. Global Environmental Change 19(2): 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voggesser, G., Lynn, K., Daigle, J., Lake, F., and Ranco, D. (2013). Cultural impacts to tribes from climate change influences on forests. Climatic Change 120: 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, K. P. (2013). Justice forward: tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility in Indian country. Climatic Change 120: 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildcat, D. (2009). Red alert: saving the planet with Indigenous knowledge, Fulcrum Publishing, Golden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author JD. The data are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

Funding

This research project was funded by the U.S. Forest Service, Award Number 14-JV-11242309-101.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John J. Daigle.

Ethics declarations

All participants received notification of informed consent prior to the focus group sessions and we followed all other protocols approved by the University of Maine Human Subjects Office.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daigle, J.J., Michelle, N., Ranco, D.J. et al. Traditional Lifeways and Storytelling: Tools for Adaptation and Resilience to Ecosystem Change. Hum Ecol 47, 777–784 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00113-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00113-8

Keywords

Navigation