Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge, Learning and the Evolution of Conservation Practice for Social-Ecological System Resilience

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two broadly conceptualized ways in which conservation knowledge may evolve: the depletion crisis model and the ecological understanding model. The first one argues that developing conservation thought and practice depends on learning that resources are depletable. Such learning typically follows a resource crisis. The second mechanism emphasizes the development of conservation practices following the incremental elaboration of environmental knowledge by a group of people. These mechanisms may work together. Following a perturbation, a society can self-organize, learn and adapt. The self-organizing process, facilitated by knowledge development and learning, has the potential to increase the resilience (capability to absorb disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change) of resource use systems. Hence, conservation knowledge can develop through a combination of long-term ecological understanding and learning from crises and mistakes. It has survival value, as it increases the resilience of integrated social--ecological systems to deal with change in ways that continue to sustain both peoples and their environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alcorn, J. B., Bamba, J., Masiun, S., Natalia, I., and Royo, A. (2003). Keeping ecological resilience afloat in cross-scale turbulence: an indigenous social movement navigates change in Indonesia. In Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 299–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. S. (1993). Testing the “ecologically noble savage” hypothesis: interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of the Peruvian Amazon. Human Ecology 21: 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aswani, S. (1998). Patterns of marine harvest effort in southwestern New Georgia, Solomon Islands: resource management or optimal foraging? Ocean & Coastal Management 40: 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahn, P., and Flenley, J. (1992). Easter Island, Earth Island, Thames and Hudson, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaucage, P., and Taller de Tradición Oral del Cepec. (1997). Integrating innovation: The traditional Nahua coffee-orchard (Sierra Norte de Puebla, Mexico). Journal of Ethnobiology 17: 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia and London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (2002). Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature, Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 121–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, T. C., and Anderson, K. (eds.) (1993). Before the Wilderness: Environmental Management by Native Californians, Anthropological Papers No. 40, Ballena Press, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. T. (ed.) (1999). Indians, Fire and the Land in the Pacific Northwest, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., and Gunderson, L. H. (2001). Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics of ecosystem management. BioScience 51: 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, A., and Toledo, V. M. (2001). Applying ecology in the Third World: the case of Mexico. BioScience 50: 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. D. (1985). Environmental influences on the development of traditional conservation in the South Pacific region. Environmental Conservation 12: 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasmann, R. F. (1988). Towards a biosphere consciousness. In The Ends of the Earth, Worster, D. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp. 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deur, D., and Turner, N. J. (eds.) (2005). “Keeping it Living”: Traditions of Plant Use and Cultivation on the Northwest Coast of North America, University of Washington Press, Seattle and UBC Press, Vancouver.

  • Drolet, C. A., Reed, A., Breton, M., and Berkes, F. (1987). Sharing wildlife management responsibilities with native groups: case histories in Northern Quebec. Transactions of the 52nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, pp. 389–398.

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T. et al. (2002). Resilience for Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. International Council for Scientific Unions (ICSU), Rainbow Series No. 3, Paris. [Online] URL: http://www.sou.gov.se/mvb/pdf/resiliens.pdf

  • Folke, C., Colding, J., and Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. In Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 352–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J., and Martinez, D. (eds.) (2000). Ecological Applications 10 (5); Special Issue on Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Ecosystem Science, and Environmental Management.

  • Geertz, C. (1963). Agricultural Involution, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., Orensanz, J. M., and Parma, A. (2005). Institutions, incentives and the future of fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. (1996). The Mbaracayu Reserve and the Ache of Paraguay. In Traditional Peoples and Biodiversity Conservation in Large Tropical Landscapes, Redford, K. H. and Mansour, J. A. (eds.), America Verde Publications and the Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, pp. 159–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4: 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, F. L. (2005). The catch-22 of conservation: indigenous peoples, biologists and cultural change. Human Ecology 33: 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. S., Johnson, D., Russell, P., and Thornton, T. F. (2003). Huna Tlingit traditional environmental knowledge, conservation, and the management of a “wilderness” park. Current Anthropology 44: S79–S103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, R. E. (1978). Traditional marine conservation methods in Oceania and their demise. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 9: 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, R. E. (1998). The case for data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical nearshore fisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, R. E. (2002). Did indigenous conservation ethics exist? Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin 14: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, R. E., and MacFarlane, W. (1991). Traditional Fishing in the Torres Strait Islands. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Hobart, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krech, S. III (1999). The Ecological Indian: Myth and History, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, D. (2005). Traditional use in contemporary ailan (island) ways: the management challenge of a sustainable dugong fishery in Torres Strait. In Indigenous Use and Management of Marine Resources, Kishigami, N. and Savelle, J. (eds.), Senri Ethnological Studies N. 67, National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, Japan, pp. 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, J. S. (1991). Priests and Programmers, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. D. (ed.) (2000). Polycentric Games and Institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, H., Bigelow, G. F., Amorosi, T., and Russell, D. (1988). Northern islands, human error and environmental degradation. Human Ecology 16: 225–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P.O’B., and Kislalioglu, M. (2004). Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for comanagement. Ecology & Society 9(3): 2. [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchagata, M., and Brown, K. (2000). Colonist farmers’ perceptions of fertility and the frontier environment in eastern Amazonia. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima, D. (1991). The ecological knowledge of Belcher Island Inuit: a traditional basis for contemporary wildlife comanagement. PhD Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC.

  • Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future, Routledge, London, UK and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34: 75–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.) (2002). The Drama of the Commons, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle, K. (1994). A guide to the literature on traditional community-based fishery management in the Asia-Pacific tropics. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 869, Rome.

  • Smith, E. A., and Wishnie, M. (2000). Conservation and subsistence in small-scale societies. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 493–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, D. W. (1995). Prehistoric extinctions of Pacific island birds: biodiversity meets zooarcheology. Science 267: 1123–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiepa, T., Lyver, P., Horsley, P., Davis, J., Bragg, M., and Moller, H. (1997). Comanagement of New Zealand's conservation estate by Maori and Pakeha: a review. Environmental Conservation 24: 236–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, A. (1979). Bringing Home Animals: Religious Ideology and the Mode of Production of the Mistassini Cree Hunter, Hurst, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N. J., Ignace, M. B., and Ignace, R. (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of aboriginal peoples in British Columbia. Ecological Applications 10: 1275–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N. J., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., and O’Flaherty, M. (2003). Ecological edges and cultural edges: diversity and resilience of traditional knowledge systems. Human Ecology 31: 439–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, W. T. (1994). From opportunism to nascent conservation. Human Nature 5: 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. A., Acheson, J. M., Metcalfe, M., and Kleban, P. (1994). Chaos, complexity and communal management of fisheries. Marine Policy 18: 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the panel, “Knowledge for the development of adaptive co-management,” N.J. Turner and F. Berkes (session organizers) International Association for the Study of Common Property, IASCP ‘04, Oaxaca, Mexico. For the development of the ideas presented here, we thank our many colleagues in the IASCP session and Douglas Nakashima, UNESCO, Paris. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Bob Johannes, an original thinker on the meaning of conservation and its relationship to traditional ecological knowledge. Berkes’ work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and the Canada Research Chairs program; Turner's work was supported by SSHRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berkes, F., Turner, N.J. Knowledge, Learning and the Evolution of Conservation Practice for Social-Ecological System Resilience. Hum Ecol 34, 479–494 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9008-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9008-2

Key Words

Navigation