Abstract
Returnee faculty experiencing cross-border academic mobility have obtained ample transnational experience in an international academic environment, which may potentially influence their professional development satisfaction after returning to their home countries. Most research has compared returnee faculty’s research productivity with their home-trained colleagues. However, the joint impact of local and overseas networks on professional development satisfaction needs to be further explored, particularly how they take advantage of overseas and domestic academic networks in professional development. This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore these issues. In the quantitative research section, a survey of 1307 returnees from 41 top Chinese universities was conducted. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) models were adopted to probe the influence of the dual academic networks on returnee scholars’ professional development and to reveal the causal effect of the alum faculty status, respectively. In the qualitative research section, thirteen returnee faculty from nine Chinese universities participated in interviews. Key findings show that dual academic networks impact returnees’ satisfaction with professional development, and network members with different tie strengths played diverse roles. The frequency of contact with former domestic and overseas supervisors and domestic colleagues is positively related to the returnee faculty’s professional development satisfaction. Furthermore, the alum faculty status has a negative effect on returnees’ professional development satisfaction. Returnees are advised to effectively and intentionally manage the strength of their ties to various roles within the dual academic networks to enhance their professional development satisfaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Barbalet, J. (2021). The theory of guanxi and Chinese society. Oxford University Press.
Baruffaldi, S., Visentin, F., & Conti, A. (2016). The productivity of science & engineering PhD students hired from supervisors’ networks. Research Policy, 45, 785–796.
Bian, Y. J. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 366–385.
Bian, Y. (2019). Guanxi, how China works. Polity Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
Chen, Q. Q. (2017). Globalization and transnational academic mobility: The experience of Chinese academic returnees. Springer.
Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Huang, S. (2013). Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1), 167–207.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Gu, J., Levin, J. S., & Luo, Y. (2018). Reproducing “academic successors” or cultivating “versatile experts”: Influences of doctoral training on career expectations of Chinese PhD students. Higher Education, 76, 427–447.
Holmes, P., Costa, N., & Lopes, B. (2019). The role of supervision in doctoral education–a transversal perspective. The Doctorate as experience in Europe and beyond: Supervision, languages, identities (pp. 213–228). Routledge.
Huang, S. (2021). Power anomie in university field of China from the perspective of relational sociology. Dalian University of Technology.
Janis, I. (1991). Groupthink. In E. Griffin (Ed.), A first look at communication theory (pp. 235–246). McGraw Hill.
Ji, Y. (2012). Culture, institution and structure: Reflections on the studies of Chinese social relations. Sociological Studies, 2, 60–85.
Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333.
Levin, D. Z., Walter, J., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organization Science, 22(4), 923–939.
Li, J. (2003). Beyond strong and weak ties: Reconsidering the concept of ties. Sociological Studies, 03, 42–50.
Li, L. Y. (2007). The weak valence in weak ties and its transformation: A cultural interpretation of Chinese guanxi. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 27(4), 175–194.
Li, F., & Tang, L. (2019). When international mobility meets local connections: Evidence from China. Science and Public Policy, 46(4), 518–529.
Li, M., Yang, R., & Wu, J. (2018). Translating transnational capital into professional development: A study of China’s Thousand Youth Talents Scheme scholars. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19, 229–239.
Lin, J., & Chao, Y. (2019). A mixed study of the organizational culture types and features in advisor postgraduate fellowship. Journal of Higher Education Management., 13(6), 35–44.
Liu, D. (2021). Discussion on the significance, issues and optimization of academic activities within a faculty. Higher Education Forum., 11, 87–90.
Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(4), 309–336.
Lu, X. (2014). Social network and career advancement: An empirical study on Chinese academic labor market. Science and Society, 4(2), 49–62.
Lu, X., & McInerney, P. B. (2016). Is it better to “Stand on Two Boats” or “Sit on the Chinese Lap”?: Examining the cultural contingency of network structures in the contemporary Chinese academic labor market. Research Policy, 45(10), 2125–2137.
McGee, R. (1960). The function of institutional inbreeding. American Journal of Sociology, 65(5), 483–488.
Melin, G. (2004). Post-doc abroad: Inherited scientific contacts or establishment of new networks? Research Evaluation, 13(2), 95–102.
Qiu, Z., & Qiao, T. (2018). Weak ties, strong ties, or the homophily based on social attributes? The Sociological Review, 6(1), 3–20.
Rosen, S., & Zweig, D. (2003). Transnational capital: valuing academic returnees in a globalizing China. In L. Cheng (Ed.), Bridging minds across the Pacific: US-China educational exchanges (pp. 111–132). Lexington Books.
Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11(1), 10.
Singh, L., & Singh, A. P. (2021). The role of professional development on job satisfaction of the LIS professionals. Library Philosophy and Practice (ejournal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6221/
Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Sage.
Stephens, S. (2014). The supervised as the supervisor. Education+ Training, 56(6), 537–550.
Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science: A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25(1), 1–21.
Sun, X. E., & Bian, Y. (2012). Ethnic networking in the transnational engagement of Chinese American scientists. Asian Perspective, 36(3), 435–461.
Sun, Y., & Bian, Y. (2017). The mechanism of human relationship in occupational status acquisition. Social Science Front, 5, 189–199.
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.
Waggoner, G. R. (1966). Problems in the professionalization of the university teaching career in Central America. Journal of Inter-American Studies, 8(2), 193–211.
Wang, J., Hooi, R., Li, A. X., & Chou, M. H. (2019). Collaboration patterns of mobile academics: The impact of international mobility. Science and Public Policy, 46(3), 450–462.
Wen, C. F. (2022, May 31). Shimen culture: The invisible force that determines students’ future development. China Science Daily, 004.
Woolley, R., Turpin, T., Marceau, J., & Hill, S. (2008). Mobility matters: Research training and network building in science. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 6(3), 159–184.
Yao, T. H., & Yu, C. P. (2019). The relationship between supervisor-fellow students supports research self-efficacy and graduates’ scientific Creativity. Higher Education Exploration, 4, 46–53.
Ynalvez, M. A., & Shrum, W. M. (2011). Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country. Research Policy, 40(2), 204–216.
Zheng, G., Shen, W., & Cai, Y. (2018). Institutional logics of Chinese doctoral education system. Higher Education, 76, 753–770.
Acknowledgements
We want to express our sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful input and to Professor Juergen Henze for his helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding
This study is funded by the National Social Science Fund in China–Education, “Research on the Chinese highly-cited scholars and their international research networking” (BIA210190).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Han Wu is the first author.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 7
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Zhu, J. Returning home and becoming alumni faculty: dual academic networks and their impact on Chinese returnee faculty’s professional development satisfaction. High Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01110-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01110-z