Abstract
Under the relentless neoliberalism, there is a growing claim that doctoral students have transformed into highly performative, enterprising, and self-reliant subjects in the current higher education landscape. Whilst this seems almost a truism to encapsulate the unprecedentedly competitive educational context in which the PhD is pursued, it is equally important to recognise the diversified profiles of doctoral individuals. Against this backdrop, the study draws upon Archer’s critical realist theory to conceptualise the heterogeneity and complexity of eighteen doctoral students’ experiences with/in the neoliberal university and academy. Using Archer’s reflexive modality as an inclusive framework, analysis has detected the positive linkage between participants’ preferable deployment of particular mode(s) of reflexivity and the prototypical way they steer their PhD trajectories taking a multiplicity of forms. As such, the study makes original contribution to existing literature in three aspects. First, in illuminating the differential concerns participants hold about the PhD pursuit, it suggests that the prevailing neoliberal forces do not invariably produce damaging impacts, nor are they inescapable for all candidates. Second, analysis highlights that whilst participants with a great clarity of value commitments and career goals at the beginning of their PhD can consistently translate their reflexivity into agentic action, this is not a commonplace experience. Third, the finding on participants’ practice of hybrid and shifting reflexive modes throws into relief the limits of Archer’s thesis, which tends to champion a fixed conception of reflexivity and downplay structural influences on the mode of reflexivity one employs. In view of these insights, the study culminates in pointing towards more promising lines of inquiry alongside presenting a set of practical implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Due to ethical restrictions entailed in this study, data sharing is not applicable and will not be provided accordingly.
References
Acker, S., & Wagner, A. (2019). Feminist scholars working around the neoliberal university. Gender and Education, 31(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1296117
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Z. (2019). Reflexivity, structure and agency: Using reflexivity to understand further education students’ higher education decision-making and choices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1483820
Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Investigating multilingual identity in study abroad contexts: A short story analysis approach. System, 71, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.014
Beasy, K., Emery, S., & Crawford, J. (2021). Drowning in the shallows: An Australian study of the PhD experience of wellbeing. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1669014
Bosanquet, A., Mantai, L., & Fredericks, V. (2020). Deferred time in the neoliberal university: Experiences of doctoral candidates and early career academics. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1759528
Burkitt, I. (2012). Emotional reflexivity: Feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology, 46(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511422587
Caetano, A. (2015). Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014549684
Caretta, M. A., Drozdzewski, D., Jokinen, J. C., & Falconer, E. (2018). “Who can play this game?” The lived experiences of doctoral candidates and early career women in the neoliberal university. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1434762
Carter, S., Smith, K., & Harrison, N. (2021). Working in the borderlands: Critical perspectives on doctoral education. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1911098
Chase, S. E. (2013). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (4 ed., pp. 55–83). SAGE Publications.
Collyer, F. M. (2015). Practices of conformity and resistance in the marketisation of the academy: Bourdieu, professionalism and academic capitalism. Critical Studies in Education, 56(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.985690
Dépelteau, F. (2013). Structure and agency again, and much more. Contemporary Sociology, 42(6), 815–819. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43185219.
Dyke, M., Johnston, B., & Fuller, A. (2012). Approaches to reflexivity: Navigating educational and career pathways. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(6), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.686895
Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Gordon, R., & Zainuddin, N. (2020). Symbolic violence and marketing ECRs in the neoliberal university. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(7–8), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1733047
Gravett, K. (2021). Disrupting the doctoral journey: Re-imagining doctoral pedagogies and temporal practices in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1853694
Hinostroza-Paredes, Y. (2021). Reflexivity and agency in university-based teacher educators: A critical realist analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943651
Horta, H., & Li, H. (2023). Nothing but publishing: The overriding goal of PhD students in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau. Studies in Higher Education, 48(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2131764
Huang, Y. (2021). Doctoral writing for publication. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1789073
Jung, J. (2018). Learning experience and perceived competencies of doctoral students in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9530-0
Kahn, P. E. (2018). Renewing the professions by attending to structural influences on reflexivity: A critical realist perspective. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joy005
Khan, J. (2022). A stressed present and a scared future: An autoethnography of a migrant scholar in Finland. Journal of International Students, 12(2), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12iS2.4344
Li, D., & Li, Y. (2021). Preparing for RAE 2020 in Hong Kong: Academics’ research, writing and publishing trajectories in a neoliberal governance landscape. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1901272
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Sage.
Macfarlane, B. (2021). The neoliberal academic: Illustrating shifting academic norms in an age of hyper-performativity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(5), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1684262
Manathunga, C. (2019). ‘Timescapes’ in doctoral education: The politics of temporal equity in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1629880
McAlpine, L. (2020). Views on the usefulness of the PhD outside academia: What do we know and need to know? Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education, 241–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_9
O’Keeffe, P. (2020). PhD by publication: Innovative approach to social science research, or operationalisation of the doctoral student … or both? Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1666258
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm008
Pyhältö, K., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Doctoral students’ sense of relational agency in their scholarly communities. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136
Vähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2011). Vocational teachers’ pathways in the course of a curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.557839
Wimalasena, L. (2017). Reflexivity and women’s agency: A critical realist morphogenetic exploration of the life experience of Sri Lankan women. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2017.1346988
Xing, C., Mu, G. M., & Henderson, D. (2022). Submission or subversion: Survival and resilience of Chinese international research students in neoliberalised Australian universities. Higher Education, 84(2), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00778-5
Xu, X., Sit, H., & Chen, S. (2021). International education through a bioecological development lens–A case study of Chinese doctoral students in Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 40(6), 1342–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1811646
Zhuang, T., & Huang, Y.-T. (2021). Characterizing university faculty’s perceptions of scholarly teaching in engineering education: A social realistic perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 646–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1765742
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X. Characterising multiple trajectories towards the reflexive PhD project within a neoliberalist landscape. High Educ 87, 1453–1470 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01073-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01073-1