Abstract
The second year of university is little-researched, despite being a focal point for declining performance, persistence, and satisfaction. It is important to establish appropriate methods for studying this ‘sophomore slump’ and to pinpoint specific antecedents from broad domains noted in literature (e.g. students’ social integration, perceptions of the curriculum). Using a novel methodology, 166 undergraduates were surveyed in successive years of study to derive a gold standard ‘within-subjects’ data sample. Under a replicated design, a ‘between-subjects’ sample of over 1000 students completed the same e-survey just once, in year one, two, or three. Quantitative comparison of the responses across years showed over 85% agreement between samples. This endorses between-subject approaches (i.e. simultaneously surveying students from different years) to facilitate rapid interventions that benefit students before they graduate. In terms of detailed findings, year two saw positive trends in students’ academic engagement (e.g. self-reported independent study time), social integration (e.g. feeling accepted, involvement in extra-curricular activities), and views on teaching staff (e.g. approachability). Although appraisals remained broadly favourable, there was, in contrast, significant deterioration in global perceptions of the learning atmosphere (e.g. course enjoyment), as well as specific elements of the teaching provision (e.g. contact hours, feedback). Notably, there appeared to be little progression in students’ academic self-perceptions (e.g. confidence to make presentations, enter class debates). Year two also saw increased thoughts of drop-out. These results highlight the unique character of the second year at university and indicate potential target areas for enhancing this phase of the undergraduate journey.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Extended programmes, where undergraduates spend an interceding year on professional placement
After exclusion of repeating students
References
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
Bates, E. A., & Kaye, L. K. (2014). ‘I’d be expecting caviar in lectures’: the impact of the new fee regime on undergraduate students’ expectations of higher education. Higher Education, 67(5), 655–673.
Borghi, S., Mainardes, E., & Silva, É. (2016). Expectations of higher education students: a comparison between the perception of student and teachers. Tertiary Education and Management, 22(2), 171–188.
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 78–96.
Darwent, S., & Stewart, M. (2014). Are student characteristics implicated in the ‘sophomore slump’? Liverpool John Moores University. http://secondyearexperience.ljmu.ac.uk/?page_id=1040.Accessed 6 Sept 2017.
Denz-Penhey, H., & Murdoch, J. C. (2009). A comparison between findings from the DREEM questionnaire and that from qualitative interviews. Medical Teacher, 31(10), 449–453.
Freedman, M. B. (1956). The passage through college. Journal of Social Issues, 12, 13–27.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.
Gore Jr., P. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 92–111.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553.
HESA (2017). Non-continuation rates summary: UK performance indicators 2015/16. Higher Education Statistics Agency. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/performance-indicators/non-continuation-summary. Accessed 9 Oct 2017
Hunter, M. S., Tobolowsky, B. F., Gardner, J. N., Evenback, S. E., Patengale, J. A., Schaller, M. A., Schreiner, L. A., et al. (2010). Helping sophomores succeed: understanding and improving the second-year experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Ishitani, T. T. (2016). Time-varying effects of academic and social integration on student persistence for first and second years in college: national data approach. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 18(3), 263–286.
Jacklin, A., & Le Riche, P. (2009). Reconceptualising student support: from ‘support’ to ‘supportive’. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 735–749.
Jones, L., Allen, B., Dunn, P., & Brooker, L. (2017). Demystifying the rubric: a five-step pedagogy to improve student understanding and utilisation of marking criteria. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(1), 129–142.
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: theory and practice. London: Sage.
Killam, W. K., & Degges-White, S. (Eds.). (2017). College student development: applying theory to practice on the diverse campus. New York: Springer.
Lieberman, D. A., & Remedios, R. (2007). Do undergraduates’ motives for studying change as they progress through their degrees? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 379–395.
Lowe, H., & Cook, A. (2003). Mind the gap: are students prepared for higher education? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(1), 53–76.
Mabel, Z., & Britton, T. A. (2018). Leaving late: understanding the extent and predictors of college late departure. Social Science Research, 69, 34–51.
Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138–150.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77–86.
Milsom, C., & Yorke, M. (2015). Defining the second year. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 14–23). Abingdon: Routledge.
Milsom, C., Stewart, M., Yorke, M., & Zaitseva, E. (2015). Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions. Abingdon: Routledge.
Money, J., Nixon, S., Tracy, F., Hennessy, C., Ball, E., & Dinning, T. (2017). Undergraduate student expectations of university in the United Kingdom: what really matters to them? Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301855.
Neves, J., & Hillman, N. (2016). The 2016 Student Academic Experience Survey. York: Higher Education Academy.
Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.
Quinn, J. (2013). Drop-out and completion in higher education in Europe among students from under-represented groups. Brussels: European Commission.
Rose-Adams, J. (2012). Leaving university early: a research report from the Back on Course project. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147–164.
Scott, J., & A. Cashmore. (2012). Fragmented transitions: moving to the 2nd year. Proceedings STEM Annual Conference. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/jon_scott_1.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2017
Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2002). Performance goals: the moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 603–610.
Soemantri, D., Herrera, C., & Riquelme, A. (2010). Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: a systematic review. Medical Teacher, 32(12), 947–952.
Stewart, M., & Darwent, S. (2015). Psychological orientations to learning in the second year. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 39–53). Abingdon: Routledge.
Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 423–442.
Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success Programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
Tinto, V. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917.
Watson, R. (2011). A rationale for the development of an extracurricular employability award at a British university. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 16(3), 371–384.
Webb, O. J., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2018). Early withdrawal from higher education: a focus on academic experiences. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1437130.
Webb, O. J., Wyness, L., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2017). Enhancing access, retention, attainment and progression in higher education: a review of the literature showing demonstrable impact. York: Higher Education Academy.
Whittle, S. R. (2016). The second-year slump—now you see it, now you don’t: using DREEM-S to monitor changes in student perception of their educational environment. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1206854.
Willcoxson, L., Cotter, J., & Joy, S. (2011). Beyond the first-year experience: the impact on attrition of student experiences throughout undergraduate degree studies in six diverse universities. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 331–352.
Yorke, M. (2015). Why study the second year? In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 1–13). Abingdon: Routledge.
Yorke, M., & Zaitseva, E. (2013). Do cross-sectional student assessment data make a reasonable proxy for longitudinal data? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 957–967.
Yorke, M., Hoekstra, P., & Turnbull, W. (2015). Maximising the use of institutional data. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 84–103). Abingdon: Routledge.
Zaitseva, E., Milsom, C., & Stewart, M. (2013). Connecting the dots: using concept maps for interpreting student satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 225–247.
Zaitseva, E., Darwent, S., & Thompson, S. (2015). Implications for student support. In C. Milsom, M. Stewart, M. Yorke, & E. Zaitseva (Eds.), Stepping up to the second year at university: academic, psychological and social dimensions (pp. 68–83). Abingdon: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Ms. Tricia Nash who helped administer the TLS, and respondents who contributed time to this study. Views expressed in this report, and any errors or omissions, remain the responsibility of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval was granted by the host institution, a public university in Southern England.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webb, O.J., Cotton, D.R.E. Deciphering the sophomore slump: changes to student perceptions during the undergraduate journey. High Educ 77, 173–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0268-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0268-8