Abstract
In higher education, just amounts of tuition fees are often a topic of heated debate among different groups such as students, university teachers, administrative staff, and policymakers. We investigated whether unpleasant situations that students often experience at university due to social crowding can affect students’ views on the justified amount of tuition fees at universities. We report two experiments on whether conditions that lead to experienced crowding in higher education can affect how students cognitively deal with a given topic. Experiment 1 (N = 80) showed that the mere cognitive activation of crowdedness in text stories about situations related to student activities influenced prospective students’ estimates of what are justified university tuition fees. In Experiment 2 (N = 72), student participants wrote an essay on tuition fees in a small versus large room in groups of three versus six persons. Here, results showed that students together with relatively many others in a small room estimated higher tuition fees to be justified than participants in all other experimental conditions. We discuss the implications of the present findings for the configuration of classes in higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Two participants did not respond to this item.
One participant did not provide an answer on this item.
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
American Psychological Association. (2012). Guidelines for ethical conduct of behavioral projects involving human participants by high school students. http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/care/chr-hs-guidelines.pdf
Bedard, K., & Kuhn, P. (2008). Where class size really matters: Class size and student ratings of instructor effectiveness. Economics of Education Review, 27, 253–265. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.08.007.
Bruins, J., & Barber, A. (2000). Crowding, performance, and affect: A field experiment investigating mediational processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1268–1280. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02520.x.
Budd, R. (2016). Undergraduate orientations towards higher education in Germany and England: Problematizing the notion of ‘student as customer’. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9977-4.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805–818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805.
Callender, C., & Jackson, J. (2005). Does the fear of debt deter students from higher education? Journal of Social Policy, 34, 509–540. doi:10.1017/S004727940500913X.
Campbell, D. E., & Shlechter, T. M. (1979). Library design influences on user behavior and satisfaction. Library Quarterly, 49, 26–41. doi:10.1086/600899.
Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and the allocation of attention. In A. Baum, J. E. Singer, & S. Valins (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, S., & Sherrod, D. R. (1978). When density matters: Environmental control as a determinant of crowding effects in laboratory and residential settings. Journal of Population, 1, 189–202.
Eastman, C. M., & Harper, J. (1971). A study of proxemic behavior: Toward a predictive model. Environment and Behavior, 3, 418–437.
Evans, G. W. (1979). Behavioral and physiological consequences of crowding in humans. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 27–46.
Evans, G. W., & Lepore, S. J. (1993). Household crowding and social support: A quasiexperimental analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 308–316. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.308.
Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B., & Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 843–853. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843.
Gelbrich, K., & Sattler, B. (2014). Anxiety, crowding, and time pressure in public self-service technology acceptance. Journal of Services Marketing, 28, 82–94. doi:10.1108/JSM-02-2012-0051.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. California: University of California Press.
Hellmann, J. H., Adelt, M. H., & Jucks, R. (2016). No space for others? On the increase of students’ self-focus when prodded to think about many others. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. doi:10.1177/0261927X16629521.
Henderson, M. D., & Wakslak, C. J. (2010). Over the hills and far away: The link between physical distance and abstraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 390–394. doi:10.1177/0963721410390802.
Hübner, M. (2012). Do tuition fees affect enrollment behavior? Evidence from a ‘natural experiment’ in Germany. Economics of Education Review, 31, 949–960. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.06.006.
Jessop, T., Gubby, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Space frontiers for new pedagogies: A tale of constraints and possibilities. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 189–202. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.503270.
Karay, Y., & Matthes, J. (2016). A study on effects of and stance over tuition fees. GMS Journal of Medical Education. doi:10.3205/zma001005.
Kokkelenberg, E. C., Dillon, M., & Christy, S. M. (2008). The effects of class size on student grades at a public university. Economics of Education Review, 27, 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.09.011.
Maeng, A., & Tanner, R. J. (2013). Construing in a crowd: The effects of social crowding on mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1044–1048. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.010.
Maeng, A., Tanner, R. J., & Soman, D. (2013). Conservative when crowded: Social crowding and consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 739–752. doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0118.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Zhu, R. (2007). The influence of ceiling height: The effect of priming on the type of processing that people use. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 174–186. doi:10.1086/519146.
Monks, J., & Schmidt, R. (2010). The impact of class size and number of students on outcomes in higher education [Electronic version]. Last retrieved 12 May 2016, from Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations site. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/114/
Obama, B. H. [BarackObama] (2012). POTUS: ‘We can decide that in America, no child should have her dreams deferred because of an overcrowded classroom.’ [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/249187180818358274
Pennell, H., & West, A. (2005). The impact of increased fees on participation in higher education in England. Higher Education Quarterly, 59, 127–137. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2005.00286.x.
Quast, H., Spangenberg, H., Hannover, B., & Braun, E. (2012). Determinanten der Studierbereitschaft unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Studiengebühren [Determinants of willingness to study with a special focus on tuition fees]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft [Journal of Educational Science], 15, 305–326. doi:10.1007/s11618-012-0276-x.
Stoessel, K., Ihme, A. T., Barbarino, M.-L., Fisseler, B., & Stürmer, S. (2014). Sociodemographic diversity and distance education: Who drops out from academic programs and why? Research in Higher Education, 55, 433–526. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9343-x.
Stokols, D. (1972). On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research. Psychological Review, 79, 275–277. doi:10.1037/h0032706.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Välimaa, J., & Nokkala, T. (2014). The dimensions of social dynamics in comparative studies on higher education. Higher Education, 67, 423–437. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9684-y.
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2.
Westerlund, J. (2008). Class size and student evaluations in Sweden. Education Economics, 16, 19–28. doi:10.1080/09645290701419532.
Xu, J., Shen, H., & Wyer, R. S. (2012). Does the distance between us matter? Influences of physical proximity to others on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 418–423. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.06.006.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Marijke H. Adelt and Christina Hanna for their help with data collection. Jens Riehemann and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments to an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with applicable ethical standards, including those specified by the APA (American Psychological Association 2012) or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was provided by all individual participants included in the present research, as specified in the descriptions of the experiments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Experiment 1: Text passages read by participants in the condition containing hints on limitations in space due to the presence of many students (translated from German)
Although the departments at the university arrange the allocation of university courses in different ways, most students should know their schedule for the present winter term by now. Anna (23 years old and studying in her 5th semester) told us: “The courses and lectures for the upcoming semester are already announced in the course catalog, so we know them long before the new semester starts. In the first week of the current semester, there was a real run for participation in the courses. There are far more students than places. So in the first session, lots have to be drawn for participation.”
Student activities are a major part of city life in Münster. For most students, the favorite way to travel is by bicycle. As Marie (19) told us: “Usually, I like to travel by bike. However, if I turn up just before the start of a lecture, I won’t be able to find hardly any empty seats. Many students throng into the lecture halls long before a lecture starts.”
Studying is not limited to lecture halls. Many students also study in the main library. Laura (24) describes the situation in the library as follows: “Currently, I am writing my bachelor thesis and I am working in here most of the time. However, ever since the start of term, it has been very busy. Being able to sit at a table on my own is not something I can take for granted. Sometimes I do not get a seat at all. Moreover, when there are so many students, it’s not that quiet either, even though they all do heed the ‘Be quiet’ sign. Some days, I cannot focus on my studies at all.”
Appendix 2: Experiment 1: Text passages read by participants in the condition containing no hints of limitations in space due to the presence of many students (translated from German)
Although the departments at the university arrange the allocation of university courses in different ways, most students should know their schedule for the present winter term by now. Anna (23 years old and studying in her 5th semester) told us: “The courses and lectures for the upcoming semester are already announced in the course catalog, so we know them long before the new semester starts. The number of interested students and the number of places available generally match. For example, in the current semester, I had no trouble getting a place on the first two courses I had chosen.”
Student activities are a major part of city life in Münster. For most students, the favorite way to travel is by bicycle. As Marie (19) told us: “Usually, I like to travel by bike. Even when I turn up just before a lecture starts, I can still choose one of the many empty seats in the lecture hall.”
Studying is not limited to lecture halls. Many students also study in the main library. Laura (24) describes the situation in the library as follows: “Currently, I am writing my bachelor thesis and I am working in here most of the time because it is easy to get some peace. Additionally, I can spread out my laptop and several articles across the table. In general, I can concentrate very well on doing my writing and work in the library.”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hellmann, J.H., Jucks, R. The crowd in mind and crowded minds: an experimental investigation of crowding effects on students’ views regarding tuition fees in Germany. High Educ 74, 131–145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0033-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0033-9