Abstract
The present study analyses Finnish higher education steering system, management by results, from the perspective of higher education institutions. We ask what happens inside a higher education institution, called here the “Campus University”, during the actual negotiations related to the national steering system. We analyse not only the management by results as a steering system but pay close attention to the social space created by this managerial fad. The social space of the negotiations is constructed by different kinds of unofficial elements of social interaction; the physical space, the expected behaviour of the negotiators, the seating arrangements, the coffee servings, and the “small talk”. These elements of interaction are part of the polity of the negotiations and they are controlled by the chairperson of the negotiations. They form the modes of the social space of these negotiations. Therefore, the social space of the negotiations not only supports the hierarchical character of the ritual, but also makes it natural for the Rector to use power to allocate resources because s/he represents the institution. The analysis is based on qualitative and ethnographic methods of research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Faculty is an organisational and administrative structure equivalent to school in American universities.
The “Campus University” has seven Faculties: Faculty of Humanities, Faculty of Information Technology, Faculty of Education, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, School of Business and Economics and Faculty of Social Sciences.
It must also be pointed out, that the students are absent from the process at the University level. This is not the case in some other Finnish universities.
References
Abélès, M. (1997). Political anthropology: New challenges, new aims. International Social Science Journal, 153, 319–332.
Bell, C. (1997). Ritual. Perspectives and dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. Chichester: John Wiley.
Birnbaum, R. (2001). Management fads in higher education. Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkley: University of California Press.
Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of Ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Collins, R. (1994). Four sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eräsaari, L. (2002). Julkinen tila ja valtion yhtiöittäminen. Gaudeamus. Tammer-paino. Tampere.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Harjunen, H., Määttä, P., Mielonen, K., & Liimatainen, V.-P. (2005). Yliopisto ja johtamisen haasteet. JOPLAA—Johtamisen Paras Laatu -hanke Jyväskylän yliopistossa 2002–2005. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Higher Education Policy. (2001). Higher education policy in Finland. The Ministry of Education (http://www.minedu.fi/minedu/publications/55.html).
Hoffman, D., Välimaa, J., & Huusko, M. (2007). The Bologna process in academic basic units: Finnish universities and competitive horizons. In J. Välimaa & O.-H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education, in press.
Kuoppala, K. (2004). Neljän suomalaisen monialaisen yliopiston hallinnon itsearvioinnin yhteenvetoraportti. Tampereen yliopisto. Hallintotieteen laitos.
Latour, B. (1993). Messenger talks. Institute of Economic Research, Working Paper No 9, Lund University.
Ministry of Education. (2004). Helsinki.
Noro, A. (1986). Simmel, muoti ja moderni. Johdatus “moderniin”, in Muodin filosofia. Helsinki: Odessa, pp. 7–18.
Noro, A. (1991). Muoto, moderniteetti ja ‘kolmas’. Tutkielma Georg Simmelin sosiologiasta. Tutkijaliitto. Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
Noro, A. (1997). Georg Simmel – muotojen sosiologiasta moderniteetin diagnoosiin. In T. J. Gronow, A. Noro, & P. Töttö (toim.), Sosiologian klassikot (pp. 213–261). Tampere: Tammer-Paino.
Näsi, S., & Treuthardt, L. (2005, August). The results-based steering and management system of the Finnish universities analysed through the conceptual framework of politics. Paper presented at the International Conference Educational Economics.
Palonen, K. (1993). Introduction: From policy and polity to politicking and politicization. In K. Palonen & T. Parvikko (Eds.), Reading the Political. Exploring the Margins of Politics. Tampere: Tammer-Paino Oy.
Pollit, C. (1995). Justification by works or by faith? Evaluating the new public management. Evaluation, 1(2), 133–154.
Rekilä, E. (1998). Korkeakoulujen valtionohjaus ja korkeakoulun johtaminen. In M. Mälkiä & J. Vakkuri (Eds.), Strateginen johtaminen yliopistoissa. Ajattelutavat, mahdollisuudet ja haasteet (pp. 67–82). Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino.
Ritzer, G. (1992). Sociological theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humboldt.
Simmel, G. (1917). Grundfragen der Soziologie. Individuum und Gesellschaft. Berlin: Göschen’sche Verlag & handlung G.m.b.H.
Simmel, G. (1986). Muodin filosofia. (A. Alanen, Translated by Finnish). Helsinki: Odessa. (Originally published 1923).
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism—Politics, policies and the Entrepreneurial university. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University.
Summa, H. (1995). Tulosohjaus hallinnan rationaliteettina ja tekniikoina. Arvioita tulosohjauksen valtionhallintoon jättämistä jäljistä (Vol. 2, pp. 143–151) Ajankohtaista. Hallinnon tutkimus.
Teichler, U. (2003). Internationalisation of higher education in Europe. In H. Aittola (Ed.), €KG? €urooppa, korkeakoulutus, globalisaatio? Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. Jyväskylän yliopistopaino. Jyväskylä.
Treuthardt, L. (2004). Tulosohjauksen yhteiskunnallisuus Jyväskylän yliopistossa. Tarkastelunäkökulmina muoti ja seurustelu. PhD-dissertation. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
van Gennep, A. (1965). The rites of passage (2nd ed.) (M. B. Vizedom & G. L. Caffee, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1908).
Välimaa, J. (2001). The changing nature of academic employment in Finnish higher education. In J. Enders (Ed.), Academic staff in Europe: Changing contexts and conditions (pp. 67–90). Westport (Conn.): Greenwood Publishing Group.
Välimaa, J. (2004). Three rounds of evaluation and the idea of accreditation in Finnish higher education. In S. Schwarz & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area (pp. 101–125). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Välimaa, J., & Jalkanen, H. (2001). Strategic flow and Finnish universities. In J. Välimaa (Ed.), Finnish higher education in transition. Perspectives on massification and globalisation (pp. 185–202). Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Treuthardt, L., Välimaa, J. Analysing Finnish steering system from the perspective of social space: the case of the “Campus University”. High Educ 55, 607–622 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9078-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9078-0