Abstract
The paper attempts to identify the extent to which modes of knowledge can be associated with different patterns of and assumptions about power.
It discusses the meanings and scope of power itself, i.e. both within and beyond epistemic communities, as against ‘social robustness’ implying more democratic or inclusive forms of evaluation.
It analyses the extent to which knowledge has shifted from an internalist perspective relying on the prestige of epistemic communities towards socially relevant assumptions resting within social contexts. It discusses the factors affecting types of power patterns, such as: the nature of sponsors’ objectives and the uses to which they might put knowledge; epistemic characteristics; the nature of the resource required, and the stage of finalisation reached. It sketches the range of models of sponsorship to which knowledge is subjected – from that of the free standing and autonomous individual through different patterns of sponsorship to the directly managed.
It attempts to link these classifications to a range of empirical examples, including the power of knowledge in government and in crossing the boundaries between universities and industry.
In discussing the reciprocal relationships between power and knowledge, it accepts that power affects the identification, use and transmission of knowledge. It is concerned, however, to question overdetermined perspectives of the relationships between knowledge and power whose mutual impacts may be strong but not easily predicted or defined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Becher (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories Open University Press Buckingham
Biglan, A. (1973). ‘Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments’, Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3), 204–213.
Bourdieu, P. (1975). ‘The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of progress’, Social Sciences Information 14 (6), 19–47.
J.M. Braxton L.L. Hargens (1996) ‘Variations among academic disciplines: analytical frameworks and research’, in Smart, J. Agathon Press, pp. 1–46 (ed.), Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XI, New York
Buxton, M., Gonzalez-Block, M.-H, and Kogan, M., ‘The Utilisation of Health Research in Policy-Making: Concepts, Examples, and Methods of Assessment’. HERG Research Report No. 28 October 2002.
N. Caplan (1977) ‘The use of social research knowledge at the national level’, in Weiss, C.H. Heath (ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policymaking. Lexington, DC
C.E. Lindblom D. Cohen (1979) Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving Yale University Press New Haven
Cronbach, L. and Suppes, P. (eds.) (1969). Research for Tomorrow’s School. A Disciplined Enquiry for Education.
A. Elzinga (1985) ‘Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria’ in Wittrock, B. Almqvist and Wicksell et al. (eds.), The University Research System, the Public Policies of the Homes of Scientists. Stockholm
A. Elzinga (1987) ‘Internal and external regulatives in research and higher education systems’ R. Premfors (Eds) Disciplinary Perspectives on Higher Education and Research Almqvist and Wicksell Report No. 37. Stockholm
M. Foucault (1977) Power/Knowledge Pantheon New York
M.. Gibbons et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge Sage London
A. Gornitzka (2004) Science, Clients and the State: A Study of Scientific Knowledge Production CHEPS/UT Enschede
M. Henkel (1991) Government, Evaluation and Change Jessica Kingsley Publishers London
Henkel, M. (1998). ‘Evaluation in Higher Education. Conceptual and epistemological foundations’ European Journal of Education 33 September.
M. Henkel (2000) Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education Jessica Kingsley Publishers London
M. Henkel S. Hanney J. Vaux D. Von Walden Laing (2000) Academic Responses to the UK Foresight Initiative CEPPP, Brunel University Research Report. Uxbridge
J. Isaac (2004) ArticleTitle‘Conception of power’ in Hawkesworth, M. and Kogan, M. (eds.), Routledge Encyclopaedia of Government and Politics 2nd Edition, London: Routledge 57–69
R. Johnston (1993) ‘The Effects of Resource Concentration on Research Performance’ National Board of Employment, Education and Training Canberra
M. Kogan M. Henkel (1983) Government and Research Heinemann London
M. Kogan M. Henkel (2000) ‘Getting inside: policy reception of research’, in Schwarz, S. Kluwer and Teichler, U. (ed.), The Institutional Basis of Higher Education Research. Chapter 2. Dordrecht
T.S. Kuhn (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago University Press Chicago
S. Kyvik (1991) Productivity in Academia Norwegian University Press Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities. Oslo
Kyvik, S. (1993). ‘Academic Staff and Scientific Production’, Higher Education Management Vol 5.2, July 1993.
Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. and Whitley, R. (eds.) (1977). The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge Vol.1. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Merton, R.K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure Glecoe Ill.
M.J. Mulkay (1977) ‘Sociology of the scientific research community’, in Spiegel-Rosing, I. Sage and de Solla Price, D. (eds.), Science, Technology and Society. London
Mulkay, M.J. (1979). Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. George Allen and Unwin.
E. Nagel (1961) The Structure of Science Routledge and Kegan Paul Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London and Henley
H. Nowotny P. Scott M. Gibbons (2001) Rethinking Science: Knowledge ,and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty Polity Press Oxford
OECD (1995). Educational Research and Development. Trends, Issues and Challenges.Paris: OECD.
Owen-Smith, J. (2003). ‘Complements and Substitutes: The Changing Institutional Environment of Public ,and Private Science’. Draft paper presented at the SCANCOR Conference on Universities and the Production of Knowledge, Stanford University, April 2003.
Polanyi, M. (1962). ‘The Republic of Science: Its political, and economic theory’, Minerva, 1(1).
M. Philp (1984) ‘Authority’ in Kuper, A. Routledge and J. The Social Science Encyclopaedia, pp. 55–56, London
K.R. Popper (1972) The Logic of Scientific Discovery Hutchinson London
M. Rein (1983) From Policy to Practice Macmillan New York
Rip, ‘A Cognitive Approach to the Relevance of Science’. Social Science Information. 36(4), pp. 615–640.
N.W. Storer (1967) ArticleTitle‘The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 55(1) 75–84
N.W. Storer (1972) ‘Relations among scientific disciplines’, in Nagi, Corwin, S.Z. Wiley, pp. 229–68 and R.G. (eds.), The Social Contexts of Research. New York
N.W. Storer T. Parsons (1968) ‘The disciplines as a differentiating force’, in Montgomery, E.B. Division of Summer Sessions, Syracuse University (ed.), The Foundation of Access in Knowledge–A Symposium. Syracuse
Trist, (1972). ‘Types of output mix of research organisations and their complementarity’, in Cherns A.B. et al. (eds.), Social Science and Government, Policies and Problems. Tavistock Publications.
W. Van den Daele Krohn W. P. Weingart (1977) ‘The political direction of scientific Development’, in Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. D. Reidel Publishing Co and Whitley, R.D. (eds.), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, vol. 1. Dordecht
Warnock Report (1978) Meeting Special Educational Needs: The Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Education of Handicapped Children and Young People HMSO London
C.H. Weiss. (1977) Using Social Research in Public Policymaking Lexington Heath, pp. 183–197 DC
P. Weingart (1977) ‘Science policy and the development of science’, in Blume, S. John Wiley & Son (ed.), Perspectives in the Sociology of Science. Chichester
C. Weiss (1980) Social Science Research and Decision-Making Columbia University Press Columbia
C. Weiss (1982) ‘Policy research in the context of diffuse decision-making’, in Kosse G. NFER-Nelson (ed.), Social Science Research and Public Policy-making. London
Whitley, R.D. (1977). ‘Changes in the social and intellectual organisation and social organisation of the sciences’ in Mendelsohn, E., Weingart, P. and Whitley, R. op.cit.
Whitley, R.D. (1984). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences.
Wirt, F. (1981). ‘Professionalism and political conflict: A developmental model’, Journal of Public Policy, 1, Part 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kogan, M. Modes of knowledge and patterns of power. High Educ 49, 9–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2911-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2911-9