Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Alternative Dispute Resolution Research Landscape from 1981 to 2022

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an important means of resolving disputes outside of traditional legal frameworks. It is usually adopted because of its flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to preserve relationships that a contentious court battle might damage. This study aims to evaluate the scientific publication related to ADR. To do so, we used metadata of ADR-related articles from 1981 to 2022 collected in the Web of Science Core Collection and carried out a bibliometric, network, and latent Dirichlet allocation analysis. Our results indicate that ADR research is concentrated in North America, with research organizations from the United States accounting for most publications. At the same time, recent years have seen a shift to a more diverse group of countries, with the Chinese City University of Hong Kong and the Australian Victoria University leading in the last five years. The five main topics in ADR research include online dispute resolution for consumer protection, mediation for family law, arbitration in medical malpractice cases, ADR in construction projects, and ADR in employment law. The most frequent research areas assigned to ADR publications are Government & Law and Business & Economics. Network results show keywords ADR, Mediation, and Arbitration as central nodes, while the Chinese and North American organizations established the most frequent collaborations, addressing ADR applications in various sectors. The findings underscore the interdisciplinary nature of ADR research, its adaptability across industries, and the importance of cross-cultural research partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FM: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Supervision; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. LB: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Writing—review and editing. BC: Conceptualization; Investigation; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Batista Mota.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. No funding was received for conducting this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 137 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mota, F.B., Braga, L.A.M. & Cabral, B.P. Alternative Dispute Resolution Research Landscape from 1981 to 2022. Group Decis Negot 32, 1415–1435 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09848-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09848-8

Keywords

Navigation