Abstract
Cosmological models typically neglect the complicated nature of the spacetime mani-fold at small scales in order to hypothesize idealized general relativistic solutions for describing the average dynamics of the Universe. Although these solutions are remarkably successful in accounting for data, they introduce a number of puzzles in cosmology, and their foundational assumptions are therefore important to test. In this paper, we go beyond the usual assumptions in cosmology and propose a formalism for averaging the local general relativistic spacetime on an observer’s past null cone: we formulate average properties of light fronts as they propagate from a cosmological emitter to an observer. The energy-momentum tensor is composed of an irrotational dust source and a cosmological constant—the same components as in the \(\varLambda \)CDM model for late cosmic times—but the metric solution is not a priori constrained to be locally homogeneous or isotropic. This generally makes the large-scale dynamics depart from that of a simple Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker solution through ‘backreaction’ effects. Our formalism quantifies such departures through a fully covariant system of area-averaged equations on the light fronts propagating towards an observer, which can be directly applied to analytical and numerical investigations of cosmic observables. For this purpose, we formulate light front averages of observable quantities, including the effective angular diameter distance and the cosmological redshift drift and we also discuss the backreaction effects for these observables.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Notes
We might in principle choose any world line to initialize a past null cone, but we shall often be interested in observers comoving with the matter in the cosmological spacetime.
Another option is to consider level surfaces of constant affine parameter \(\lambda \) of the geodesic null congruence defined from the propagation requirement \(k^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }\lambda = 1\). In order to uniquely define \(\lambda \) as a spacetime function, we must specify initial conditions. We might, for instance, require setting \(\lambda |_\gamma = 0\). From this it follows immediately that \(u^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }\lambda |_\gamma = 0\), and the gradient of \(\lambda \) is thus spacelike in the vicinity of \(\gamma \), and \(\lambda = \text {constant}\)-level surfaces define timelike cylinders in the same vicinity. Far away from the vertex, the use of \(\lambda \) as a meaningful foliation scalar must be carefully re-assessed.
As a result of the fact that \(l^\mu \) does not in general generate a geodesic null congruence, it does not in general satisfy the condition (6). For the same reason, \(l^\mu \) is not necessarily hypersurface-forming. However, it is irrotational through its definition as a linear combination of irrotational vector fields, Eq. (10b), after projection onto the screen space normal to \(k^\mu \) and \(u^\mu \): \(p_{\mu }^{\ \alpha } \; p_{\nu }^{\ \beta } \nabla _{[\alpha } l_{\beta ]} = 0\).
It is a well-known result from calculus of variations in Riemannian geometry that surfaces minimizing the area measure locally have zero trace of the extrinsic curvature scalar of the embedding.
Since causal lines can only leave a past null cone (and not enter), we indeed expect a negative contribution to the overall expansion rate of the screen space from the drift of the screen space boundaries relative to the matter congruence: the screen space is sampling the cross section of fewer fluid elements as the vertex of the past null cone is approached. However, local differential expansion of the dust matter congruence and the spatial fluctuations in the rest mass density \(\varrho \) could potentially compensate this tendency locally.
With Eq. (10a), when acting on scalar-valued variables, the operator identity \(E^{-1}k^{\rho }\partial _{\rho } = u^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }- e^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }\) applies.
In generic cosmological spacetimes the observer area distance for a luminous astrophysical source does not necessarily coincide with the linear size based angular diameter distance for the same source due to potential Weyl curvature induced shearing along the observer’s past null cone of an incoming geodesic null ray bundle. Only in an exact FLRW cosmology do their conceptions become identical as a consequence of the prevailing spatial isotropy, and thus vanishing Weyl curvature; cf. Refs. [149, Eq. (25,27)] and [59, Sec. 4.5.2].
In general, local coordinates preserved along \(k^\mu \) are not preserved along \(u^\mu \), since \(k^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }x^A = 0\) implies that \(k^\alpha \nabla _\alpha (u^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }x^A) = \pounds _{{\textbf {k}}} (u^\rho ) \partial _{\rho }x^A \), where the operator \(\pounds _{{\textbf {k}}}\) is the Lie derivative along the geodesic null rays associated with \(k^\mu \). Thus, if the change of \(u^\mu \) along the geodesic null rays has components tangential to the screen space (which happens generically in spatially inhomogeneous cosmologies), then \(u^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }x^A = 0\) cannot be satisfied globally on the past null cone.
We still refer to the dust case here; a generalization including fluid pressure with general considerations on lapse and shift can be found in [121].
For an analogous definition of domain boundaries in the \(3+1\) slicing formalism, see Ref. [75].
Any restriction imposed on the volume shear rate of the matter congruence leads to constraints on the Weyl curvature and on the spatial gradient of the expansion rate through the geodesic deviation equation and constraint equations for the relevant congruence [55]. For example, \(n^{\mu } q^\nu {\hat{\sigma }}_{\mu \nu } = 0 \Rightarrow k^\alpha n^\mu q^\beta k^\nu C_{\alpha ( \mu \beta ) \nu } = 0\) in the present set-up. By imposing such restrictions it must be checked whether there exist non-trivial cosmological spacetimes fulfilling such conditions for the volume shear rate.
We omit the normalization of the dimensionfull quantities \(d_A\) and \(d_L\) inside the logarithm; the corresponding equations hold for any choice of normalization.
The Weyl curvature has no influence on the properties of the geodesic null congruence in this case.
See the references therein, also to earlier work on other relativistic perturbation theories, the history of Lagrangian perturbation theory, and e.g. [37] for their application as a closure condition for the \((3+1)\) averaged system.
References
Adamek, J., Clarkson, C., Coates, L., Durrer, R., Kunz, M.: Bias and scatter in the Hubble diagram from cosmological large-scale structure. Phys. Rev. D 100, 021301 (2019). arXiv:1812.04336
Adamek, J., Daverio, D., Durrer, R., Kunz, M.: General relativity and cosmic structure formation. Nat. Phys. 12, 346 (2016). arXiv:1509.01699
Aghanim, N., et al.: (Planck Collaboration). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020). arXiv:1807.06209
Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., Misner, C.W.: The dynamics of general relativity. In Gravitation, edited by L. Witten (Wiley, New York, 1962), 227. Reprinted: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1997 (2008). arXiv:gr-qc/0405109
Bagheri, S., Schwarz, D.J.: Light propagation in the averaged universe. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 073 (2014). arXiv:1404.2185
Beenakker, W., Venhoek, D.: A structured analysis of Hubble tension. arXiv:2101.01372
Ben-Dayan, I., Gasperini, M., Marozzi, G., Nugier, F., Veneziano, G.: Backreaction on the luminosity-redshift relation from gauge invariant light-cone averaging. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04, 036 (2012). arXiv:1202.1247
Ben-Dayan, I., Gasperini, M., Marozzi, G., Nugier, F., Veneziano, G.: Average and dispersion of the luminosity-redshift relation in the concordance model. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06, 002 (2013). arXiv:1302.0740
Ben-Dayan, I., Gasperini, M., Marozzi, G., Nugier, F., Veneziano, G.: Do stochastic inhomogeneities affect dark-energy precision measurements? Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 021301 (2013). arXiv:1207.1286
Bengtsson, I.: The Hawking energy on photon surfaces. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52, 52 (2020). arXiv:2001.08491
Bentivegna, E., Bruni, M.: Effects of nonlinear inhomogeneity on the cosmic expansion with numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 251302 (2016). arXiv:1511.05124
Bildhauer, S., Futamase, T.: The cosmic microwave background in a globally inhomogeneous universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 249, 126 (1991)
Biswas, T., Mansouri, R., Notari, A.: Nonlinear structure formation and apparent acceleration: an investigation. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12, 017 (2007). arXiv:astro-ph/0606703
Bolejko, K.: Volume averaging in the quasispherical Szekeres model. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 41, 1585 (2009). arXiv:0808.0376
Bolejko, K.: Emerging spatial curvature can resolve the tension between high-redshift CMB and low-redshift distance ladder measurements of the Hubble constant. Phys. Rev. D 97, 103529 (2018). arXiv:1712.02967
Bonvin, C., Durrer, R., Gasparini, M.A.: Fluctuations of the luminosity distance. Phys. Rev. D 73, 023523 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0511183
Borzyszkowski, M., Bertacca, D., Porciani, C.: LIGER: mock relativistic light-cones from Newtonian simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 3899 (2017). arXiv:1703.03407
Brady, P.R., Droz, S., Israel, W., Morsink, S.M.: Covariant double-null dynamics: 2 + 2-splitting of the Einstein equations. Class. Quantum Gravity 13, 2211 (1996). arXiv:gr-qc/9510040
Breton, M.A., Rasera, Y., Taruya, A., Lacombe, O., Saga, S.: Imprints of relativistic effects on the asymmetry of the halo cross-correlation function: from linear to non-linear scales. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483, 2671 (2019). arXiv:1803.04294
Brouzakis, N., Tetradis, N., Tzavara, E.: The effect of large-scale inhomogeneities on the luminosity distance. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 013 (2007). arXiv:astro-ph/0612179
Bruni, M., Sonego, S.: Observables and gauge invariance in the theory of non-linear spacetime perturbations. Class. Quantum Gravity 16, L29 (1999). arXiv:gr-qc/9906017
Brunswic, L., Buchert, T.: Gauss–Bonnet–Chern approach to the averaged Universe. Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 215022 (2020). arXiv:2002.08336
Buchert, T.: On average properties of inhomogeneous cosmologies. In: 9th JGRG Meeting, Hiroshima 1999, Y. Eriguchi et al. (eds.). J.G.R.G. 9, 306 (2000). arXiv:gr-qc/0001056
Buchert, T.: On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity: dust cosmologies. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 32, 105 (2000). arXiv:gr-qc/9906015
Buchert, T.: On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity: perfect fluid cosmologies. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 33, 1381 (2001). arXiv:gr-qc/0102049
Buchert, T.: Dark Energy from structure: a status report. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 467 (2008). arXiv:0707.2153
Buchert, T.: A cosmic equation of state for the inhomogeneous universe: can a global far-from-equilibrium state explain dark energy? Class. Quantum Gravity 22, L113 (2005). arXiv:gr-qc/0507028
Buchert, T.: Toward physical cosmology: focus on inhomogeneous geometry and its non-perturbative effects. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 164007 (2011). arXiv:1103.2016
Buchert, T., Carfora, M.: Regional averaging and scaling in relativistic cosmology. Class. Quantum Gravity 19, 6109 (2002). arXiv:gr-qc/0210037
Buchert, T., Carfora, M.: On the curvature of the present-day Universe. Class. Quantum Gravity 25, 195001 (2008). arXiv:0803.1401
Buchert, T., Coley, A., Kleinert, H., Roukema, B.F., Wiltshire, D.L.: Observational challenges for the standard FLRW model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1630007 (2016). arXiv:1512.03313
Buchert, T., Delgado Gaspar, I., Ostrowski, J.J.: On general-relativistic Lagrangian perturbation theory and its non-perturbative generalization. Universe 8, 583 (2022). arXiv:2209.13417
Buchert, T., Ehlers, J.: Averaging inhomogeneous Newtonian cosmologies. Astron. Astrophys. 320, 1 (1997). arXiv:astro-ph/9510056
Buchert, T., Larena, J., Alimi, J.-M.: Correspondence between kinematical backreaction and scalar field cosmologies: the ‘morphon field’. Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 6379 (2006). arXiv:gr-qc/0606020
Buchert, T., Mourier, P., Roy, X.: Cosmological backreaction and its dependence on spacetime foliation. Class. Quantum Gravity 35, 24LT02 (2018). arXiv:1805.10455
Buchert, T., Mourier, P., Roy, X.: On average properties of inhomogeneous fluids in general relativity III: general fluid cosmologies. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52, 27 (2020). arXiv:1912.04213
Buchert, T., Nayet, C., Wiegand, A.: Lagrangian theory of structure formation in relativistic cosmology. II. Average properties of a generic evolution model. Phys. Rev. D 87, 123503 (2013). arXiv:1303.6193
Buchert, T., Räsänen, S.: Backreaction in late-time cosmology. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 57 (2012). arXiv:1112.5335
Carfora, M., Familiari, F.: A comparison theorem for cosmological lightcones. Lett. Math. Phys. 111, 53 (2021). arXiv:2101.12698
Chirinos Isidro, E.G., Barbosa, R.M., Piattella, O.F., Zimdahl, W.: Averaged Lemaître–Tolman–Bondi dynamics. Class. Quantum Gravity 34, 035001 (2017). arXiv:1608.00452
Clarkson, C., Umeh, O.: Is backreaction really small within concordance cosmology? Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 164010 (2011). arXiv:1105.1886
Clifton, T., Gallagher, C.S., Goldberg, S., Malik, K.A.: Viable gauge choices in cosmologies with nonlinear structures. Phys. Rev. D 101, 063530 (2020). arXiv:2001.00394
Delgado Gaspar, I., Buchert, T., Ostrowski, J.J.: Beyond relativistic Lagrangian perturbation theory. I. An exact-solution controlled model for structure formation. Phys. Rev. D (accepted) arXiv:2210.04004
Demianski, M., de Ritis, R., Marino, A.A., Piedipalumbo, E.: Approximate angular diameter distance in a locally inhomogeneous universe with nonzero cosmological constant. Astron. Astrophys. 411, 33 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0310830
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D.F., Riess, A.G., Silk, J.: In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions. Class. Quantum Gravity 38, 153001 (2021). arXiv:2103.01183
Dyer, C.C., Roeder, R.C.: Observations in locally inhomogeneous cosmological models. Astrophys. J. 189, 167 (1974)
East, W.E., Wojtak, R., Abel, T.: Comparing fully general relativistic and Newtonian calculations of structure formation. Phys. Rev. D 97, 043509 (2018). arXiv:1711.06681
East, W.E., Wojtak, R., Pretorius, F.: Einstein–Vlasov calculations of structure formation. Phys. Rev. D 100, 103533 (2019). arXiv:1908.05683
Ehlers, J.: Beiträge zur relativistischen Mechanik kontinuierlicher Medien. Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz, Abhandl. Math.–Nat. Kl. 11, 793–837 (1961). English translation: Contributions to the relativistic mechanics of continuous media. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 25, 1225–1266 (1993)
Einstein, A.: Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.), 844–847 (1915). English translation: einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/129
Einstein, A.: Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.), 142–152 (1917). English translation: Cosmological considerations on the general theory of relativity. In The Principle of Relativity, (London, Methuen, 1923). Reprinted: (Mineola, Dover Publications, 1952), 175–188. einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/433
Ellis, G.F.R.: Dynamics of pressure-free matter in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 8, 1171–1194 (1967)
Ellis, G.F.R.: Relativistic cosmology. In: General Relativity and Cosmology, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi" (Varenna), Course XLVII, edited by R. K. Sachs (Academic Press, New York, 1971), 104–182. Reprinted: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 41, 581–660 (2009)
Ellis, G.F.R.: Relativistic cosmology—its nature, aims and problems. In: Bertotti, B., de Felice, F., Pascolini, A. (eds.), General Relativity and Gravitation, pp. 215–288. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1984)
Ellis, G.F.R.: Shear free solutions in General Relativity Theory. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 3253 (2011). arXiv:1107.3669
Ellis, G.F.R., Bassett, B.A.C.C., Dunsby, P.K.S.: Lensing and caustic effects on cosmological distances. Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 2345 (1998). arXiv:gr-qc/9801092
Ellis, G.F.R., Börner, G., Buchert, T., Ehlers, J., Hogan, C.J., Kirshner, R.P., Press, W.H., Raffelt, G., Thielemann, F.-K., van den Bergh, S.: What do we know about global properties of the Universe? In: örner, G.B., Gottlöber, S. (eds.), Dahlem Workshop Report ES19 The Evolution of the Universe, Berlin 1995, p. 51. Wiley, Chichester (1997)
Ellis, G.F.R., Buchert, T.: The universe seen at different scales. Phys. Lett. A 347 (Einstein Special Issue), 38 (2005). arXiv:gr-qc/0506106
Ellis, G.F.R., van Elst, H.: Cosmological Models (Cargèse Lectures 1998). In Proc. of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Theoretical and Observational Cosmology, Cargèse, France, August 17–29, 1998, edited by M. Lachièze–Rey, (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1999), 1–116 and NATO Science Series C 541, 1–116 (1999). arXiv:gr-qc/9812046
Ellis, G.F.R., Maartens, R., MacCallum, M.A.H.: Relativistic Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Ellis, G.F.R., Nel, S.D., Maartens, R., Stoeger, W.R., Whitman, A.P.: Ideal observational cosmology. Phys. Rep. 124, 315 (1985)
Ellis, G.F.R., Solomons, D.M.: Caustics of compensated spherical lens models. Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 2381 (1998). arXiv:gr-qc/9802005
Elmardi, M.Y.A.: Topics in Relativistic Cosmology: Cosmology on the Past Lightcone and in Modified Gravitation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cape Town, South Africa (January 2018). [Inspire]
van Elst, H.: Extensions and applications of \(1+3\) decomposition methods in general relativistic cosmological modelling. Ph.D. thesis, University of London (1996). [NASA/ADS]
van Elst, H.: \((1+3)\)-Covariant Methods in General Relativistic Cosmology. University of Cape Town (1998)
van Elst, H.: An introduction to inductive statistical inference: from parameter estimation to decision-making. arXiv:1808.10173
van Elst, H., Uggla, C., Lesame, W.M., Ellis, G.F.R., Maartens, R.: Integrability of irrotational silent cosmological models. Class. Quantum Gravity 14, 1151–1162 (1997). arXiv:gr-qc/9611002
Enqvist, K., Mattsson, T.: The effect of inhomogeneous expansion on the supernova observations. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 019 (2007). arXiv:astro-ph/0609120
Etherington, I.M.H.: On the definition of distance in general relativity. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 15, 761 (1933). Reprinted: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 39, 1055 (2007)
Fanizza, G., Gasperini, M., Marozzi, G., Veneziano, G.: Generalized covariant prescriptions for averaging cosmological observables. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 017 (2020). arXiv:1911.09469
Fleury, P., Dupuy, H., Uzan, J.P.: Interpretation of the Hubble diagram in a nonhomogeneous universe. Phys. Rev. D 87, 123526 (2013). arXiv:1302.5308
Fleury, P., Dupuy, H., Uzan, J.P.: Can all cosmological observations be accurately interpreted with a unique geometry? Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 091302 (2013). arXiv:1304.7791
Fleury, P., Nugier, F., Fanizza, G.: Geodesic-light-cone coordinates and the Bianchi I spacetime. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06, 008 (2016). arXiv:1602.04461
Gabbard, H., Williams, M., Hayes, F., Messenger, C.: Matching matched filtering with deep networks for gravitational-wave astronomy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 141103 (2018). arXiv:1712.06041
Gasperini, M., Marozzi, G., Veneziano, G.: A covariant and gauge invariant formulation of the cosmological ‘backreaction’. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 009 (2010). arXiv:0912.3244
Gasperini, M., Marozzi, G., Nugier, F., Veneziano, G.: Light-cone averaging in cosmology: formalism and applications. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 008 (2011). arXiv:1104.1167
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Dunson, D.B., Vehtari, A., Rubin, D.B.: Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2014)
Giblin, J.T., Mertens, J.B., Starkman, G.D.: Departures from the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker cosmological model in an inhomogeneous Universe: a numerical examination. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 251301 (2016). arXiv:1511.01105
Giblin, J.T., Mertens, J.B., Starkman, G.D.: Observable deviations from homogeneity in an inhomogeneous Universe. Astrophys. J. 833, 247 (2016). arXiv:1608.04403
Giblin, J.T., Mertens, J.B., Starkman, G.D., Tian, C.: Limited accuracy of linearized gravity. Phys. Rev. D 99, 023527 (2019). arXiv:1810.05203
Goldberg, J.N., Sachs, R.K.: A theorem on Petrov types. Acta Phys. Polon. 22, 1323. Suppl. Reprinted as a Golden Oldie: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 41, 433 (2009)
Gourgoulhon, E., Jaramillo, J.L.: A \(3+1\) perspective on null hypersurfaces and isolated horizons. Phys. Rep. 423, 159–294 (2006). arXiv:gr-qc/0503113
Grasso, M., Korzyński, M., Serbenta, J.: Geometric optics in general relativity using bilocal operators. Phys. Rev. D 99, 064038 (2019). arXiv:1811.10284
Grasso, M., Villa, E., Korzyński, M., Matarrese, S.: Isolating nonlinearities of light propagation in inhomogeneous cosmologies. Phys. Rev. D 104, 043508 (2021). arXiv:2105.04552
Hawking, S.: Gravitational radiation in an expanding universe. J. Math. Phys. 9, 598 (1968)
Hayward, S.A.: Quasilocal gravitational energy. Phys. Rev. D 49, 831 (1994). arXiv:gr-qc/9303030
Heinesen, A.: Multipole decomposition of the general luminosity distance ‘Hubble law’ - a new framework for observational cosmology. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05, 008 (2021). arXiv:2010.06534
Heinesen, A.: Multipole decomposition of redshift drift: model-independent mapping of the expansion history of the Universe. Phys. Rev. D 103, 023537 (2021). arXiv:2011.10048
Heinesen, A.: Redshift drift as a model independent probe of dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 103, L081302 (2021). arXiv:2102.03774
Heinesen, A.: Redshift drift cosmography for model-independent cosmological inference. Phys. Rev. D 104, 123527 (2021). arXiv:2107.08674
Heinesen, A., Buchert, T.: Solving the curvature and Hubble parameter inconsistencies through structure formation-induced curvature. Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 164001 (2000). (Focus issue on the Hubble constant tension); Erratum (2020). Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 229601 (2000). arXiv:2002.10831
Heinesen, A., Macpherson, H.J.: A prediction for anisotropies in the nearby Hubble flow. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03, 057 (2022). arXiv:2111.14423
Hellaby, C.: The mass of the cosmos. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 370, 239 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0603637
Hildebrandt, H., et al.: KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 1454 (2017). arXiv:1606.05338
Israel, W.: Covariant double-null dynamics. Helv. Phys. Acta 69, 3 (1996)
Jimenez, P., Loeb, A.: Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages. Astrophys. J. 573, 37 (2002). arXiv:astro-ph/0106145
Jordan, P., Ehlers, J., Sachs, R.K.: Beiträge zur Theorie der reinen Gravitationsstrahlung. Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz, Abhandl. Math.–Nat. Kl. 1, 1–62 (1961). English translation: Contributions to the theory of pure gravitational radiation. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 45, 2691–2753 (2013)
Kantowski, R.: The Lamé equation for distance-redshift in partially filled beam Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 68, 123516 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0308419
Kantowski, R., Kao, J.K., Thomas, R.C.: Distance-redshift relations in inhomogeneous Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker cosmology. Astrophys. J. 545, 549 (2000)
Kantowski, R., Thomas, R.C.: Distance-redshift in inhomogeneous \(\Omega _{0}=1\) Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker cosmology. Astrophys. J. 561, 591 (2001). arXiv:astro-ph/0011176
Koksbang, S.M.: Light propagation in Swiss cheese models of random close-packed Szekeres structures: effects of anisotropy and comparisons with perturbative results. Phys. Rev. D 95, 063532 (2017). arXiv:1703.03572
Koksbang, S.M.: Another look at redshift drift and the backreaction conjecture. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 036 (2019). arXiv:1909.13489
Koksbang, S.M.: Observations in statistically homogeneous, locally inhomogeneous cosmological toy-models without FLRW backgrounds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, L135 (2020). arXiv:2008.07108
Koksbang, S.M.: Understanding the Dyer-Roeder approximation as a consequence of local cancellations of projected shear and expansion rate fluctuations. Phys. Rev. D 104, 043505 (2021). arXiv:2106.12913
Kolb, E.W., Matarrese, S., Riotto, A.: On cosmic acceleration without dark energy. New J. Phys. 8, 322 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0506534
Korzyński, M., Kopiński, J.: Optical drift effects in general relativity. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03, 012 (2018). arXiv:1711.00584
Korzyński, M., Miśkiewicz, J., Serbenta, J.: Weighing the spacetime along the line of sight using times of arrival of electromagnetic signals. Phys. Rev. D 104, 024026 (2021). arXiv:2102.00095
Kristian, J., Sachs, R.K.: Observations in cosmology. Astrophys. J. 143, 379–399 (1966). Reprinted as a Golden Oldie: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43 337–358 (2011)
Lavinto, M., Räsänen, S., Szybka, S.J.: Average expansion rate and light propagation in a cosmological Tardis spacetime. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12, 051 (2013)
Li, N., Schwarz, D.J.: Onset of cosmological backreaction. Phys. Rev. D 76, 083011 (2007). arXiv:gr-qc/0702043
Lu, T.H.C., Hellaby, C.: Obtaining the spacetime metric from cosmological observations. Class. Quantum Gravity 24, 4107 (2007). arXiv:0705.1060
Maartens, R., Bassett, B.A.: Gravitoelectromagnetism. Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 705 (1998). arXiv:gr-qc/9704059
Maartens, R., Matravers, D.R.: Isotropic and semi-isotropic observations in cosmology. Class. Quantum Gravity 11, 2693 (1994)
Macpherson, H.J.: Cosmological distances with general-relativistic ray tracing: framework and comparison to cosmographic predictions. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (submitted). arXiv:2209.06775
Macpherson, H.J., Heinesen, A.: Luminosity distance and anisotropic sky-sampling at low redshifts: A numerical relativity study. Phys. Rev. D 104, 023525 (2021). Erratum. Phys. Rev. D 104, 109901 (2021). arXiv:2103.11918
Macpherson, H.J., Lasky, P.D., Price, D.J.: Inhomogeneous cosmology with numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. D 95, 064028 (2017). arXiv:1611.05447
Macpherson, H.J., Price, D.J., Lasky, P.D.: Einstein’s Universe: cosmological structure formation in numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. D 99, 063522 (2019). arXiv:1807.01711
Macpherson, H.J., Heinesen, A.: Ray tracing in full general relativity and all-sky map of cosmic distances (in preparation)
McElreath, R.: Statistical Rethinking—A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2020)
Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, J.A.: Gravitation. Freeman, San Francisco (1973)
Mitsou, E., Fanizza, G., Grimm, N., Yoo, J.: Cutting out the cosmological middle man: general relativity in the light-cone coordinates. Class. Quantum Gravity 38, 055011 (2021). arXiv:2009.14687
Mustapha, N., Hellaby, C., Ellis, G.F.R.: Large-scale inhomogeneity versus source evolution: can we distinguish them observationally? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 292, 817 (1997). arXiv:gr-qc/9808079
Mustapha, N., Bassett, B.A.C.C., Hellaby, C., Ellis, G.F.R.: The distortion of the area distance-redshift relation in inhomogeneous isotropic universes. Class. Quantum Gravity 15, 2363 (1998). arXiv:gr-qc/9708043
Newman, E., Penrose, R.: An approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients. J. Math. Phys. 3, 566–578 (1962)
Ng, A.: Machine Learning Yearning—Technical Strategy for AI Engineers, In the Era of Deep Learning (2018)
Palle, D.: On the large-scale inhomogeneous Universe and the cosmological constant. Nuovo Cim. 117B, 687 (2002). arXiv:astro-ph/0205462
Paranjape, A., Singh, T.P.: Explicit cosmological coarse graining via spatial averaging. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 139 (2008). arXiv:astro-ph/0609481
Perivolaropoulos, L., Skara, F.: Challenges for \(\Lambda \)CDM: An update. New Astron. Rev. 95, 101659 (2022). arXiv:2105.05208
Perlick, V.: Gravitational lensing from a spacetime perspective. Living Rev. Relat. 7, 9 (2004). arXiv:1010.3416
Prelogović, D., Mesinger, A., Murray, S., Fiameni, G., Gillet, N.: Machine learning galaxy properties from 21 cm lightcones: impact of network architectures and signal contamination. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 3852 (2021). arXiv:2107.00018
Pyne, T., Birkinshaw, M.: The luminosity distance in perturbed FLRW spacetimes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 348, 581 (2004). arXiv:astro-ph/0310841
Räsänen, S.: Accelerated expansion from structure formation. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11, 003 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0607626
Räsänen, S.: Light propagation in statistically homogeneous and isotropic dust universes. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02, 011 (2009). arXiv:0812.2872
Räsänen, S.: Light propagation in statistically homogeneous and isotropic universes with general matter content. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP03, 018 (2010). arXiv:0912.3370
Räsänen, S.: Backreaction: directions of progress. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 164008 (2011). arXiv:1102.0408
Ratsimbazafy, A.L., et al.: Age-dating luminous red galaxies observed with the southern African large telescope. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 3239 (2017). arXiv:1702.00418
Riess, A.G., et al.: Large magellanic cloud cepheid standards provide a 1% foundation for the determination of the hubble constant and stronger evidence for physics beyond \(\Lambda \)CDM. Astrophys. J. 876, 85 (2019). arXiv:1903.07603
Roeder, R.C.: Apparent magnitudes, redshifts, and inhomogeneities in the universe. Astrophys. J. 196, 671 (1975)
Roy, X.: On the 1+3 formalism in general relativity (2014). arXiv:1405.6319
Roy, X., Buchert, T., Carloni, S., Obadia, N.: Global gravitational instability of FLRW backgrounds—interpreting the dark sectors. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 165004 (2011). arXiv:1103.1146
Sachs, R.: Gravitational waves in general relativity, VI. The outgoing radiation condition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 264, 309–338 (1961)
Sanghai, V.A.A., Fleury, P., Clifton, T.: Ray tracing and Hubble diagrams in post-Newtonian cosmology. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 028 (2017). arXiv:1705.02328
Sasaki, M.: Cosmological gravitational lens equation—its validity and limitation. Progr. Theor. Phys. 90, 753 (1993)
Sasaki, M.: The magnitude-redshift relation in a perturbed Friedmann universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 228, 653 (1987)
Schmalzing, J., Buchert, T.: Beyond genus statistics: a unifying approach to the morphology of cosmic structure. Astrophys. J. 482, L1 (1997). arXiv:astro-ph/9702130
Schneider, P., Ehlers, J., Falco, E.E.: Gravitational lenses. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Seitz, S., Schneider, P., Ehlers, J.: Light propagation in arbitrary space-times and the gravitational lens approximation. Class. Quantum Gravity 11, 2345 (1994). arXiv:astro-ph/9403056
Sikora, S., Głód, K.: Example of an inhomogeneous cosmological model in the context of backreaction. Phys. Rev. D 95, 063517 (2017). arXiv:1612.03604
Stephani, H.: Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, 4th edn. Dt. Verlag d. Wissenschaften, Berlin (1991)
Stephani, H., Kramer, D., MacCallum, M.A.H., Hoenselaers, C.A., Herlt, E.: Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Stewart, J.M., Ellis, G.F.R.: Solutions of Einstein’s equations for a fluid which exhibits local rotational symmetry. J. Math. Phys. 9, 1072–1082 (1968)
Stock, D.: The Hawking energy on the past lightcone in cosmology. Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 215005 (2020). arXiv:2003.13583
Stock, D.: Applications of the Hawking energy in inhomogeneous cosmology. Class. Quantum Gravity 38, 075019 (2021). arXiv:2010.07896
Sussman, R.A.: Back-reaction and effective acceleration in generic LTB dust models. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 235002 (2011). arXiv:1102.2663
Sussman, R.A.: Weighed scalar averaging in LTB dust models, part I: statistical fluctuations and gravitational entropy. Class. Quantum Gravity 30, 065015 (2013). arXiv:1209.1962
Umeh, O.: The influence of structure formation on the evolution of the Universe. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cape Town, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics (2013)
Uzun, N.: Reduced phase space optics for general relativity: symplectic ray bundle transfer. Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 045002 (2020). arXiv:1811.10917
Vanderveld, R.A., Flanagan, É.É., Wasserman, I.: Systematic corrections to the measured cosmological constant as a result of local inhomogeneity. Phys. Rev. D 76, 083504 (2007). arXiv:0706.1931
Vigneron, Q., Buchert, T.: Dark Matter from Backreaction? Collapse models on galaxy cluster scales. Class. Quantum Gravity 36, 175006 (2019). arXiv:1902.08441
Wainwright, J., Ellis, G.F.R. (eds.): Dynamical Systems in Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Wald, R.M.: General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)
Weinberg, S.: Apparent luminosities in a locally inhomogeneous universe. Astrophys. J. 208, L1 (1976)
Wiegand, A., Buchert, T.: Multiscale cosmology and structure-emerging dark energy: a plausibility analysis. Phys. Rev. D 82, 023523 (2010). arXiv:1002.3912
Wiltshire, D.L.: Cosmic clocks, cosmic variance and cosmic averages. New J. Phys. 9, 377 (2007). arXiv:gr-qc/0702082
Wiltshire, D.L.: What is dust? Physical foundations of the averaging problem in cosmology. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 164006 (2011). arXiv:1106.1693
Wiltshire, D.L.: Cosmic structure, averaging and dark energy. In: Novello, M., Perez Bergliaffa, S.E. (eds.) Cosmology and Gravitation: XVth Brazilian School of Cosmology and Gravitation, pp. 203–244. Cambridge Scientific Publishers, Cambridge (2014). arXiv:1311.3787
Yoo, J., Durrer, R.: Gauge-transformation properties of cosmological observables and its application to the light-cone average. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09, 016 (2017). arXiv:1705.05839
Yoo, J., Mitsou, E., Grimm, N., Durrer, R., Refregier, A.: Cosmological information contents on the light-cone. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12, 015 (2019). arXiv:1905.08262
Acknowledgements
This work is part of a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement ERC advanced Grant 740021-ARTHUS, PI: TB). The authors would like to thank Jürgen Ehlers, George Ellis, Pierre Mourier, Dominik Schwarz and Nezihe Uzun for useful discussions, and Giuseppe Fanizza, Syksy Räsänen and Dennis Stock for valuable comments on the manuscript. We would in addition like to thank the anonymous referee for constructive suggestions that helped improving the paper. This work has been begun during a visit of TB in 2007 to the University of Bielefeld, Germany. TB wishes to thank Dominik Schwarz for his invitation to hold a temporary C4-chair at the department of physics. HvE acknowledges the generous hospitality of the UCT Cosmology and Gravity Group during the period from July to October 2010 when a significant share of the work underlying this paper was accomplished.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Work supported by ERC advanced Grant 740021-ARTHUS.
Light front-adapted spacetime metric
Light front-adapted spacetime metric
We shall consider the embedding of the light fronts into the cosmological spacetime, and write the metric tensor in local coordinates that are adapted to the screen space, \(x^\mu = (\tau , V, x^A)\). We require that the local coordinates \(x^{A}\), with \(A = 2,3\), satisfy the propagation law \(k^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }x^A = 0\). The propagation laws for \(\tau \) and V are also fixed through \(k^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }\tau = E\) and \(k^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }V = 0\) (see Eqs. (24) and (7)), and the full adapted system of local coordinates \(x^\mu = (\tau ,V, x^A)\) is thus specified throughout the past null cone domain, once initial conditions for the local coordinates are fixed at a screen space. In these local coordinates, we have that
where \(U^A := u^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }(x^A) /E\) defines the drift of the screen space coordinates in the matter frame. The one-form components in (A.1) follow directly from the definitions \(k_\mu := \partial _\mu V\) and \(u_\mu := - \partial _\mu \tau \). The vector components in (A.2) follow from the definition of the energy function \(E := - k^\mu u_\mu \) and the transport rules (shift vectors) \(k^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }(x^A) = 0\) and \(u^{\rho }\partial _{\rho }(x^A) = E U^A\). We may now write the projection tensor onto the light fronts (11) in the adapted local coordinate system \(x^\mu = (\tau , V, x^A)\):
where \(U_A := p_{AB} U^B\) and \(U^2 := p_{AB} U^A U^B\), and where the area-adapted screen space metric \(p_{AB}\) has inverse \(p^{AB}\). The tensor components in (A.3) follow from the orthogonality conditions \(p_{\mu \nu } k^\nu = p_{\mu \nu } u^\nu = 0\) and \(p^{\mu \nu } k_\nu = p^{\mu \nu } u_\nu = 0\), respectively. Note that in general the values of the components \(p_{11}\), \(p_{1A}\) and \(p_{A1}\) are non-zero, which comes from generally non-zero values for \(u^1\) and \(u^A\) in (A.2).
Using the definitions (10a) and (11), we might formulate the metric tensor for the cosmological spacetime as \(g_{\mu \nu } = k_\mu k_\nu /E^2 - (k_\mu u_\nu + u_\mu k_\nu )/E + p_{\mu \nu }\), and insert Eqs. (A.1), (A.2), and (A.3) in this formulation to obtain
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Buchert, T., van Elst, H. & Heinesen, A. The averaging problem on the past null cone in inhomogeneous dust cosmologies. Gen Relativ Gravit 55, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-022-03051-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-022-03051-x