Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial equity in urban facility versus residents’ satisfaction: challenge for the unplanned cities—a case study of Barasat city, India

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial equity in urban facilities or service distribution is considered as a critical determinant of the quality of urbanization. Spatial equity simply means the presence of adequate facilities and equal proximity. Many initiatives have mostly focused on one type of facility, obviating the holistic understanding of the equity of distribution of all basic facilities in cities. Moreover, the perceptions of the citizens in the process of planning are hardly considered. In this paper, an integrated facility-satisfaction index is presented to evaluate the balance between the distribution of facilities and the level of residents' satisfaction derived from those facilities. This method has taken all possible urban facilities and categorized them as educational, health, financial, recreation, and others. The per capita facility availability is calculated by incorporating the spatial distribution of urban facilities, the service range of facilities, population distribution, and weight. The proper weights have been given by employing the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The satisfaction index has been derived from the citizens’ perception of each facility, marked on a 5-point Likert scale during the field survey. The paired-sample t-test demonstrated that there is a significant difference between the facility availability and satisfaction index at the significance level of 0.05. The application of the method is demonstrated in fast urbanizing Barasat city, West Bengal, India. Based on the degree of facility-satisfaction differences or correspondences, the entire region has been categorized into four zones viz. satisfied people with favorable facility availability, unsatisfied people with poor facility availability, unsatisfied people with relatively high facility availability, and satisfied people with relatively low facility availability. The pattern has been validated by identifying spatial clusters and spatial outliers of facility availability and satisfaction using local Moran’s I. This approach can help a city to distribute the facilities to satisfy the citizens of all corners which will help to overcome the constant problems of policy decisions without adequate and reliable information about the actual demand of the residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, S., Ahmad, T., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice among hypertensive patients attending a health care facility in North India. International Journal of Research Medicine, 4(2), 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., 1993. The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association, pp. 111–125.

  • Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashik, F., Mim, S., & Neema, M. (2020). Towards vertical spatial equity of urban facilities: An integration of spatial and aspatial accessibility. Journal of Urban Management, 9(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi, S. and Chattopadhyay, S., 2004. Decentralised urban governance in India: implications for financing of urban infrastructure. Economic and Political Weekly, pp.5253–5260.

  • Balarajan, Y., Selvaraj, S., & Subramanian, S. V. (2011). Health care and equity in India. The Lancet, 377(9764), 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G., Powell, M., & Ashworth, R. (2001). Spatial equity and public services: An empirical analysis of local government finance in England. Public Management Review, 3(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census of India 2011. Census of India Website : Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. [online] Censusindia.gov.in. Available at: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/ [Accessed 21 Oct. 2020].

  • Chandio, I., Matori, A., Lawal, D., & Sabri, S. (2011). GIS- based land suitability analysis using ahp for public parks planning in Larkana City. Modern Applied Science. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v5n4p177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. S., & Liao, C. H. (2011). Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 28(5), 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, E. J., & Garlick, J. P. (1979). The Ecology of disease in urban societies. Current Anthropology, 20(4), 798–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadashpoor, H., Rostami, F., & Alizadeh, B. (2016). Is inequality in the distribution of urban facilities inequitable? Exploring a method for identifying spatial inequity in an Iranian city. Cities, 52, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. G. (1971). The efficiency of public versus private firms, the case of Australia’s two airlines. The Journal of Law and Economics, 14(1), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkip, F. B. (1997). The distribution of urban public services: The case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities, 14(6), 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X., Tao, S., & Dai, B. (2017). Spatial accessibility of country parks in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guagliardo, M. F. (2004). Spatial accessibility of primary care: Concepts, methods and challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., Song, C., Pei, T., Liu, Y., Ma, T., Du, Y., et al. (2019). Accessibility to urban parks for elderly residents: Perspectives from mobile phone data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W., Li, L., & Su, M. (2019). Spatial inequity of multi-level healthcare services in a rapid expanding immigrant city of China: A case study of shenzhen. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., & Kirby, A. (1982). Provision and wellbeing: An agenda for public resources research. Environment and Planning A, 14(3), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanuganti, S., Sarkar, A., & Singh, A. (2016). Quantifying accessibility to health care using two-step floating catchment area method (2SFCA): A case study in Rajasthan. Transportation Research Procedia, 17, 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinman, E. L. (1999). Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca Bolivia. Social Science & Medicine, 49(5), 663–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, A., Pinch, S., & Knox, P. (2017). Public service provision and urban development. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A., Bagchi, S. and Kundu, D., 1999. Regional distribution of infrastructure and basic amenities in urban India: issues concerning empowerment of local bodies. Economic and Political Weekly, pp.1893–1906.

  • Kunzmann, K. (1998). Planning for spatial equity in Europe. International Planning Studies, 3(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J., 2009. The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Princeton University Press.

  • Luo, W., & Whippo, T. (2012). Variable catchment sizes for the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Health & Place, 18(4), 789–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mali, S., Bhailume, S. and Das, S., 2013. Geoinformatics application for urban utilities information system: A case study of Pune City, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Computer Applications, 65(22).

  • McGrail, M., & Humphreys, J. (2009). Measuring spatial accessibility to primary care in rural areas: Improving the effectiveness of the two-step floating catchment area method. Applied Geography, 29(4), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K.J., Stewart Jr, J. and England, R.E., 1991. The politics of bureaucratic discretion: Educational access as an urban service. American Journal of Political Science, pp.155–177.

  • Miranda, R. A., & Tunyavong, I. (1994). Patterned inequality? Reexamining the role of distributive politics in urban service delivery. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 29(4), 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, K., Maroko, A., Grady, K., Maantay, J., & Arno, P. (2010). Not Just a walk in the park: Methodological improvements for determining environmental justice implications of park access in New York City for the promotion of physical activity. Cities and the Environment, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15365/cate.3182010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, S. (2013). Health care services in India: A few questions on equity. Health, 05(01), 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, K. (2020). Delineating fringe by rough-set theoretic approach: A case study on Barasat city India. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1579(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1579/1/012026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, K., & Das, P. (2018). Modelling the relationship between urban growth modes and the thermal environment - a case study of the Barasat Municipality, West Bengal. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 17(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2018/44047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagesha, G., & Gayithri, K. (2014). A research note on the public-private partnership of India’s infrastructure development. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 6(2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpure, A., Reiner, M., & Ramaswami, A. (2018). Resource requirements of inclusive urban development in India: Insights from ten cities. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 025010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nallathiga, R. (2010). Urban infrastructure development in India: Resource requirements and mobilisation methods. IUP Journal of Infrastructure VIII, 1&2, 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Asset Directory (2017). National Asset Directory. [online] Assetdirectory.gov.in. Available at: http://assetdirectory.gov.in/assetListReport.htm [Accessed 22 Feb. 2018].

  • Ogryczak, W. (2009). Inequality measures and equitable locations. Annals of Operations Research, 167(1), 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J.K. and Getis, A., 1994. Distributional issues concerning distance statistics. Working paper.

  • Pandey, B., Brelsford, C., & Seto, K. C. (2022). Infrastructure inequality is a characteristic of urbanization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(15), e2119890119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, G., Vasiliades, L., & Loukas, A. (2015). Multi-criteria analysis framework for potential flood prone areas mapping. Water Resources Management, 29, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0817-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, J., Ganaie, S., & Sultan Bhat, M. (2018). GIS based land suitability analysis using AHP model for urban services planning in Srinagar and Jammu urban centers of J&K India. Journal of Urban Management, 7(2), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, S. K. (2013). Accessibility assessment of urban infrastructure for planning and management of urban growth: A Case study of North Lakhimpur Town, Assam, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 2(3), 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. (2012). Factors and dimensions of inter-ward disparities in urban facility-utility services in Burdwan city India. Archives of Applied Science Research, 4(3), 1376–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAUL, S. (2020). Analysis of micro level disparities in urban facility-utility services: A study on Barasat City, West Bengal, INDIA. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 4(2), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, S. (2012). Cities and services: The geography of collective consumption. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ArcGIS Pro (2018). Cluster and Outlier Analysis (Anselin Local Moran's I)—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop. [online] Pro.arcgis.com. Available at: http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/cluster-and-outlier-analysis-anselin-local-moran-s.htm [Accessed 24 Aug. 2020].

  • Roy, AD., Parial, MD., & Mukherjee, K. (2020). Synergy Between air quality, various urban forms, and land surface temperature: A case study of Kolkata metropolitan area. In Handbook of Research on Resource Management for Pollution and Waste Treatment (pp. 576–609). IGI Global.

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, A. (2016). Why smart cities need smart citizens. [online] The Hindu. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/features/homes-and-gardens/why-smart-cities-need-smart-citizens/article8625075.ece [Accessed 21 Feb. 2021].

  • Sullivan, C., & Smithson, J. (2007). Perspectives of homeworkers and their partners on working flexibility and gender equity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601167797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suman, P. (2017). Spatial modelling of urban infrastructure: A study from a developing country (India). Rom. Journ. Geogr., 61(2), 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E. (2003). Neighborhoods as service providers: A methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E., & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4), 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thill, J. C., & Rushton, G. (1992). Demand sensitivity to space-price competition with manhattan and euclidean representations of distance. Annals of Operations Research, 40(1), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiefelsdorf, M., Griffith, D. A., & Boots, B. (1999). A variance-stabilizing coding scheme for spatial link matrices. Environment and Planning A, 31(1), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46(sup1), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, L. M. (1988). Equity as a decision rule in determining the distribution of urban public services. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23(3), 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsou, K., Hung, Y., & Chang, Y. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Sustainable Development Summit 2015 .:. Sustainable development knowledge platform. Sustainabledevelopment.un.org. (2015). Retrieved 24 December 2020, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/summit.

  • Wang, J., Du, F., Huang, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Access to hospitals: potential vs observed. Cities, 100, 102671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Luo, L., Xu, W., & Ledwith, V. (2008). Use of local Moran’s I and GIS to identify pollution hotspots of Pb in urban soils of Galway Ireland. Science of the Total Environment, 398(1–3), 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Adamas University, Barasat-Barrackpore Road, Kolkata, 700126, India

    Kasturi Mukherjee & Debika Mondal

Authors
  1. Kasturi Mukherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debika Mondal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasturi Mukherjee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest. All authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, K., Mondal, D. Spatial equity in urban facility versus residents’ satisfaction: challenge for the unplanned cities—a case study of Barasat city, India. GeoJournal 87 (Suppl 4), 931–949 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10674-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10674-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation