Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pareto’s law and sample size: a case study of China’s urban system 1984–2008

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While Pareto’s law has been widely supported by empirical evidence in urban studies, past studies have focused on finding best fits for city rank-size distribution. A main concern with Pareto’s law is the truncation of sample selection, for which few studies have examined it directly. This study tests three existing threshold methods (number threshold, size threshold, and urban population percentage threshold) using China’s city system as a case study. In addition, this study proposes a new method based upon the percentage threshold of the total number of cities. A systematic analysis is applied to examine the relationship between Pareto exponent and sample size using different threshold methods. The results show that Pareto exponent is sensitive to sample size and the truncation point. Including only large cities is problematic because a slight change in the truncation point will yield quite different results of Pareto exponent. In addition, the new method, the percentage threshold of the total number of cities method, presents an advantage over previous methods, in that this method yields a consistent set of results over a wide range of thresholds. Finally, when using this new method with China’s city system, the Pareto exponent presents a turning point in 1996, representing China’s transition from a planned economy to a more market oriented economy during that period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cities with a population of less than 200,000 are generally classified as small cities (Song and Zhang 2002).

References

  • Allen, G. R. P. (1954). The ‘curbe des population’: A further analysis. Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 16(May–June), 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G., & Ge, Y. (2005). The size distribution of Chinese cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(6), 756–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, F. (1913). Das Gesetz der Bevolkerungskoncentration. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 59(1), 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, D. F. (2001). Complex landscapes of spatial interaction. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(1), 81–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2008). The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science, 319(5864), 769–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L. (1961). City size distributions and economic development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9(4), 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., & Henderson, V. (2003). Urban evolution in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(4), 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosker, M., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & Schramm, M. (2008). A century of shocks: The evolution of the German city size distribution 1925–1999. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(4), 330–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Marrewijk, C. V., & Berg, M. V. D. (1999). The return of Zipf: Towards a further understanding of the rank-size distribution. Journal of Regional Science, 39(1), 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R. (1982). National city-size distributions: What do we know after 67 years of research. Progress in Human Geography, 6(1), 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W. (1992). Economic growth strategy and urbanization policies in China, 1949–1982. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(2), 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W. (2009). What is the true urban population of China? Which is the largest city in China?. http://faculty.washington.edu/kwchan/Chan-urban.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2012.

  • Cheshire, P. (1999). Trends in sizes and structures of urban areas. In P. Cheshire & E. S. Mills (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. III, pp. 1339–1372). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. (2009). China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Planning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • China State Statistical Bureau. (1985–2004). China City statistical yearbook 1985–2004. Beijing: China Statistical Press.

  • Chlebus, E., & R. Ohri. (2005). Estimating parameters of the Pareto distribution by means of Zipf’s law: Application to Internet research. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01577794. Accessed 17 May 2012.

  • Delgado, A. P., & Godinho, I. M. (2004). The evolution of city size distribution in Portugal: 1864-2001. http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/04.07.23_WP151_Ana%20Paula%20e%20Isabel.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2012.

  • Eeckhout, J. (2004). Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1429–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhout, J. (2009). Gibrat’s law for (all) cities: Reply. American Economics Review, 99(4), 1676–1683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. C. (1999). The vertical and horizontal expansions of China’s city system. Urban Geography, 20(6), 493–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, J. W. (1989). Urban rank size hierarchy: A mathematical interpretation. Zanesville: Institute of Mathematical Geography in Ohio University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 739–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaix, X., & Ioannides, Y. M. (2004). The evolution of city size distributions. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. IV, pp. 2341–2378). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesen, K., Zimmermann, A., & Suedekmn, J. (2010). The size distribution across all cities—Double Pareto lognormal strikes. Journal of Urban Economics, 68(2), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin-Pace, F. (1995). Rank-size distribution and the process of urban growth. Urban Studies, 32(3), 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, Y. M., & Overman, H. G. (2003). Zipf’s law for cities: An empirical examination. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(2), 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G. C. S., & Wei, Y. H. D. (2002). Guest editorial. Environment and Planning A, 34(9), 1535–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, C. J. (1956). Some indicators of stability in the growth of cities in the United States. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 4(3), 236–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. J. (1980). Growth and change in the analysis of rank-size distributions: Empirical findings. Environment and Planning A, 12(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch, V. (2005). Zipf zipped. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overman, H. G., & Ioannides, Y. M. (2001). Cross-sectional evolution of the US city size distribution. Journal of Urban Economics, 49(3), 543–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. B. (1985). A note on the size distribution of cities over time. Economics Letters, 18(2), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. J. (2002). On the rank-size distribution for human settlements. Journal of Regional Science, 42(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, K. T., & Resnick, M. (1980). The size distribution of cities: An examination of the Pareto law and primacy. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H. W. (1936). The ‘courbe des populations’: A parallel to Pareto’s law. Economic Journal, 46(182), 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, S. F., & Zhang, K. H. (2002). Urbanisation and city size distribution in China. Urban Studies, 39(12), 2317–2327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soo, K. T. (2005). Zipf’s law for cities: A cross-country investigation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(3), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soo, K. T. (2007). Zipf’s law and urban growth in Malaysia. Urban Studies, 44(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, W. C., & Shishido, H. (1981). Urban concentration, agglomeration economies, and the level of economic development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 30(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., & Zhu, N. (2009). City size distribution in China: Are large cities dominant? Urban Studies, 46(10), 2159–2185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. B., & Zhang, L. (1995). Urban performance and the control of urban size in China. Urban Studies, 32(4–5), 813–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA

    Shujuan Li

  2. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Daniel Sui

Authors
  1. Shujuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Sui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shujuan Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., Sui, D. Pareto’s law and sample size: a case study of China’s urban system 1984–2008. GeoJournal 78, 615–626 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9455-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9455-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation