Abstract
The evaluation method of the impact hazard during the mining face extraction is relatively mature, but it is difficult to directly apply to the risk analysis of the impact of roadway excavation. Therefore, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is introduced into the evaluation of the impact hazard during the excavation of the west belt roadway in second mining area. First of all, geological factors and mining technical conditions are considered to build a hierarchical structure model of impact hazard assessment for coal mining face, and construct the relationship matrix between target layer, standard layer and decision layer. Then, through the fuzzy consistent matrix, the comprehensive influence weight value of impact hazard grade in decision layer is calculated. The results show that the west belt roadway has no impact hazard, which is consistent with the measured results of support loading method and drilling cutting method. The above conclusion indicates that fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) can be used to evaluate the impact hazard during roadway excavation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dou LM, He XQ (2001) Theory and technology of rock burst prevention. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou
Feng GL, Feng XT, Chen BR et al (2015) A microseismic method for dynamic warning of rockburst development processes in tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(5):2061–2076
Han J, Zhang HW (2007) Fuzzy integrated estimation of fault activity in geology dynamic zoning. Chin J Geol Hazard Control 18(2):101–105
Jiang FX, Qu XC, Yu ZX et al (2011) Real time monitoring and measuring early warning technology and development of mine pressure bumping. Coal Sci Technol 39(2):59–64
Kaiser PK (2012) Design of rock support system under rockburst condition. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4(3):215–227
Kornowski J, Kurzeja J (2012) Prediction of rockburst probability given seismic energy and factors defined by the expert method of hazard evaluation (MRG). Acta Geophys 60(2):472–486
Lei Y (2005) Study on establishment and application of hazard evaluation model for rock-burst. China Coal Research Institute CCRI, Bejing
Liu XF, Wang EY, Zhao EL et al (2010) Study on multi-prediction of rockburst in the mining of gob-surrounded coal face and demonstration. J Min Saf Eng 27(2):215–218
Ortlepp WD, Stacey TR (1994) Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 9(1):59–65
Pan YS, Li ZH, Zhang MT (2003) Distribution, type, mechanism and prevention of rockbrust in china. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 22(11):1844
Pan JF, Ning Y, Mao DB et al (2012) Theory of rockburst start-up during coal mining. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(3):586–596
Qi QX, Lei Y, Li HY et al (2007) Theory and application of prevention of rock burst by break-tip blast in deep hole. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 26(a01):3522–3527
Qian QH (2014) Definition, mechanism, classification and quantitative forecast model for rockburst and pressure bump. Rock Soil Mech 35(1):1–6
Qin ZH, Peng YW (2011) Study on evaluation method of mine regional pressure bumping danger based on dynamic weight. Coal Sci Technol 39(10):18–21
Qu XC, Jiang FX, Yu ZX et al (2011) Rockburst monitoring and precaution technology based on equivalent drilling research and its applications. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(11):2346–2351
Sharan SK (2007) A finite element perturbation method for the prediction of rockburst. Comput Struct 85(17):1304–1309
Song LZ, Wang TX, He Y et al (2015) Rock burst evaluation of half isolated island face by probability index diagnosis method. Saf Coal Mines 46(8):209–211
Tian YL (2008) Mining pressure and strata control. China Coal Industry Publishing Home, Beijing
Wang PZ (1983) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai
Wei D, Wesseloo J, Potvin Y (2015) Evaluation of the adjusted rockburst damage potential method for dynamic ground support selection in extreme rockburst conditions, In: International seminar on design methods in underground mining
Wu XQ (2010) Evaluation and prevention of bumping danger from full seam mining in unstable thick seam. Coal Sci Technol 38(3):22–27
Wu YP (2017) Evaluation of impact hazard comprehensive index method for working face. Energy Technol Manag 4:130–132
Xie WQ (2008) Mechanism of rock-burst in underground works and counter measures. Mod Tunn Technol 45(4):42–48
Xu SB (1988) The principle of analytic hierarchy process. Tianjin University Press, Tianjin
Zhang HW, Rong H, Chen JQ et al (2015) Risk assessment of rockburst based on geo-dynamic division method in suberect and extremely thick coal seam. J China Coal Soc 40(12):2755–2762
Zhang HW, Meng QN, Han J, et al (2016a) Application of the geological dynamic division in rock burst coal mine. J Liaoning Tech Univ (5):449–455
Zhang JF, Jiang FX, Yang JB et al (2016b) Recoverability of isolated coal pillars in rockburst coal seam. J Min Saf Eng 33(5):867–872
Acknowledgements
This Work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51774196, 51774194), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(No. 2016M592221), and SDUST Young Teachers Teaching Talent Training Plan (No. BJRC20160501).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, ZH., Gao, XJ., Ma, Q. et al. Impact Hazard Assessment of Mine Roadway Excavation Based on FAHP Method. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 1859–1868 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0728-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0728-z