Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes over and between tile drains on corn, soybean, and forage fields under tile drainage management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Controlled tile drainage (CTD) can benefit the environment and crop production. However, CTD has the potential to increase soil greenhouse gas (GHG: CO2, CH4, N2O) emissions by increasing soil water contents and elevating field water levels. A paired-field (CTD and uncontrolled tile drainage (UTD)) approach was used to compare soil GHG emissions for silt loam corn, soybean, and forage fields under CTD and UTD management in eastern Ontario, Canada during a drier and a wetter growing season. A total of five field pairs were examined. Soil GHG emissions directly over tile drains (OT) and between tile drains (BT) in the CTD fields were also assessed. Average soil GHG emissions did not significantly differ (p > 0.05) for CTD and UTD field pairs, except for CO2 emissions (greater emissions from UTD fields) among two field pairs studied (forage in the drier growing season and soybean in the wetter growing season), and N2O emissions from a soybean field pair in the wet growing season (greater emissions from CTD field). Significantly higher soil water contents in the UTD forage field may have augmented CO2 fluxes there. There were some significantly higher N2O (in the wetter growing season) and CO2 emissions (in both growing seasons) BT relative to OT locations in some fields; but these differences were not translated significantly to other BT and OT site comparisons. The wetter growing season examined resulted in greater average daily soil CO2 fluxes overall, but similar CH4 and N2O fluxes for soybean fields compared to soybean fields in the drier growing season. Overall, there were no spatially or temporally systematic differences in GHG emissions among CTD and UTD field pairs, or among BT and OT locations in CTD fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh MS, Doran JW, Mosier AR (1992) Soil denitrification—significance, measurement, and effects of management. In: Stewart BA (ed) Advances in soil science. Springer, New York, NY, pp 1–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball BC, Scott A, Parker JP (1999) Field N2O, CO2, and CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality in Scotland. Soil Till Res 53(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball-Coelho BB, Murray R, Lapen D, Topp E, Bruin A (2012) Phosphorus and sediment loading to surface waters from liquid swine manure application under different drainage and tillage practices. Agric Water Manag 104:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blandford D, Gaasland I, Vårdal E (2014) The trade-off between food production and greenhouse gas mitigation in Norwegian agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 184:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden RD, Newkirk KM, Rullo GM (1998) Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes by a forest soil under laboratory-controlled moisture and temperature conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 30(12):1591–1597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM, Blackmer AM (1978) Nitrous oxide: emission from soils during nitrification of fertilizer nitrogen. Science 199(4326):295–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante M, Robledo-Abad C, Harper R, Mbow C, Ravindranat NH, Sperling F, Haberl H, Siqueira Pinto A, Smith P (2014) Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector. Glob Change Biol 20(10):3270–3290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick DR, Pain BF (1997) Methane fluxes following slurry applications to grassland soils: laboratory experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 63:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan AKA, Parkin TB (2001) Effect of land use on methane flux from soil. J Environ Qual 30:786–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W (1996) Measurement of rhizosphere respiration and organic matter decomposition using natural 13C. Plant Soil 183(2):263–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cicek H, Sunohara M, Wilkes G, McNairn H, Pick F, Topp E, Lapen DR (2010) Using vegetation indices from satellite remote sensing to assess corn and soybean response to controlled tile drainage. Agric Water Manag 98(2):261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabbé P, Lapen DR, Clark H, Sunohara M, Liu Y (2012) Economic benefits of controlled tile drainage: watershed evaluation of beneficial management practices, South Nation river basin, Ontario. Water Qual Res J Can 47(1):30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta A, Smith P, Lal R (2013) Effects of long-term tillage and drainage treatments on greenhouse gas fluxes from a corn field during the fallow period. Agric Ecosyst Environ 171:112–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Verchot LV, Cattânio JH, Ackerman IL, Carvalho JEM (2000) Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48(1):53–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie KE, Smith KA (2001) The effects of temperature, water-filled pore space and land use on N2O emissions from an imperfectly drained gleysol. Eur J Soil Sci 52(4):667–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie KE, Smith KA (2003) Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: the impact of soil water-filled pore space and other controlling variables. Glob Change Biol 9(2):204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie KE, Smith KA (2006) The effect of water table depth on emissions of N2O from a grassland soil. Soil Use Manag 22(1):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie KE, McTaggart IP, Smith KA (1999) Nitrous oxide emissions from intensive agricultural systems: variations between crops and seasons, key driving variables, and mean emission factors. J Geophys Res Atmos 104(D21):26891–26899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ECCC (2015) Environment and Climate Change Canada, Russel Station, ON. Canadian climate normals 1981–2010. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?stnID=4376&autofwd=1. Date modified 2015-02-11. Accessed 14 Oct 2015

  • ECCC (2016) National inventory report 1990–2014: greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada—executive summary. https://www.ec.gc.ca/ges-ghg/default.asp?lang=En&n=662F9C56-1. Date modified 2016-04-14. Accessed 13 Sept 2016

  • Elmi A, Madramootoo C, Hamel C (2000) Influence of water table and nitrogen management on residual soil NO3 − and denitrification rate under corn production in sandy loam soil in Quebec. Agric Ecosyst Environ 79(2):187–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elmi A, Burton D, Gordon R, Madramootoo C (2005) Impacts of water table management on N2O and N2 from a sandy loam soil in southwestern Quebec, Canada. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 72(3):229–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AB, Libig MA, Hanson JD (2002) Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in northern semiarid grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 34(9):1235–1241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frey SK, Hwang HT, Park YJ, Hussain SI, Gottschall N, Edwards M, Lapen DR (2016) Dual permeability modeling of tile drain management influences on hydrologic and nutrient transport characteristics in macroporous soil. J Hydrol 535:392–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JW, Skaggs RW, Weed SB (1979) Drainage control to diminish nitrate loss from agricultural fields. J Environ Qual 8(1):137–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glenk K, Eory V, Colombo S, Barnes A (2014) Adoption of greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture: an analysis of dairy farmers’ perceptions and adoption behaviour. Ecol Econ 108:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant R, Pattey E (1999) Mathematical modeling of nitrous oxide emissions from an agricultural field during spring thaw. Glob Biogeochem Cycl 13:679–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Rochette P, VandenBygaart AJ, Angers DA (2005) Greenhouse gas contributions of agricultural soils and potential mitigation practices in eastern Canada. Soil Till Res 83:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Ramirez G, Brouder SM, Smith DR, Van Scoyoc GE (2009) Greenhouse gas fluxes in an eastern corn belt soil: weather, nitrogen source, and rotation. J Environ Qual 38(3):841–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacinthe P, Dick WA, Brown LC (2000) Bioremediation of nitrate-contaminated shallow soils and waters via water table management techniques: evolution and release of nitrous oxide. Soil Biol Biochem 32(3):371–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes DB, Isenhart TM (2014) Reconnecting tile drainage to riparian buffer hydrology for enhanced nitrate removal. J Environ Qual 43(2):631–638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller M, Reiners WA (1994) Soil-atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide, nitric oxide, and methane under secondary succession of pasture to forest in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica. Global Biogeochem Cycl 8(4):399–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kliewer BA, Gilliam JW (1995) Water table management effects on denitrification and nitrous oxide evolution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59(6):1694–1702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles R (1982) Denitrification. Microbiol Rev 46(1):43–70

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Levine UY, Teal TK, Robertson GP, Schmidt TM (2011) Agriculture’s impact on microbial diversity and associated fluxes of carbon dioxide and methane. ISME J 5(10):1683–1691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Linn DM, Doran JW (1984) Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1267–1272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier AR, Duxbury JM, Freney JR, Heinemeyer O, Minami K (1996) Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields: assessment, measurement and mitigation. Plant Soil 181:95–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Reule CA, Liu XJ (2006) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in Northeastern Colorado. J Environ Qual 35:1584–1598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nangia V, Sunohara MD, Topp E, Gregorich EG, Drury CF, Gottschall N, Lapen DR (2013) Measuring and modeling the effects of drainage water management on soil greenhouse gas fluxes from corn and soybean fields. J Environ Manag 129:652–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit SP, Breitenbeck GA (1992) A laboratory study of factors influencing methane uptake by soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 41(1):39–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng HYF, Tan CS, Drury CF, Gaynor JD (2002) Controlled drainage and subirrigation influences tile nitrate loss and corn yields in a sandy loam soil in Southwestern Ontario. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90(1):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen V, Pöyhönen S, Ketoja E, Pitkänen J (2001) Abundance of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris in relation to subsurface drainage pattern on a sandy clay field. Eur J Soil Biol 37(4):301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Food and Rural Affairs (2009) Cereals: fertility management. OMAFRA, Guelph. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/pub811/4fertility.htm. 7 Mar 2016

  • Orchard VA, Cook FJ (1983) Relationship between soil respiration and soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 15(4):447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin T (2008) Effect of sampling frequency on estimates of cumulative nitrous oxide emissions. J Environ Qual 37:1390–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powlson DS, Goulding KWT, Willison TW, Webster CP, Hütsch BW (1997) The effect of agriculture on methane oxidation in soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 49(1):59–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabot E, Cousin I, Hénault C (2015) A modeling approach of the relationship between nitrous oxide fluxes from soils and the water-filled pore space. Biogeochemistry 122(2):395–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson G, Grace P (2004) Greenhouse gas fluxes in tropical and temperate agriculture: the need for a full-cost accounting of global warming potentials. Environ Dev Sustain 6(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P (2011) Towards a standard non-steady-state chamber methodology for measuring soil N2O emissions. Anim Feed Sci Tech 166–167:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P, Bertrand N (2008) Soil-surface gas emissions. In: Carter M, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 851–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P, Hutchinson GL (2005) Measuring soil respiration in situ: chamber techniques. In: Hatfield JL, Baker JM (eds) Micrometeorology in agricultural systems. ASA monograph no. 47. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 247–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P, Flanagan LB, Gregorich EG (1999) Separating soil respiration into plant and soil components using analyses of the natural abundance of carbon-13. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(5):1207–1213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MG, Law BE (2005) Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration. Biogeochemistry 73(1):3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sass RL, Fisher FM, Wang YB, Turner FT, Jund MF (1992) Methane emission from rice fields: the effect of floodwater management. Glob Biogeochemical Cycl 6(3):249–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW, Brevé MA, Gilliam JW (1994) Hydrologic and water quality impacts of agricultural drainage. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 24(1):1–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skopp J, Jawson MD, Doran JW (1990) Steady-state aerobic microbial activity as a function of soil water content. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1619–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedema LK, Rycroft DW (1983) Land drainage: planning and design of agricultural drainage systems. Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunohara M, Youssef MA, Topp E, Lapen DR (2010) Measured effect of agricultural drainage water management on hydrology, water quality, and crop yield. Paper IDS-CSAE-100175. In: 9th international drainage symposium. CIGR and CSAE/SCGAB, Quebec City

  • Sunohara MD, Craiovan E, Topp E, Gottschall N, Drury CF, Lapen DR (2014) Comprehensive nitrogen budgets for controlled tile drainage fields in eastern Ontario, Canada. J Environ Qual 43(2):617–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sunohara MD, Gottschall N, Wilkes G, Craiovan E, Topp E, Que Z, Seidou O, Frey SK, Lapen DR (2015) Long-term observations of nitrogen and phosphorus export in paired-agricultural watersheds under controlled and conventional tile drainage. J Environ Qual 44(5):1589–1604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sunohara MD, Gottschall N, Craiovan E, Wilkes G, Topp E, Frey SK, Lapen DR (2016) Controlling tile drainage during the growing season in Eastern Canada to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus, and bacteria loading to surface water. Agric Water Manag 178:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan CS, Drury CF, Gaynor JD, Ng HYF (1999) Effect of controlled drainage and subirrigation on subsurface tile drainage nitrate loss and crop yield at the farm scale. Can Water Resour J 24(3):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topp E, Pattey E (1997) Soils as sources and sinks for atmospheric methane. Can J Soil Sci 77(2):167–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Riddle C, Thurtell GW (1998) Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields during winter and spring thaw as affected by management practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 52:151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weier KL, Doran JW, Power JF, Walters DT (1993) Denitrification and the dinitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon, and nitrate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:66–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wesström I, Messing I (2007) Effects of controlled drainage on N and P losses and N dynamics in a loamy sand with spring crops. Agric Water Manag 87(3):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund RE, Richards NR (1962) Soil survey of Russell and Prescott Counties. Rep No. 33 of the Ontario Soil Survey, Research Branch. Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s (AAFC) Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Program (AGGP). The authors would like to acknowledge the landowners for their cooperation and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Advanced Research Complex, University of Ottawa, 25 Templeton Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada

    Alisha Van Zandvoort, Ian D. Clark & Corey Flemming

  2. Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada

    David R. Lapen, Emilia Craiovan, Mark D. Sunohara & Natalie Gottschall

  3. South Nation Conservation, 38 Victoria Street, P.O. Box 29, Finch, ON, K0C 1K0, Canada

    Ronda Boutz

Authors
  1. Alisha Van Zandvoort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David R. Lapen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ian D. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Corey Flemming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emilia Craiovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mark D. Sunohara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ronda Boutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Natalie Gottschall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Lapen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Zandvoort, A., Lapen, D.R., Clark, I.D. et al. Soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes over and between tile drains on corn, soybean, and forage fields under tile drainage management. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 109, 115–132 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9868-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9868-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation