Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of specimen geometry and size-effect on the K R -curve based on the cohesive stress in concrete

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative study for determining the K R -curves associated with the cohesive stress distribution for complete fracture process for two standard specimen geometries i.e., three-point bending test and compact tension test specimen geometries of concrete using analytical method and weight function approach is reported in the paper. The laboratory size specimen (100 ≤  D  ≤  400 mm) with initial-notch length/depth ratios 0.3 and 0.5 are considered in the investigation. The load-crack opening displacement curves for these specimens are obtained using well known version of Fictitious Crack Model (FCM). It is found from the numerical results that the weight function method improves computational efficiency without any appreciable error. The stability analysis on the K R -curves and the influence of specimen geometry and the size-effect on the K R -curves, the CTOD-curves and the process zone length during crack propagation of complete fracture process are also described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Compact tension

TPBT:

Three-point bending test

SIF:

Stress intensity factor

DKFM:

Double-K fracture model

CMOD:

Crack mouth opening displacement

COD:

Crack opening displacement

CTOD:

Crack tip opening displacement

CTOD c :

Critical value of crack tip opening displacement

LEFM:

Linear elastic fracture mechanics

FCM:

Fictitious crack model

CCM:

Cohesive crack model

References

  • ASTM International Standard E399-06 (2006) Standard test method for linear-elastic method plane-strain fracture toughness K IC of metallic materials

  • Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct 16(93): 155–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueckner HF (1970) A novel principle for the computation of stress intensity factors. Z Angew Math Mech 50: 529– 546

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carpinteri A (1989) Decrease of apparent tensile and bending strength with specimen size: two different explanations based on fracture mechanics. Int J Solid Struct 25: 407– 429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEB-Comite Euro-International du Beton-CEB-FIP Model Code (1990) Bulletin D’Information, EPF Lausanne

  • Glinka G, Shen G (1991) Universal features of weight functions for cracks in Mode I. Eng Fract Mech 40(6): 1135–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillerborg A, Modeer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6: 773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin GR (1960) Crack extension force for a part-through crack in a plate. ASTM Bull 243:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenq YS, Shah SP (1985) Two parameter fracture model for concrete. J Eng Mech ASCE 111(10): 1227–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Karihaloo BL, Nallathambi P (1991) Notched beam test: mode I fracture toughness. In: Shah SP, Carpinteri A (eds) Fracture mechanics test methods for concrete. Report of RILEM Technical Committee 89-FMT. Chamman & Hall, London, pp 1–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafft JM, Sullivan AM, Boyle RW (1961) Effect of dimensions on fast fracture instability of notched sheets. In: Proceedings of the crack propagation symposium, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield, England vol 1, pp 8–26

  • Kumar S, Barai SV (2008a) Determining the double-K fracture parameters for three-point bending notched concrete beams using weight function. Theor Appl Fract Mech (under submission)

  • Kumar S, Barai SV (2008b) determining double-K fracture parameters of concrete for compact tension and wedge splitting tests using weight function. Eng Fract Mech (under review)

  • Kumar S, Barai SV (2008c) Influence of specimen geometry on determination of double-K fracture parameters of concrete: a comparative study. Int J Fract 149:47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Barai SV (2008d) Weight function approach for determining crack extension resistance based on the cohesive stress distribution in concrete. Eng Fract Mech (under review)

  • Kumar S, Barai SV (2008e) Size-effect prediction from the double-K fracture model for notched concrete beam. Int J Damage Mech (accepted)

  • MATLAB, Version 7, The Math Works, Inc., Copyright 1984–2004

  • Murakami Y (1987) Stress intensity factors handbook vol-1. Pergamon, Oxford (Committee on Fracture Mechanics, The Society of Materials Science, Japan)

  • Petersson PE (1981) Crack growth and development of fracture zone in plain concrete and similar materials, Report No. TVBM-100, Lund Institute of Technology

  • Planas J, Elices M (1990) Fracture criteria for concrete: mathematical approximations and experimental validation. Eng Fract Mech 35: 87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planas J, Elices M (1991) Nonlinear fracture of cohesive material. Int J Fract 51: 139–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt HW, Xu S (1999) Crack extension resistance based on the cohesive force in concrete. Eng Fract Mech 64: 563–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt HW, Cornelissen HAW, Hordijk DA (1986) Tensile tests and failure analysis of concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE 112(11): 2462–2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JR (1972) Some remarks on elastic crack-tip stress fields. Int J Solid Struct 8: 751–758

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • RILEM Draft recommendation 50-F (1985) Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend test on notched beams. Mater Struct 18:285–290

    Google Scholar 

  • RILEM Technical Committee 89-FMT (1990) Determination of fracture parameters (Ks IC and CT ODc) of plain concrete using three-point bend tests, proposed draft recommendation. RILEM, Mater Struct 23(138):457–460

  • Roesler J, Paulino GH, Park K, Gaedicke C (2007) Concrete fracture prediction using bilinear softening. Cem Concr Compos 29: 300–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tada H, Paris PC, Irwin G (1985) The stress analysis of cracks handbook. Paris Productions Incorporated, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Reinhardt HW (1998) Crack extension resistance and fracture properties of quasi-brittle materials like concrete based on the complete process of fracture. Int J Fract 92: 71–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Reinhardt HW (1999a) Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle materials, Part I: experimental investigation of crack propagation. Int J Fract 98:111–149. doi:10.1023/A:1018668929989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Reinhardt HW (1999b) Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle materials, part II: analytical evaluating and practical measuring methods for three-point bending notched beams. Int J Fract 98: 151–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Reinhardt HW (1999c) Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle materials, part III: compact tension specimens and wedge splitting specimens. Int J Fract 98: 179–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Barai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Barai, S.V. Influence of specimen geometry and size-effect on the K R -curve based on the cohesive stress in concrete. Int J Fract 152, 127–148 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-008-9275-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-008-9275-6

Keywords

Navigation