Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural and sexual selection on male behaviour and morphology, and female choice in a wild field cricket population: spatial, temporal and analytical components

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used multiple regression, path analysis and non-parametric selection surface visualisation to investigate natural and sexual selection and, in addition, cross-sectional female choice statistics to analyse female choice in a wild population of the field cricket Gryllus campestris L. in central Germany. Adults (167 males, 75 females) were individually marked and followed daily over the entire adult stage. Two morphological traits (pronotum width, body condition) and two behavioural traits (burrow occupation time, daily displacement) were measured for each male and used in selection analyses. Individuals mated multiply and male mating success was strongly right skewed with less than 6% of the population achieving 50% of the copulations. In males, analysis of natural selection in terms of lifespan revealed positive directional selection on burrow occupation time and stabilising selection on daily displacement. Analysis of sexual selection in term of mating success showed positive directional selection on pronotum width and lifespan. Path analysis confirmed the close association between natural and sexual selection and illustrated indirect effects of the behavioural variables on mating success via their effect on lifespan. Multiple regression analysis further indicated positive quadratic (disruptive) sexual selection on lifespan but the non-parametric cubic spline regression showed this to be an artefact of the quadratic approach. In fact, lifespan was under “threshold selection” i.e. it was not under selection below a threshold and under positive directional sexual selection above the threshold. A positive correlational selection gradient between lifespan and body condition revealed that a high body condition is advantageous among long-lived males. Female choice statistics showed that females chose large and heavy males in the beginning of the season only and that choosiness decreases with increasing distance to potential alternative mates. Our findings highlight the benefits of combining several analytical methods to uncover selection patterns and to avoid misinterpretations based on single methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984a) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984b) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman PW, Gilson LN, Ferguson JWH (2001) Male size and sequential mate preference in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav 61:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentsen CL, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus. Am Nat 167:E102–E116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blows MW, Brooks R (2003) Measuring nonlinear selection. Am Nat 162:815–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED, Janzen FJ (1996) On the assignment of fitness values in statistical analyses of selection. Evolution 50:437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED, Moore AJ, Janzen FJ (1995) Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 10:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cade WH (1981) Field cricket spacing, and the phonotaxis of crickets and parasitoid flies to clumped and isolated cricket songs. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 55:365–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK (2001) How strong is natural selection? Trends Ecol Evol 16:215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DA (1999) Intrinsic factors affecting female choice in house crickets: time cost, female age, nutritional condition, body size, and size-relative reproductive investment. J Insect Behav 12:691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green PJ, Silverman BW (1994) Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (2001) Katydids and bush-crickets: reproductive behavior and evolution of the Tettigoniidae. Cornell University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick AV, Dill LM (1993) Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim Behav 46:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D (2004) Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution 58:2133–2143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hockham LR, Vahed K (1997) The function of mate guarding in a field cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae; Teleogryllus natalensis Otte and Cade). J Insect Behav 10:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hoang A, Hill CE, Beerli P, Kingsolver JG (2001) Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9157–9160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber F, Moore TE, Loher WE (1989) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Smith MJ, Bentsen CL, Bussiere LF (2004) High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432:1024–1027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiflawi M, Gray DA (2000) Size-dependent response to conspecific mating calls by male crickets. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2157–2161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW (2007) Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 57:561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157:245–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2004) Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler G, Reinhardt K (1992) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Feldgrille (Gryllus campestris L.) in Thüringen. Articulata 7:63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Mappes J (2005) Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed. Evolution 59:1876–1885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Olds T, Bergelson J (1990) Statistical genetics of an annual plant, Impatiens capensis. II. Natural selection. Genetics 124:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw RG (1987) Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petraitis PS, Dunham AE, Niewiarowski PH (1996) Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. Funct Ecol 10:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Arnold SJ (1989) Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov AV (1975) Acoustic behaviour and migrations of field crickets Gryllus campestris (in russian). Zoologichesky Zhurnal 54:1803–1809

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J Comp Physiol A 119:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser MR, Murray A-M, Cade WH (1997) The influence of female age on phonotaxis during single and multiple song presentations in the field cricket, Gryllus integer (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Insect Behav 10:437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2006) R—a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz MS (2000) Verhalten der Männchen in einer Wildpopulation der Feldgrille (Gryllus campestris L.). Articulata 15:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz MS, Köhler G (2007) Male behaviour over the season in a wild population of the field cricket Gryllus campestris L. Ecol Entomol 32:384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz MS, Sakaluk SK (2002) The role of the male’s cerci in copulation and mate guarding in decorated crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus). J Zool 257:519–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost R, Honegger HW (1987) The timing of premating and mating behavior in a field population of the cricket Gryllus campestris L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder JJ, Siva-Jothy MT (2000) Male calling song provides a reliable signal of immune function in a cricket. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1171–1175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK (1991) Post-copulatory mate guarding in decorated crickets. Anim Behav 41:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Cade WH (1983) The adaptive significance of female multiple matings in house and field crickets. In: Gwyne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems, sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 319–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Schaus JM, Eggert A-K, Snedden WA, Brady PL (2002) Polyandry and fitness of offspring reared under varying nutritional stress in decorated crickets. Evolution 56:1999–2007

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner SM, Mitchell RJ, Callahan HS (2000) Using path analysis to measure natural selection. J Evol Biol 13:423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (1988) Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D, Nychka D (1994) Exploring fitness surfaces. Am Nat 143:597–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B (2000) Cause and correlation in biology: a user’s guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shuvalov VF, Popov AV (1973) The importance of the calling song rhythmic pattern of males of the genus Gryllus for phonotaxis of females. Zoologichesky Zhurnal 52:1179–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1987) Sperm competition as a mechanism of female choice in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988a) The calling song of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): constraints on transmission and its role in intermale competition and female choice. Anim Behav 36:380–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1988b) Male size, mating potential and lifetime reproductive success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim Behav 36:372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1992) Sexual selection and body size in a natural population of the field cricket, Gryllus campestris (L.). Journal of Orthoptera Research 1:12–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (1995) Correlates of male quality in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris L.: age, size, and symmetry determine pairing success in field populations. Behav Ecol 6:376–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Ritchie MG (1996) Symmetry in the songs of crickets. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1308–1311

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Zuk M (1992) Variability in call structure and pairing success of male field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus: the effect of age, size and parasite load. Anim Behav 44:1145–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe JR, Agrawal AF, Hohenlohe PA, Arnold SJ, Blows MW (2008) Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: Double or nothing? Evolution 62:2435–2440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (1998) Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM (2005) Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108:643–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieth E (1989) Fitting piecewise linear regression functions to biological responses. J Appl Physiol 67:390–396

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WEJ, Hoback WW (1999) Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket. Anim Behav 57:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1920) The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 6:320–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zippelius H-M (1949) Die Paarungsbiologie einiger Orthopteren-Arten. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 6:372–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M (1987) Variability in attractiveness of male field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) to females. Anim Behav 35:1240–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M (1988) Parasite load, body size, and age of wild-caught male field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): effects on sexual selection. Evolution 42:969–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

K. Reinhardt and an anonymous referee gave us the final push to conduct the detailed selection analysis on our data set. S. K. Sakaluk, R. Brooks and three anonymous referees made helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Ecology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Markus S. Ritz & Günter Köhler

Authors
  1. Markus S. Ritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Günter Köhler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus S. Ritz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritz, M.S., Köhler, G. Natural and sexual selection on male behaviour and morphology, and female choice in a wild field cricket population: spatial, temporal and analytical components. Evol Ecol 24, 985–1001 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9328-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9328-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation