Abstract
To determine the levels of heterosis in F1 hybrids of juncea canola under well-watered and water deficit conditions, glasshouse experiments were conducted at the University of Melbourne, Parkville campus between 2012 and 2014. Three juncea canola hybrids, their parents and an open-pollinated juncea canola control cultivar (OasisCL) were grown. Plants were subjected to two treatments—well-watered and water deficit after first open flower to maturity. Measurements were recorded on days to various phenological stages, biomass production, seed yield and yield components. Yield heterosis was determined as superiority of F1 hybrids over mid parent and better parent. Two juncea canola hybrids—HJM1Z-2013 and HJM1Z-0027 out-yielded OasisCL and showed significant mid parent and better parent heterosis for seed yield under water deficit. Number of pods per plant was the major yield component affected by water deficit whereas seeds per pod, thousand seed weight and harvest index were stable. Water deficit had significant negative effects on biomass production at harvest. The study revealed the possibility of exploiting yield heterosis of juncea canola under terminal drought conditions. However, further experiments are recommended to verify the results as the results were from pot experiments in controlled conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burton WA (2009) Juncea canola update. Department of Primary Industries. http://www.australianoilseeds.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/7354/burton__juncea_canola_2009.pdf
Burton W, Salisbury PA, Potts D (2003) The potential of canola quality Brassica juncea as an oilseed crop for Australia. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th Australian Research Assembly on Brassicas, NSW Agriculture: Tamworth, NSW, 8–11 Sept 2003
Burton WA, Flood RF, Norton RM, Field B, Potts DA, Robertson MJ, Salisbury PA (2008) Identification of variability in phenological responses in canola-quality Brassica juncea for utilisation in Australian breeding programs. Aust J Agric Res 59(9):874–881. doi:10.1071/AR07415
Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck F-W, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, Marè C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res 105(1–2):1–14. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004
Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Hamblin J (1992) Relationship between barley grain yield measured in low- and high-yielding environments. Euphytica 64(1–2):49–58. doi:10.1007/BF00023537
Chauhan JS, Tyagi MK, Kumar A, Nashaat NI, Singh M, Singh NB, Jakhar ML, Welham SJ (2007) Drought efects on yield and its componenst in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Plant Breeding 126:399–402
Gan Y, Malhi SS, Brandt S, Katepa-Mupondwa F, Kutcher HR (2007) Brassica juncea canola in the Northern Great Plains. Agron J 99(5):1208–1218. doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0296
Gomez NV, Miralles DJ (2010) Factors that modify early and late reproduction phases in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): its impact on seed yield and oil content. Ind Crop Prod 34(2):1277–1285
Gunasekera CP, Martin LD, Siddique KHM, Walton GH (2006) Gentype by environment interactions of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) and canola (B. napus L.) in mediterranean-type environments. 1. Crop growth and yield. Europ J Agronomy 25:1–12
Gunasekera CP, French RJ, Martin LD, Siddique KHM (2009) Comparison of the responses of two Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) genotypes to post-flowering soil water deficit with the response of canola (B. napus L.) cv. Monty. Crop Pasture Sci 60:251–261
Hashem A, Amin Majumdar MN, Hamid A, Hossain MM (1998) Drought stress effects on seed yield, yield attributes, growth, cell membrane stability and gas exchange of synthesized Brassica napus L. J Agron Crop Sci 180(3):129–136. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00382.x
Haskins B, McCaffery D, Bambach R (2009) Juncea canola in the low rainfall zone of south-western NSW. Primefact 789:1–10
Hocking PJ, Stapper M (2001) Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components. Aust J Agric Res 52(6):623–634. doi:10.1071/AR00113
Hocking PJ, Kirkegaard JA, Angus JF, Gibson AH, Koetz EA (1997) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crop Res 49(2–3):107–125. doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(96)01063-5
Kumar A, Singh DP, Singh P (1994) Influence of water stress on photosynthesis, transpiration, water use efficiency and yield of Brassica juncea L. Field Crop Res 37:95–101
Lewis GJ, Thurling N (1994) Growth, developement and yield of three oilseed Brassica species in a water-limited environment. Aust J Exp Agric 34:93–103
Ma Q, Niknam SR, Turner DW (2006) Responses of osmotic adjustemtnt and seed yield of Brassica napus and B. juncea to soil water deficit at different growth stages. Aust J Agric Res 57:221–226
Mahto JL, Haider ZA (2004) Heterosis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Cosson). J Trop Agric 42(1–2):39–41
Malviya N, Kumar K, Babu U, Verma OP (2012) Heterosis for seed yield, oil content and yield components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss). Plant Arch 12(1):279–281
Nanda R, Bhargava SC, Tomar DPS, Rawson HM (1996) Phenological development of Brassica campestris, B. juncea, B. napus and B. carinata grown in controlled environments and from 14 sowing dates in the field. Field Crop Res 46(1–3):93–103. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(95)00090-9
Oram RN, Walton G, Marcroft S, Potter TD, Salisbury PA, Burton W, Robson DJ, Castleman GH, Easton AA, Kirk JTO (1997) Progress in breeding canola-grade Indian mustard. In: Paper presented at the proceedings 11th Australian research assembly on Brassicas, Perth, Western Australia, 6–10 Oct 1997
Oram R, Salisbury PA, Kirk J, Burton W (1999) Brassica juncea breeding. In: Salisbury PA (ed) Canola in Australia: the first 30 years. 10th international rapeseed congress, Canberra, Australia, 1999, Canberra, ACT. Organizing Committee of 10th International Rapeseed Congress, pp 37–40
Patel CG, Parmar MB, Patel KR, Patel KM (2010) Exploitation of heterosis breeding in Indian mustard, Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss. J Oilseeds Res 27(1):47–48
Pradhan AK, Sodhi YS, Mukhopadhyay A, Pental D (1993) Heterosis breeding in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss): analysis of component characters contributing to heterosis for yield. Euphytica 69(3):219–229. doi:10.1007/bf00022368
Rakow G, Raney JP, Males D Field performance of canola quality Brassica juncea. In: Murphy D (ed) GCIRC 9th international rapeseed congress, Cambridge, UK, 1995. Organizing committee of the 9th international rapeseed congress, pp 228–230
Sabaghnia N, Dehghani H, Alizadeh B, Mohghaddam M (2010) Interrelationships between seed yield and 20 related traits of 49 canola (Brassica napus L.) genotypes in non-stressed and water-stressed environments. Span J Agric Research 8(2):356–370
Si P, Walton GH (2004) Determinants of oil concentration and seed yield in canola and Indian mustard in the lower rainfall areas of Western Australia. Aust J Agric Res 55:367–377
VSN International (2011) GenStat for Windows, 14th edn. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead
Wright PR, Morgan JM, Jessop RS, Cass A (1995) Comparative adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (B. juncea) to soil water deficits: yield and yield components. Field Crop Res 42(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(95)00013-G
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted as a part of corresponding author’s Ph.D. project with scholarships from the University of Melbourne. We highly appreciate support from Seednet Australia for germplasm used in the experiments. We extend our sincere gratitude to Dr. Allison Gurung for her critical comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, B.R., Burton, W.A., Nicolas, M.E. et al. Heterosis of juncea canola under terminal drought conditions. Euphytica 210, 451–460 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1715-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1715-1