Skip to main content
Log in

Can cultivars from participatory plant breeding improve seed provision to small-scale farmers?

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seed provision for small-scale farmers deals with multiple constraints. These include, on the supply side, high seed production costs and poor adaptedness of the cultivars, and on the demand side, anticyclical demand and low and variable sales. Approaches to improve seed provision to this sector of farmers have so far not been very successful. This paper discusses how well-adapted cultivars developed through participatory plant breeding (PPB) initiatives create new opportunities for production and distribution of quality seed. It reviews supply and demand-side issues, based on research and experiences with seed production. Given better adaptation of PPB-cultivars, the diffusion of seed of PPB initiatives should not be a major bottleneck. But constraints in the provision of quality seed from cultivars that are commonly used remain and need to be addressed. Major points of attention are cost-effective seed production and distribution, high information linked transaction costs, and appropriate seed production technology. Research on these issues is needed to understand farmers’ seed demand. At the same time, these issues need to be taken into account in new seed production initiatives that apply integrated approaches. Long term commitment by farmers to produce, distribute and use seeds is a condition. Even if seed production is not economically sustainable at household or organization level, farmer-based seed systems generate benefits to society as a whole that justify long term public investment to maintain them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almekinders C, Crespo M, Coco C, Plata G (2004a) Fítomejoramiento Participativo y Producción de Semilla: Logros y Retos. Documentación de Taller Abril 26–28, 2004, Cochabamba, Proinpa/Preduza. www.preduza.org

  • Almekinders C, Estrada R, Gallegos A (2004b) Fítomejoramiento Participativo y Producción de Semilla: Logros y Retos. Documentación de Curso-Taller Abril 20–23, 2004, Cuzco, INIA/Preduza. www.preduza.org

  • Almekinders C, Louette D (2000) Examples of innovations in local seed systems in Mesoamerica. In: Almekinders CJM, de Boef WS (eds) Encouraging diversity. Plant genetic resource conservation and crop development. IT Publications, London, pp 219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders C, Louwaars NP (2002) The importance of the farmers’ seed system in a functional national seed sector. In: Louwaars NP (ed) Seed policy, legislation and law: widening a narrow focus. Food Products Press, New York, pp 15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders CJM, Louwaars NP, de Bruijn G (1994) Local seed systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica 78:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders C, Thiele G (2003) What to do with the seed for small-scale farmers after all? Questions on seed supply strategies, considering PPB successes. Cultivos Trop (English version) 24(4):5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby JA, Quiros CA, Rivers YM (1989) Farmer participation in technology development: work with crop varieties. In: Chambers R, Pacey A, Thrupp LA (eds) Farmer first. Farmer innovation and agricultural research. IT Publications Ltd, London, pp 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27:2021–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellon MR (2004) Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation. World Dev 32:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellon MR, Risopoulos J (2001) Small-scale farmers expand the benefits of improved maize germplasm: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico. World Dev 29:799–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley J, Vasques D (1998) The seed potato system in Bolivia: organisational growth and missing links. Agricultural Administration Network Paper 85, ODI, London

  • Bentley J, Tripp R, Delgado de la Flor R (2001) Liberalization of Peru’s formal seed sector. Agric Human Values 18:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broers LHM (1994) Memorias del primer taller sobre Resistencia Duradera en Cultivos Alto andinos de Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador y Perú. Quito, 30 de Mayo-3 de Junio 1994

  • Camargo CP, Bragantini C, Monares A (1989) Seed production systems for small farmers: a nonconventional approach. CIAT, Cali, Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell E (ed) (1990) Diffusion mechanisms in small farm communities: lessons from Asia, Africa and Latin America. Network paper 21, ODI, Inner Circle, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4NS, England

  • Danial DL, Almekinders CJM, Thiele G (this issue) Farmers’ participation and breeding for durable disease resistance in the Andean Region. Euphytica

  • Danial DL, Lindhout P (2002) Seed increase in Ecuador. In: Preduza Annual Report 2002. Quito-Ecuador, pp␣12–14

  • David S (2004) Farmer seed enterprises: a sustainable approach to seed delivery. Agric Human Values 21:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duijndam FP, Evenhuis CJ, Parlevliet JE (this issue) Production and use of maize seed for sowing in Bolivar, Ecuador. Euphytica

  • Evenson RE, Gollin D (2003) Crop variety improvement and its effect on productivity: the impact of international agricultural research. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Faguet JP (2004) Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. J Public Econ 88:867–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollin D, Smale M (1999) Valuing genetic diversity: crop plants and agroecosystem. In: Collins WW, Qualset CO (eds) Biodiversity in agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 237–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisley W, Shamambo M (1993) An analysis of the adoption and diffusion of carioca beans in Zambia resulting from an experimental distribution of seed. Agric Syst 43:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häbich GE (1991) Pequeñas empresas de semillas. Taller Centroamericano sobre desarollo de sistemas de pequeñas empresas de semillas (PES), Guatemala, 22–26 Abril, 1991. PROFRIJOL, CIAT, DIGESA

  • Hall A, Sulaiman R, Clark N, Yoganand B (2003) From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective in improving the management of international agricultural research. Agric Syst 78:213–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen W, Luna CA, Duque MC (1992) Small-farmer behaviour towards bean seed: evidence from Colombia. J Appl Seed Product 10:43–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RB, Audi PA, Tripp R (2001) The role of informal seed systems in disseminating modern varieties. The example of pigeon pea from a semi-arid area of Kenya. Expl Agric 37:539–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugbei S, Turner M (2000) Structure and establishment of small-scale enterprises in seed industries in developing countries. In: Kugbei S, Turner M, Witthaut P (eds) Finance and management of small scale seed enterprises. Aleppo, Syria, pp 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton M, Longhurst R (1989) New seeds and poor people. London, Unwin & Hyman

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire S (2005) Getting Genes: rethinking seed system analysis and reform for sorghum in Ethiopia. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University

  • Ndjeunga J (2002) Village seed systems and pearl millet seed quality in Niger. Exp Agric 38:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazon N, Peralta E, Falconi E, Pinzon J, Merino F (2003) In: Danial D (ed) Agro biodiversidad y producción de semilla con el sector informal a travez del mejoramiento particiativo en la Zona Andina. 22–26 de Septiembre del 2003, Lima, Perú, pp 131–138

  • Parlevliet JE (2003) Agrobiodiversidad: que es, como surgio y como usarla mas eficientemente. In: Danial DL (ed) Agro-biodiversidad y production de semilla con el sector informal a traves del mejoramiento participativo en la Zona Andina. Sept. Lima, Peru, pp 160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet JE (this issue) How to maintain improved cultivars. Euphytica

  • Perry S, van der Vossen HAM (2000) Report of the evaluation mission of Preduza, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia, 6–9 August 2000

  • Rana RB (2004) Influence of socio-economic and cultural factors on agrobiodiversity conservation on farm in Nepal. PhD Thesis, University of Reading

  • Roa JI, Ashby JA, Gracia T, del Pilar Guerrero M, Quirós CA (1991) Investigación participativa en la producción de semilla mejorada por pequeños agricultores. El caso de Ashertop, Pescador, Cauca, Colombia. Documento de trabajo. Taller Centroamericano sobre desarollo de sistemas de pequeñas empresas de semillas (PES), Guatemala, 22– 26 Abril, 1991. PROFRIJOL, CIAT, DIGESA

  • Scurrah M, Fernandez-Beca E, Canto R, Nuñez E, Olivera E, Zuñiga N (1999) Learning about biodiversity in Peru. LEISA Mag 15(3/4):26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling L, Ashby JA, Smith ME, Weltzien E, McGuire S (2001) A framework for analyzing participatory plant breeding approaches and results. Euphytica 122:439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidegger U, Prain G, Ezeta F, Vittorelli C (1989) Linking formal R&D to indigenous systems: a user oriented potato seed programme for Peru. Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Network Paper 10, London, ODI

  • Tejada T (2004) Por qué no funciona el sistema convencional de producción y distribución de semilla de maíz amiláceo en la sierra norte del Perú?: Análisis y Propuesta. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agraria—INIEA—Estación Experimental Baños del Inca

  • Thiele G (1999a) Informal potato seed systems in the Andes: why are they important and what should we do with them. World Dev 27:83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele G, Bustamante J, Mansilla J, Scott G (1999b) Qué pasa con el precio de la papa? Un análisis del período 1980–1995. Rev Procampo 83:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp R (2001) Seed provision and agricultural development. ODI/James Currey, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf B, Almekinders C, von Lossau A (2003) Incentive measures for on farm conservation. In: CIP-UPWARD, Conservation and sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity: a sourcebook. International Potato Center-Users’ Perspectives with Agricultural Research and Development, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, pp 578–589

  • Wiggins S, Cromwell E (1995) NGOs and seed provision to smallholders in developing countries. World Dev 23:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the importance of the information that was generated and shared by the participants in the mentioned workshops as a contribution to this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conny J. M. Almekinders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almekinders, C.J.M., Thiele, G. & Danial, D.L. Can cultivars from participatory plant breeding improve seed provision to small-scale farmers?. Euphytica 153, 363–372 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9201-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9201-9

Keywords

Navigation