Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Integrative Model of Entitlement Beliefs

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entitlement is frequently cited as a pressing managerial challenge in contemporary organizations, but the extant research on this topic has been inconsistent, vague, and incomplete. In response, this paper presents an integrative model of entitlement beliefs. Specifically, prior research across multiple disciplines is synthesized to offer an integrative conceptualization of entitlement beliefs, which is distinguished from trait entitlement. This synthesis forms the conceptual foundation for a theoretical model that specifies antecedents to entitlement beliefs, and the proximal and distal outcomes associated with these beliefs. Theoretical and practical implications for managing entitlement beliefs more effectively are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–279). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J., & Vredenburg, D. J. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, R. (2008). The trophy kids grow up. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: the acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. The Academy of Management Executive, 18, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: a synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., Thau, S., & Scouten, J. (2005). “I deserve more because my name is on the door:” entitlement, embeddedness, and employee deviance in the family business. In R. E. Kidwell Jr. & C. L. Martin (Eds.), Managing organizational deviance (pp. 287–300). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, H. C. (1990). Black’s law dictionary. St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, G. L., Andrews, M. C., & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. (2004). Managing human resources (13th ed.). Mason: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., & Tang, R. L. (2008). When employees strike back: investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1104–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, C. (2010). Entitlement an epidemic in sports, USA Today, p. 3C.

  • Brown, S. A., Venkatesh, J., Kuruzovich, J., & Massey, A. P. (2008). Expectation confirmation: an examination of three competing models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Z. S., Miller, B. K., & Pitts, V. E. (2010). Trait entitlement and perceived favorability of human resource management practices in the prediction of job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, T. (1994). Owners, immigrants and ethnic conflict in Fiji and Mauritius. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 17, 301–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, A. (2012). Culture of entitlement widely prevalent among Indian R&D professionals, says Zinnov Study. The Economic Times (Online). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/abiglobal/docview/1034296567/1392B1C3BBD1849DC7A/1?accountid=2837

  • Chen, G., Trevino, L. K., & Hambrick, D. C. (2009). CEO elitist association: toward a new understanding of an executive behavioral pattern. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 316–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, L. (2007). Facing off against a culture of entitlement. Canadian HR Reporter, 20, 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N. D., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 699–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: the impact of upward social comparisons on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egotistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 13, 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, H. K., & Bing, M. N. (2008). The multidimensionality of the equity sensitivity construct: integrating separate benevolence and entitlement dimensions for enhanced construct measurement. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20, 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D. (2003). How self-conception may lead to inequality: effects of hierarchical roles on the equality-rule in organizational resource-sharing tasks. Group & Organization Management, 28, 282–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: leader behavior in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 263–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., van Dijk, E., & Folmer, C. P. R. (2009). Why leaders feel entitled to take more: feelings of entitlement as a moral rationalization strategy. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 107–119). USA: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? a narrative’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derber, C. (1978). Unemployment and the entitled worker: Job entitlement and radical political attitudes among the youthful unemployed. Social Problems, 26, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: a social-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchon, D., & Drake, B. (2009). Organizational narcissism and virtuous behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edds, K. (2003). On deck, at bat, and increasingly, in court: High school coaches face lawsuits from disappointed parents, The Washington Post, p. A3.

  • Europe’s entitlement reckoning. (2011). Wall Street Journal (Online), 16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/abiglobal/docview/902758584/1392B20B02A58DAE781/3?accountid=2837

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: a natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: studies in the psychology of deservingness. Hingham: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2003). Distinguishing between deservingness and entitlement: earned outcomes versus lawful outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (2008). Perceived legitimacy of a promotion decision in relation to deservingness, entitlement, and resentment in the context of affirmative action and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1230–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Johnstone, C. (2001). Social norms, entitlement, and deservingness: differential reactions to agressive behavior of schizophrenic and personality disorder patients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 755–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillion, K. (2006). What your profs really think. Macleans’s, 119, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, G. M. (2010). “I want it all and I want it now!” an examination of the etiology, expression, and escalation of excessive employee entitlement. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, T., & Goldberg, L. (2003). Getting what they asked for: There’s no paucity of perks at the top, but at least investors are getting a glimpse into the executive suite (p. 1). Chronicle: The Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, T. M. (1992). The emerging right to democratic government. American Journal of International Law, 86, 46–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Generation ‘why?’. (2008, October 1). Accountancy, 142, 18.

  • Greenhaus, J. H., Seidel, C., & Marinas, M. (1983). The impact of expectations and values on job attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 394–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Z., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M., Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2008). Keeping up with the joneses: a field study of the relationships among upward, lateral, and downward comparisons and pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 665–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., & Harris, K. J. (2010). Frustration-based outcomes of entitlement and the influence of supervisor communication. Human Relations, 63, 1639–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., & Martinko, M. J. (2009). An empirical examination of the role of attributions in psychological entitlement and its outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 459–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, L. Q., & Lindsey, J. D. (1983). The effects of trait anxiety and test difficulty on undergraduates’ state anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 113, 289–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. (1976). Rational choice and social exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Knez, M., & Camerer, C. (1993). The strategic management of the entitlement process in the employment relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochwarter, W. A., Summers, J. K., Thompson, K. W., Perrewe, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2010). Strain reactions to perceived entitlement behavior by others as a contextual stressor: moderating role of political skill in three samples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1964). Leaders, groups, and influence. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: some preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1055–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: the equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jex, S. M., & Beehr, T. A. (1991). Emerging theoretical and methodological issues in the study of work-related stress. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 9, 311–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: a core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. (2001). Broken promises: equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W. C., Hinson, T. D., & Day, D. D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., & Chertkoff, J. M. (1973). A bargaining theory of coalition formation. Psychological Review, 80, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondrasuk, J. N., Reed, L. J., & Jurinski, J. J. (2002). The dangers of misclassifying “employees”: Microsoft litigation emphasizes distinctions between employees and nontraditional workers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Roberts, K., Fisher, S., & DeMarr, B. (1998). Career self-management: a quasi-experimental assessment of the effects of a training intervention. Personnel Psychology, 51, 935–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, K., Martensen, A., & Gronholdt, L. (1999). Measuring the impact of buying behavior on customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 10, 602–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labich, K. (1999, September 6). No more crude at Texaco. Fortune, 205-212.

  • Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: a theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167–218). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (2006). The price of privilege. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., & Smithson, J. (2001). Sense of entitlement to support for the reconciliation of employment and family life. Human Relations, 54, 1455–1481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maconachie, G., & Goodwin, M. (2010). Employer evasion of workers’ entitlements 1986-1995: Why, what and whose? Journal of Industrial Relations, 52, 419–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: the role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 293–355). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martocchio, J. J. (2011). Employee benefits: a primer for human resource professionals (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2011). Compensation (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, S. E., Minsky, B. D., & Sturman, M. C. (2002). The use of the concept ‘entitlement’ in management literature: a historical review, synthesis, and discussion of compensation policy implications. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: corporations, cults, and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. A. L. (1995). The turnover process in organizations: an exploration of the role of met-unmet expectations. Human Relations, 48, 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, S. (2003, June 23). Over the line: A staffer ordered to commit fraud balked, then caved, The Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A6.

  • Raghavan, A., Kranhold, K., & Barrionuevo, A. (2002). How Enron bosses created a culture of pushing limits, The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.

  • Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, M. (2009). Student expectations seen as causing grade disputes, The New York Times, p. 15.

  • Rynes, S. (2007). Let’s create a tipping point: what academics and practitioners can do, alone and together. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1046–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, R. J. (2003). CEO welfare, The Washington Post, p. A23.

  • Sauley, K. S., & Bedian, A. G. (2000). Equity sensitivity: construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26, 885–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, D. R. (1996). Power rewards: Rewards that really motivate. Management Review, 45-50.

  • Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and entitlement in marriage: benefits and barriers. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: justice in close relationships (pp. 229–258). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2005). I’m Doing the best I can (for myself): leadership and variance of harvesting in social dilemmas. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, M. C., Boudreau, J. W., & Corcoran, R. J. (1996). Why do employees keep choosing the high-premium health care plan? an investigation of the financial consequences and logic of employee health care plan selections. Human Resource Management, 35, 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannebaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, J. E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: the influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: a psychological approach. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, E. C., & Bockanic, W. N. (2009). Avoiding liability for wrongful termination: “ready, aim, … fire!”. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 21, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation Me. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic: living in the age of entitlement`. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Self-benefiting behavior in the allocation of scarce resources: leader-follower differences and the moderating effect of social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1352–1361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1975). Police socialization: a longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 206–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Poland, T. D., Premack, S. L., & Davis, K. S. (1992). The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change: measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group & Organization Management, 25, 132–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weathington, B. L., & Tetrick, L. E. (2000). Compensation or right: an analysis of employee “fringe” benefit perception. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional model of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellner, A. S. (2004). Spoiled brats. HR Magazine, 61–65.

  • Zaslow, J. (2007). The most-praised generation goes to work, The Wall Street Journal, p. W1.

  • Zitek, E. M., Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., & Leach, F. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Industrial Relations, College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, PO Box 6025, Morgantown, WV, 26506-6025, USA

    Edward C. Tomlinson

Authors
  1. Edward C. Tomlinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward C. Tomlinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomlinson, E.C. An Integrative Model of Entitlement Beliefs. Employ Respons Rights J 25, 67–87 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-012-9208-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-012-9208-4

Key words

Search

Navigation