Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Privacy and Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: A Model of Managerial Cognition and Relational Trust Development

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of experience at the current organization, prior experience at other organizations, and individual propensity to trust on workplace electronic monitoring and trust formation between employees and management. Taking a cognitive approach, these relationships are investigated through the lens of cognitive categorization theory. The paper discusses trustworthiness as the category label of a group of traits and behaviors that subsequently leads to lower levels of turnover, increased organizational commitment, and lower levels of electronic monitoring. Organizational and individual level outcomes are explored with respect to electronic monitoring procedures in organizations. The discussion focuses on implications for practice and future research as well as several ethical and managerial implications, and provides recommendations regarding implementation of electronic monitoring systems for managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar, F. J. (1998). Corporations, ethics in. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Vol. 1.

  • Alder, G. S. (2001). Employee reactions to electronic performance monitoring: A consequence of organizational culture. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G., & Smithson, H. (2001). Internet Surveillance: The Effects of Notification Policies on Privacy and Procedural Justice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Alder, G. S. (2000). Designing, implementing, and utilizing computerized performance monitoring: Enhancing organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, 187–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., Alder, G. S., & Noel, T. W. (1998). Electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of rights. In Schminke, M. (Ed.), Managerial Ethics: Moral Management of People and Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

  • American Management Association, “2001 AMA Survey: Workplace Monitoring and Surveillance.” http://www.amanet.org/research/pdfs/Email_Policies_Practices.pdf.

  • American Management Association, “2003 AMA Survey: Email Policies, Rules and Practices” http://www.amanet.org/research/pdfs/Email_Policies_Practices.pdf.

  • American Management Association, “2004 AMA Survey: Workplace E-mail and Instant Messaging.” http://www.amanet.org/research/index.htm.

  • Argandona, A. (1999). Sharing out in alliances: Trust and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Saks, A. M. (1996). Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 149–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohach v. City of Reno, 932F. Supp. 1232 (D. Nev. 1996).

  • Boon, S. D., & Holmes, J. G. (1991). The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In Hinde, R. A., & Groebel, J. (Eds.), Cooperation and Pro-social Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwin, M. (1993). Timing is everything. Small Business Reports, November, 43–51.

  • Brown, W. S. (1996). Technology, workplace privacy, and personhood. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1237–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. R., & Gray, G. R. (1988). A positive alternative to employment at will. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 53, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylinski, G. (1991). How companies spy on employees. Fortune, November 4, 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College. (2003). Survey “Yous’ve Got Mail ... And the Boss Knows.”

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottone, E. R. (2002). Employee protection from unjust discharge: A proposal for judicial reversal of the terminable at will doctrine. Santa Clara Law Review, 42, 1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • DS’Art, D., & Turner, T. (2003). Independent collective representation: Providing effectiveness, fairness, and democracy in the employment relationship. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, I. (2004). Privacy concerns regarding the monitoring of instant messaging in the workplace: Is it big brother or just business? Nevada Law Journal, 5, 319–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douthitt, E. A., & Aiello, J. R. (2001). The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 867–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1997). Some privacy, please, for e-mail. New York Times, November 23, BU12.

  • Fairweather, N. B. (1999). Surveillance in employment: The case of teleworking. Journal of Business Ethics, 22, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas, C. P. (2004). 1984 is still fiction: Electronic monitoring in the workplace and U.S. privacy law. Duke Law and Technology Review, 15.

  • Feldman, C. D. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6, 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer v. Mt. Olive Lutheran Church, 207 F. Supp. 2d 914, 922, 928 (W. D. Wis. 2002).

  • Foti, R. J., & Lord, R. G. (1987). Prototypes and scripts: The effects of alternative methods of processing information on rating accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 318–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, J. T. A., & Mansfield, N. R. (2003) The information revolution and its impact on the employment relationship: An analysis of the cyberspace workplace. American Business Law Journal, 40, 301–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, M. J., & Stevens, C. D. (2003). Sign this agreement not to compete or yous’re fired! Non-compete agreements and the public policy exception to employment at will. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15, 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. S. (1997). Occupational Crime, 2nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, E. R., Canzoneri, C., & Annamma, J. (2000). Workplace testing, monitoring and surveillance: Summary of key findings. American Management Association. Accessed via Internet at http://www.amanet.org/research/pdfs/monitr_surv.pdf.

  • Greenlaw, P. S., & Prundeanu, C. (1997). The impact of federal legislation to limit electronic monitoring. Public Personnel Management, 26, 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, A. (1997). On the office PC, bosses opt for all work, and no play. New York Times, September 22, A1, D11.

  • Hart, P., & Saunders, C. (1997). Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science, 8, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, L. C. (2002). Methods and extent of employer use of electronic monitoring and surveillance. Employee Privacy Law, 1: Section 8A:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, T. J., Englander, F., & Englander, V. (1999). Ethical, legal, and economic aspects of employer monitoring of employee electronic mail. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. G. (1991). Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. In Jones, W. H., & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 2, 57–104. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovorka-Mead, A., Ross, W. H., Whipple, T., & Brenchin, M. B. (2002). Watching the detectives: Seasonal student employee reactions to electronic monitoring with and without advance notification. Personnel Psychology, 55, 329–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallman, E. (1993). Electronic monitoring of employees: Issues and guidelines. Journal of Systems Management, June, 17–21.

  • King, N. J. (2003). Electronic monitoring to promote national security impacts workplace privacy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15, 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, 302 F. 3d 868, 870 (9th Cir. 2002).

  • Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laabs, J. J. (1992). Surveillance: Tool or trap? Personnel Journal, June, 96–104.

  • Leahy, M. C. M. (2002). Recovery and reconstruction of electronic email as evidence. American Jurisprudence Proof of Facts (3d.), 41, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In Bunker, B. B., & Rubin, J. Z. (Eds.), Conflict, Cooperation and Justice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., & Foti, R. J. (1986). Schema theories, information processing, and organizational behavior. In Sims Jr., H. P., & Gioia, D. A. (Eds.), The Thinking Organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. T., & Sherizen, S. (1987). Corporations that spy on their employees. Business and Society Review, 60, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren v. Microsoft Corporation, 1999 WL 339015 (Tex. App. 1999) (unpublished opinion).

  • Meindl, J. R., Stubbart, C., & Porac, J. F. (1996). Cognition Within and Between Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello, J. A. (2003). The evolving nature of the employment relationship: Reconsidering employee responsibilities and rights. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15, 99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhl, C. J. (2003). Workplace e-mail and Internet use: Employees and employers beware. Monthly Labor Review, 126, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Workrights Institute (2004). Report “Privacy Under Siege: Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace”.

  • Nissenbaum, H. (2004), Symposium: Technology, values, and the justice system: Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 119–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. A. (2003). New kind of snooping arrives at the office. New York Times, July 13, 3.12

  • Oz, E., Glass, & Behling. (1999). Electronic workplace monitoring: What employees think. Omega, 27, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, M. (1994). February. Working under an electronic thumb. Training, 31, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, T. J., & Werhane, P. H. (2003). Employment-at-will, employee rights, and future directions for employment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, S. (1998). Computer and information ethics. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Vol. 1.

  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 27–47. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R. S. (1999). The workplace on the verge of the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 22, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, L. E. (2000). Privacy or dignity: Electronic monitoring in the workplace. New York Law Journal of International and Comparative Law, 19, 379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 615–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustad, M. L., & Koenig, T. H. (2003) Cybertorts and legal lag: An empirical analysis. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 13, 77–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth v. Pillsbury Co., 914 F. Supp. 97 (E. D. Pa. 1996).

  • Stoney, A. (2001). Employee reactions to electronic performance monitoring: A consequence of organizational culture. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traub, S. H. (1996). Battling employee crime: A review of corporate strategies and programs. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. T., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Whither trust? In Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. v. Simmons, 206 F. 3d 392 (4th Cir. 2000).

  • Velasquez, M. G. (2002). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H. (1999). Justice and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H., & Radin, T. J. (1996). Employment-at-will and due process. In Donaldson, T., & Werhane, P. H. (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. F. (1992). Two key factors that belong in a macro ergonomics analysis of electronic performance monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 35–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, P. (1979). Trust and distrust. In Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Towson University, Towson, Maryland

    Filiz Tabak & William P. Smith

Authors
  1. Filiz Tabak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William P. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filiz Tabak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tabak, F., Smith, W.P. Privacy and Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: A Model of Managerial Cognition and Relational Trust Development. Employ Respons Rights J 17, 173–189 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-6940-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-6940-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation