Abstract
Adaptive reuse of buildings is considered a superior alternative for the renewal of today’s built environment. However, little research has been done for assessing adaptive reuse building projects in terms of life cycle and Circular Economy. Because of the great impact that the building industry has on the environment, failing to optimize buildings’ useful life can result in their residual life cycle expectancy not being fully exploited, and with it, wasting the resources embedded therein, such as Primary Energy Demand. The aim of this study is to develop and test a methodology to analyze the net environmental impacts as well as the building’s cost performance of an adaptive reuse project. This paper focuses on the analysis of the structural system. Results show that the adaptive reuse of the building structure produces a considerable decrease in the environmental impacts and the construction building cost. Distribution of cost among materials and equipment is different from those for a new building, while the distribution cost for labor remains the similar. This study objectively demonstrates the considerable benefits of the adaptive reuse of the structure of an existing asset. In contrast, the non-structural building subsystems have been identified as an area with high potential for improving the existing inefficiencies during the adaptive reuse process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigwi IE, Egbelakin T, Ingham J (2018) Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilised historical buildings: towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centres. Int J Build Pathol Adapt 36(4):385–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007
Asdrubali F, Baldassarri C, Fthenakis V (2013) Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy Build 64:73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018
Azari R, Abbasabadi N (2018) Embodied energy of buildings: a review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends. Energy Build 168:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.003
Ball R (1999) Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant industrial buildings. Build Res Inf 27(3):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132199369480
Beccali M, Cellura M, Fontana M et al (2013) Energy retrofit of a single-family house: life cycle net energy saving and environmental benefits. Renew Sust Energy Rev 27:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.040
Blengini GA, Di Carlo T (2010) The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy Build 42(6):869–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.009
Boyko CT, Davey CL, Cooper R et al (2006) Addressing sustainability early in the urban design process. Manag Environ Qual 17(6):689–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830610702520
Bullen PA (2007) Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings. Facilities 25(1/2):20–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770710716911
Cabeza LF, Rincon L, Vilarino V et al (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 29:394–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037
Canadian Industrial Energy End‐use Data and Analysis Centre (CIEEDAC) (2016) CIEEDAC Database on Energy, Production and Intensity Indicators for Canadian Industry. http://naicsdb.rem.sfu.ca/CIEEDACweb/mod.php?mod=NAICSPublic&menu=1602. Accessed 15 July 2016
Cantell SF (2005) The adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings: regulation barriers, best practices and case studies. Master dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Chastas P, Theodosiou T, Bikas D (2016) Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: a literature review. Build Environ 105:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.040
Conejos S (2013) Designing for future building adaptive reuse. Doctoral Dissertation, Institute of Sustainable Development and Architecture, Bond University
Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2011) Improving the implementation of adaptive reuse strategies for historic buildings
Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2013) AdaptSTAR model: a climate-friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainability. Habitat Int 37:95–103
Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2014) Designing for better building adaptability: a comparison of adaptSTAR and ARP models. Habitat Int 41:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.002
Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2015) Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset: a comparison of adaptstar and adaptive reuse potential (ARP) models. Facilities 33(9–10):531–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0011
Conejos S, Langston C, Chan EHW et al (2016) Governance of heritage buildings: australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Build Res Inf 44(5–6):507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951
Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2014) IR242-2—Front end planning of renovation and revamp projects Version 1.1
Esther Yakubu I, Egbelakin T, Dizhur D et al (2017) Why are older inner-city buildings vacant? Implications for town centre regeneration. J Urban Regener Renew 11(1):44–59
Hein MF, Houck KD (2008) Construction challenges of adaptive reuse of historical buildings in Europe. Int J Constr Educ Res 4(2):115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578770802229466
Highfield D, Gorse C (2009) Refurbishment and upgrading of buildings, 2nd, ed edn. Taylor & Francis Group, New York
Huovila P (2007) Buildings and climate change: status, challenges, and opportunities. UNEP/Earthprint
Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2015) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 14040 Environmental Management—Life cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework
Jalaei F (2015) Integrate Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Sustainable Design at the Conceptual Stage of Building Projects. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ottawa
Jalaei F, Jrade A (2014) An automated BIM model to conceptually design, analyze, simulate, and assess sustainable building projects. J Constr Eng 2014:672896. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/672896
KT Innovations® (2015) Tally Methods. http://www.choosetally.com/methods/. Accessed 15 July 2016
KT Innovations®, Thinkstep®, Autodesk® (2019) Tally—methods. https://choosetally.com/methods/. Accessed 8 May 2019
Kibert CJ (2007) The next generation of sustainable construction. Build Res Inf 35(6):595–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701467040
Kokkos A (2014) Computational Modelling tools for the promotion of Design for Deconstruction. Master dissertation, Delft University of Technology
Langston C (2008) The sustainability implications of building adaptive reuse. In: Feng C, Yu M, Zhao Z (eds) CRIOCM 2008 international research symposium on advancement of construction management and real estate, Beijing, China, October 31–November 3, 2008, vol 8. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
Langston C, Shen L (2007) Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: a case study of Lui Seng Chun. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 11(4):193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1648715X.2007.9637569
Langston C, Wong FKW, Hui ECM et al (2008) Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Build Environ 43(10):1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017
Larkham P (2002) Conservation and the City. Routledge, London
Liu B, Wang D, Xu Y et al (2018) Embodied energy consumption of the construction industry and its international trade using multi-regional input–output analysis. Energy Build 173:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.040
Love P, Bullen P (2011) A new future for the past: a model for adaptive reuse decision-making. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag 1(1):32–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441241111143768
Matthews J, Dyson K, Love PED (2016) Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag 6(1):44–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002
Mohamed R, Boyle R, Yang AY et al (2017) Adaptive reuse: a review and analysis of its relationship to the 3 Es of sustainability. Facilities 35(3/4):138–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-12-2014-0108
Moncaster AM, Pomponi F, Symons KE et al (2018) Why method matters: temporal, spatial and physical variations in LCA and their impact on choice of structural system. Energy Build 173:389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.039
National Energy Board (2016) Commodity Prices and Trade Updates. https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/ntgrtd/mrkt/prcstrdrtcl/index-eng.html?pedisable=true. Accessed 15 July 2016
Natural Resources Canada (2016) Transportation Fuel Prices. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/fuel-prices/4593. Accessed 15 July 2016
Peuportier B (2001) Life cycle assessment applied to the comparative evaluation of single family houses in the French context. Energy Build 33(5):443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00101-8
Pinard A, Wade M (2012) Listing of non-designated properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the municipal heritage register CSD-12-036
RSMeans (2013) Building Construction Cost Data, 71st ed. edn. R.S. Means Company, Inc, United States of America
Sanchez B, Haas C (2018a) Capital project planning for a circular economy. Constr Manag Econ 36(6):303–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1435895
Sanchez B, Haas C (2018b) A novel selective disassembly sequence planning method for adaptive reuse of buildings. J Clean Prod 183:998–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.201
Sandin G, Peters GM, Svanstrom M (2014) Life cycle assessment of construction materials: the influence of assumptions in end-of-life modelling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):723–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0686-x
Schultmann F, Sunke N (2007) Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning. Build Res Inf 35(6):602–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701431210
Shindell DT (2015) The social cost of atmospheric release. Clim Change 130(2):313–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0
Shipley R, Utz S, Parsons M (2006) Does adaptive reuse pay? A study of the business of building renovation in Ontario, Canada. Int J Herit Stud 12(6):505–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600940181
Sugden E (2018) The Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage Buildings: A Multiple-Case Studies Approach. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo
Tan Y, Shen L, Langston C (2014) A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 18(1):66–76. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.864718
Unalan B, Tanrivermis H, Bulbul M et al (2016) Impact of embodied carbon in the life cycle of buildings on climate change for a sustainable future. Int J Hous Sci Appl 40(1):61–71
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2016) Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative. http://www.unep.org/sbci/AboutSBCI/Background.asp. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2017) Tool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI). https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/tool-reduction-and-assessment-chemicals-and-other-environmental-impacts-traci. Accessed 8 May 2019 2015
Van Ast L, Maclean R, Sireyjol A (2013) White paper: Valuing water to drive more effective decisions. Truecost PLC white paper
Vilches A, Garcia-Martinez A, Sanchez-Montañes B (2017) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: a literature review. Energy Build 135:286–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042
Viscusi WK (2005) Monetizing the benefits of risk and environmental regulation. Fordham Urban Law J 33(4):1003
Wilkinson SJ, James K, Reed R (2009) Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Struct Surv 27(1):46–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910941683
Wilson C (2010) Adaptive reuse of industrial buildings in Toronto, Ontario: evaluating criteria for determining building selection. Master dissertation, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen’s University
Wu W, Issa RRA (2015) An integrated green BIM process model (IGBPM) for BIM execution planning in green building projects. In: Issa RRA, Olbina S (eds) Building information modeling: applications and practices. American society of civil engineers (ASCE), Reston, p 135
Yeung J (2016) Development of Analysis Tools for the Facilitation of Increased Structural Steel Reuse. Doctoral dissertation, UWSpace
Yeung J, Walbridge S, Haas C et al (2017) Understanding the total life cycle cost implications of reusing structural steel. Environ Syst Decis 37(1):101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9621-6
Yudelson J (2009) Greening existing buildings. New York, USA
Yung EHK, Chan EHW (2012) Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat Int 36(3):352–361
Zabalza Bribian I, Aranda Uson A, Scarpellini S (2009) Life cycle assessment in buildings: state-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build Environ 44(12):2510–2520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the energy Council of Canada (ECC) and the Waterloo Institute for Sustainable Energy (WISE) for providing support for this research paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchez, B., Esnaashary Esfahani, M. & Haas, C. A methodology to analyze the net environmental impacts and building’s cost performance of an adaptive reuse project: a case study of the Waterloo County Courthouse renovations. Environ Syst Decis 39, 419–438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09734-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09734-2