Skip to main content
Log in

Does the combination of low-carbon and innovative policies promote the high-quality development of enterprises?—A quasi-natural experiment based on the “dual pilot” of low carbon and innovation cities

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-carbon and innovative policies have been proven to be effective means of addressing environmental externalities and innovation externalities, and assessing the potential impacts of their combined effects on economic development is an integral part of policy evaluation. Drawing from the quasi-natural experiment concerning innovative and low-carbon cities, we build a time-varying DID model to investigate the economic consequences of combining environmental and innovative policies. By monitoring the listed companies in China’s manufacturing sector from 2009 to 2020, the effects of the excellent creation of “dual-pilot” policies are investigated from the perspective of total factor productivity (TFP). According to the study, combination policies boost total factor productivity and facilitate high-quality development among Chinese enterprises. Robustness tests, such as correcting for time trends, replacing variable measures, and placebo tests, all show that this conclusion remains valid. The mechanism test finds that when environmental and innovation policies are combined, total factor productivity in the business sector is boosted. This is because, among other things, technical innovation and labor distortion both impact businesses’ ability to launch green innovation and optimize the efficiency with which they allocate resources. Further analysis reveals that the combination of policies is more likely to affect critical urban firms, highly polluting firms, and state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The findings provide important insights for further comprehensive roll-out on low-carbon policy and innovative policy combinations for high-quality enterprise development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

References

  • Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Q., Salman, A., & Parveen, S. (2022). Evaluating the effects of environmental management practices on environmental and financial performance of firms in Malaysia: The mediating role of ESG disclosure. Heliyon, 8(12).

  • Aslam, S., Elmagrhi, M. H., Rehman, R. U., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Environmental management practices and financial performance using data envelopment analysis in Japan: The mediating role of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1655–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. A. (2011). Local environmental regulation and plant-level productivity. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2516–2522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeing, P. (2016). The allocation and affectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies: Evidence from listed Firms[J]. Research Policy, 45(9), 1774–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechezleprêtre, A., Koźluk, T., Kruse, T., Nachtigall, D., & De Serres, A. (2019). Do environmental and economic performance go together? A review of micro-level empirical evidence from the past decade or so. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 13(1–2), 1–118. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., Tong, X., Li, X., Zhou, J., Wang, S., & Liu, B. (2019). Some developments and new insights of environmental problems and deep mining strategy for cleaner production in mines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1562–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Y., Yang, M., Huang, L., Chin, T., Fiano, F., de Nuccio, E., & Zhou, L. (2022). Unveiling the impacts of explicit vs. tacit knowledge hiding on innovation quality: The moderating role of knowledge flow within a firm. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1489–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S., Huang, H., Mbanyele, W., Guo, Z., & Zhang, C. (2023). Inclusive green growth for sustainable development of cities in China: Spatiotemporal differences and influencing factors. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(4), 11025–11045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., Tang, H., & Mou, M. (2023). Innovation-driven development and urban carbon emission reduction: A quasi-natural experiment in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 8002–8019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, K., & Yuan, Y. (2021). The effect of innovation-driven development on pollution reduction: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R., & Yuan, Y. (2020). Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: Evidence from Chinese provincial data. Energy Policy, 145, 111747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 5(1), 90.

  • Hong, Z., Wang, H., & Gong, Y. (2019). Green product design considering functional-product reference. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., Wang, H., & Liu, Z. (2021). The impact of the free trade zone on green total factor productivity——evidence from the Shanghai pilot free trade zone. Energy Policy, 148, 112000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, I., Zakari, A., Zhang, J., Dagar, V., & Singh, S. (2022a). A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: New insights from three trilemma leadership. Energy, 248, 123619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, I., Zakari, A., Dagar, V., & Singh, S. (2022b). World energy trilemma and transformative energy developments as determinants of economic growth amid environmental sustainability. Energy Economics, 108, 105884.

  • Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Li, Z., Su, C. W., Umar, M., & Shao, X. (2022). Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic policy uncertainty on China’s carbon emissions trading market price: Do different types of uncertainty matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, R., Wen, X., & Zhu, S. (2023). The impact of emission charges on the quality of corporate innovation: Based on the perspective of breakthrough technological innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. L., & Yang, Y. B. (2021). Macro tax burden, R&D subsidies and innovation-driven long-term economic growth. Economic Research, 56(05), 40–57. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, S., Yimamu, N., Li, Y., Wu, H., Irfan, M., & Hao, Y. (2023). Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1847–1871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv, C., Shao, C., & Lee, C. C. (2021). Green technology innovation and financial development: Do environmental regulation and innovation output matter? Energy Economics, 98, 105237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv, K., Zhu, S., Liang, R., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Environmental regulation, breakthrough technological innovation and total factor productivity of firms–evidence from emission charges of China. Applied Economics, 1–15.

  • Ma, D., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development. Journal of Business Research, 145, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, N., Zhao, Y., Lou, Q., & Geng, J. (2022). Role of environmental regulations and eco-innovation in energy structure transition for green growth: Evidence from OECD. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGavock, T. (2021). Here waits the bride? The effect of Ethiopia’s child marriage law. Journal of Development Economics, 149, 102580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley, S., & Pakes, A. (1992). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry.

  • Pan, X., & Yu, L. (2024). Do China’s pilot emissions trading schemes lead to domestic carbon leakage? Perspective from the firm relocation. Energy Economics, 107334.

  • Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B. K., & Ghosh, J. (2022). A computable general equilibrium (CGE) assessment of technological progress and carbon pricing in India’s green energy transition via furthering its renewable capacity. Energy Economics, 106, 105788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S. G., Zheng, J. J., Liu, D. H., & Chen, X. H. (2019). Does the emissions Trading mechanism increase total factor Productivity of firms-evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Industrial Economics, 05, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Sun, H., & Tang, Y. (2022). CEO’s Hometown Identity and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management, 01492063221104988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920632211049.

  • Ren, S., Huang, M., Liu, D., & Yan, J. (2023). Understanding the impact of mandatory CSR disclosure on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. British Journal of Management, 34(2), 576–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, X., Zhang, X., Yan, C., & Gozgor, G. (2022a). Climate policy uncertainty and firm-level total factor productivity: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 113, 106209.

  • Shao, S., Hu, Z., Cao, J., Yang, L., & Guan, D. (2020). Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: A review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1465–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H., Li, J., He, M., Li, J., Zhi, D., Qin, F., & Zhang, C. (2021). Global evolution of research on green energy and environmental technologies: A bibliometric study. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, 113382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TitusJr, V., O’Brien, J. P., & Dixit, J. (2022). Does performance breed slack? Ownership as a contingency to the performance feedback and slack relationship. Journal of Management, 48(5), 1270–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, J., Liu, W., & Xue, J. (2016). Environmental regulation, factor input structure and transformation and upgrading of industrial sectors. Economic Research, 51(7), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Xu, M., & Ma, S. (2021). The effect of the spatial heterogeneity of human capital structure on regional green total factor productivity. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. A., Liu, X., Li, H., & Yang, C. (2023). Analyzing the impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on enterprises’ labor demand: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 124, 106676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., Hao, Y., & Ren, S. (2020). How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 91, 104880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Qu, Y., Huang, H., & Xia, Y. (2023). Carbon emission trading policy and corporate green innovation: Internal incentives or external influences. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 31501–31523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, R., & Teo, T. S. (2022). Green technology innovation, environmental externality, and the cleaner upgrading of industrial structure in China—considering the moderating effect of environmental regulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Cui, J., B (2020). Low-carbon cities and firms’ green technological innovation. China Industrial Economics, (12), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2020.12.008. (In Chinese).

  • Yang, L. S., Zhu, J. P., & Jia, Z. J. (2019). Influencing factors and current challenges of China’s carbon emission reduction realization - based on the perspective of technological progress. Economic Research,2019,54(11):118–132.

  • Yang, S., Jahanger, A., & Hossain, M. R. (2023). How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Energy Economics, 118, 106523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, S., Zhou, R., Li, M., & Lv, C. (2023). Investigating the influence of digital technology application on employee compensation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S., Jin, G., Tan, K., & Liu, X. (2023). Can low-carbon city construction reduce carbon intensity? Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Zheng, T. (2023). Can dual pilot policy of innovative city and low carbon city promote green lifestyle transformation of residents? Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Fei, H., Zhang, Y., & Liu, B. (2015). Regulatory uncertainty and corporate pollution control strategies: An empirical study of the ‘Pay for Permit’policy in the Tai Lake Basin. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Hao, Y., & Liu, Z. (2021a). Shooting two hawks with one arrow: Could China’s emission trading scheme promote green development efficiency and regional carbon equality? Energy Economics, 101, 105412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Yu, L., & Sun, C. (2022). How does urban environmental legislation guide the green transition of enterprises? Based on the perspective of enterprises’ green total factor productivity. Energy Economics, 110, 106032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Liang, C., & Zhang, X. (2021). Positive or negative externalities? Exploring the spatial spillover and industrial agglomeration threshold effects of environmental regulation on haze pollution in China. Environment Development and Sustainability, 23, 11335–11356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siwei Zhu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, F., Zhao, Y., Liang, R. et al. Does the combination of low-carbon and innovative policies promote the high-quality development of enterprises?—A quasi-natural experiment based on the “dual pilot” of low carbon and innovation cities. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04979-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04979-7

Keywords

Navigation