Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate environmental governance and firm value: beyond greenwashing for sustainable development

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate greenwashing is becoming more common as a result of companies' growing awareness of the need to protect the environment and help to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. This study analyzes the relationship between corporate environmental governance (CEG) and firm value from short- and long-term perspectives. It is based on balanced panel data of 575 Chinese-listed companies in high-polluting industries from 2012 to 2018. The findings demonstrate that, first, there is no correlation between CEG and firm value during either the current or the first lag period, suggesting that corporate environmental governance has no discernible short-term effects on company value. Second, in the second and third eras, there is a noteworthy positive association between CEG and company value, suggesting that, over time, corporate environmental governance can considerably raise the business's future value. Corporate environmental governance significantly increases business value over the long run. This study goes beyond only offering greenwashing; instead, it offers some policy implications for businesses to be sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Bai, Y., Song, S., Jiao, J., & Yang, R. (2019). The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 819–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Business & Society, 50(2), 233–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L., & He, C. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility and equity prices. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Ma, Y. (2021). Does green investment improve energy firm performance? Energy Policy, 153, 112252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2021). COVID-19 and the opportunity to create a sustainable world through economic and political decisions. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 18(4), 417–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2022a). European Union policies and their role in combating climate change over the years. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 15(8), 1333–1340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2022b). Circular economy and sustainability as a basis for economic recovery post-COVID-19. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30, 122–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custodio, C. (2014). Mergers and acquisitions accounting and the diversification discount. The Journal of Finance, 69(1), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dost, M., Pahi, M. H., Magsi, H. B., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Influence of the best practices of environmental management on green product development. Journal of Environmental Management, 241, 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsayed, K., & Paton, D. (2005). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2013). Corporate environmental, economic performance of Japanese manufacturing firms: Empirical study for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, L., Nilsson, H., & Nyquist, S. (2005). The value relevance of environmental performance. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Long, W. B., Song, X. Z., & Tang, T. J. (2020). The driving force in corporate environmental governance: Turnover of environmental protection department directors as an indicator. Nankai Business Review International, 11, 253–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, H., & Okada, K. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1691–1700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jara, M., López-Iturriaga, F., San-Martín, P., & Saona, P. (2019). Corporate governance in Latin American firms: Contestability of control and firm value. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(4), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 351–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorge, M. L., Madueño, J. H., Martínez-Martínez, D., & Sancho, M. P. L. (2015). Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises: Is there a direct link? Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurshid, A., Khan, K., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). 2030 Agenda of sustainable transport: Can current progress lead towards carbon neutrality? Transportation Research Part d: Transport and Environment, 122, 103869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafuente-Lechuga, M., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Faura-Martínez, Ú. (2020). Mathematics applied to the economy and sustainable development goals: A necessary relationship of dependence. Education Sciences, 10(11), 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, X., Yue, S., & Chen, H. (2022). Can green credit increase firm value? Evidence from Chinese listed new energy companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 18702–18720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Li, W., Seppänen, V., & Koivumäki, T. (2023). Effects of greenwashing on financial performance: Moderation through local environmental regulation and media coverage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 820–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Lu, X. (2016). Institutional interest, ownership type, and environmental capital expenditures: Evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 459–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Liao, G., & Albitar, K. (2020). Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Jiang, Y., & Gan, S. (2022). How does D&O insurance affect corporate environmental investment? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 960097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorente, D. B., Mohammed, K. S., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Shahzad, U. (2023). Dynamic connectedness among climate change index, green financial assets and renewable energy markets: Novel evidence from sustainable development perspective. Renewable Energy, 204, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Liang, M., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Guan, H., Mazeikaite, K., & Streimikis, J. (2021). Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 686–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009(89), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K., Nguyen, T. B. H., Trinh, T. Q., Wu, Q., & Kokubu, K. (2021). Are corporate environmental activities to meet sustainable development goals (SDGs) simply greenwashing? An empirical study of environmental management control systems in Vietnamese companies from the stakeholder management perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekovic, S., Grolleau, G., & Mzoughi, N. (2018). Environmental invstment: Too much of a good thing? International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzi, S., Caputo, A., Corvino, A., & Venturelli, A. (2020). Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs): A bibliometric investigation and systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Green and competitiveness: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmen, A., & Lorentzen, B. (2000). Employee participation and cleaner technology: Learning processes in environmental teams. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8, 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Blanco, S., Romero, S., & Fernandez-Feijoo, B. (2022). Green, blue or black, but washing: What company characteristics determine greenwashing? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–22.

  • Sakamoto, M., Ahmed, T., Begum, S., & Huq, H. (2019). Water pollution and the textile industry in Bangladesh: Flawed corporate practices or restrictive opportunities? Sustainability, 11(7), 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seth, R., & Mahenthiran, S. (2022). Impact of dividend payouts and corporate social responsibility on firm value: Evidence from India. Journal of Business Research, 146, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir, M. S., & Wisdom, O. (2020). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39946–39957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, G. D., Shahbaz, M., Singh, S., Chopra, R., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Investigating the nexus between green economy, sustainability, bitcoin and oil prices: Contextual evidence from the United States. Resources Policy, 80, 103168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu, M., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Sustainability policies to reduce pollution in energy supply and waste sectors in the V4 countries. Utilities Policy, 82, 101551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu, M., Radulescu, M., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Pollution and electricity price in the EU Central and Eastern European countries: A sectoral approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(42), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017). Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uche, E., Das, N., Bera, P., & Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2023). Understanding the imperativeness of environmental-related technological innovations in the FDI–Environmental performance nexus. Renewable Energy, 206, 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utomo, M. N., Rahayu, S., Kaujan, K., & Irwandi, S. A. (2020). Environmental performance, environmental disclosure, and firm value: Empirical study of non-financial. Green Finance., 2(1), 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Usman, M., Radulescu, M., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2023). Achieving ecological sustainability through technological innovations, financial development, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption in developing European countries. Gondwana Research, 119, 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Wijem, F., & Heugens, P. P. (2017). Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham, K. L., Earle, A. G., Leyva-de la Hiz, D. I., & Argiolas, A. (2023). The impact of the United Nations sustainable development goals on corporate sustainability reporting. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W., Batten, J. A., Ahmad, A. H., Mohamed-Arshad, S. B., Nordin, S., & Adzis, A. A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters, 39, 101593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, P. L., Han, S. H., & Rho, J. J. (2015). Impact of environmental performance on firm value for sustainable investment: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 402–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, H., Li, X., Huang, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). The impact of the consistency of carbon performance and carbon information disclosure on enterprise value. Finance Research Letters, 37, 101680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousaf, Z., Palazzo, M., Radulescu, M., & Javed, A. (2023). Unleashing the role of greenwashing in the relationship of environmental sustainability thoughts and environmental performance: Exploring the importance of generative leadership. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–20

  • Yu, E. P. Y., Van Luu, B., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., Wang, C., & Dong, Y. (2023). How does firm ESG performance impact financial constraints? An experimental exploration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The European Journal of Development Research, 35(1), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

“This work has been supported by the “Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education of China” “Research on the Driving Mechanism, Realization Path and Policy Optimization of Green Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises under the Targets of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutralization (Grant No. 23YJA630025)”, the Fujian Social Science Planning Project “Research on the Dynamic Mechanism and Path of Green Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises in Fujian Province under the Dual Carbon Targets (Grant No. FJ2022B068)” & “Research on the Influence Mechanism and Effect of Service Industry on the Global Value Chain Status of China's Manufacturing Industry under the Background of RCEP (Grant No. FJ2023B064)”, and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province “Research on the Influencing Mechanism of Business Ecosystem Choice of New Ventures (Grant No.2018A0303130214)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingquan Jiang or Javier Cifuentes-Faura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, H., Jiang, Q., Cifuentes-Faura, J. et al. Corporate environmental governance and firm value: beyond greenwashing for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04375-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04375-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation