Abstract
Global environmental concerns have led countries to take action to transition to renewables. In this context, countries have begun to change their energy patterns to achieve ecological sustainability through the adoption of clean energy sources. Therefore, this study explores the impact of the energy mix on the ecological footprint by using the Fourier ADL and ARDL models for Cameroon from 1980 to 2018. To test the impact of the energy mix, the study adopts non-renewable energy, modern renewable energy, as well as combustible renewables and waste. The empirical findings reveal that GDP and electricity generation from non-renewable energy sources contribute the most to environmental deterioration in Cameroon. Modern renewables and combustible renewables and waste contribute significantly to environmental sustainability and reduce the ecological footprint. This implies that increased use of renewable energy sources, especially modern renewables, can help Cameroon achieve its renewable energy target and contribute to environmental sustainability. To mitigate the harmful impacts of non-renewable energy sources, the country should promote increasing the share of combustible renewables in its energy mix as a clean substitute.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Adedoyin, F. F., Ozturk, I., Agboola, M. O., Agboola, P. O., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). The implications of renewable and non-renewable energy generating in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of economic policy uncertainties. Energy Policy, 150, 112115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112115
AFREC (2022). https://au-afrec.org/index.php/cameroon (Accessed 10 March 2023).
Ahmed, M. M., & Shimada, K. (2019). The effect of renewable energy consumption on sustainable economic development: Evidence from emerging and developing economies. Energies, 12(15), 2954. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152954
Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M. M., Malik, M. N., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67, 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 685, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139
Ansari, M., Akram, V., & Haider, S. (2022). A link between productivity, globalisation and carbon emissions: Evidence from emissions by coal, oil and gas. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(22), 33826–33843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18557-9
Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Hishan, S. S., Nassani, A. A., Sheikh, A. Z., Vo, X. V., & Abro, M. M. Q. (2020). Dynamic linkages between transportation, waste management, and carbon pricing: Evidence from the Arab World. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122151
Aquilas, N. A., & Atemnkeng, J. T. (2022). Climate-related development finance and renewable energy consumption in greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Congo basin. Energy Strategy Reviews, 44, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100971
Bakari, S., & Tiba, S. (2021). The impact of Combustible Renewables and Waste on Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Tunisia. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/108616/ (Accessed 20 August 2023).
Banerjee, P., Arčabić, V., & Lee, H. (2017). Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from crude oil market. Economic Modelling, 67, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.004
Chien, F. (2022). How renewable energy and non-renewable energy affect environmental excellence in N-11 economies? Renewable Energy, 196, 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.013
Christoforidis, T., & Katrakilidis, C. (2021). The dynamic role of institutional quality, renewable and non-renewable energy on the ecological footprint of OECD countries: Do institutions and renewables function as leverage points for environmental sustainability? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 53888–53907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13877-8
Danish, K., & Wang, Z. (2019). Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 670, 1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.268
Demirbas, A. (2008). The sustainability of combustible renewables. Energy Sources, Part A433A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects+A465, 30(12), 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030701258261
Destek, M. A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
Ehigiamusoe, K. U. (2020). A disaggregated approach to analyzing the effect of electricity on carbon emissions: Evidence from African countries. Energy Reports, 6, 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.039
Emir, F., & Karlilar, S. (2023). Application of RALS cointegration test assessing the role of natural resources and hydropower energy on ecological footprint in emerging economy. Energy & Environment, 34(4), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211073807
Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey-Fuller type unit root tests. Economic Letters, 117, 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
Erdogan, S., Pata, U. K., & Solarin, S. A. (2023). Towards carbon-neutral world: The effect of renewable energy investments and technologies in G7 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 186, 113683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113683
Erdogan, S., Sarkodie, S. A., Adedoyin, F. F., Bekun, F. V., & Owusu, P. A. (2022). Analyzing transport demand and environmental degradation: The case of G-7 countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02729-1
Eweade, B. S., Uzuner, G., Akadiri, A. C., & Lasisi, T. T. (2022). Japan energy mix and economic growth nexus: Focus on natural gas consumption. Energy & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221130460
Fontes, C. H. D. O., & Freires, F. G. M. (2018). Sustainable and renewable energy supply chain: A system dynamics overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.033
Global Footprint Network (2023). National footprint accounts. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?cn=32&type=BCpc,EFCpc (Accessed 5 April 2023).
Hadj, T. B. (2021). Nonlinear impact of biomass energy consumption on ecological footprint in a fossil fuel–dependent economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(48), 69329–69342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15521-x
Haug, A. A. (2002). Temporal aggregation and the power of cointegration tests: a monte carlo study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00025
Ibrahiem, D. M., & Hanafy, S. A. (2020). Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: An empirical analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1549–1568. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0029
IEA (2020). Renewables Information: Overview. IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewablesinformation-overview (Accessed 31 August 2023).
IEA (2022). Renewable Electricity, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-electricity, License: CC BY 4.0
IEA-CMR (2023). Cameroon country profile. https://www.iea.org/countries/cameroon (Accessed 30 August 2023).
INDC-CMR (2021). Republique Du Cameroun Contribution Determinee Au Niveau National -Actualisee (Cdn) Nationally Determined Contribution- Updated (NDC). https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/CDN%20r%C3%A9vis%C3%A9e%20CMR%20finale%20sept%202021.pdf (Accessed 20 August 2023).
IRENA-CMR (2022). Cameroon energy profile. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Statistics/Statistical_Profiles/Africa/Cameroon_Africa_RE_SP.pdf (Accessed 31 August 2023).
Jebli, M. B., & Belloumi, M. (2017). Investigation of the causal relationships between combustible renewables and waste consumption and CO2 emissions in the case of Tunisian maritime and rail transport. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 820–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.108
Jebli, M. B., & Youssef, S. B. (2019). Combustible renewables and waste consumption, agriculture, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil. Carbon Management, 10(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1605482
Jena, P. K., Mujtaba, A., Joshi, D. P. P., Satrovic, E., & Adeleye, B. N. (2022). Exploring the nature of EKC hypothesis in Asia’s top emitters: Role of human capital, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 88557–88576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21551-w
Jin, X., Ahmed, Z., Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., & Erdogan, S. (2023). Do investments in green energy, energy efficiency, and nuclear energy R&D improve the load capacity factor? Geoscience Frontiers. An augmented ARDL approach. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101646
Kanat, O., Yan, Z., Asghar, M. M., Ahmed, Z., Mahmood, H., Kirikkaleli, D., & Murshed, M. (2022). Do natural gas, oil, and coal consumption ameliorate environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Russia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4540–4556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15989-7
Karlilar, S., & Emir, F. (2023). Exploring the role of coal consumption, solar, and wind power generation on ecological footprint: Evidence from India using Fourier ADL cointegration test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(9), 24077–24087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23910-z
Kartal, M. T., Pata, U. K., Depren, O., & Erdogan, S. (2023b). Effectiveness of nuclear and renewable electricity generation on CO2 emissions: Daily-based analysis for the major nuclear power generating countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139121
Kartal, M. T. (2022). The role of consumption of energy, fossil sources, nuclear energy, and renewable energy on environmental degradation in top-five carbon producing countries. Renewable Energy, 184, 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.022
Kartal, M. T., Erdogan, S., Alola, A. A., & Pata, U. K. (2023a). Impact of renewable energy investments in curbing sectoral CO2 emissions: Evidence from China by nonlinear quantile approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30282-5
Katircioglu, S. T. (2015). The impact of biomass consumption on CO2 emissions: An empirical investigation from Turkey. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 7(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2014-0077
Koholé, Y. W., Fohagui, F. C. V., & Tchuen, G. (2022). A holistic overview of Cameroon renewable energy sources: Potentials, achievements, challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 43(1), 7308–7320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2068065
Kuşkaya, S., & Bilgili, F. (2020). The wind energy-greenhouse gas nexus: The wavelet-partial wavelet coherence model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118872
Li, R., Wang, X., & Wang, Q. (2022). Does renewable energy reduce ecological footprint at the expense of economic growth? An empirical analysis of 120 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131207
Liu, H., Pata, U. K., Zafar, M. W., Kartal, M. T., Karlilar, S., & Caglar, A. E. (2023). Do oil and natural gas prices affect carbon efficiency? Daily evidence from China by wavelet transform-based approaches. Resources Policy, 85, 104039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104039
Long, X., Naminse, E. Y., Du, J., & Zhuang, J. (2015). Nonrenewable energy, renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in China from 1952 to 2012. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.176
Nathaniel, S. P., & Iheonu, C. O. (2019). Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Science of the Total Environment, 679, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.011
Nathaniel, S. P., Yalçiner, K., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resources Policy, 70, 101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101924
Njoh, A. J., Etta, S., Essia, U., Ngyah-Etchutambe, I., Enomah, L. E., Tabrey, H. T., & Tarke, M. O. (2019). Implications of institutional frameworks for renewable energy policy administration: Case study of the Esaghem, Cameroon community PV solar electrification project. Energy Policy, 128, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.042
Ouédraogo, M., Peng, D., Chen, X., Hashmi, S. H., & Sall, M. I. (2021). Dynamic effect of oil resources on environmental quality: Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for selected African countries. Sustainability, 13(7), 3649. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073649
Our World in Data (2023). Electricity Mix. https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix (Accessed 31 August 2023).
Pata, U. K. (2018). The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy, 160, 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095
Pata, U. K. (2021). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3
Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozkan, O. (2023a). Is reducing fossil fuel intensity important for environmental management and ensuring ecological efficiency in China? Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117080
Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., Adebayo, T. S., & Ullah, S. (2023b). Enhancing environmental quality in the United States by linking biomass energy consumption and load capacity factor. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(3), 101531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101531
Pata, U. K., & Samour, A. (2023). Assessing the role of the insurance market and renewable energy in the load capacity factor of OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 48604–48616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25747-6
Pata, U. K., Wang, Q., Kartal, M. T., & Sharif, A. (2023c). The role of disaggregated renewable energy consumption on income and load capacity factor: A novel inclusive sustainable growth approach. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(1), 101693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101693
Pata, U. K., Yurtkuran, S., Ahmed, Z., & Kartal, M. T. (2023d). Do life expectancy and hydropower consumption affect ecological footprint? Evidence from novel augmented and dynamic ARDL approaches. Heliyon., 9(9), e19567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19567
Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371–413.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545
Rahman, M. M., Ahmed, R., Mashud, A. H. M., Malik, A. I., Miah, S., & Abedin, M. Z. (2022). Consumption-based CO2 emissions on sustainable development goals of SAARC region. Sustainability, 14(3), 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031467
Rashid, A., Irum, A., Malik, I. A., Ashraf, A., Rongqiong, L., Liu, G., & Yousaf, B. (2018). Ecological footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan’s first footprint analysis from urbanization perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.186
REEEP (2018). Energy Profile Cameroon: Policy and Regulation. Prepared by SERN for the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP). http://www.reegle.info/countries/cameroon-energy-profile/CM. (Accessed 3 February 2023).
REN21 (2022). Renewables 2022 Global Status Report (Paris: REN21 Secretariat). ISBN 978–3–948393–04–5
Saint Akadiri, S., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Contemporaneous interaction between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental sustainability in South Africa: What drives what? Science of the Total Environment, 686, 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.421
Sarkodie, S. A., & Adams, S. (2018). Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: Accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 643, 1590–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.320
Shahzad, F., & Fareed, Z. (2023). Examining the relationship between fiscal decentralization, renewable energy intensity, and carbon footprints in Canada by using the newly constructed bootstrap Fourier Granger causality test in quantile. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 4617–4626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22513-y
Shahzad, U., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, F., & Shahzad, K. (2021). Investigating the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint for the United States: New insights from quantile methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123806
Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Kautish, P. (2021). Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867
Sun, J. W. (2004). The IEA’s data on combustible renewables and waste from 1973 to 2000. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 22(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1260/0144598041217329
Sun, Y., Usman, M., Radulescu, M., Pata, U. K., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2023). New insights from the STIPART model on how environmental-related technologies, natural resources and the use of the renewable energy influence load capacity factor. Gondwana Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.05.018
Ulucak, R., Yucel, A. G., & Kocak, E. (2019). The process of sustainability: from past to present. Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) (pp. 37–53). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816797-7.00005-9
UNCTAD (2019). The role of science, technology and innovation in promoting renewable energy by 2030. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2019d2_en.pdf (Accessed 31 August 2023).
Usman, M., & Radulescu, M. (2022). Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: Does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Science of the Total Environment, 841, 156662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156662
Xie, Q., Adebayo, T. S., Irfan, M., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Race to environmental sustainability: Can renewable energy consumption and technological innovation sustain the strides for China? Renewable Energy, 197, 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.138
You, V., & Kakinaka, M. (2022). Modern and traditional renewable energy sources and CO2 emissions in emerging countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 17695–17708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16669-2
Zhang, Q., Shah, S. A. R., & Yang, L. (2022). Modeling the effect of disaggregated renewable energies on ecological footprint in E5 economies: Do economic growth and R&D matter? Applied Energy, 310, 118522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118522
Acknowledgements
None, no fund received.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
UKP worked in software, investigation, formal analysis, and writing—original draft. SK helped in conceptualization, investigation, data curation, methodology, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. BSE worked in investigation, writing—review and editing, and writing—original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Consent for publication
Our study does not contain individual person’s data.
Consent to participate
No human or animal subjects were used in our study, and no questionnaire was conducted.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pata, U.K., Karlilar, S. & Eweade, B.S. An environmental assessment of non-renewable, modern renewable, and combustible renewable energy in Cameroon. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04192-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04192-y