Skip to main content
Log in

Going green: understanding the impacts of economic complexity, clean energy and natural resources on ecological footprint in complex economies

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To counter environmental degradation, policymakers across the world are trying to design a policy framework that focuses on expanding economic sophistication and complexity of production alongside fostering the use of renewable energy and mitigating natural resource depletion. This study aims to investigate how different factors affect the ecological footprint in 50 major complex economies. The study undertakes an extended STIRPAT equation with data from 1990 to 2018. The STIRPAT equation allows us to test the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis and explore the impact of renewable energy use, technology, population, and natural resources. The study utilizes several second-generation econometric techniques such as augmented mean group, mean group, and common correlated effect mean group estimation techniques and a second-generation panel causality test. The outcome of the study reveals the existence of the EKC in these complex economies. Economic complexity, clean energy consumption, and population density have a significant negative impact on ecological footprint, whereas natural resources reveal insignificant impacts. The research concludes with policy suggestions for achieving sustainable development in these major complex countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available upon request.

References

  • Adebayo, T. S. (2023). Towards unlocking the chain of sustainable development in the BRICS economies: Analysing the role of economic complexity and financial risk. Geological Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo, T. S., Akadiri, S. S., Adedapo, A. T., & Usman, N. (2022a). Does interaction between technological innovation and natural resource rent impact environmental degradation in newly industrialized countries? New evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2), 3162–3169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17631-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo, T. S., Onifade, S. T., Alola, A. A., & Muoneke, O. B. (2022b). Does it take international integration of natural resources to ascend the ladder of environmental quality in the newly industrialized countries? Resources Policy, 76(June), 102616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshan, S., Ozturk, I., & Yaqoob, T. (2022). Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method. Renewable Energy, 196, 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., & Huang, B. (2021). An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89(July), 106603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Adebayo, T. S., Udemba, E. N., Murshed, M., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022a). Effects of economic complexity, economic growth, and renewable energy technology budgets on ecological footprint: The role of democratic accountability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(17), 24925–24940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17673-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Alvarado, R., Sinha, A., Shah, M. I., & Abbas, S. (2022b). Towards environmental sustainability: Do financial risk and external conflicts matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Murshed, M., Shah, M. I., Mahmood, H., & Abbas, S. (2022c). How do green energy technology investments, technological innovation, and trade globalization enhance green energy supply and stimulate environmental sustainability in the G7 countries? Gondwana Research, 112, 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Rjoub, H., Kalugina, O. A., & Hussain, N. (2021). Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M. M., Malik, M. N., & Nawaz, K. (2020a). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67(August), 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Zafar, M. W., & Ali, S. (2020b). Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: An empirical analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akadiri, S. S., Adebayo, T. S., Asuzu, O. C., Onuogu, I. C., & Oji-Okoro, I. (2022). Testing the role of economic complexity on the ecological footprint in China: A nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach. Energy & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X2210945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram, R., Ibrahim, R. L., Wang, Z., Adebayo, T. S., & Irfan, M. (2023). Neutralizing the surging emissions amidst natural resource dependence, eco-innovation, and green energy in G7 countries: Insights for global environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S., et al. (2022). Exploring the linkage between export diversification and ecological footprint: Evidence from advanced time series estimation techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(25), 38395–38409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48(January), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 685(October), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alola, A. A., Celik, A., Awan, U., Abdallah, I., & Obekpa, H. O. (2023). Examining the environmental aspect of economic complexity outlook and environmental-related technologies in the Nordic states. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408, 137154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakry, W., Mallik, G., Nghiem, X. H., Sinha, A., & Vo, X. V. (2023). Is green finance really “green”? Examining the long-run relationship between green finance, renewable energy and environmental performance in developing countries. Renewable Energy, 208, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., Feng, Q., & Kao, C. (2012). A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657(March), 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili, F., & Ulucak, R. (2018). Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(35), 35404–35419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3457-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. (2023). Population and environment: The evolution of the debate between optimists and pessimists. Population and Environment, 45(2), 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T. (2020). The environmental Kuznets curve: Seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rep021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Ma, X., Mu, H., & Li, P. (2010). The inequality of natural resources consumption and its relationship with the social development level based on the ecological footprint and the HDI. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 12(01), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333210003528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2019). Mean group estimation in presence of weakly cross-correlated estimators. Economics Letters, 175, 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., Weng, S., Nadeem, A. M., Rafique, M. Z., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Exploring the role of renewable energy, urbanization and structural change for environmental sustainability: Comparative analysis for practical implications. Renewable Energy, 184(January), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, B. M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632–638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, U. R., & Baloch, M. A. (2023). An empirical approach to the nexus between natural resources and environmental pollution: Do economic policy and environmental-related technologies make any difference? Resources Policy, 81, 103361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, U. R., & Khan, S. U. D. (2020). Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54(March), 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek, M. A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242(January), 118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan, B., Driha, O. M., Balsalobre Lorente, D., & Shahzad, U. (2021). The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-sectional dependence in nonstationary panel models: A novel estimator. Retrieved July 23, 2022, from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17870/

  • Fakher, H. A., Ahmed, Z., Acheampong, A. O., & Nathaniel, S. P. (2023). Renewable energy, nonrenewable energy, and environmental quality nexus: An investigation of the N-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve based on six environmental indicators. Energy, 263, 125660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Working Paper 3914 (November). https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

  • Guo, J., et al. (2021). Exploring the role of green innovation and investment in energy for environmental quality: An empirical appraisal from provincial data of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Q., Abbas, S., AbdulKareem, H. K., Shuaibu, M. S., Khudoykulov, K., & Saha, T. (2023a). Devising strategies for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa: The roles of renewable, non-renewable energy, and natural resources. Energy, 284, 128713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M., Saini, S., & Sahoo, M. (2022). Determinants of ecological footprint and PM2.5: Role of urbanization, natural resources and technological innovation. Environmental Challenges, 7(April), 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S. T., Wang, P., Khan, I., & Zhu, B. (2023). The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: Towards circular economy initiatives. Gondwana Research, 113, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570–10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, B., Alola, A. A., Tauni, M. Z., Adebayo, T. S., & Abbas, S. (2023). Pathway to cleaner environment: How effective are renewable electricity and financial development approaches? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 67, 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Haseeb, M., Usman, M., & Ozturk, I. (2022). Dynamic association between ICT, renewable energy, economic complexity and ecological footprint: Is there any difference between E-7 (developing) and G-7 (developed) countries? Technology in Society, 68(February), 101853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., Usman, M., Khan, J. A., Tarar, Z. H., & Sarwar, M. A. (2022). Reinvestigation of environmental Kuznets curve with ecological footprints: Empirical analysis of economic growth and population density. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikram, M., Xia, W., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, U., & Rafique, M. Z. (2021). Exploring the nexus between economic complexity, economic growth and ecological footprint: Contextual evidences from Japan. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47(October), 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanger, A., Awan, A., Anwar, A., & Adebayo, T. S. (2023). Greening the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) economies: Assessing the impact of electricity consumption, natural resources, and renewable energy on environmental footprint. Natural resources forum (Vol. 47, pp. 484–503). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanger, A., Usman, M., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations. Resources Policy, 76, 102569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanat, O., Yan, Z., Asghar, M. M., Ahmed, Z., Mahmood, H., Kirikkaleli, D., & Murshed, M. (2022). Do natural gas, oil, and coal consumption ameliorate environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Russia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4540–4556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapetanios, G., Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2011). Panels with non-stationary multifactor error structures. Journal of Econometrics, 160(2), 326–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartal, M. T., Samour, A., Adebayo, T. S., & Depren, S. K. (2023). Do nuclear energy and renewable energy surge environmental quality in the United States? New insights from novel bootstrap Fourier Granger causality in quantiles approach. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 155, 104509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J. A., & Koengkan, M. (2022). The impact of income inequality and economic complexity on ecological footprint: An analysis covering a long-time span. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J. A., Salehnia, N., & Osmani, F. (2023). The effect of economic complexity, fertility rate, and information and communication technology on ecological footprint in the emerging economies: A two-step stirpat model and panel quantile regression. Quality & Quantity, 57(1), 737–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S., Yahong, W., & Chandio, A. A. (2022). How does economic complexity affect ecological footprint in G-7 economies: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumptions and testing EKC hypothesis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 47647–47660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19094-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakwa, P. A., Alhassan, H., & Adu, G. (2020). Effect of natural resources extraction on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission in Ghana. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 14(1), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. C., Chen, M. P., & Wu, W. (2022). The criticality of tourism development, economic complexity, and country security on ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(24), 37004–37040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18499-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., Wang, X., & Wang, Q. (2022). Does renewable energy reduce ecological footprint at the expense of economic growth? An empirical analysis of 120 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W., Li, Y., Li, X., & Xu, D. (2018). The dynamic analysis and evaluation on tourist ecological footprint of city: Take Shanghai as an instance. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Adebayo, T. S., Ramzan, M., Ullah, S., Abbas, S., & Olanrewaju, V. O. (2023). Do coal efficiency, climate policy uncertainty and green energy consumption promote environmental sustainability in the United States? An application of novel wavelet tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 137851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed, A., Wang, L., Zhang, X., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic links among natural resources, economic globalization, disaggregated energy consumption, and environmental quality: Fresh evidence from GCC economies. Resources Policy, 73, 102204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehmood, U. (2022). Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(25), 38017–38025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murshed, M., Nurmakhanova, M., Al-Tal, R., Mahmood, H., Elheddad, M., & Ahmed, R. (2022). Can intra-regional trade, renewable energy use, foreign direct investments, and economic growth mitigate ecological footprints in South Asia? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2038730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 64871–64881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15360-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel, S., Anyanwu, O., & Shah, M. (2020). Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 14601–14613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08017-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel, S. P., Ekeocha, D. O., & Nwulu, N. (2022). Quantile estimation of ecological footprint and economic complexity in emerging economies: The moderating role of increasing energy consumption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(22), 33856–33871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18397-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel, S., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272(November), 122709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, C. P., & Doytch, N. (2022). Does knowledge matter for the environment? Global evidence of economic complexity and ecological footprints. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21547-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Numan, U., Ma, B., Meo, M. S., & Bedru, H. D. (2022). Revisiting the N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve for economic complexity and ecological footprint. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365(September), 132642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouattara, B., & Zhang, Y. F. (2019). Infrastructure and long-run economic growth: evidence from Chinese provinces. Empirical Economics, 57, 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan, B., Ulucak, R., & Dogan, E. (2019). Analyzing long lasting effects of environmental policies: Evidence from low-, middle- and high-income economies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44(January), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkan, O., Alola, A. A., & Adebayo, T. S. (2023). Environmental benefits of nonrenewable energy efficiency and renewable energy intensity in the USA and EU: Examining the role of clean technologies. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 58, 103315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pata, U. K. (2021). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Available at SSRN 572504.

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Tosetti, E. (2011). Large panels with common factors and spatial correlation. Journal of Econometrics, 161(2), 182–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafique, M. Z., Nadeem, A. M., Xia, W., Ikram, M., Shoaib, H. M., & Shahzad, U. (2022). Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 4623–4640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01625-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. M. (2017). Do population density, economic growth, energy use and exports adversely affect environmental quality in Asian populous countries? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77(September 2016), 506–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramzan, M., Abbasi, K. R., Iqbal, H. A., & Adebayo, T. S. (2023). What’s at Stake? The empirical importance of government revenue and debt and renewable energy for environmental neutrality in the US economy. Renewable Energy, 205, 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza, S. A., & Shah, N. (2018). Testing environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in G7 countries: The role of renewable energy consumption and trade. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(27), 26965–26977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky, P. (2013). Do urbanization and industrialization affect energy intensity in developing countries? Energy Economics, 37, 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky, P. (2014). The effect of urbanization and industrialization on energy use in emerging economies: Implications for sustainable development. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 73(2), 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, M., & Sethi, N. (2022). The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: Evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(3), 4244–4277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01614-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib, N. (2022a). Green energy, non-renewable energy, financial development and economic growth with carbon footprint: Heterogeneous panel evidence from cross-country. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 6945–6964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib, N. (2022b). Asymmetric linkages between renewable energy, technological innovation, and carbon-dioxide emission in developed economies: Non-linear ARDL analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 60744–60758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib, N., Radulescu, M., Usman, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Cilan, T. (2023). Environmental technology, economic complexity, renewable electricity, environmental taxes and CO2 emissions: Implications for low-carbon future in G-10 bloc. Heliyon, 9(6), e16457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib, N., Usman, M., Radulescu, M., Sinisi, C. I., Secara, C. G., & Tolea, C. (2022). Revisiting EKC hypothesis in context of renewable energy, human development and moderating role of technological innovations in E-7 countries? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 2509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saud, S., Haseeb, A., Zafar, M. W., & Li, H. (2023). Articulating natural resource abundance, economic complexity, education and environmental sustainability in MENA countries: Evidence from advanced panel estimation. Resources Policy, 80, 103261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M. I. (2021). Investigating the role of regional economic integration on growth: Fresh insights from South Asia. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 13(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, F., Lodhi, M. S., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Zaman, K., Awan, U., Asif, M., Ahmed, W., & Siddique, M. (2022). Cleaner technology and natural resource management: An environmental sustainability perspective from China. Clean Technologies, 4(3), 584–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad, U., Elheddad, M., Swart, J., Ghosh, S., & Dogan, B. (2023). The role of biomass energy consumption and economic complexity on environmental sustainability in G7 economies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 781–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad, U., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, F., & Shahzad, K. (2021). Investigating the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint for the United States: New insights from quantile methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279(January), 123806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Kautish, P. (2021). Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin, S. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Bello, M. O. (2019). A multi-country convergence analysis of ecological footprint and its components. Sustainable Cities and Society, 46, 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2011). International energy outlook 2011 (IEO2011).

  • Uddin, G. A., Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., & Gow, J. (2017). Ecological footprint and real income: Panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecological Indicators, 77, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2021). United Nations framework convention on climate change - COP26: global innovation hub launched for transformative climate solutions. Retrieved July 23, 2022, from https://unfccc.int/news/cop26-global-innovation-hub-launched-for-transformative-climate-solutions

  • United Nations. (2022). The sustainable development goals report 2022. https://resources.unsdsn.org/2022-sustainable-development-report.

  • US. (2022). Energy information administration. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=3130

  • Usman, M., Makhdum, M. S. A., & Kousar, R. (2021). Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65(February), 102590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Usman, M., Saqib, N., Shahbaz, M., & Hossain, M. R. (2023a). Asymmetric environmental performance under economic complexity, globalization and energy consumption: Evidence from the World’s largest economically complex economy. Energy, 279, 128050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Dong, Z., Li, R., & Wang, L. (2022a). Renewable energy and economic growth: New insight from country risks. Energy, 238, 122018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Wang, X., & Li, R. (2022b). Does official development assistance alleviate the environmental pressures during the urbanization of recipient countries? Evidence from the sub-Saharan Africa countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Chandavuth, Y., Zhang, B., Ahmed, Z., & Ahmad, M. (2023b). Environmental degradation, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: Assessing the role of financial and political risks? Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2021). Climate change action plan: 2021–2025, supporting green, resilient and inclusive development.

  • Wu, M., Wei, Y., Lam, P. T., Liu, F., & Li, Y. (2019). Is urban development ecologically sustainable? Ecological footprint analysis and prediction based on a modified artificial neural network model: A case study of Tianjin in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237(November), 117795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, R., Geng, Y., & Liu, W. (2017). Trends of natural resource footprints in the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(January), 775–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, L., Haseeb, M., Mahmood, H., Alkhateeb, T. T. Y., & Murshed, M. (2021). Renewable energy use and ecological footprints mitigation: Evidence from selected South Asian economies. Sustainability, 13(4), 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q., Huo, J., Saqib, N., & Mahmood, H. (2022). Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: Evidence from methods moment of quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 192, 485–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yilanci, V., & Pata, U. K. (2020). Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: The role of economic complexity on ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32683–32694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09434-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafar, M. W., Zaidi, S. A. H., Khan, N. R., Mirza, F. M., Hou, F., & Kirmani, S. A. A. (2019). The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States. Resources Policy, 63(October), 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, K., Awan, U., Islam, T., Paidi, R., Hassan, A., & bin Abdullah, A. (2016). Econometric applications for measuring the environmental impacts of biofuel production in the panel of worlds’ largest region. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(7), 4305–4325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeraibi, A., Jahanger, A., Adebayo, T. S., Ramzan, M., & Yu, Y. (2023). Greenfield investments, economic complexity, and financial inclusion-environmental quality nexus in BRICS Countries: Does renewable energy transition matter? Gondwana Research, 117, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Shah, S. A. R., & Yang, L. (2022). Modeling the effect of disaggregated renewable energies on ecological footprint in E5 economies: Do economic growth and R&D matter? Applied Energy, 310, 118522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Adebayo, T. S., Yin, W., & Abbas, S. (2023). The co-movements among renewable energy, total environmental tax, and ecological footprint in the United Kingdom: Evidence from wavelet local multiple correlation analysis. Energy Economics, 126, 106900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is supported by the grant of Russian Science Foundation: Code: 23-10-10165.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shujaat Abbas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

All authors have given explicit consent to submit and publish this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7

Table 7 Summarized findings of the recent literature: on economic complexity and ecological footprint

.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, S., Ghosh, S., Sucharita, S. et al. Going green: understanding the impacts of economic complexity, clean energy and natural resources on ecological footprint in complex economies. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04154-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04154-4

Keywords

Navigation