Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Agricultural production efficiency, food consumption, and food waste in the European countries

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although previous studies have focused on agricultural production, food consumption has rarely been considered. Food waste needs to be addressed when assessing consumption. In this study, we used a modified undesirable epsilon-based measure, a two-stage data envelopment analysis model, to evaluate the agricultural production and food consumption (food import, consumption, and waste) efficiencies of European countries. The inputs in agricultural production include agricultural fixed assets, agricultural labor areas, and fertilizers. Fertilizer use often results in ammonia emissions, which is an undesirable output that negatively affects the environment. At Stage 1 of the analysis, we evaluated agricultural production and environmental efficiencies in Europe. Because not all foods are produced domestically, food import serves as an input at Stage 2 (food consumption), whereas household food consumption serves as the output; furthermore, food waste is regarded as an undesirable output. At Stage 2 of the analysis, we explored food consumption and waste in Europe. Based on the empirical findings, the overall agricultural production efficiency was poor in most countries. Between the model’s two stages (agricultural production and food consumption), most countries performed better at the latter stage (consumption stage) than at the former stage (production stage). The fertilizer use efficiency scores of 19 countries were smaller than 0.5 at all five-time points. The countries varied considerably in terms of environmental efficiency; only 8 of the total 27 countries performed well in terms of food waste and ammonia emission. Unfortunately, environmental problems associated with food production and consumption are prevalent in most countries. The research results could be an essential reference for the government to promote the development of agriculture through sustainable production and consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the official EU open data website Eurostat. [https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database].

References

  • Ahmad, Z., Jun, M., Abdullah, M., Ishaq, M. N., Lateef, M., & Khan, I. (2015). Optimal scheme selection of agricultural production structure adjustment—based on dea model; Punjab (Pakistan). Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (English Edition), 22(4), 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akran, H. E., & Samut, P. K. (2013). Analysis of the efficiency determinants of Turkey’s agriculture sector by two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA). Ege Academic Review, 13(1), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldieri, L., Brahmi, M., Chen, X., & Vinci, C. P. (2021). Knowledge spillovers and technical efficiency for cleaner production: An economic analysis from agriculture innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., & Smaje, C. (2008). Surplus retail food redistribution: An analysis of a third sector model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(11), 1290–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ananda, J., Karunasena, G. G., & Pearson, D. (2022). Identifying interventions to reduce household food waste based on food categories. Food Policy, 111, 102324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armagan, G. (2008). Determining the factors affecting efficiency scores in agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(4), 325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschemann-Witzel, J., De Hooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larsen, T., & Oostindjer, M. (2015). Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability, 7(6), 6457–6477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K., & Miller, R. (2016). Significant atmospheric aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(10), 5394–5400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Błażejczyk-Majka, L. (2017). Application of DEA for evaluating the efficiency of economic policy as exemplified by EU agriculture. Studia Historiae Oeconomicae, 35, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravi, L., Francioni, B., Murmura, F., & Savelli, E. (2020). Factors affecting household food waste among young consumers and actions to prevent it. A comparison among UK Spain and Italy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakar, B., Aydin, S., Varank, G., & Ozcan, H. K. (2020). Assessment of environmental impact of FOOD waste in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1979). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(4), 339–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management, 5(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dace, E., & Blumberga, D. (2016). How do 28 European union member states perform in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions? It depends on what we look at: Application of the multi-criteria analysis. Ecological Indicators, 71, 352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2007). Gleaning from Gluttony: An Australian youth subculture confronts the ethics of waste. Australian Geographer, 38(3), 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A., Jr. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, H., & Kondo, Y. (2018). Decomposition analysis of food waste management with explicit consideration of priority of alternative management options and its application to the Japanese food industry from 2008 to 2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 568–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girotto, F., Alibardi, L., & Cossu, R. (2015). Food waste generation and industrial uses: A review. Waste Management, 45, 32–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Van Otterdijk, R., & Meybeck, A. (2011). Global food losses and food waste.

  • Guthrie, S., Giles, S., Dunkerley, F., Tabaqchali, H., Harshfield, A., Ioppolo, B., & Manville, C. (2018). The impact of ammonia emissions from agriculture on biodiversity. RAND Corporation and The Royal Society.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3206–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(3), 949–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S., Lee, Y. S., Min, H. G., & Kim, J. G. (2020). Applicability of the dynamic chamber-capture system (DCS) for estimating the flux of ammonia emission during liquid fertilizer spreading. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 11(4), 723–729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kočišová, K. (2015). Application of the DEA on the measurement of efficiency in the EU countries. Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, L., Balezentis, T., Hou, L., & Wang, D. (2020). Technical and environmental efficiency of livestock farms in China: A slacks-based DEA approach. China Economic Review, 62, 101213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, H. F., Chen, H. L., & Tsou, K. W. (2014). Analysis of farming environmental efficiency using a DEA model with undesirable outputs. Apcbee Procedia, 10, 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., Jiang, Y., Yu, Z., & Shang, L. (2017). Analysis of agriculture total-factor energy efficiency in China based on DEA and Malmquist indices. Energy Procedia, 142, 2397-2402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., Yang, Y., Wu, Y., Liu, B., Tao, L., Zhan, Y., & Yang, Y. (2022). Better performance of compound fertilizers than bulk-blend fertilizers on reducing ammonia emission and improving wheat productivity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 335, 108018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K. (2015). Application of DEA method in the evaluation of agriculture economic efficiency. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 7(3), 997–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. C., Chiu, S. Y., Chiu, Y. H., & Chang, T. H. (2022). Three-stage circular efficiency evaluation of agricultural food production, food consumption, and food waste recycling in EU countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 343, 130870.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, J., De Fraiture, C., & Molden, D. (2008). Saving water: from field to fork: Curbing losses and wastage in the food chain. Working paper. https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/handle/10535/5088.

  • Mohammed, S., Alsafadi, K., Takács, I., & Harsányi, E. (2020). Contemporary changes of greenhouse gases emission from the agricultural sector in the EU-27. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 4(4), 282–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J. K., Wright, N., & Bin Ujang, Z. (2014). The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulot, F., & Jacob, D. J. (2014). Hidden cost of US agricultural exports: Particulate matter from ammonia emissions. Environmental Science and Technology, 48(2), 903–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quested, T. E., Parry, A. D., Easteal, S., & Swannell, R. (2011). Food and drink waste from households in the UK.

  • Reidy, B., Webb, J., Misselbrook, T. H., Menzi, H., Luesink, H. H., Hutchings, N. J., & Dämmgen, U. (2009). Comparison of models used for national agricultural ammonia emission inventories in Europe: Litter-based manure systems. Atmospheric Environment, 43(9), 1632–1640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srijuntrapun, P., Sukwong, P., & Marshall, A. (2022). The role of food waste hierarchy as Thai hotels seek to fulfill their corporate social responsibility. Heliyon, 8(10), e11201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. (2009). Waste: Uncovering the global food scandal. WW Norton & Company.

  • Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3–4), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlontzos, G., Niavis, S., & Manos, B. (2014). A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlontzos, G., & Pardalos, P. M. (2017). Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, N. (2002). “Food deserts” in British cities: Policy context and research priorities. Urban Studies, 39(11), 2029–2040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P., Zhang, Y., Gong, W., Hou, X., Kroeze, C., Gao, W., & Luan, S. (2015). An inventory of the emission of ammonia from agricultural fertilizer application in China for 2010 and its high-resolution spatial distribution. Atmospheric Environment, 115, 141–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Z., Guo, X., Cheng, L., Cheng, S., Chen, D., Wang, W., & Liu, B. (2019). Reducing PM2.5 and secondary inorganic aerosols by agricultural ammonia emission mitigation within the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Atmospheric Environment, 219, 116989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., Henze, D. K., Zhu, L., Song, Y., & Huang, B. (2018). Agricultural ammonia emissions in China: reconciling bottom-up and top-down estimates. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(1), 339–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Dore, A. J., Ma, L., Liu, X. J., Ma, W. Q., Cape, J. N., & Zhang, F. S. (2010). Agricultural ammonia emissions inventory and spatial distribution in the North China Plain. Environmental Pollution, 158(2), 490–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City, 701, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Tai-Yu Lin

  2. Department of Economics, Soochow University, 56, Kueiyang St., Sec. 1, Taipei, 100, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Shih-Yung Chiu & Kuei-Ying Huang

  3. Department of Economics, Soochow University, 56, Kueiyang St., Sec. 1, Taipei, 10048, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Yung-ho Chiu

  4. Department of Multimedia and Game Science, Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, 300 Sec. 1, Wanshou Rd., Guishan District, Taoyuan City, 333, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Liang-Chun Lu

Authors
  1. Tai-Yu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shih-Yung Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yung-ho Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liang-Chun Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kuei-Ying Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-Yung Chiu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, TY., Chiu, SY., Chiu, Yh. et al. Agricultural production efficiency, food consumption, and food waste in the European countries. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04133-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04133-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation