Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated seeding attachment for combine harvesters: a sustainable approach for conservation agriculture

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An intensive rice–wheat rotation system produces high yields but leaves abundant residue in the fields after harvest, which interferes with seeding operation. This residue needs to be managed through incorporation or mulching for timely sowing of wheat. Presently, straw incorporation or direct sowing of wheat in stubble fields requires highly energy-intensive machinery achieve desired results. Therefore, a seeding attachment having concave disc furrow openers was developed for combine harvester to sow wheat simultaneously harvesting rice. The performance of the seeding attachment was evaluated at three levels of forward speeds (i.e. 1.5, 2.1, and 2.8 km/h) and stubble heights (i.e. 38, 45, and 52 cm) in terms of plant emergence, effective tillers, grain yield, fuel consumption, and field capacity of the combine harvester. The plant emergence and effective tillers were found at par as compared to other prevalent methods, whereas the average field capacity, fuel consumption, and grain yield of the developed attachment were found 0.43 ha/h, 9.2 l/h, and 4430.7 kg/ha, respectively. The total energy used for wheat crop establishment using the developed seeding attachment was 1343.2 MJ/ha and about 63.35% of the average energy demand from other methods (2113.46 MJ/ha). The use of seeding attachment may improve the utility of a combine harvesters for the sowing of wheat while rice harvesting. The current study indicated a significant gain in energy-use efficiency, and a reduction in environmental mitigation is possible with developed seeding attachment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig.10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abboye, A. D., Megresa, A., & Hirpa, D. (2020). Effect of plant population on growth, yields and quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties at Kulumsa in Arsi Zone, South-Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Research and Standard Agriculture Science., 6(2), 32–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abo, E. N., & Abed El-Hammed, S. F. (2010). Evaluating the performance of a locally combine for harvest wheat crop. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering., 27(1), 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, R., Awasthi, A., Singh, N., Gupta, P. K., & Mittal, S. K. (2012). Effects of exposure to rice-crop residue burning smoke on pulmonary functions and Oxygen Saturation level of human beings in Patiala (India). Science of The Total Environment, 429, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.074

  • Alipour, A., Veisi, H., Darijani, F., Mirbagheri, B., & Behbahani, A. G. (2012). Study and determination of energy consumption to produce conventional rice of the Guilan province. Research in Agricultural Engineering., 58(3), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijarniya, D., Parihar, C. M., Jat, R. K., Kalvania, K., Kakraliya, S. K., & Jat, M. L. (2020). Portfolios of climate smart agriculture practices in smallholder rice-wheat system of Eastern Indo-Gangetic plains: Crop productivity, resource use efficiency and environmental foot prints. Agronomy, 10(10), 1561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chamsing, A., Salokhe, V., M., & Singh, G. (2006). Energy consumption analysis for selected crops in different regions of Thailand. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 4, 1–8.

  • Chauhan, B. S., & Abugho, S. B. (2013). Effect of crop residue on seedling emergence and growth of selected weed species in a sprinkler-irrigated zero-till dry-seeded rice system. Weed Science., 61(3), 403–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanda, S., Yadav, A., Yadav, D. B., & Chauhan, B. S. (2022). Emerging issues and potential opportunities in the rice–wheat cropping system of North-Western India. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 832683.

  • Dhanger, P., Jain, M., Rani, V., Kumar, H., Jaideep, J., Mor, A., & Sachin, S. (2021). Comparison of the energy consumption in traditional and advanced paddy residue management technologies for wheat sowing. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 20(3), 846–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2016). Agricultural mechanization: A key input for subSaharan African smallholders. Integrated Crop Management, 23, 23.

  • Gajri, P. R., Ghuman, B. S., Singh, S., Mishra, R. D., Yadav, D. S., & Singh, H. (2002) Tillage and residue management practices in rice–wheat system in Indo-Gangetic Plains: A diagnostic survey. Technical Report, National Agricultural Technology Project. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi and Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.

  • Gummert, M., Hung, N. V., Chivenge, P., & Douthwaite, B. (2020). Sustainable rice straw management (p. 192). Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. A., Iqbal, M., Haq, Z., Ali, M. M., Mahmood, H. S., Kalwar, S. A., Shahid, L. A., Niazi, B. M. K., & Husain, M. (2019). Field performance evaluation of zone disk tiller machine for soil physical properties and its relative impact on wheat crop recovery in cotton stubble field. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 32(2), 343–352.

  • Jamshidi, A. R., & Afrous, A. (2015). Effect of soil moisture and tractor speed on soil physical properties and Barley yield in Shoushtar region. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 2(2), 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Z., Zhang, L., Liu, H., & Nie, L. (2021). Energy assessment of different rice–wheat rotation systems. Food and Energy Security, 10(2), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.v10.210.1002/fes3.284

  • Kassim, M. A., Meng, T. K., Serri, N. A., Yusoff, S. B., Shahrin, N. A. M., Seng, K. Y., & Keong, L. C. (2020). Sustainable biorefinery concept for industrial bioprocessing. Biorefinery Production Technologies for Chemicals and Energy, 5, 15–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Saini, K. S., Dasila, H., Kumar, R., Devi, K., Bisht, Y. S., & Kaushik, P. (2023). Sustainable intensification of cropping systems under conservation agriculture practices: Impact on yield, productivity and profitability of Wheat. Sustainability, 15(9), 7468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., & Singh, M. (2017). Growth parameters and productivity of wheat as influenced by crop establishment methods and different seed rate. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 5(4), 2134–2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohan, S. K., Jat, H. S., Yadav, A. K., Sidhu, H. S., Jat, M. L., Choudhary, M., & Sharma, P. C. (2018). Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, K. G., Saha, K. P., Ghosh, P. K., Hati, K. M., & Bandyopadhyay, K. K. (2002). Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India. Biomass and Bioenergy, 23(5), 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, C. R., Chandel, N. S., Jena, P. C., & Jha, A. (2019). Indian agriculture counting on farm mechanization. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 50(1), 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirdashti, H., Pirdashti, M., Mohammadi, M., Baigi, M. G., & Movagharnejad, K. (2015). Efficient use of energy through organic rice–duck mutualism system. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35, 1489–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogovskii, I. L., Voinash, S. A., Sokolova, V. A., and Krivonogova, A. S. (2021). Research on fuel consumption for different values of capacity factor of engine of combine harvester. In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (Vol. 666, No. 3, p. 032093). IOP Publishing.

  • Saharawat, Y. S., Singh, B., Malik, R. K., Ladha, J. K., Gathala, M., Jat, M. L., & Kumar, V. (2010). Evaluation of alternative tillage and crop establishment methods in a rice–wheat rotation in North Western IGP. Field Crops Research, 116(3), 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, H. S., Humphreys, E., Dhillon, S. S., Blackwell, J., & Bector, V. (2007). The Happy Seeder enables direct drilling of wheat into rice stubble. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 47(7), 844–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. K., Singh, S. P., Kushwaha, H. L., Singh, M. K., & Ekka, U. (2020). Combine Harvester: Opportunities and Prospects as Resource Conservation Technology. RASSA Journal of Science for Society, 2(1), 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Y., & Sidhu, H. S. (2014). Management of cereal crop residues for sustainable rice-wheat production system in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 80(1), 95–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, S. S., Chandel, R., & Narang, M. K. (2018). Studies on straw management techniques using paddy-straw chopper cum spreader along with various tillage practices and subsequent effect of various sowing techniques on wheat yield and economics. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 49(2), 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, M. S., Heiniger, R. W., & Crozier, C. R. (2019). Tiller initiation and its effects on yield and yield components in winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 111(3), 1323–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatramanan, V., Shah, S., Rai, A. K., & Prasad, R. (2021). Nexus between crop residue burning, bioeconomy and sustainable development goals over north-western India. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, 614212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, I., Akcaoz, H., & Ozkan, B. (2005). An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 30(2), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dilwar designed and executed the experiments and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BD and MN wrote the protocol and supervised to conduct the experiments. DS and MJ helped in proof reading and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilwar Singh Parihar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parihar, D.S., Dogra, B., Narang, M.K. et al. Integrated seeding attachment for combine harvesters: a sustainable approach for conservation agriculture. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03787-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03787-9

Keywords

Navigation