Abstract
This study explores the relationship between “ownerless” companies and environmental performance in the absence of actual controllers. We argue that companies lacking actual controllers may opt to enhance their environmental performance to address external doubts about their governance legitimacy. Opting for an empirical analysis approach, we devised a theoretical framework, and executed a regression analysis on a sample of 6676 listed companies within China’s A-shares market spanning from 2011 to 2021. The findings corroborated our hypothesis that “ownerless” companies are significantly positively related to environmental performance. Furthermore, we find that the top management team (TMT) stability negatively moderates the “ownerless” companies—environmental performance relationship, while external stakeholder environmental pressure (government environmental governance and public environmental attention) positively moderates this relationship. These findings contribute to the research on stakeholder theory and the growing literature on emerging economies. They also provide insights in practice for policymakers on how to properly perceive the phenomenon of “ownerless” companies and promote their environmental performance through institutional design and policy guidance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Agarwal, R., Braguinsky, S., & Ohyama, A. (2020). Centers of gravity: The effect of stable shared leadership in top management teams on firm growth and industry evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 41(3), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3048
Agrawal, A., & Cooper, T. (2017). Corporate governance consequences of accounting scandals: Evidence from top management, CFO and auditor turnover. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 7(01), 1650014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010139216500142
Agyemang, A. O., Yusheng, K., Twum, A. K., Edziah, B. K., & Ayamba, E. C. (2023). Environmental accounting and performance: empirical evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02853-y
Bai, G., & Meng, D. (2022). Assessing influence mechanism of management overconfidence, corporate environmental responsibility and corporate value: The moderating effect of government environmental governance and media attention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010577
Beloskar, V. D., & Rao, S. N. (2023). Did ESG save the day? Evidence from India during the COVID-19 crisis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 30(1), 73–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09369-5
Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36461950
Biswas, P. K., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2018). Board composition, sustainability committee and corporate social and environmental performance in Australia. Pacific Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-12-2017-0107
Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318
Burrough, B., & Helyar, J. (2010). Barbarians at the gate: The fall of RJR Nabisco. Random House. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40258266.
Chen, H., An, M., Wang, Q., Ruan, W., & Xiang, E. (2021a). Military executives and corporate environmental information disclosure: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123404
Chen, J., Luo, W., Ren, X., & Liu, T. (2023). The local-neighborhood effects of low-carbon city pilots program on PM2. 5 in China: A spatial difference-in-differences analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 857, 159511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159511
Chen, S., Wang, Y., Albitar, K., & Huang, Z. (2021b). Does ownership concentration affect corporate environmental responsibility engagement? The mediating role of corporate leverage. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21, S13–S24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001
Chen, Z., Kahn, M. E., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018). The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88, 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.010
Cheng, J., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of public attention on the environmental performance of high-polluting firms: Based on big data from web search in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.146
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2
Crutchley, C. E., Garner, J. L., & Marshall, B. B. (2002). An examination of board stability and the long-term performance of initial public offerings. Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3666315
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Colpan, A. M. (2023). Owners’ nonfinancial objectives and the diversification and internationalization of business groups. Corporate Governance an International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12507
Darrell, W. A. L. D. E. N., & Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(96)00015-4
DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (1985). Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 33–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90043-1
Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Donald, C. H. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Dong, W., Dong, X., & Lv, X. (2022). How does ownership structure affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from the manufacturing sector in China. Energy Economics, 112, 106112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106112
Du, S., & Ma, L. (2022). Non-actual controllers and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(3), 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100253
Du, C., Zhang, Q., & Huang, D. (2023). Environmental protection subsidies, green technology innovation and environmental performance: Evidence from China’s heavy-polluting listed firms. PLoS ONE, 18(2), e0278629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278629
Du, X., Weng, J., Zeng, Q., Chang, Y., & Pei, H. (2017). Do lenders applaud corporate environmental performance? Evidence from Chinese private-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2758-2
Fan, J. P., & Wong, T. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00047-2
Fang, Y., Hu, M., & Yang, Q. (2018). Do executives benefit from shareholder disputes? Evidence from multiple large shareholders in Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 51, 275–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.06.008
Francoeur, C., Lakhal, F., Gaaya, S., & Saad, I. B. (2021). How do powerful CEOs influence corporate environmental performance? Economic Modelling, 94, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.09.024
Friedman, E., Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Propping and tunneling. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 732–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2003.08.004
Gangi, F., Daniele, L. M., D’Angelo, E., Varrone, N., & Coscia, M. (2022). The impact of board gender diversity on banks’ environmental policy: The moderating role of gender inequality in national culture. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2418
Gao, Q., Gao, L., Long, D., & Wang, Y. (2023). Chairman Narcissism and social responsibility choices: The moderating role of analyst coverage. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030245
Gao, Y., Gu, J., & Liu, H. (2019). Interactive effects of various institutional pressures on corporate environmental responsibility: Institutional theory and multilevel analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2276
García-Sánchez, I. M., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2019). Chief executive officer ability, corporate social responsibility, and financial performance: The moderating role of the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2263
Gloßner, S. (2019). Investor horizons, long-term blockholders, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 103, 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.03.020
Gogineni, S., Linn, S. C., & Yadav, P. K. (2022). Vertical and horizontal agency problems in private firms: Ownership structure and operating performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(4), 1237–1278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109021000363
Guo, J., & Cheng, H. (2023). Acquirers’ carbon risk, environmental regulation, and cross-border mergers and acquisitions: evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03276-z
Habib, A. M. (2022). Does the efficiency of working capital management and environmental, social, and governance performance affect a firm’s value? Evidence from the United States. Financial Markets Institutions and Risks, 6(3), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(3).18-25.2022
Habib, A. M., & Mourad, N. (2023). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on US firms’ performance: Evidence from the coronavirus crisis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01278-w
Habib, A. M. (2023). Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17847
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
Haque, F., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3318–3334. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3078
Hayward, M. L., Rindova, V. P., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Believing one’s own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.405
Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2017). Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity: The influence of transactive memory systems. Journal of Management, 43(3), 919–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314545652
Hossain, M. I., Ong, T. S., Tabash, M. I., & Teh, B. H. (2022). The panorama of corporate environmental sustainability and green values: evidence of Bangladesh. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02748-y
Hrazdil, K., Mahmoudian, F., & Nazari, J. A. (2021). Executive personality and sustainability: Do extraverted chief executive officers improve corporate social responsibility? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1564–1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2116
Huang, W., Luo, Y., Wang, X., & Xiao, L. (2022b). Controlling shareholder pledging and corporate ESG behavior. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101655
Huang, J., Duan, Z., Hu, M., & Li, Y. (2022a). More stable, more sustainable: Does TMT stability affect sustainable corporate social responsibility? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(4), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2020.1852926
Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jiang, C., Liu, R., & Han, J. (2022). Does accountability audit of natural resource promote corporate environmental performance? An external supervision perspective. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02441-0
Jiang, F., Cai, W., Wang, X., & Zhu, B. (2018). Multiple large shareholders and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.02.001
Jiang, F., & Kim, K. A. (2015). Corporate governance in China: A modern perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 190–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.010
Kaku, P. M., Zhu, H., & Fangninou, F. F. (2022). Evaluation of the EIA process in Zanzibar: The participation of stakeholders in public and private projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02334-2
Karaevli, A., & Zajac, E. J. (2013). When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1267–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12046
Kazemian, S., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2015). Earnings management and ownership structure. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 618–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01149-1
Khan, T. M., Gang, B., Fareed, Z., & Yasmeen, R. (2020). The impact of CEO tenure on corporate social and environmental performance: An emerging country’s analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 19314–19326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08468-y
Kim, I., Ryou, J. W., & Yang, R. (2020). The color of shareholders’ money: Institutional shareholders’ political values and corporate environmental disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101704
Kiriu, T., & Nozaki, M. (2020). A text mining model to evaluate firms’ ESG activities: An application for japanese firms. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 27(4), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-020-09309-1
Kou, P., & Han, Y. (2021). Vertical environmental protection pressure, fiscal pressure, and local environmental regulations: Evidence from China’s industrial sulfur dioxide treatment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(42), 60095–60110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14947-7
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Langpap, C., & Shimshack, J. P. (2010). Private citizen suits and public enforcement: Substitutes or complements? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.01.001
Lee, K. H., Cin, B. C., & Lee, E. Y. (2016). Environmental responsibility and firm performance: The application of an environmental, social and governance model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1855
Lee, M. D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Domesticating radical rant and rage: An exploration of the consequences of environmental shareholder resolutions on corporate environmental performance. Business & Society, 50(1), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394640
Lee, T., Liu, W. T., & Yu, J. X. (2021). Does TMT composition matter to environmental policy and firm performance? The role of organizational slack. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2042
Li, X., Hu, Z., Cao, J., & Xu, X. (2022b). The impact of environmental accountability on air pollution: A public attention perspective. Energy Policy, 161, 112733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112733
Li, Q., Ruan, W., Li, R., & Li, H. (2022a). Do institutional investors’ holdings affect corporate environmental information disclosure? Evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02686-9
Liao, X. (2018). Public appeal, environmental regulation and green investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 119, 554–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.020
Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.001
Liu, L., Ren, G., He, B., & Zheng, M. (2022b). Environmental regulation, environmental decentralization, and enterprise environmental protection investment: evidence from china. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.821488
Liu, H., Jiang, J., Xue, R., Meng, X., & Hu, S. (2022a). Corporate environmental governance scheme and investment efficiency over the course of COVID-19. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102726
Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004
Liu, Q., Yu, L., Yan, G., & Guo, Y. (2023). External governance pressure and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12492
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326
Lu, J., Mahmoudian, F., Yu, D., Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2021). Board interlocks, absorptive capacity, and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3425–3443. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2811
Lu, T., Ren, J., & Liu, E. (2020). Actual controller’s foreign residency and firm leverage: Evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 27(8), 620–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1728220
Luo, J. H., Wan, D. F., Cai, D., & Liu, H. (2013). Multiple large shareholder structure and governance: The role of shareholder numbers, contest for control, and formal institutions in Chinese family firms. Management and Organization Review, 9(2), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12000
Ma, S., & Seidl, D. (2018). New CEOs and their collaborators: Divergence and convergence between the strategic leadership constellation and the top management team. Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 606–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2721
McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905–2932. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12393
Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Qi, G. Y. (2016). The impact of product market competition on corporate environmental responsibility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9450-z
Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00008-1
Nguyen, L. T., & Thanh, C. L. (2022). The influence of board characteristics on environmental performance: Evidence from East Asian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(10), 2702–2720. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0744
O’Sullivan, D., Zolotoy, L., & Fan, Q. (2021). CEO early-life disaster experience and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(11), 2137–2161. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3293
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
Orazalin, N., & Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664–1676. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1915
Ouyang, Z., Lv, R., & Liu, Y. (2023). Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during corporate environmental violation events? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2465
Peng, X., Tang, P., Yang, S., & Fu, S. (2020). How should mining firms invest in the multidimensions of corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Resources Policy, 65, 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101576
Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2348
Rego, A., Cunha, M. P. E., & Polónia, D. (2017). Corporate sustainability: A view from the top. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2760-8
Sales, R. G., Rodríguez Sousa, A. A., Yáñez, E., Blanco Cano, L., Raffin, D., Jatar, L., & Rescia, A. J. (2023). Degree of importance of demographic and socio-cultural factors in environmental perception: bases for the design of public policies in Argentina and Spain. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03079-2
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001
Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1129–1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0150
Seckin-Halac, D., Erdener-Acar, E., & Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Y. (2021). Ownership and corporate social responsibility:” The power of the female touch”. European Management Journal, 39(6), 695–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.008
Shah, S. G. M., & Ivascu, L. (2023). Accentuating the moderating influence of green innovation, environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and innovation output between vigorous board and Romanian manufacturing firms’ performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03164-6
Shah, M. H., & Xiao, Z. (2023). Internal pyramid structure, judicial efficiency, firm-level governance and dividend policy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 764–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.10.019
Shevchenko, A. (2021). Do financial penalties for environmental violations facilitate improvements in corporate environmental performance? An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1723–1734. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2711
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Tang, Y., Yue, S., Ma, W., & Zhang, L. (2022). How do environmental protection expenditure and green technology innovation affect synergistically the financial performance of heavy polluting enterprises? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 89597–89613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21908-1
Tian, X., & Wang, T. Y. (2014). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr130
Tsendsuren, C., Yadav, P. L., Han, S. H., & Kim, H. (2021). Influence of product market competition and managerial competency on corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from the US. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304, 127065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127065
Ullah, F., Jiang, P., Elamer, A. A., & Owusu, A. (2022). Environmental performance and corporate innovation in China: The moderating impact of firm ownership. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121990
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2009). How are US family firms controlled? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3047–3091. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn080
Wagner, M. (2008). Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 66(2), 392–402.
Walls, J. L., & Berrone, P. (2017). The power of one to make a difference: How informal and formal CEO power affect environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2902-z
Wang, Y., Wilson, C., & Li, Y. (2021). Gender attitudes and the effect of board gender diversity on corporate environmental responsibility. Emerging Markets Review, 47, 100744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100744
Wang, Y., Qiu, Y., & Luo, Y. (2022). CEO foreign experience and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2036–2051. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3006
Wicaksono, A. P., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Impacts of stakeholder pressure on water disclosure within Asian mining companies. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02972-0
Xiao, G., & Shen, S. (2022). To pollute or not to pollute: Political connections and corporate environmental performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 74, 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102214
Xie, X., Han, Y., & Hoang, T. T. (2022). Can green process innovation improve both financial and environmental performance? The roles of TMT heterogeneity and ownership. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122018
Xu, P., Meng, D., Bai, G., & Song, L. (2021). Performance pressure of listed companies and environmental information disclosure: An empirical research on Chinese enterprise groups. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(5), 4789. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/134542
Yao, S., Pan, Y., Wang, L., Sensoy, A., & Cheng, F. (2023). Building eco-friendly corporations: The role of minority shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(4), 933–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05291-y
Yu, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, J. Z., Wu, Y., & Liao, Z. (2022). Do circular economy practices matter for financial growth? An empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, 133255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133255
Yu, J., Lo, C. W. H., & Li, P. H. Y. (2017). Organizational visibility, stakeholder environmental pressure and corporate environmental responsiveness in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1923
Zang, Z., Zhu, Q., & Mogorrón-Guerrero, H. (2019). How does R&D investment affect the financial performance of cultural and creative enterprises? The moderating effect of actual controller. Sustainability, 11(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020297
Zeng, H., Zhang, X., Zhou, Q., Jin, Y., & Cao, J. (2022). Tightening of environmental regulations and corporate environmental irresponsibility: A quasi-natural experiment. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(11), 13218–13259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01988-8
Zeng, S. X., Meng, X. H., Zeng, R. C., Tam, C. M., Tam, V. W., & Jin, T. (2011). How environmental management driving forces affect environmental and economic performance of SMEs: A study in the Northern China district. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(13), 1426–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.002
Zhang, P., Wu, F., Guo, Y., & Ma, J. (2022a). Does enforcement matter in promoting corporate environmental investment: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130432
Zhang, R., & Fu, W. (2023). Multiple large shareholders and corporate environmental performance. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103487
Zhang, B., Ma, M., & Chiu, Y. H. (2023a). Considering the impact of geographic location and climate on China’s environmental efficiency based on a meta dynamic non-radial DDF. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03041-2
Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., & Nurdazym, A. (2023b). How do female CEOs affect corporate environmental policies? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2366
Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, Z. (2021). Doing well by doing good: How corporate environmental responsibility influences corporate financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2031
Zhang, Y., Peng, X., Li, Y., & Fu, S. (2022b). How geographic diversification affects corporate social responsibility? The moderating effects of ownership and environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(54), 81658–81669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21550-x
Zhang, Y., Tong, L., & Li, J. (2020). Minding the gap: Asymmetric effects of pay dispersion on stakeholder engagement in corporate environmental (Ir) responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2354–2367. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2003
Zhong, R., Li, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). Multiple large shareholders, control contests, and forced CEO turnover. Emerging Markets Review, 48, 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100816
Zhou, Y., Zhu, H., Hu, X., & Chang, X. (2023). Disproportional ownership structures and corporate R&D investment: From the investor protection perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 92(4), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2023.129564
Zhu, D., Gao, X., Luo, Z., & Xu, W. (2022). Environmental performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 74, 101811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101811
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.7389921
Zou, H., Zeng, S. X., Lin, H., & Xie, X. M. (2015). Top executives’ compensation, industrial competition, and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2014-0515
Funding
This work was supported by the Key Program of National Social Science Foundation of China under Grant [No.18ZDA095] and the National Social Science Fund Youth Project [No.22CJY049].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: DM, LW; Data curation: DM; Formal analysis: DM, LW; Methodology: DM, LW; Supervision: YL, LW; Validation: DM; Visualization: DM, LW; Writing-original draft: DM; Writing–review & editing: DM, YL.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
This article has selected the related vocabulary in the context of environmental pollution and governance that may feature in government work reports. These words include: environmental conservation, haze, PM10, PM2.5, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, sustainability, clean energy, fossil fuels, coal, oil, natural gas, solar energy, nuclear energy, recycling, resources, circular economy, global warming, acid rain, greenhouse effect, water conservation, afforestation, greening, dust, soot, exhaust emissions, atmosphere, clear water, blue sky, sewage, treatment efficiency, river length, green space, aesthetics, water source, water consumption, particulate matter, joint prevention and control, air quality, environmental protection, pollution, energy consumption, emission reduction, sewage discharge, ecology, green initiatives, low-carbon, and air purity.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Meng, D., Li, Y. & Wang, L. Seeking legitimacy? “Ownerless” companies and environmental performance. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03764-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03764-2