Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Green credits, green securities, renewable energy, and environmental quality: a comparative analysis of sustainable development across Chinese provinces

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combating climate change has emerged as a critical mandate for sustainable development, particularly among the top polluters. Green financial instruments have become popular in this regard as the world is shifting to a low-carbon economy to curb global environmental deterioration. This study assesses how renewable energy and two major green financial instruments, green credits (TLBs) and green securities (CAPs), affect environmental quality during the 1992Q1–2020Q4 period. We focused on China, the world’s second-largest economy and one of the main CO2 emitters, as a case study from which other countries can adjust their green policies to sustainable development. In a comparative analysis, we mainly employed the method of moments-quantile regression (MM-QR) with the fixed-effects model and Granger’s spectral causality in the frequency domain. First, the results revealed that green securities effectively reduced CO2 emissions in all regions at all quantiles than green credits that mainly improved environmental quality in the eastern region, unlike the central and western regions in most cases. Second, we found disparate and asymmetrical effects of the size of TLBs and CAPs on CO2 emissions across provinces. Third, renewable energy consumption enhanced environmental quality in all provinces. In contrast, economic growth, oil prices, urbanization, trade openness, and foreign direct investments have heterogeneous effects over time on CO2 emissions across provinces. Accordingly, based on the special characteristics of each region, our findings imply heterogeneous and specific green policies for sustainable development over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database (CSMAR) and the Wind database.

Notes

  1. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019/emissions#abstract.

  2. https://www.irena.org/IRENADocuments/Statistical_Profiles/Asia/China_Asia_RE_SP.pdf.

  3. According to Turner et al. (2012), the consolidated assets of the banking system reached about 240% of GDP and domestic credit was equivalent to 145% of GDP in 2011.

  4. https://equator-principles.com/members-reporting/.

  5. https://www.iea-coal.org/china-top-global-emitter-aims-to-go-carbon-neutral-by-2060/.

  6. http://unepinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Synthesis_Report_Full_EN.pdf.

  7. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2018/indexeh.htm.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the distinguished Prof. LUC HENS, the editorial team, and the honorable reviewers for their valuable comments that have improved the quality of this manuscript.

Funding

Henan University funded this research under the postdoctoral research grant CJ3050A0670895.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: DFK, YL, DY; Methodology: DFK, YTG, DY; Formal analysis and investigation: DFK, YTG, DY; Writing—original draft preparation: DFK, YL, DY; Writing—review and editing: SJT, FEG, RS; Funding acquisition: DFK, YL, DY; Resources: SJT, FEG, RS; Supervision: YL, DFK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dang Yongjie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Consent to participate

All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 81 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 8 Classification of the Chinese provinces by percentile of average values of Carbon emissions over the 1997–2020 period

8.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kassi, D.F., Li, Y., Gnangoin, T.Y. et al. Green credits, green securities, renewable energy, and environmental quality: a comparative analysis of sustainable development across Chinese provinces. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03717-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03717-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation