Abstract
Green economic development is an effective tactic for China to cope with the predicament of resources and the environment. As “smoke-free industries”, producer services are becoming the main contributors to urban green economic development (UGED). The paper adopts the super-efficiency EBM model to estimate the UGED index of 268 Chinese cities from 2005 to 2019. Based on the theoretical analysis, econometric models are constructed to systematically test how the specialized and diversified agglomeration of producer services impacts UGED. The findings reveal that both agglomeration modes considerably enhance UGED in the local area and its surroundings. Diversified agglomeration exerts a stronger radiation and promotion effect than specialized agglomeration. In addition, the impact of the two agglomeration modes on UGED demonstrates pronounced heterogeneity in urban scales, economic development stages, and industries. Furthermore, mechanism studies suggest that agglomeration substantially boosts UGED by improving human capital, technological innovation, and upgrading industrial structure. As such, our findings serve as an empirical basis for understanding the mechanism of the impact of PSA on UGED and also offer significant insight for local governments to adopt differentiated industrial policies to enhance the positive agglomeration effect on UGED.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
Notes
In the notice, Chinese cites are classified into four categories according to their permanent population. A city with a population of less than 500,000 is a small city. Cities with a population of more than 500,000 and less than 1 million are medium-sized cities. A city with a population of more than 1 million and less than 5 million is a large city; Cities with a population of more than 5 million are megacities.
A measure of EA is derived from the ratio between the value of tertiary industry output and that of secondary industry output. The reason lies in that on average, the ratio of primary industry’s output to GDP does not matter since the ratio of primary industry’s output to GDP is tiny, about 6.08% and this percentage does not differ significantly across all cities.
According to per capita output value and technology intensity, high-end producer services and medium and low-end producer services are divided (Yang et al., 2020a). “Transportation, warehousing, post and telecommunications”, “leasing and commercial services” and “wholesale and retail trade” are defined as medium and low-end producer services. “Finance”, “information transmission, computer services and software”, “scientific research, technical services and geological survey” are defined as high-end producer services.
References
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1987-13085-001.
Cao, C., & Chen, X. (2019). Development model, structural adjustment and urban economic growth of producer services: An empirical study based on dynamic spatial Dubin Model. Management Review, 31(1), 15–26+61.
Demena, B. A., & Afesorgbor, S. K. (2020). The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 138, 111192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111192
Dong, X. Y., & Hao, Y. (2018). Would income inequality affect electricity consumption? Evidence from China. Energy, 142, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.027
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2005). From sectoral to functional urban specialisation. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(2), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.12.002
Eswaran, M., & Kotwal, A. (2002). The role of the service sector in the process of industrialization. Journal of Development Economics, 68(2), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00019-6
Gao, K., & Yuan, Y. (2021). The effect of innovation-driven development on pollution reduction: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121047
Guo, Y., Tong, L., & Mei, L. (2020). The effect of industrial agglomeration on green development efficiency in Northeast China since the revitalization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120584
Hao, Y., Gai, Z., & Wu, H. (2020). How do resource misallocation and government corruption affect green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 143, 111562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111562
Islam, M. (2022). Does financial development cause environmental pollution? Empirical evidence from South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4350–4362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16005-8
Jacobs, J. (2016). The economy of cities (pp. 162–164). Vintage.
Ke, S., He, M., & Yuan, C. (2014). Synergy and co-agglomeration of producer services and manufacturing: A panel data analysis of Chinese cities. Regional Studies, 48(11), 1829–1841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.756580
Koenker, R., (2004). Quantreg: an R package for quantile regression and related methods. The Comprehensive R Archive Network website
Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 857–880. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946642
Li, G., Zhou, Y., Liu, F., & Wang, T. (2020). Regional differences of manufacturing green development efficiency considering undesirable outputs in the Yangtze River economic belt based on super-SBM and WSR system methodology. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, 299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.631911
Li, J., Pan, S. Y., Kim, H., Linn, J. H., & Chiang, P. C. (2015). Building green supply chains in eco-industrial parks towards a green economy: Barriers and strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 162, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.030
Li, X., & Xu, H. (2020). The Energy-conservation and Emission-reduction Paths of Industrial sectors: Evidence from China’s 35 industrial sectors. Energy Economics, 86, 104628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104628
Lin, B., & Du, K. (2015). Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China’s regional economies: Do market-oriented reforms matter? Energy Policy, 78, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.025
Lin, B., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Measuring the green economic growth in China: Influencing factors and policy perspectives. Energy, 241, 122518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122518
Liu, L., Meng, Y., Wu, D., Ran, Q., Cao, J., & Liu, Z. (2022). Impact of haze pollution and human capital on economic resilience: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02625-8
Liu, Y., & Dong, F. (2021). How technological innovation impacts urban green economy efficiency in emerging economies: A case study of 278 Chinese cities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, 105534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105534
Marshall, A., & Guillebaud, C. W. (1961). Principles of economics: An introductory volume. Macmillan.
Meng, Y., Liu, L., Xu, Z., Gong, W., & Yan, G. (2022). Research on the heterogeneity of green biased technology progress in chinese industries decomposition index—Analysis based on the slacks-based measure integrating (SBM). Journal of Economic Analysis, 1(2), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea01020002
Ren, S., Liu, Z., Zhanbayev, R., & Du, M. (2022). Does the internet development put pressure on energy-saving potential for environmental sustainability? Evidence from China. Journal of Economic Analysis, 1(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.58567/jea01010004
Shen, Y. M., Wu, K., & Ren, W. B. (2009). Research progress of the spatial agglomeration on producer services. Geographical Research, 6 (In Chinese). https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DLYJ200906006.html
Shuai, S., & Fan, Z. (2020). Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of China: Empirical evidence from super efficiency DEA-Tobit model. Journal of Environmental Management, 261, 110227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110227
Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Alvarado, R. (2020). Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118549
Song, X., Zhou, Y., & Jia, W. (2019). How do economic openness and R&D investment affect green economic growth?—evidence from China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.050
Song, Y., Wei, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, J., & Zhang, M. (2021). Environmental regulation and economic growth: A new perspective based on technical level and healthy human capital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128520
Su, Y., & Fan, Q. M. (2022). Renewable energy technology innovation, industrial structure upgrading and green development from the perspective of China’s provinces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121727
Sun, W., & Huang, C. (2020). How does urbanization affect carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122828
Talberth, J., & Bohara, A. K. (2006). Economic openness and green GDP. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.002
Tian, Y., Jiang, G., Zhou, D., Ding, K., Su, S., Zhou, T., & Chen, D. (2019). Regional industrial transfer in the Jingjinji urban agglomeration, China: An analysis based on a new “transferring area-undertaking area-dynamic process” model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.167
Udemba, E. N., & Yalçıntaş, S. (2021). Interacting force of foreign direct invest (FDI), natural resource and economic growth in determining environmental performance: A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) approach. Resources Policy, 73, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102168
Wang, K. L., Zhao, B., Ding, L. L., & Miao, Z. (2021). Government intervention, market development, and pollution emission efficiency: Evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment, 757, 143738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143738
Wang, N., Zhang, W., & Fu, Y. (2021). Decomposition of energy intensity in China’s manufacturing industry using an agglomeration extended LMDI approach. Energy Efficiency, 14(7), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09968-7
Wang, S., Gao, S., Li, S., & Feng, K. (2020). Strategizing the relation between urbanization and air pollution: Empirical evidence from global countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118615
Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Chen, H. (2020). Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency. Energy Economics, 85, 104573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104573
Wang, X., & Feng, Z. (2001). Rural household energy consumption with the economic development in China: Stages and characteristic indices. Energy Policy, 29(15), 1391–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00037-4
Wang, Z., Liang, L., Sun, Z., & Wang, X. (2019). Spatiotemporal differentiation and the factors influencing urbanization and ecological environment synergistic effects within the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Management, 243, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.088
Wen, Z., Zhang, L., et al. (2004). The test procedure of intermediary effect and its application. Journal of Psychology, 05, 614–620.
Wood, P. (2006). Urban development and knowledge-intensive business services: Too many unanswered questions? Growth and Change, 37(3), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00327.x
Wu, J., Ma, Z., & Liu, Z. (2019). The moderated mediating effect of international diversification, technological capability, and market orientation on emerging market firms’ new product performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.025
Xu, C., Bin, Q., & Shaoqin, S. (2021). Polycentric spatial structure and energy efficiency: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. Energy Policy, 149, 112012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112012
Xu, M., Lin, B., & Wang, S. (2021). Towards energy conservation by improving energy efficiency? Evidence from China’s metallurgical industry. Energy, 216, 119255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119255
Yan, J., Yang, X., Nie, C., Su, X., Zhao, J., & Ran, Q. (2022). Does government intervention affect CO2 emission reduction effect of producer service agglomeration? Empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model and dynamic threshold model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 61247–61264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20143-y
Yang, F. F., Yeh, A. G., & Wang, J. (2018). Regional effects of producer services on manufacturing productivity in China. Applied Geography, 97, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.014
Yang, H., Lu, F., & Zhang, F. (2020). Exploring the effect of producer services agglomeration on China’s energy efficiency under environmental constraints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121320
Yang, H., Zhang, F., & He, Y. (2021). Exploring the effect of producer services and manufacturing industrial co-agglomeration on the ecological environment pollution control in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01339-7
Yang, Y., Lin, Q., Liang, Y., Ruan, Z., Qian, Z. M., Syberg, K. M., & Lin, H. (2020). The mediation effect of maternal glucose on the association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in Foshan China. Environmental Pollution, 266, 115128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115128
Ye, F., Quan, Y., He, Y., & Lin, X. (2021). The impact of government preferences and environmental regulations on green development of China’s marine economy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106522
Young, A. (2003). Gold into base metals: Productivity growth in the People’s Republic of China during the reform period. Journal of political economy, 111(6), 1220–1261. https://doi.org/10.1086/378532
Yuan, H., Feng, Y., Lee, C. C., & Cen, Y. (2020). How does manufacturing agglomeration affect green economic efficiency? Energy Economics, 92, 104944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104944
Zhai, X., & An, Y. (2021). The relationship between technological innovation and green transformation efficiency in China: An empirical analysis using spatial panel data. Technology in Society, 64, 101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101498
Zhang, J., Chang, Y., Wang, C., & Zhang, L. (2018). The green efficiency of industrial sectors in China: A comparative analysis based on sectoral and supply-chain quantifications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.015
Zhang, M., Liu, X., & Ding, Y. (2021). Assessing the influence of urban transportation infrastructure construction on haze pollution in China: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106547
Zhang, Y., & Dilanchiev, A. (2022). Economic recovery, industrial structure and natural resource utilization efficiency in China: Effect on green economic recovery. Resources Policy, 79, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102958
Zhao, H., Cao, X., & Ma, T. (2020). A spatial econometric empirical research on the impact of industrial agglomeration on haze pollution in China. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13(11), 1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00884-w
Zhao, H., & Lin, B. (2019). Will agglomeration improve the energy efficiency in China’s textile industry: Evidence and policy implications. Applied Energy, 237, 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.068
Zhao, J., Dong, X., & Dong, K. (2021). How does producer services’ agglomeration promote carbon reduction?: The case of China. Economic Modelling, 104, 105624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105624
Zhao, J., Yan, J., Ran, Q., Yang, X., Su, X., & Shen, J. (2022). Does the opening of high-speed railways improve urban livability? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101275
Zhao, J., Yan, J., Yang, X., Nie, C., Sun, H., & Ran, Q. (2022). Government competition, corruption and green total factor energy efficiency: An empirical analysis from china. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.976451
Zhao, X., Nakonieczny, J., Jabeen, F., Shahzad, U., & Jia, W. (2022). Does green innovation induce green total factor productivity? Novel findings from Chinese city level data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122021
Zheng, H., Wu, S., Zhang, Y., & He, Y. (2023). Environmental regulation effect on green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116465
Zhou, Y., Jiang, J., Ye, B., & Hou, B. (2019). Green spillovers of outward foreign direct investment on home countries: Evidence from China’s province-level data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.042
Zhu, Y., Liang, D., & Liu, T. (2020). Can China’s underdeveloped regions catch up with green economy? A convergence analysis from the perspective of environmental total factor productivity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 120216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120216
Zhu, Y., Xie, J., Huang, F., & Cao, L. (2020). The mediating effect of air quality on the association between human mobility and COVID-19 infection in China. Environmental research, 189, 109911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109911
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support from Research Funds for Universities of Xinjiang Autonomous Region (XJEDU2022J037); Humanities and Social Sciences Program Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (18SKSJ034). Special Project of Shanghai Business School on “Deepening Learning and Implementing the Spirit of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China” (AX-10999-1103-1102). The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JY Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing—review & editing, Writing original draft. JZ Software, Visualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision. XY Writing—review & editing, Validation, Formal analysis. ZZ Writing—review & editing, Validation. QR Writing—review & editing, Validation, Supervision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, J., Zhao, J., Yang, X. et al. Is producer services agglomeration a “new engine” for urban green economic development? an econometric analysis of Chinese cities. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03331-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03331-9