Abstract
Selecting a proper set of projects is an important issue to make crucial decisions for many project-oriented organizations enabling them to achieve their goals despite the existing operational constraints (resources, time, etc.) and competitive environments. Since the results and consequences of the selected projects have short-term and long-range effects on social, economic, and environmental conditions, sustainable development suggests considering both financial and non-financial factors simultaneously. Thus, paying attention to the principles of sustainable development and considering social and environmental criteria along with economic criteria will lead to proper selection of sustainable and balanced project portfolio. In this paper, first, the conventional sustainability criteria are identified and screened; afterward, the importance weights of them will be calculated using the Z-AHP approach. Then by utilizing the Z-DEA, the input and output sustainability criteria are identified and the efficiency of the undertaken projects is finally calculated. In this paper, the project efficiencies have been calculated once using the Z-DEA and once through the Z-AHP-DEA approach. The results show that when the importance weights of sustainability criteria obtained by the Z-AHP are being considered, it will affect the project efficiencies as well as the ranking of the projects and make it possible, to achieve a more effective solution applying the Z-AHP-DEA approach (modified importance weights are considered). The results of AHP, DEA, and AHP-DEA approaches have been compared with the results of certain and fuzzy conditions when the measure of expert opinions is calculated by Z-Number. It has been depicted that by shifting from certainty to uncertainty (certainty, fuzzy, Z-Number (fuzzy considering probability)) the answers get more effective and realistic and it also demonstrates that the proposed Z-AHP-DEA can be used for ranking of projects as a reliable approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Atef, A., & Hussein, A. N. (2019). Some appraisal criteria for multi-mode scheduling problem. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(4), 1641–1654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0771-x
Amiri, M. P. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6218–6224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103
Anagnostopoulos, K. P., & Mamanis, G. (2010). A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables. Computers and Operations Research, 37(7), 1285–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.09.009
Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 33(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Chaparro-González, F., Pastor-Ferrando, J. P., & Pla-Rubio, A. (2014). An AHP (analytic hierarchy process)/ANP (analytic network process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy, 66, 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.016
Azadeh, A., Saberi, M., Atashbar, N. Z., Chang, E., & Pazhoheshfar, P. (2013). Z-AHP: A Z-number extension of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. In IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2013.6611344
Beiragh, R. G., Alizadeh, R., Kaleibari, S. S., Cavallaro, F., Zolfani, S. H., Bausys, R., & Mardani, A. (2020). An integrated multi-criteria decision making model for sustainability performance assessment for insurance companies. Sustainability (switzerland), 12(3), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030789
Büyüközkan, G., & Öztürkcan, D. (2010). An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5835–5847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.022
Carazo, A. F., Gómez, T., Molina, J., Hernández-Díaz, A. G., Guerrero, F. M., & Caballero, R. (2010). Solving a comprehensive model for multiobjective project portfolio selection. Computers & Operations Research, 37(4), 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.06.012
Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
Chang, P. T., & Lee, J. H. (2012). A fuzzy DEA and knapsack formulation integrated model for project selection. Computers and Operations Research, 39(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2010.10.021
Chen, W., Lei, L., Wang, Z., Teng, M., & Liu, J. (2018). Coordinating supplier selection and project scheduling in resource-constrained construction supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 56(19), 6512–6526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1436782
Chen, Y. S., Chuang, H. M., Sangaiah, A. K., Lin, C. K., & Huang, W. B. (2019). A study for project risk management using an advanced MCDM-based DEMATEL-ANP approach. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(7), 2669–2681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0973-2
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. New York: Springer.
Dobrovolskienė, N., & Tamošiūnienė, R. (2016). An index to measure sustainability of a business project in the construction industry: Lithuanian case. Sustainability (switzerland), 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010014
Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., & Vahdani, B. (2012). A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(9), 4197–4217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050
Fernández-Sánchez, G., & Rodríguez-López, F. (2010). A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management - application to infrastructure projects in Spain. Ecological Indicators, 11(3), 902–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.04.009
Frini, A., & Benamor, S. (2015). A TOPSIS multi-criteria multi-period approach for selecting projects in sustainable development context. In IEOM 2015 - 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Proceeding, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEOM.2015.7093900
Ghasemzadeh, F., & Archer, N. P. (2000). Project portfolio selection through decision support. Decision Support Systems., 29(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00065-8
Gong, Z., Lin, Y., & Yao, T. (2013). Uncertain fuzzy preference relations and their applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28448-9
Guttorp, P., Kaufman, A., & Gupta, M. (1990). Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268889
Haghighi Rad, F., & Rowzan, S. M. (2018). Designing a hybrid system dynamic model for analyzing the impact of strategic alignment on project portfolio selection. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 89, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2018.10.001
Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Portfolio Management. Pegasus.
Hendiani, S., & Bagherpour, M. (2019). Development of sustainability index using Z-numbers: A new possibilistic hierarchical model in the context of Z-information. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00464-8
Hoseini, A. R., Ghannadpour, S. F., & Ghamari, R. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection by a new possibilistic hierarchical model in the context of Z-information. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01751-3
Huang, C. C., Chu, P. Y., & Chiang, Y. H. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega, 35(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.05.003
Ivanović, I., Grujičić, D., Macura, D., Jović, J., & Bojović, N. (2013). One approach for road transport project selection. Transport Policy, 25, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.001
Jafarzadeh, H., Akbari, P., & Abedin, B. (2018). A methodology for project portfolio selection under criteria prioritisation, uncertainty and projects interdependency–combination of fuzzy QFD and DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 110, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.028
Jones, S., Tefe, M., & Appiah-Opoku, S. (2013). Proposed framework for sustainability screening of urban transport projects in developing countries: A case study of Accra, Ghana. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 49, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.003
Jung, U., & Seo, D. W. (2010). An ANP approach for R&D project evaluation based on interdependencies between research objectives and evaluation criteria. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 335–342.
Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., & Doǧan, I. (2003). Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(03)00183-X
Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., & Deng, Y. (2012a) Decision making using z-numbers under uncertain environment. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 8(7), 2807–2814.
Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., & Deng, Y. (2012b). A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 9(3), 703–709.
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2016). Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031
Khalili-Damghani, K., & Tavana, M. (2014). A comprehensive framework for sustainable project portfolio selection based on structural equation modeling. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21404
Ku-Mahamud, K. R., Kasim, M. M., Nor, N. F., & Abdullah, F. (2011). An efficiency analysis of projects using DEA. European Journal of Scientific Research, 52(4), 476–486.
Kudratova, S., Huang, X., & Zhou, X. (2018). Sustainable project selection: Optimal project selection considering sustainability under reinvestment strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.259
Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Van Erck, R. P. G. (2005). Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.007
Lertworasirikul, S., Fang, S. C., Joines, J. A., & Nuttle, H. L. (2003). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): A possibility approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 139(2), 379–394.
Ma, J., Harstvedt, J. D., Jaradat, R., & Smith, B. (2020). Sustainability driven multi-criteria project portfolio selection under uncertain decision-making environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106236.
Mohamad, D., Shaharani, S. A., & Kamis, N. H. (2014). A Z-number-based decision making procedure with ranking fuzzy numbers method. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1635(1), pp. 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4903578
Peng, H. G., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). Hesitant uncertain linguistic Z-numbers and their application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(5), 1300–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0257-y
RezaHoseini, A., Ghannadpour, S. F., & Hemmati, M. (2020). A comprehensive mathematical model for resource-constrained multi-objective project portfolio selection and scheduling considering sustainability and projects splitting. Journal of Cleaner Production., 269, 122073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122073
Sahrom, N. A., & Dom, R. M. (2015). A Z-number extension of the hybrid Analytic Hierarchy Process-Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis for risk assessment. In ICREM7 2015 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research and Education in Mathematics: Empowering Mathematical Sciences through Research and Education, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREM.2015.7357019
Sánchez, M. A. (2015). Integrating sustainability issues into project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.087
Silvius, A. J. G., & Schipper, R. (2015). A Conceptual Model for Exploring the Relationship between Sustainability and Project success. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.497
Smith-Perera, A., García-Melón, M., Poveda-Bautista, R., & Pastor-Ferrando, J. P. (2010). A project strategic index proposal for portfolio selection in electrical company based on the analytic network process. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(6), 1569–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.022
Tavana, M., Keramatpour, M., Santos-Arteaga, F. J., & Ghorbaniane, E. (2015). A fuzzy hybrid project portfolio selection method using data envelopment analysis, TOPSIS and integer programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(22), 8432–8444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.057
Taylan, O., Bafail, A. O., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Kabli, M. R. (2014). Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 17, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003
Taylor, P., Mohanty, R. P., Agarwal, R., Choudhury, A. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2005). A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R & D project selection : A case study. International Journal of Production Research, (December 2012), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500219031
Toloo, M., & Mirbolouki, M. (2019). A new project selection method using data envelopment analysis. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 138, 106119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106119
Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (1995). Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35–44.
Valmohammadi, C., & Khaki, M. M. (2019). Determinants for selection of projects for exploitation of mines in Iran. Resources Policy, 63, 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101424
van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
Walczak, D., & Rutkowska, A. (2017). Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 706–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.044
Yaakob, A. M., & Gegov, A. (2016). Interactive TOPSIS based group decision making methodology using Z-numbers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2016.1150003
Yazdi, A. K., Komijan, A. R., Wanke, P. F., & Sardar, S. (2020). Oil project selection in Iran: A hybrid MADM approach in an uncertain environment. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 88, 106066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106066
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zadeh, L. A. (2011). A note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences, 181(14), 2923–2932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Tables
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34.
35,
36,
37,
38.
Appendix 2
See Tables 39, 40,41, 42,43, 44
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RezaHoseini, A., Rahmani, Z. & BagherPour, M. Performance evaluation of sustainable projects: a possibilistic integrated novel analytic hierarchy process-data envelopment analysis approach using Z-Number information. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 3198–3257 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01565-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01565-z