Abstract
Countries, cities, and districts have many development indexes focusing on socioeconomic problems; however, the natural capital (ecosystem services) used for development is not taken into account. For this reason, it is very important to develop mathematical modeling based on known values in order to obtain ecological footprint (EF) and human development index (HDI) data and make new models on an urban scale. Mathematical models are scientifically accepted methods that are generated using available data when direct measurement is not possible. The hypothesis of the study was based on the EF value obtained from the HDI value in the districts and a new index model called Human Development Ecological Footprint (HDI-EF) was created by using both values together to measure the sustainability of human development. When the HDIdistrict values are compared with HDI-EFdistrict, it has seen that thirty-one districts have the value of HDIdistrict exceeding the HDI-EFdistrict sustainable development boundaries. These districts make the biggest contribution to EFIstanbul value and constitute a great eco-sustainable deficit for Istanbul. The expected situation for an ideal HDI-EF is small EF versus high HDI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, J. O., & Lindroth, M. (2001). Analysıs ecologically unsustainable trade. Ecological Economics., 37, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00272-X.
Baabou, W., Grunewald, N., Ouellet-Plamondon, C., Gressot, M., & Galli, A. (2017). The ecological footprint of Mediterranean cities: Awareness creation and policy implications. Environmental Science and Policy, 69, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.013.
Barrera-Roldan, A., & Valdes-Saldivar, A. (2002). Proposal and application of a sustainable development index. Ecological Indicators, 2(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00058-4.
Baston, I., Clipa, F., & Clipa, I. R. (2018). Is Romania a sustainable developed country? An analysis of ecological footprint (EF) in correlation with human development index (HDI). Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Economics and Administrative Sciences, 3(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumeneas/01.
Bettencourt, L., & West, G. (2010). A unified theory of urban living. Nature, 467, 912–913. https://doi.org/10.1038/467912a.
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002.
Cavill, N., Kahlmeier, S.,& Racioppi, F. (2006). Physical activity and health in Europe: evidence for action. World Health Organization 2006. ISBN 92-890-1387-7. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/87545/E89490.pdf.
Costanza, R. (2000a). The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 32, 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00150-0.
Costanza, R. (2000b). Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystem, 3(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000002.
Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023.
Deakin, M., & Reid, A. (2014). Sustainable urban development: Use of the environmental assessment methods. Sustainable Cities and Society, 10, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.04.002.
Despotis, D. (2005). Measuring via human development data envelopment analysis: The case of Asia and the Pacific. Omega., 33(5), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.002.
Devas, N., & Rakodi, C., (1993). Managing Fast growing cities. New approaches to urban planning and management in the developing world. New York: Longman Scientific and Technical. ISBN-13: 978-0470220467 https://www.worldcat.org/title/managing-fast-growing-cities-new-approaches-to-urban-planning-and-management/oclc/1000547231?referer=di&ht=edition
Ewing, B., Reed, A., Galli, A., Kitzes J., & Wackernagel, M. (2010). Calculation methodology for the national footprint accounts, 2010 Edn. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, USA. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/images/uploads/National_Footprint_Accounts_Method_Paper_2010.pdf
Fanni, Z., Khakpour, B. A., & Heydari, A. (2014). Evaluating the regional development of border cities by TOPSIS model (case study: Sistan and Baluchistan Province, Iran). Sustainable Cities and Society, 10, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.05.002.
Fisher, B., Turner, K. R., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
Gershenfeld, N., (2011). The nature of mathematical modeling. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521210508 https://fab.cba.mit.edu/classes/S62.12/docs/NMM_FEM.pdf
Gidwitz, Z., Heger, M. P., Pineda, J., & Rodríguez, F. (2010). Understanding performance in human development: A cross-national study. Human Development Research Papers Office. New York, NY: UNDP, 45. Global Footprint Network, 2018. https://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/papers/HDRP_2010_42.pdf
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003.
Hassan, S. T., Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516.
Jesinghaus, J. (2000). The World economic forum’s environmental sustainability index: Strong and weak points. Ispra (Italy): European Commission Joint Research Centre.
Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQuenn, J., Mendelovits, J. & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change performance and engagement across countries results from PISA 2000. OECD Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33690904.pdf.
Koroneos, C. J., & Rokos, D. (2012). Sustainable and integrated development: A critical analysis. Sustainability, 4(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4010141.
Lind, N. C. (1992). Some thoughts on the human development index. Social Indicators Research, 27(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300511.
Magri, A., & Berezowska-Azzag, E. (2019). New tool for assessing urban water carrying capacity (WCC) in the planning of development programs in the region of Oran, Algeria. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.040.
Mazumdar, K. (2003). A new approach to human development index. Journal Review of Social Economy, 61(4), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034676032000160895.
Moffatt, I. (2000). Ecological footprints and sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 32, 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00154-8.
Moran, D., & Mazumdar, D. (2008). Measuring sustainable development: Nation by nation. Ecological Economics, 64(1), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.017.
Moroke, T., Schoeman, C., & Schoeman, I. (2019). Developing a neighbourhood sustainability assessment model: An approach to sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101433.
Morse, S. (2003a). Greening the United Nations’ human development index? Sustainable Development, 11(4), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.219.
Morse, S. (2003b). For Better or for Worse, Till the Human Development Index Dous Part? Ecological Economics, 45(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00085-5.
Mostafa, M. M. (2010). A Bayesian approach to analyzing the ecological footprint of 140 nations. Ecological Indicators, 10, 808–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.01.002.
Neumayer, E. (2001). The human development index and sustainability: A constructive proposal. Ecological Economics, 39(1), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00201-4.
Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. (1998). Sustainability and global cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2004.9982383
Niss, M., Blum, W., Berry, J. S., Biehler, R., Huntley, I., Kaiser-Messmer, G., & Profke, L., (1989). Aims and scope of applications and modelling in mathematics curricula. In Applications and modelling in learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 22–31). Chichester: Ellis Horwood
Noorbaksa, F. (1998). A modified human development index. World Development, 26(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10063-8.
Ogwang, T. (2000). Inter-country inequality in human development indicators. Applied Economics Letters, 7, 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048500351140.
Pearson, L. J. (2013). In search of resilient and sustainable cities: Prefatory remarks. Ecological Economics, 86, 222–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.020.
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., McDonnell, M. J., & Zhou, W. (2016). Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(7), e01229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1229.
Rees, W. E. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics. Environment and Urbanization, 4, 121. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789200400212.
Ruževıčıus, J. (2010). Ecological footprint as an indicator of sustainable development, economics and management (Vol. 15). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.660.5827&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Sagar, A. D., & Najam, A. (1998). The human development index: A critical review. Ecological Economics, 25(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00168-7.
Şeker, M., Bakış, Ç., & Dizeci, B., (2018) In Ed. Çoker, N. B. (Ed.). Human development index: Dıstrıcts (HDI-D) 2017, Transıtıonıng from Consumer to Human IngevCertificate No/34794 Publication No/3 İstanbul. https://ingev.org/raporlar/HDI-D-2017-ENG.pdf
Shahraki, A. A. (2017). Regional development assessment: Reflections of the problem-oriented urban planning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.07.021.
Shaker, R. R. (2018a). A mega-index for the Americas and its underlying sustainable development correlations. Ecological indicators, 89, 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.050.
Shaker, R. R. (2018). Examining sustainable landscape function across the Republic of Moldova. Habitat International, 72, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.002.
Shaker, R. R., & Zubalsky, S. L. (2015). Examining patterns of sustainability across Europe: A multivariate and spatial assessment of 25 composite indices. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.923058.
Siche, R., Agostinho, F., Ortega, E., & Romeiro, A. R. (2008). Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the energy performance indices. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.023.
Solarin, S. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Bello, M. O. (2019). Amulti-country convergence analysis of ecological footprint and its components. Sustainable Cities and Society, 46, 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101422.
Spangenberg, J. H., Fuad-Luke, A., & Blincoe, K. (2010). Design for Sustainability (DfS): The interface of sustainable production and consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(15), 1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.002.
Stiglitz, J. E., & Squire, L. (1998). International development: Is it possible? Foreign Policy. No. 110, Special Edition: Frontiers of Knowledge (pp. 138–151), New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149282
Türe, C. (2013). A methodology to analyse the relations of ecological footprint corresponding with human development index: Eco-sustainable human development index. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 20(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2012.751562.
Türe, C. (2019). Evaluation and analysis of Turkish states according to eco-sustainable human development index. International Journal of Economics, Politics, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2641593.
Türe, C., & Böcük, H. (2008). Investigation of threatened arable weeds and their conservation status in Turkey. Weed Research, 48(3), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00630.x.
Türe, C., Böcük, H., Türker, O., Yakar, A., Bekki, A., Koç, S., et al. (2013). Ecological footprint analysis of coordinator teachers involved in the international eco-schools program. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science., 8(1), 86–93.
Türe, Y., & Türe, C. (2020). An assessment of using aluminium and magnesium on CO2 emission in European passenger cars. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119120.
Ul-Haq, M. (1996). Reflections on human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & de Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modelling and tool use in mathematics education. Mathematics education library (Vol. 30). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3194-2_16
Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Moran, D., Wermer, P., Goldfinger, S., Deumling, D., & Murray, M. (2005). National footprint and biocapacity accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA, USA. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/91bb/1ea1caaf0236ff724920656bbd7204dd2e4a.pdf
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1997). Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics, 20, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00077-8.
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205.
Wang, M., Song, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, J. (2012). Exploring the anthropogenic driving forces of China’s provincial environmental impact. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 19(5), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2012.712924.
Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J. (2010). A review of the ecological footprint indicator—perceptions and methods. Sustainability, 2(6), 1645–1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2061645.
Ziegler, R. (2007). Political perception and ensemble of macro objectives and measures: The paradox of the index for sustainable economic welfare. Environmental Values, 16(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.3197/09632710778016036.
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Türe, C., Türe, Y. A model for the sustainability assessment based on the human development index in districts of Megacity Istanbul (Turkey). Environ Dev Sustain 23, 3623–3637 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00735-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00735-9