Abstract
This paper focuses on findings from an analysis of data submitted through the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS). STARS has addressed the demand for standard metrics to measure sustainability progress at US and Canadian colleges and universities, with expanding access to institutions in other countries gained through the launch of an International Pilot and release of STARS 2.0. Since its release in 2009, STARS has emerged as a reputable source of data that can provide a broad overview of the state of campus sustainability. The release of STARS Version 2.0 in 2013 improved upon the original reporting framework and also expanded accessibility of STARS to all higher education institutions worldwide. The findings in this paper tell the story of a campus sustainability movement that is quite young. As STARS matures along with this movement, STARS data will hopefully show a trend of continuous improvement at participating institutions. By participating in STARS and learning from examples set by other institutions, colleges and universities from across the world can be on the leading edge of moving toward a more just and sustainable world.
References
Abu Sayed Md, K., & Asmuss, M. (2013). Benchmarking tools for assessing and tracking sustainability in higher educational institutions: Identifying an effective tool for the University of Saskatchewan. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 449–465.
Carnegie Foundation. (2010). Basic classification summary tables: Distribution of institutions and enrollments by classification category. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved November 1, 2012 from http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/summary/basic.php.
Higher Education Associations Sustainability Consortium (HEASC). (2006). Call for a system for assessing & comparing progress in campus sustainability. Retrieved November 1, 2012 from http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/STARS/HEASCcall.pdf.
Kamal, A. S. M., & Asmuss, M. (2013). Benchmarking tools for assessing and tracking sustainability in higher educational institutions: Identifying an effective tool for the University of Saskatchewan. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 449–465.
Leal Filho, W. (Ed.). (2010). Sustainability at universities: Opportunities, challenges and trends. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Scientific Publishers.
Leal Filho, W. (ed) (2012) Sustainable development at universities: New horizons. ISBN ISBN 9783631625606. Peter Lang Scientific Publishers, Frankfurt.
Leal Filho, W., Goncalves, F., Pereira, R., Azeiteiro, U. (Eds) (2012) Contributions to the UN decade of education for sustainable development. ISBN 9783631613474. Peter Lang Scientific Publishers, Frankfurt.
Lozano, R., Lozano, F., Mulder, K., Huisingh, D., & Waas, T. (2013). Advancing Higher Education for Sustainable Development: International insights and critical reflections. In Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 3–9.
Lozano, R., & Peattie, K. (2011). Assessing Cardiff University’s curricula contribution to sustainable development using the STAUNCH(RTM) system. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5, doi: 10.1177/097340821000500114.
Martin, J., & Samels, J. (2012). The sustainable university: Green goals and new challenges for higher education leaders. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
McIntosh, M., Cacciola, K., Clermont, S., Keniry, J. (2001). State of the campus environment: A national report card on environmental performance and sustainability in higher education. National Wildlife Federation. pp. 78–97. Retrieved November 1, 2012 from http://www.nwf.org/Global-Warming/Campus-Solutions/Resources/Reports/State-of-the-Campus-Environment-Report.aspx.
McIntosh, M., Gaalswyk, K., Keniry, J., Eagan, D. (2008). Campus environment 2008: A national report card on sustainability in higher education. National Wildlife Federation. p.13. Retrieved November 1, 2012 from http://www.nwf.org/Global-Warming/Campus-Solutions/Resources/Reports/Campus-Report-Card.aspx.
Posner, S. M., & Stuart, R. (2013). Understanding and advancing campus sustainability using a systems framework. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(3), 264–277.
Shriberg, M. (2002). Sustainability in US higher education: Organizational factors influencing campus environmental performance and leadership. The University of Michigan. p. 86. Retrieved November 1, 2012 from http://promiseofplace.org/research_attachments/Shriberg2002SustainabilityinHigherEdu.pdf.
STARS: A Year in Review. (2011). Association for the advancement of sustainability in higher education. p. 4. Retrieved February 14, 2014 from http://www.aashe.org/files/stars_annual_review_2010.pdf.
STARS Annual Review. (2013), Association for the advancement of sustainability in higher education. p. 3. Retrieved February 14, 2014 from http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/STARS/stars_2013_annual_review_final.pdf.
STARS Quarterly Review. (2012a, Spring). Framing campus sustainability. Retrieved February 14, 2014 from http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/STARS/sqr_spring_2012_final.pdf.
STARS Quarterly Review. (2012b, Fall). The role of institutional diversity. Retrieved February 14, 2014 from http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/STARS/sqr_fall_2012-final.pdf.
STARS Quarterly Review. (2012c, Winter). The role of institutional diversity. Retrieved February 14, 2014 from http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/STARS/sqr_winter_2012-final.pdf.
STARS Score Display. (2012). Association for the advancement of sustainability in higher education. Retrieved November 1, 2012 from https://stars.aashe.org/institutions/data-displays/scores/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Urbanski, M., Filho, W.L. Measuring sustainability at universities by means of the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS): early findings from STARS data. Environ Dev Sustain 17, 209–220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9564-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9564-3