Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Land evaluation approaches comparing TOPSIS and SAW with parametric methods for rice cultivation

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Population growth has resulted in an increase in land exploitation on a large scale. Therefore, to increase crop yield and sustainable use of soil, it is necessary to exploit the land according to its potential. Due to land suitability assessment’s multifactor nature, it needs a method for evaluating the factors simultaneously; in this case, multi-criteria decision models can be used. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficiency of the parametric method (square root) with multi-criteria decision-making approaches (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and simple additive weighting (SAW)) for evaluating land suitability in some rice cultivated areas in Khuzestan province, southwest Iran. A total of 28 rice farms were selected in the study area, and a pedon was dug, examined, and sampled in each. Several physicochemical land characteristics were used for the evaluation process, such as soil, climate, and topographical factors. According to the results, soil texture is the main limiting factor for rice farming in the study region, and organic carbon, salinity, and alkalinity ranked next. The range of land index for rice cultivation calculated by the square root method was from 19.3 to 70.9, from 49 to 95.3 by TOPSIS, and from 3.57 to 74.7 by SAW. The calculated explanatory coefficients between the actual yield and land indices for rice products estimated by the square root method, the TOPSIS approach, and the SAW method were 0.44, 0.63, and 0.60, respectively. This result confirms the high accuracy of TOPSIS method compared to SAW and square root methods. TOPSIS is therefore the ideal method for prioritizing options based on the simulation of the ideal answer because it is highly technical and robust in its decision-making approach. Furthermore, it uses the standardization method, equations, mathematical matrices, and suitable weights. Overall, it can be recommended as a suitable efficiency approach for land suitability evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abd-Elmabod, S. K., Bakr, N., Muñoz-Rojas, M., Pereira, P., Zhang, Z., Cerda, A., Jordan, A., Mansour, H., De La Rosa, D., & Jones, L. (2019). Assessment of soil suitability for improvement of soil factors and agricultural management. Sustainability, 11(6), 1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi, O., Alamdari, P., Servati, M., & Khoshzaman, T. (2021). Investigate the suitability and capability of lands using parametric methods to achieve sustainable development. Geography and Development, 18(61), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, A., Jalali, S. A., & Navidi, M. N. (2023a). Assessment of land suitability for sugarcane cultivation using TOPSIS and parametric methods in Southwestern Iran.  Eurasian Soil Science, 56, 818–829.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, A., Zareian, G., & Shakeri, S. (2023b). Digital mapping of soil fertility for some agricultural lands by using fuzzy-AHP (FAHP) techniques and GIS in highly calcareous soil, Southwest Iran. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 54(20), 2885–2897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherzadeh, A., & Gholizadeh, A. (2016). Modeling land suitability evaluation for wheat production b parametric and TOPSIS approaches using GIS, northeast of Iran. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(3), 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtiarifar, M., Mesgari, M., & Karimi, M. (2008). Changing land uses, using spatial multi-criteria decision analyses. Integrating Generations, FIG Working Week Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilbao-Terol, A., Arenas-Parra, M., Cañal-Fernández, V., & Antomil-Ibias, J. (2014). Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds. Omega, 49, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2020). An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabuk, A. J., Al-Ansari, N., Hussain, H. M., Knutsson, S., & Pusch, R. (2017). GIS-based assessment of combined AHP and SAW methods for selecting suitable sites for landfill in Al-Musayiab Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Environmental Earth Science, 76(5), 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, C., Creamer, R. E., Schulte, R. P., O’Sullivan, L., & Jordan, P. (2016). A functional land management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy, 56, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Rosa, D., & Van Diepen, C. A. (2002). Qualitative and quantitative land evaluation. In W. Verheye (Ed.), 1.5. Land use and land cover, in Encyclopedia of Life Support System (EOLSSUNESCO) (Developed under the Aus pices of the UNESCO). Eolss Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delsouz Khaki, B., Torabi Gelsefidi, H., & Davatgar, N. (2022). Comparison of three land suitability evaluation depth scenarios for irrigated paddy fields (case study: North of Iran). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 69(9), 1454–1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedeoğlua, M., & Dengiz, O. (2019). Generating of land suitability index for wheat with hybrid system approach using AHP and GIS. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 167, 105062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elaalem, M., Comber, A., & Fisher, P. (2010). Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy AHP with TOPSIS methods. In 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science (pp. 1–8).

  • Eskandari, M., Zeinadini, A., Navidi, M., & Salmanpour, A. (2022). Evaluating TOPSIS method in prioritizing lands for saffron cultivation. Water and Soil, 36(2), 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (1976). A framework for land evaluation. FAO Soil Bulletin No 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT. (2020). FAOSTAT statistical database. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Rome.

  • Fetanat, A., Mofid, H., Mehrannia, M., & Shafipour, G. (2019). Informing energy justice based decision-making framework for waste-to-energy technologies selection in sustainable waste management: A case of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1377–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, C., Chen, S., Yu, Y., Xu, Z., Zhu, B., Xu, X., & Wang, Z. (2021). Evaluation of agricultural land suitability based on RS, AHP, and MEA: A case study in Jilin Province, China. Agriculture, 11(4), 370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanh, H. Q., Azadi, H., Dogot, T., Ton, V. D., & Lebailly, P. (2017). Dynamics of agrarian systems and land use change in North Vietnam. Land Degradation & Development, 28(3), 799–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, M. C., Wang, E. M. Y., Lee, W. C., Li, L. W., Hsieh, C. Y., Tsai, W., & Liu, T. C. (2018). Application of HFACS, fuzzy TOPSIS, and AHP for identifying important human error factors in emergency departments in Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 67, 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K., Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (pp. 58–191).

  • Khiddir, S. M. (1986). A statistical approach in the use of parametric systems applied to the FAO framework for land evaluation. Unpublished thesis. State University Ghent

  • Kilic, O. M., Ersayin, K., Gunal, H., Khalofah, A., & Alsubeie, M. S. (2022). Combination of fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques in land suitability assessment for wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 29(4), 2634–2644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., He, X., Chan, F. T., & Wang, Z. (2022a). An extended multi-criteria group decision-making method with psychological factors and bidirectional infuence relation for emergency medical supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 202, 117414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Zhang, J., Niu, B., Liu, L., & He, X. (2022b). A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making approach with intuitionistic fuzzy sets to design reverse supply chains for COVID-19 medical waste recycling channels. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 108228.

  • Maf-Gholami, D., Jaafari, A., Zenner, E. K., Kamari, A. N., & Bui, D. T. (2020). Vulnerability of coastal communities to climate change: Thirty-year trend analysis and prospective prediction for the coastal regions of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Science of the Total Environment, 741, 140305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoudi, M., & Elhaeesahar, M. (2016). Trend assessment of climate changes in Khuzestan Province, Iran. Natural Environment Change, 2(2), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendas, A., Delali, A., Khalfallah, M., Likou, L., Gacemi, M. A., Boukrentach, H., Djilali, A., & Mahmoudi, R. (2014). Improvement of land suitability assessment for agriculture-application in Algeria. Arabian Journal of Geoscience, 7(2), 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture Iran. (2021). Agricultural statistics, 2019–2020 (Vol. 1). Available at: http://www.maj.ir/Portal/Home/.pdf

  • Mousavi, S., Sarmadian, F., & Taati, A. (2017). Comparison of FAO method and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to assess land suitability for rainfed wheat in Kohin region. Soil Research, 30(4), 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffari, M., Bemani, A., Erfani, M., Yarami, N., & Siyahati, G. (2023). Integration of LCSA and GIS-based MCDM for sustainable landfill site selection: A case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(4), 510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Assessment of optimized pattern in milling factories of rice production based on energy, environmental and economic objectives. Energy, 169, 1259–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. H., & Khuong, M. H. (2019). Applying AHP method and GIS to evaluate land suitability for paddy rice crop in Quang Xuong district, Thanh Hoa province. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 11(3), 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan, O. (2021). Land suitability determination for citrus cultivation using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis in Mersin, Turkey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 190, 106433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkaya, G., Timor, M., & Erdin, C. (2021). Science, technology and innovation policy indicators and comparisons of countries through a hybrid model of data mining and MCDM methods. Sustainability, 13, 694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G., & Pan, J. (2011). Research in crop land suitability analysis based on GIS. In International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture (pp. 314–325). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourkhabbaz, H. R., Javanmardi, S., & Faraji Sabokbar, H. A. (2014). Suitability analysis for determining potential agricultural land use by the multi-criteria decision making models SAW and VIKOR-AHP (Case study: Takestan-Qazvin Plain). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16, 1005–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi, M., Mansourian, A., & Talei, M. (2011). Comparing study between AHP, AHP-OWA and fuzzy AHP-OWA multi-criteria decision making methods for site selection of residential complexes in Tabriz-Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies, 37(57), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, F., & Sharifian, S. (2022). A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(9), 657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J., & Saha, S. (2018). Assessment of land suitability for the paddy cultivation using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): A study on Hinglo river basin, Eastern India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 4(2), 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2013). Sensitivity analysis in the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks (pp. 345–360).

  • Seyed Jalali, S. A., Azadi, A., Navidi, M., Eskandari, M., Charti, A., Mahmoud Soltani, S., Zeinadini, A., & Delsouz Khaki, B. (2022). Effect of soil factors on rice growth in Guilan, Mazandaran, and Khuzestan Provinces, Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 35(4), 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyedmohammadi, J., & Navidi, M. N. (2022). Applying fuzzy inference system and analytic network process based on GIS to determine land suitability potential for agricultural. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(10), 712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A. A., Ghorbani, M. A., & Shahbazi, F. (2018). Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops. Geoderma, 310, 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyedmohammadi, J., Zeinadini, A., Navidi, M. N., & McDowell, R. W. (2023). A new robust hybrid model based on support vector machine and firefly meta-heuristic algorithm to predict pistachio yields and select effective soil variables. Ecological Informatics, 102002.

  • Shariff, A. M., & Wan, M. D. (2008). Land suitability study using GIS and MCDA in agriculture activities: A land suitability study for harumanis mango in perlis using GIS and MCDA. GIS Bulletin, 2, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to soil taxonomy (12th ed.). USDA, NRCS. U.S. Gov. Print. Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. (2014a). Kellogg soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42, Version 5. R. Burt and Soil Survey Staff (ed.). United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. (2014b). Keys to soil taxonomy (12th ed.). United States Department of Agriculture, National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sposito, C. (2016). The chemistry of soils (3rd Ed., p. 272). Oxford University Press.

  • Storie, R. E. (1978). The storie index soil rating revised. Davis, CA, University of California, Division of Agricultural Science, Special Publication No. 3203.

  • Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., & Debaveye, D. J. (1991). Land evaluation, part I: Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculation. Agricultural Publications, No 7. General Administration for Development Cooperation. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., Debaveye, J., & Beernaert, F. (1993). Land evaluation. Part III: Crop requirements. Agricultural Publications, No 7. General Administration for Development Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tale Jenekanlou, A., Karimi, M., & Taleai, M. (2015). Residential land suitability assessment using fuzzy group TOPSIS-OWA. Journal of Geometrics Science and Technology, 4(4), 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tercan, E., & Dereli, M. A. (2020). Development of a land suitability model for citrus cultivation using GIS and multi-criteria assessment techniques in Antalya province of Turkey. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thi Thu, H. L., & Tien Long, N. (2012). Multicriteria analysis for land suitability assessment for gialun banana in nam Dong district, Thua Thien Hue Province. International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienwong, K., Dasananda, S., & Navanugraha, C. (2009). Integration of land evaluation and the analytical hierarchical process method for energy crops in Kanchanaburi, Thailand. ScienceAsia, 35, 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafaeinejad, A. (2016). Cropping pattern optimization by using of TOPSIS and genetic algorithm based on the capabilities of GIS. Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 3(1), 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahidi, M. J., Behdani, M. A., Servati, M., & Naderi, M. (2023). Fuzzy-based models’ performance on qualitative and quantitative land suitability evaluation for cotton cultivation in Sarayan County, South Khorasan Province, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(4), 488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. J. (2015). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, L. P., & Dress, L. R. (1983). Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil. In: B. B., Trangmar, R. S., Yost & G. Uehara (Eds.), Advances in agronomy (Vol. 38).

  • Zabihi, H., Ahmad, A., Vogeler, I., Said, M. N., Golmohammadi, M., Golein, B., & Nilashi, M. (2015). Land suitability procedure for sustainable citrus planning using the application of the analytical network process approach and GIS. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 117, 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zareian, G. R., Azadi, A., & Shakeri, S. (2021). Evaluation of soil fertility map for bean cultivation in Eghlid Plain by using hybrid fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques. Iran Agricultural Research, 40(1), 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Hu, Q., Zeng, S., & Su, W. (2021). IOWLAD-based MCDM model for the site assessment of a household waste processing plant under a Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers who considerably improved the quality of the manuscript.

Funding

The funding for the research was provided by the Soil and Water Research Institute of Iran 014-10-10-9452-94008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ahvaz, Iran

    Abolfazl Azadi

  2. Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

    Alireza Seyed Jalali & Mir Naser Navidi

Authors
  1. Abolfazl Azadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alireza Seyed Jalali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mir Naser Navidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Abolfazl Azadi, Alireza Seyed Jalali, and Mir Naser Navidi contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results, and to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Azadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azadi, A., Jalali, A.S. & Navidi, M.N. Land evaluation approaches comparing TOPSIS and SAW with parametric methods for rice cultivation. Environ Monit Assess 195, 1296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11849-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11849-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation