Abstract
Sanitary landfill is still the most significant and reasonable and the least expensive waste disposal method. The process of selecting a landfill site with minimal adverse effects on the environment is a complex task, in which numerous criteria need to be taken into account. In the present research, the AHP (analytical hierarchy process) and TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) models were used to weigh the layers and prioritize the identified regions, respectively. In the present study, the following criteria were considered: (1) environmental criteria consisting of groundwater depth and distance from rivers, streams, and wetland/dam/lake; (2) physical criteria consisting of geology, slope percentage, distance from faults, heights, soil depth, and aspect; (3) social–economic criteria including the subcriteria land uses and distance from urban centers and villages; and finally, (4) access factors with the subcriteria distance from roads and power lines. After the preparation phase, the maps corresponding to each subscale were weighed in GIS by means of AHP. To weigh the layers and evaluate the inconsistency rate of pairwise comparisons, the Expert Choice software, in which the AHP model can be run, was used. On the output map, 11 highly suitable areas for landfill were identified via the integration of layers and the identified options and were ranked using the TOPSIS technique and five secondary criteria based on experts’ views. Ultimately, area no. 12 was selected as the proposed site for the landfill in Naqadeh County. The results indicated that the combination of multicriteria decision-making models including AHP and TOPSIS can be properly utilized for the purpose of locating.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afzali, A., Samani, J., & Rashid, M. (2011). Municipal landfill site selection for Isfahan City by use of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 8(3), 273–284.
Ahmadi, M., Teymouri, P., Dinarvand, F., Hoseinzadeh, M., Babaei, A. A., & Jaafarzadeh, N. (2014). Municipal solid waste landfill site selection using analytical hierarchy process method and geographic information system in Abadan, Iran. Iranian Journal of Health Science, 2(1), 37–50.
Aivaliotis, V., Dokas, I., Hatzigiannakou, M., & Panagiotakopoulos, D. (2004). Functional relationships of landfill and landraise capacity with design and operation parameters. Waste Management & Research, 22(4), 283–290.
Al-Jarrah, O., & Abu-Qdais, H. (2006). Municipal solid waste landfill siting using intelligent system. Waste Management, 26(3), 299–306.
Bahrani, S., Ebadi, T., Ehsani, H., Yousefi, H., & Maknoon, R. (2016). Modeling landfill site selection by multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy functions in GIS, case study: Shabestar, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(4), 337.
Bertolini, M., Braglia, M., & Carmignani, G. (2006). Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract. International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 422–430.
Beskese, A., Demir, H. H., Ozcan, H. K., & Okten, H. E. (2015). Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(7), 3513–3521.
Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., & GIRI, B. C. (2016). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(3), 727–737.
Boroumandi, M., Khamehchyian, M., & Nikoudel, M. R. (2014). Hazardous wastes landfill site selection using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Zanjan Province. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(4), 97–109.
Bzi, K., & Sargolzaii, S. (2015). Site selection for garbage dumping and burial in the city of Zabol using the AHP model. Scientific Journal Management System, 3(1), 143–119.
Chabuk, A. J., Al-Ansari, N., Hussain, H. M., Knutsson, S., & Pusch, R. (2017). GIS-based assessment of combined AHP and SAW methods for selecting suitable sites for landfill in Al-Musayiab Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(5), 209.
Chang, N.-B., Parvathinathan, G., & Breeden, J. B. (2008). Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(1), 139–153.
Choi, D.-Y., & Oh, K.-W. (2000). ASA and its application to multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 89–102.
Çimren, E., Çatay, B., & Budak, E. (2007). Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35(3-5), 363–376.
Demesouka, O., Vavatsikos, A., & Anagnostopoulos, K. (2014). GIS-based multicriteria municipal solid waste landfill suitability analysis: a review of the methodologies performed and criteria implemented. Waste Management & Research, 32(4), 270–296.
Derakhshandeh, M., & Taleb Beydokhti, T. (2014). Management of landfill locating of urban waste. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 3(3), 32–39.
Eskandari, M., Homaee, M., Mahmoodi, S., & Pazira, E. (2013). Integrating GIS and AHP for municipal solid waste landfill site selection. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3(4), 588–595.
Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., & Agouti, T. (2016). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 501.
Hejazi, S. A. (2016). Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study of Marageh, Iran. Geography and Planning, 19(54), 105–125.
Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2009). Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations. Or Insight, 22(4), 201–220.
Jafari, H. R., Rafiee, Y., Ramezani Mehrian, M., & Nasiri, H. (2012). Urban landfill site selection using AHP and SAW in GIS environment (case study: Kohkiluye-o-Boyer Ahmad Province, Iran). Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(1), 131–140.
Kharat, M. G., Kamble, S. J., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Dhume, S. M. (2016). Modeling landfill site selection using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(2), 53.
Mahtabi Oghani, M., Najafi, A., & Yunesi, H. (2013). Comparison of TOPSIS and AHP in site selection of municipal solid wastes landfill (case study: Karaj landfill site selection). Iranian Journal of Health and Environment, 6(3), 341–352.
Malczewski, J. (1997). Propagation of errors in multicriteria location analysis: a case study. In G. Fandel & T. Gal (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Vol. 448). Berlin: Springer.
Mirzaei, M., Salman Mahiny, A., & Mirkarimi, S. H. (2014). Site selection of landfill by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) (case study: landfill of Golpayegan township). Journal of Natural Environment, 67(1), 105–119.
Mokhtari, M., Hosseini, F., Babaee, A., & Mirhoseini, S. (2015). Application of AHP and TOPSIS models for site selection of municipal solid waste landfill (case study: Lali City). Tolooebehdasht, 14(4), 143–153.
Onüt, S., & Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 28(9), 1552–1559.
Pourahmad, A., Habibi, K., Mohammad Zahraei, S., & Nazari Adli, S. (2007). Site selection for urban facility in Babolsar using GIS & fuzzy logic. Environmental Studies, 33(42), 31–42.
Rathore, S., Ahmad, S., & Shirazi, S. (2016). Use of the suitability model to identify landfill sites in Lahore-Pakistan. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 12, 103–108.
Romali, N. S., Mokhtar, N., Ishak, W. F. W. & Samah, M. A. A. (2013). Solid waste management: development of AHP model for application of landfill sites selection in Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
Şener, Ş., Şener, E., Nas, B., & Karaguzel, R. (2010). Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Management, 30(1), 2037–2046.
Şener, Ş., Sener, E., & Karaguzel, R. (2011). Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent–Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173(1-4), 533–554.
Shih, H.-S., Shyur, H.-J., & Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7-8), 801–813.
Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J. J., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: applications and trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 393–417.
Tchobanoglous, G., & Kreith, F. (2002). Handbook of solid waste management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tzeng, G., Teng, M., Chen, J., & Opricovic, S. (2002). Multicriteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(2), 171–187.
Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.
Funding
We appreciate Urmia University of Medical Science for providing financial and instrumental support to conduct this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khorsandi, H., Faramarzi, A., Aghapour, A.A. et al. Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: a case study in Naqadeh, Iran. Environ Monit Assess 191, 730 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7863-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7863-8