Abstract
The scale of investigation for disturbance-influenced processes plays a critical role in theoretical assumptions about stability, variance, and equilibrium, as well as conservation reserve and long-term monitoring program design. Critical consideration of scale is required for robust planning designs, especially when anticipating future disturbances whose exact locations are unknown. This research quantified disturbance proportion and pattern (as contagion) at multiple scales across North America. This pattern of scale-associated variability can guide selection of study and management extents, for example, to minimize variance (measured as standard deviation) between any landscapes within an ecoregion. We identified the proportion and pattern of forest disturbance (30 m grain size) across multiple landscape extents up to 180 km2. We explored the variance in proportion of disturbed area and the pattern of that disturbance between landscapes (within an ecoregion) as a function of the landscape extent. In many ecoregions, variance between landscapes within an ecoregion was minimal at broad landscape extents (low standard deviation). Gap-dominated regions showed the least variance, while fire-dominated showed the largest. Intensively managed ecoregions displayed unique patterns. A majority of the ecoregions showed low variance between landscapes at some scale, indicating an appropriate extent for incorporating natural regimes and unknown future disturbances was identified. The quantification of the scales of disturbance at the ecoregion level provides guidance for individuals interested in anticipating future disturbances which will occur in unknown spatial locations. Information on the extents required to incorporate disturbance patterns into planning is crucial for that process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, W. L. (1992). The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves. Landscape Ecology, 7(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133309.
Bengtsson, J., Angelstam, P., Elmqvist, T., et al. (2015). Reserves, resilience, and dynamic landscapes. Ambio, 32, 389–396.
Betts, M. G., Hagar, J. C., Rivers, J. W., & Alexander, J. D. (2010). Thresholds in forest bird occurrence as a function of the amount of early seral broadleaf forest at landscape scales. Ecological Applications, 20(8), 2116–2130. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1305.1.
Bissonette, J. A. (2012). Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Chicago: Springer Science and Business Media.
Buma, B., & Barrett, T. A. (2015). Spatial and topographic trends in forest expansion and biomass change, from regional to local scales. Global Change Biology, 21(9), 3445–3454. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12915.
Cabeza, M., & Moilanen, A. (2001). Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16(5), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02125-5.
Core Team, R. (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., & Kommareddy, A. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693.
Hawbaker, T. J., Radeloff, V. C., Steward, S. I., Hammer, R. B., Keuler, N. S., & Clayton, M. K. (2013). Human and biophysical influences on fire occurrence in the United States. Ecological Applications, 23(3), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1816.1.
Hijmans, R.J., van Etten, J. (2015). Raster: geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R Package Version 2.0–12 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.
Leroux, S. J., & Rayfield, B. (2014). Methods and tools for assessing natural disturbance dynamics in conservation planning for wilderness areas. Diversity and Distributions, 20(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12155.
Leroux, S. J., Schmeigelow, F. K. A., Cumming, S. G., Lessard, R. B., & Nagy, J. (2007). Accounting for system dynamics in reserve design. Ecological Applications, 16, 1954–1966.
Loveland, T. R., & Merchant, J. M. (2004). Ecoregions and ecoregionalizatoin: geographical and ecological perspectives. Environmental Management, 34(1), S1–S13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-5181-x.
Mayer, A. L., Buma, B., Davis, A., Gagne, S. A., Loudermilk, E. L., Scheller, R., Schmiegelow, F., Wiersma, Y., & Franklin, J. (2016). How landscape ecology informs global land change science and policy. Bioscience, 66(6), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw035.
McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Neel, M.C., Ene, E. (2012). FRAGSTATS v3: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Amherst, MA, USA.
Mladenoff, D. J., White, M. A., Pastor, J., & Crow, T. R. (1993). Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecological Applications, 3(2), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941832.
O’Hara, K. L., & Ramage, B. S. (2013). Silviculture in an uncertain world: utilizing multi-aged management systems to integrate disturbance. Forestry, 86(4), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpt012.
O’Neill, R. V., Johnson, A. R., & King, A. W. (1989). A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecology, 3(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131538.
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., & Kassem, K. R. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience, 51(11), 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2.
Omernik, J. M., & Griffith, G. E. (2014). Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environmental Management, 54(6), 1249–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1.
Ott, R. A., & Juday, G. P. (2002). Canopy gap characteristics and their implications for management in the temperate rainforests of southeast Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management, 159(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00436-4.
Pickell, P. D., Andison, D. W., & Coops, N. C. (2013). Characterizations of anthropogenic disturbance patterns in the mixedwood boreal forest of Alberta, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 304, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.031.
Pickett, S. T., & White, P. S. (1985). The ecology of natural disturbances. New York: Elsevier.
Pressey, R. L., Cabeza, M., Watts, M. E., Cowling, R. M., & Wilson, K. A. (2007). Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(11), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.001.
Riitters, K., O’Neill, R. V., & Jones, K. B. (1997). Assessing habitat suitability at multiple scales: a landscape-level approach. Biological Conservation, 81(1-2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00145-0.
Riitters, K., Wickham, J., O'Neill, R.V., Jones, B., Smith, E. (2000). Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology, 4(2):online.
Riitters, K., Wickham, J., Costanza, J. K., & Vogt, P. (2015). A global evaluation of forest interior area dynamics using tree cover data from 2000 to 2012. Landscape Ecology, 31(1), 137–148.
Sayler, K. L., Acevedo, W., & Taylor, J. L. (2016). Status and trends of land change in selected US ecoregions-2000 to 2011. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 82(9), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1112(16)30120-3
Schoennagel, T., Veblen, T. T., Kulakowski, D., & Holz, A. (2007). Multidecadal climate variability and climate interactions affect subalpine fire occurrence, Western Colorado (USA). Ecology, 88(11), 2891–2902. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1860.1.
Turner, M. G. (1989). Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20(1), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131.
Turner, M. G. (2010). Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology, 91(10), 2833–2849. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0097.1.
Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., Gardner, R. H., O’Neill, R. V., & Kratz, T. K. (1993). A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 8(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125352.
Turner, M. G., Dale, V. H., & Everham III, E. H. (1997). Fires, hurricanes, and volcanoes: comparing large disturbances. Bioscience, 47(11), 758–769. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313098.
Turner, D. P., Ritts, W. D., Kennedy, R. E., Gray, A. N., & Yang, Z. (2015). Effects of harvest, fire, and pest/pathogen disturbances on the West Cascades ecoregion carbon balance. Carbon Balance and Management, 10(1), 1.
Wiens, J. A. (2009). Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecology, 24(8), 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9284-x.
Zurlini, G., Riitters, K., Zaccarelli, N., Petrosillo, I., Jones, K. B., & Rossi, L. (2006). Disturbance patterns in a socio-ecological system at multiple scales. Ecological Complexity, 3(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.11.002.
Zurlini, G., Riitters, K., Zaccarelli, N., & Petrosillo, I. (2007). Patterns of disturbances at multiple scales in real and simulated landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 22(5), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9055-5.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by NSF Alaska EPSCoR award #OIA-1208927 and the state of Alaska. Thanks is also expressed to Hansen et al. and Google Earth Engine for supplying the data on forest disturbances. Four anonymous reviewers provided helpful feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buma, B., Costanza, J.K. & Riitters, K. Determining the size of a complete disturbance landscape: multi-scale, continental analysis of forest change. Environ Monit Assess 189, 642 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6364-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6364-x