Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Natural resource management in a protected area of the Indian Himalayas: a modeling approach for anthropogenic interactions on ecosystem

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of ecosystem conservation as a broad theme came into existence during the 1970s under the Man and Biosphere Programme (MAB) of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The Indian Government followed this approach and chose the method to segregate the landscape for conservation of the ecosystem as well as for the development of the local economy and its people. We have examined the effect of this policy and concurrently developed a theoretical modeling approach to understand how human behavior is changing under shifting political, socioeconomic and environmental conditions. A specific focus has been on how the landscape is changing in the mountains of the Indian Himalayan region where about 10% of the total geographical area is converted into protected landscape for conservation of biodiversity. For local people living in the Himalayan mountains in India, agriculture is the main land use activity and is strongly linked to the forests in providing sustainability. There are several branches in the rural ecosystems where the local people’s economy was centered. These include agriculture, animal husbandry, medicinal and aromatic plants cultivation, forest resource collection, tourism and other occupations. The greatest proportion of the population was engaged in the agriculture sector, whose contribution is high in the rural economy (61%); followed by animal husbandry (19%), forest resource collection for economic gain (18%), and medicinal and aromatic plants cultivation (1.5%). However, three decades ago the animal husbandry branch of the rural ecosystem was contributing the maximum share towards rural household income (40%) followed by tourism (35.2%), and lastly agriculture (14%). The desire of farmers to secure the optimum output from agricultural land use has resulted in an increase for resource collection from the forests. The people’s perception (n=1,648) regarding overall changes occurring in the region was varied and most showed that the current trend within rural ecosystems has emerged because of the implementation of conservation policies/creation of national park and biosphere reserve (80%), followed by limitation (22%), climate (20%), population growth (7%), national economy (10%) and least by socioeconomic change (5%). The theoretical agent model developed here draws attention to agent/farmer behavior and land resource use for his livelihood in the temporal dimension. The current study would be helpful to introduce new approaches for the development of the methodological and theoretical aspects associated with the complex human and ecosystem interactions in the Himalayan mountains for sustainable landscape development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettinger, P., & Boston, K. (2001). A conceptual model for describing decision making situations in integrated natural resource planning and modeling projects. Environmental Management, 28, 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabyn, L. (2005). Solutions for characterising natural landscapes in New Zealand using geographical information systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 76, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colchester, M. (1997). Salvaging nature: Indigenous people and protected areas. In K. B. Chimire, & M. P. Pimbert (Eds.), Social change and conservation (pp. 97–130). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadman, P. J. (1999). Modeling individual behaviour and group performance in an intelligent agent-based simulation of the tragedy of the commons. Journal of Environmental Management, 56, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoE (UK Department of the Environment) (1996). Indicators of sustainable development for the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drogoul, A., & Ferber, J. (1995). Multi-agent simulation as a tool for studying emergent processes. In D. Gilbert (Ed.), Simulating societies: The computer simulation of social phenomena (pp. 127–142). London: UCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Waikato (2003). Coastal values and beach use survey report. Technical Report No 2003/9. Hamilton New Zealand.

  • Farrow, A., & Winograd, M. (2001). Land use modelling at the regional scale: An input to rural sustainability indicators for Central America. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 85, 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findler, N. V., & Malyankar, R. M. (1995). Emergent behavior in societies of heterogeneous, interacting agents; alliances and norms. In N. Gilbert, & R. Conte (Eds.), Artificial societies: The computer simulation of social life (pp. 212–236). London: UCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraga, J. (2006). Local perspectives in conservation politics: The case of the Ria Lagartos Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Sal, A., Belmontes, J. A., & Nicolau, J. M. (2003). Assessing landscape values: A proposal for a multidisciplinary conceptual model. Ecological Modeling, 168, 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Perez, C., & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2007). Modelling software development methodologies: A conceptual foundation. Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 1778–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govt. of Uttarakhand (2007–2008). General Profile of Uttarakhand page 51 (Govt. of Uttarakhand, 2007–2008). http://gov.ua.nic.in/planning/ Accessed March 7, 2008.

  • Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., et al. (2005). Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 310, 987–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardi, P. & Zdan, T. (Eds.) (1997). Assessing sustainable development: Principles in practice. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

  • Hjortso, C. N., Steffen, S., & Finn, H. (2006). Applying multi-criteria decision-making to protected areas and buffer zone management: A case study in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Journal of Forest Economics, 12, 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPPC (2001). Third assessment report of the intergovermental panel on climate change. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J. D., & Messerli, B. (1989). The Himalayan dilemma: Reconciling development and conservation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, S., & van Ittersum, M. K. (2007). Assessing farmer behaviour as affected by policy and technological innovations: Bio-economic farm models. Report No.24, SEAMLESS integrated project, EU 6th Framework Programme, contract no. 010036-2, www.SEAMLESS-IP.org pp. 86. ISBN no. 90-8585-112-2 and 978-90-8585-112-7.

  • Kaechele, H., & Dabbert, S. (2002). An economic approach for a better understanding of conflicts between farmers and nature conservationists—An application of the decision support system MODAM to the Lower Odra Valley National Park. Agricultural Systems, 74, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevmarken, A. (1983). There is a need for applied micro-econometrics: Survey research about the household. In G. Eliasson, & H. Fries (Eds.), Microeconomics: IUI Yearbook 1982–1983. Stockholm: Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. W. (2004). Remote sensing and image interpretation (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2001). Integrating ecology with human demography, behaviour, and socioeconomics: Needs and approaches. Ecological Modelling, 140, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonergans, S., Gustavson, K., & Carter, B. (2000). The index of human insecurity. Aviso, 6, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri, R. K., Nautiyal, S., Rao, K. S., & Saxena, K. G. (1998). Medicinal plant cultivation and biosphere reserve management: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. Current Science, 74, 157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri, R. K., Nautiyal, S., Rao, K. S., & Saxena, K. G. (2001). Conservation policy-people conflicts: A case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (a world heritage site), India. Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri, R. K., Rao, K. S., & Saxena, K. G. (1996). Traditional crop diversity for sustainable development of central Himalayan agroecosystems. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 3, 8–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander, U., & Jongman, R. H. G. (1998). Human impact of rural landscapes in central and northern Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 41, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midmore, D. J., Jansen, H. G. P., & Dumsday, R. G. (1996). Soil erosion and environmental impact of vegetable production in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 60, 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millette, T. L., Tuladhar, A. R., Kasperson, R. E., & Turner, B. L. (1995). The use and limits of remote-sensing for analyzing environmental and social-change in the Himalayan-Middle-Mountains-of-Nepal. Global Environmental Change—Human and Policy Dimensions, 5, 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldan, B., & Billharz, S. (Eds.) (1997). Sustainability indicators: Report of the project on indicators of sustainable development. Sussex, UK: Wiley.

  • Moody, D. L. (2005). Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55, 243–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal, S. (1998). Ecosystem function of buffer zone villages of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. Ph.D. Thesis H.N.B. Garhwal University Srinagar Garhwal, 227 p.

  • Nautiyal, S., & Kaechele, H. (2007a). Conserving the Himalayan forests: Approaches and implications of different conservation regimes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 3737–3754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal, S., & Kaechele, H. (2007b). Adverse impact of pasture abandonment in Himalayas of India: Testing efficiency of a natural resource management plan (NRMP). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal, S., Kaechele, H., Rao, K. S., Maikhuri, R. K., & Saxena, K. G. (2007). Energy use and economic analysis of traditional Vs introduced crops cultivation in mountains of Indian Himalaya: A case study. Energy, 32, 2321–2335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal, S., Kaechele, H., & Zander, P. (2008). Conceptual model development for sustainable landscape management in the mountains of the Indian Himalayan region: An integrated modeling approach (communicated).

  • Nautiyal, S., Maikhuri, R. K., Rao, K. S., Semwal, R. L., & Saxena, K. G. (2003). Agroecosystem function around a Himalayan biosphere reserve. Journal of Environmental Systems, 29, 71–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal, S., Rajan, K. S., & Shibasaki, R. (2005). Interaction of biodiversity and economic welfare—A case study from the Himalayas of India. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 6, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, J. H. M. (1991). Household and education projections by means of a microsimulation model. Economic Modelling, 8, 480–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemela, J., Young, J., Alard, D., Askasibar, M., Henle, K., Johnson, R., et al. (2005). Identifying, managing and monitoring conflicts between forest biodiversity conservation and other human interests in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 877–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. C., Berger, T., & Manson, S. M. (Eds.) (2001). Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change, Report and Review of an International Workshop, October 4–7, Irvine, California, USA

  • Pilbeam, C. J., Tripathi, B. P., Sherchan, D. P., Gregory, P. J., & Gaunt, J. (2000). Nitrogen balances for households in the mid-hills of Nepal. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 79, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert, M. P., & Pretty, J. N. (1995). Parks, people and professionals: Putting ‘participation’ into protected area management. Online http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdf/full/X181IIED.pdf

  • Pischke, F., & Cashmore, M. (2006). Decision-oriented environmental assessment: An empirical study of its theory and methods. Environmental Impact and Assessment Review, 26, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prato, T. (2007). Assessing ecosystem sustainability and management using fuzzy logic. Ecological Economics, 61, 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramphal, S. (1993). How protected area can meet society’s needs: The social economic and political issues. In V. Barzetti (Ed.), Parks and progress (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. S., Nautiyal, S., Maikhuri, R. K., & Saxena, K. G. (2005). Material and energy flows in village ecosystems with contrasting lifestyles in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Central Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science, 2, 271–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapide, B., Defeche, C., Traore, B., Lancon, J., & Wery, J. (2006). In-field development of a conceptual crop functioning and management model: A case study on cotton in southern Mali. European Journal of Agronomy, 24, 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathore, S. K. S., Singh, S. P., Singh, J. S., & Tiwari, A. K. (1997). Changes in forest cover in a Central Himalayan catchment: Inadequacy of assessment based on forest area alone. Journal of Environmental Management, 49, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. G., & Williams, M. (1997). Monitoring changes in land cover induced by atmospheric pollution in the Kola Peninsula, Russia, using Landsat-MSS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 1703–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. A., Stallman, D., & Bieri, J. A. (2002). Modeling complex human–environment interactions: The Grand Canyon river trip simulator. Ecological Modelling, 153, 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, P., Pahlen, T. G., Edenius, L., Tommervik, H., Hagner, O., Hemberg, L., et al. (2003). Conflicts resolution by participatory management: Remote sensing and GIS as tool for communicating land-use needs for Reindeer herding in Northern Sweden. Ambio, 23, 557–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, C. (2008). Ecological evaluation of agricultural farming practices and analysis of farmers’ acceptance for the implementation of more environmentally-friendly farming practices (in German) p. 356. Germany: Humboldt University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K. G., Maikhuri, R. K., & Rao, K. S. (2005). Changes in agricultural biodiversity: Implications for sustainable livelihood in the Himalaya. Journal of Mountain Science, 2, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K. G., Rao, K. S., Sen, K. K., Maikhuri, R. K., & Semwal, R. L. (2001). Integrated natural resource management: Approaches and lessons from the Himalaya. Conservation Ecology, 5, 14 [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art14/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiffer, R. (2005). An intelligent agent model. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 666–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Vogt, D. (1998). Defining degradation: The impacts of swidden on forests in northern Thailand. Mountain Research and Development, 18, 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, R., Hill, P. B., & Esser, E. (1999). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Germany: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, B., & Seppelt, R. (2006). Analysis of pattern–process interactions based on landscape models—Overview, general concepts, and methodological issues. Ecological Modelling, 199, 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, J., & Kaechele, H. (2003). Modelling on-farm costs of soil conservation policies with MODAM. Environmental Science & Policy, 1, 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semwal, R. L., Nautiyal, S., Sen, K. K., Rana, U., Maikhuri, R. K., Rao, K. S., et al. (2004). Patterns and ecological implications of agricultural land-use changes: A case study from central Himalaya, India. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 102, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, K. K., Semwal, R. L., Rana, U., Nautiyal, S., Maikhuri, R. K., Rao, K. S., et al. (2002). Patterns and implications for land use/cover change: A case study in Pranmati Watershed (Garhwal Himalaya, India). Mountain Research and Development, 22, 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. S., Pandey, U., & Tiwari, A. K. (1984). Man and forests: A central Himalayan case study. Ambio, 13, 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straede, S., & Treue, T. (2006). Beyond buffer zone protection: A comparative study of park and buffer zone products’ importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone. Journal of Environmental Management, 78, 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommervik, H., Hogda, K. A., & Solheim, I. (2003). Monitoring vegetation changes in Pasvik (Norway) and Pechenga in Kola Peninsula (Russia) using multi-temporal Landsat MSS/TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85, 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk, M., Tomich, T. P., & Verbist, B. (2001). Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins. Conservation Ecology, 5(2), 21 [online]. Available via http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art21/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, P. (2003). Agricultural land use and conservation options: A modelling approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Land use Systems and Landscapes Ecology, Center for Agricultural Landscape and Land Use Research. Available at: http://www.gcw.nl/dissertations/3372/dis3372.pdf Accessed February 4, 2004.

  • Zander, P., & Kächele, H. (1999). Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development. Agricultural Systems, 59, 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Nautiyal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nautiyal, S., Kaechele, H. Natural resource management in a protected area of the Indian Himalayas: a modeling approach for anthropogenic interactions on ecosystem. Environ Monit Assess 153, 253–271 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0353-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0353-z

Keywords

Navigation