Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Watershed influence on fluvial ecosystems: an integrated methodology for river water quality management

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60 (Integrated River Basin Management for Europe) establishes the importance of preserving water quality through policies applied at watershed level given the strong links existing among ecological, hydrological, and hydrogeological systems. Therefore, monitoring campaigns of river water quality should be planned with multidisciplinary approaches starting from a landscape perspective. In this paper, the effects of the basin hydrology on the river water quality and, in particular, the impacts caused by the runoff production coming from agricultural areas are investigated. The fluvial segments receiving consistent amount of pollutant loads (due to the runoff routing over agricultural areas) are assumed more critical in terms of water quality and thus, they require more accurate controls. Starting from this perspective, to evaluate the runoff productions coming from agricultural areas, we applied a semi-distributed hydrological model that adopts satellite data, pedological and morphological information for the watershed description. Then, the river segments receiving critical amount of runoff loads from the surrounding cultivated areas were identified. Finally, in order to validate the approach, water quality for critical and non critical segment was investigated seasonally, by using river macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality because of their effectiveness in preserving in time a memory of pollution events. Biomonitoring data showed that river water quality strongly decreases in correspondence of fluvial segments receiving critical amount of runoff coming from agricultural areas. The results highlight the usefulness of such a methodology to plan monitoring campaigns specifically devoted to non-point pollution sources and suggest the possibility to use this approach for water quality management and for planning river restoration policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APAT (2003) Metodologie analitiche per il controllo della qualità delle acque. National Environmental Protection Agency, Manuali e linee guida n. 29/2003, ISBN 88-448-0083-7 (In Italian).

  • Armitage, P. D., Moss, D., Wright, J. F., & Furse, M. T. (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research, 17, 333–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ARPAB (2004). Censimento degli impianti di depurazione pubblici della Provincia di Potenza. Acerenza, PZ: Graphis snc, (In Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, second edition. Washington, D.C.: EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven, K., & O’Connel, P. E. (1982). On the role of distributed models in hydrology. Report 81. Wallingford, UK: Institute of Hydrology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. J., Haeusler, T., Reinfelds, I., & Williams, S. (2005). Hydraulic microhabitats and the distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in riffles. Freshwater Biology, 50, 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camporeale, C., & Ridolfi, L. (2006). Riparian vegetation distribution induced by river flow variability: A stochastic approach. Water Resources Research, 42, W10415, DOI 10.1029/2006WR004933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canivet, V., & Gibert, J. (2002). Sensitivity of epigean and hypogean freshwater macroinvertebrates to complex mixtures. Part I: Laboratory experiments. Chemosphere, 46, 999–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caricato, G., & Langella, M. (2006). La zona a Salmonidi del bacino del fiume Agri (Sud Italia): struttura, densità e biomassa delle popolazioni di trota fario, Salmo (trutta) trutta. Biologia Ambientale, 20(1), 135–140, (In Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw, N., & Vanhoorenv, G. (1983). Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia, 100, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genito, D., Gburek, W. J., & Sharpley, A. N. (2002). Response of stream macroinvertebrates to agricultural land cover in a small watershed. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 17(1), 109–119.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghetti, P. F. (2001). Manuale di Applicazione. Indice Biologico Esteso (I.B.E.). I macroinvertebrati nel controllo della qualità degli ambienti di acque correnti. (Provincia Autonoma di Trento). (In Italian).

  • Goethals, P., & De Pauw, N. (2001). Development of a concept for integrated ecological river assessment in Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Limnology, 60(1), 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, C., Stephen, B. M., Kenneth, A. D., & Bojie, F. (2000). A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and biological indicators into watershed management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliopoulou-Georgudaki, J., Kantzaris, V., Katharios, P., Kaspiris, P., Georgiadis, Th., & Montesantou, B. (2003). An application of different bioindicators for assessing water quality: a case study in the rivers Alfeios and Pineios (Peloponnisos, Greece). Ecological Indicators, 2, 345–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingegnoli, V. (2002). Landscape ecology: A widening foundation. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isidori, M., Lavorgna, M., Nardelli, A., & Parrella, A. (2004). Integrated environmental assessment of Volturno River in South Italy. Science of the Total Environment, 327, 123–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., & Chu, E. N. (1999). Restoring life in running waters. Better biological monitoring. USA: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby, M. J. (1975). Hydrograph modelling strategies. In R. F. Peel, M. D. Chisholm, & P. Haggett (Eds.), Progress in physical and human geography (pp. 69–90). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • León, L. F., Soulis, E. D., Kouwen, N., & Farquhar, G. J. (2001). Nonpoint source pollution: A distributed water quality modeling approach. Water Research, 35(4), 997–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liess, M., & Schulz, R. (1999). Linking insecticide contamination and population response in an agricultural stream. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(9), 1948–1955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. B. (1999). GIS-based spatially distributed hydrological modeling of the barebeek catchment. MSc. Dissertation Water Resources Engineering, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Mancini, L., Formichetti, P., D’Angelo, A. M., Pierdominici, E., Sorace, A., Bottoni, P., et al. (2005). Freshwater quality in urban areas: A case study from Rome, Italy. Microchemical Journal, 79(1–2), 177–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manfreda, S., Iacobellis, V., & Fiorentino, M. (2004). Un esempio di Modellistica Integrata per l’Analisi dei Processi che Controllano la Frequenza delle Piene Fluviali. (Proceedings of the 29th Convegno di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche. Editoriale Bios Trento, Vol. 2: 463–70) (ISBN 88-7740-382-9). (In Italian).

  • Manfreda, S., Sdao, F., & Sole, A. (2007). Hydrogeological Water Balance in Carbonate Hydro-Structure. (Proceedings of 2nd IASWE/WSEAS International Conference on Water Resources, Hydraulics & Hydrology (WHH –7): 216–22) (ISBN: 978-960-8457-70-6).

  • Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, L. J. (1989). Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: History and present status in Europe. Environmental Pollution, 60, 101–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, P., Burlando, P., & Ruf, W. (2002). Integrated catchment assessment of riverine landscape dynamics. Aquatic Sciences, 64, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NWC (1981). River quality: The 1980 survey and future out-look. London: National Water Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. A., Swan, C. M., Nelson, K., Silver, P., & Alvestad, R. (2000). Streambed landscapes: Evidence that stream invertebrates respond to the type and spatial arrangement of patches. Landscape Ecology, 15, 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, J., Soulsby, C., Malcolm, I. A., & Youngson, A. F. (2002). Hydrological controls on nutrient concentrations and fluxes in agricultural catchments. The Science of the Total Environment, 294, 95–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preti, F. (1999). Overland transport of nitrate: algorithms validation. Water Science and Technology, 39(3), 77–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. A. (1994). Remote sensing digital image analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaky, A., Ito, A., Aizawa, J., & Umita, T. (2005). Influence of water and sediment quality on benthic biota in an acidified river. Water Research, 39, 2517–2526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonover, J. E., Williard, K. W. J., Zaczek, J. J., Mangun, J. C., & Carver, A. D. (2005). Nutrient attenuation in agricultural surface runoff by riparian buffer zones in Southern Illinois, USA. Agroforestry Systems, 64(2), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sponseller, R. A., Benfield, E. F., & Valett, H. M. (2001). Relationship between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrates communities. Freshwater Biology, 46, 1409–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. S., Wang, L., Lyons, J., Horwatich, J. A., & Bannermann, R. (2001). Influences of watershed, riparian-corridor, and reach scale characteristics on aquatic biota in agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(6), 1475–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiere, G., & Schulz, R. (2004). Runoff-related agricultural impact in relation to macroinvertebrate communities of the Lourens River, South Africa. Water Research, 38, 3092–3102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tou, J. T., & Gonzalez, R. C. (1974). Pattern recognition principles. Massachusetts, Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980). The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., Tokner, K., Arscott, D. B., & Claret, C. (2002). Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biology, 47, 517–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, B. M., Lyons, J., Paine, L. K., Dodson, S. I., & Undersander, D. J. (2000). Using stream macroinvertebrates to compare riparian land use practices on cattle farms in southwestern Wisconsin. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 15(1), 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiles, M. R., Brock, B. L., Franzen, A. C., & Dinsmore, S. C. II (2000). Stream invertebrates communities, water quality, and land-use patterns in an agricultural drainage basin of Northeastern Nebraska, USA. Environmental Management, 26(5), 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijngaarden, R. P. A., Van Brock, T. C. M., & Van Den Brink, P. J. (2005). Threshold levels for effects of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems: A review. Ecotoxicology, 14, 355–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss, F. S. (1964). The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent River Board. Chemistry and Industry, 14, 443–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., Moss, B., Armitage, P. D., & Furse, M. T. (1984). A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwater Biology, 14, 221–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M., & Roberts, R. (2003). Ecohydrology—A new paradigm for integrated water resources management. SILnews, 40, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ARPAB, via della Fisica 18/C, 85100, Potenza, Italy

    Maria T. Carone

  2. CNR–Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale (IMAA), C.da S. Loja, Z.na Ind., 85050, Tito, PZ, Italy

    Tiziana Simoniello

  3. Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Fisica dell’Ambiente (DIFA), Università degli Studi della Basilicata, via dell’Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100, Potenza, Italy

    Salvatore Manfreda

  4. Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Animali, Università degli Studi di Basilicata, via dell’Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100, Potenza, Italy

    Gaetano Caricato

Authors
  1. Maria T. Carone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiziana Simoniello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salvatore Manfreda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gaetano Caricato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria T. Carone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carone, M.T., Simoniello, T., Manfreda, S. et al. Watershed influence on fluvial ecosystems: an integrated methodology for river water quality management. Environ Monit Assess 152, 327–342 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0319-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0319-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation