Abstract
Mercury contamination in the environment is problematic due to the unusual physical properties and well-recognized toxicity of this common metal. The bioavailability of mercury depends strongly on its chemical speciation. Anthropogenic mercury and its compounds appear in soil as “hot spots” located close to industrial facilities that used or produced mercury. The nature of the chemical production process, transportation and disposal practices often determined the chemical composition and distribution of mercury in the surrounding soils. Current ex situ soil remediation methods are expensive, produce undesirable side effects to the environment and usually involve transportation of contaminated soil.
In this project, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, a low-cost, simple approach to removing mercury from soil was evaluated. The process uses low-temperature thermal desorption of volatile metallic mercury and its compounds, and subsequent vapor capture.
The project consisted of laboratory and plot-scale experiments. The laboratory efforts evaluated theoretical calculations of mercury removal as a function of time and temperature. The plot-scale experiment was a practical application of the laboratory results. For both experiments, mercury-polluted soil was obtained from a chemical production facility located in southern Poland. In laboratory experiments, at temperature 373 K total mercury concentration decreased in soil by nearly 32%. In plot-scale experiments, at temperature 440 K, about 60–70% of total mercury was removed from the soil.
At the end of the experiment, a test of soil biological activity was performed to check if the high temperature applied to the soil did not impair the soil growth properties. There was no negative effect of temperature found.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C.W. (ed): 1993, ‘Innovative Site Remediation Technology,’, Soil Washing/Soil Flushing, Vol. 3, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Anderson, C.W. (ed): 1993a, ‘Innovative Site Remediation Technology,’, Thermal Desorption, Vol. 6, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Anderson, C.W. (ed): 1994, ‘Innovative Site Remediation Technology,’, Chemical Treatment, Vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Anderson, C.W. (ed): 1994a, ‘Innovative Site Remediation Technology,’, Stabilization/Solidification, Vol. 4, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Anderson, C.W. (ed): 1994b, ‘Innovative Site Remediation Technology,’, Thermal Destruction, Vol. 7, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Anderson, C.W. (ed): 1995, ‘Innovative Site Remediation Technology,’, Solvent/Chemical Extraction, Vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Biester, H. and Scholz, C.: 1997, ‘Determination of mercury binding forms in contaminated soils: Mercury pyrolysis versus sequential extractions,’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 233–239.
Dean, A.J. (ed): 1992, Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, 13th ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Di Giulio, T.R. and Ryan, A.E.: 1987, ‘Mercury in soil, sediments, and clams from a North Carolina Peatland. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 33, 205–219.
Dimitrow, R., Mucci, A., Lucotte, M. and Pichet, P.: 1995, ‘The partitioning of mercury in solid components of dry and flooded forest soils and sediments from hydroelectric reservoir, Quebec (Canada),’, Water, Air. Soil Pollut. 80, 1099–1103.
Ferrara, R.: 1999, ‘Mercury Mines in Europe: Assessment of Emission and Environmental Contamination,’, in: R. Ebinghaus, R.R. Turner, D.I. de Lacerda, O. Vasiliev and W. Salomons (eds), Mercury Contaminated Sites, Environmental Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 51–72.
Gillis, A.A. and Miller, D.R.: 2000, ‘Some local environmental effects on mercury emission and absorption at a soil surface,’, Sci. Total Environ. 260, 191–200.
Gonzales, H.: 1991, ‘Mercury pollution caused by chlor-alkali plant,’, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 56, 83–93.
Hempel, M. and Thoeming, J.: 1999, ‘Remediation Techniques for Hg-Contaminated Sites,’, in: R. Ebinghaus, R.R. Turner, D.I. de Lacerda, O. Vasiliev and W. Salomons (eds), Mercury Contaminated Sites, Environmental Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 113–130.
Houba, V.J.G., van der Lee, J.J. and Nowozamsky, I.: 1995, Soil Analysis Procedures, Other Procedures, Soil and Plant Analysis, part 5B, Departement of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen.
Inácio, M.M., Pereira, V. and Pinto, S.M.: 1998, ‘Mercury contamination in sandy soil an industrial emission source (Estarreja, Portugal),’, Geoderma 85, 325–339.
Leperdina, G.T., Melnikova, V.M., Khvostova, E.T.: 1999, ‘Gold Mining in Siberia as a Source of Mercury Contamination of the Environment,’, in: R. Ebinghaus, R.R. Turner, D.I. de Lacerda, O. Vasiliev and W. Salomons (eds), Mercury Contaminated Sites, Environmental Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 357–374.
Masserati, E.B. and Ferrara, R.: 1991, ‘Mercury in plants, soil and atmosphere near a chlor-alkali complex, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 56, 15–20.
Rule, H.J and Iwashchenko, M.S.: 1998, ‘Mercury concentrations in soils adjacent to a former chlor - alkali plant, J. Environ. Qual. 27, 31–37.
Schmid, B., Munz, C. and Kiayias, G.: 1998, ‘Movement and Fate of Mercury(O) in the Subsurface of a Derelict Chloralkali Plant and Implications for Remedial Options,’, in: Thomas Telford (ed), Contaminated Soil’98, London, 173–179.
Schwesig, D., Ilgen, G. and Matzner, E.: 1999, ‘Mercury and Methylmercury in upland and wetland acid forest soils of a watershed in NE-Bavaria, Germany,’, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 113, 141–154.
Wallschläger, D., Desai, M.V.M., Spengler, M. and Wilken, R.D.: 1998, ‘Mercury speciation in floodplain soils and sediments along a contaminated river transect,’, J. Environ. Qual. 27, 1034–1044.
Windmöller, C.C., Wilken, R-D., Jardum, W.D.F.: 1996, ‘Mercury speciation in contaminated soils by thermal release analysis,’, Water, Air, Soil. Pollut. 89, 83–93.
Zielonka, U., Kucharski, R. and Sas-Nowosielska, A.: 2000, ‘Evaluation of Novel Mercury Remediation Technology, Step I-Site Characterization,’, Fifth International Symposium and Exhibition on Environmental Contamination in Central and Eastern Europe, Prague, Czech Republic, 12–14 September.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kucharski, R., Zielonka, U., Sas-Nowosielska, A. et al. A Method of Mercury Removal from Topsoil Using Low-Thermal Application. Environ Monit Assess 104, 341–351 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-1620-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-1620-x