Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Value-added service providers for mobile education: empirical challenges and analytics

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More people have access to Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS, a.k.a. mobile picture messaging) than to the Internet, but mobile education markets have yet to adopt MMS as a content delivery mechanism. This paper investigates the role of carrier interoperability as an enabler of MMS in mobile multimedia distance learning. Using instructor reuse of content and learner access to content as feasibility criteria, we empirically evaluate the performance, user adoption, and commercial market of MMS-based mobile education. This study deployed a value-added service that broadcasts videos via MMS to cell phones, and conducted a 9-month public education campaign with weekly broadcasts on breast cancer. We selected a video format and markup language that is compatible with domestic carriers and cell phones, and supports existing educational material. To contrast behaviors between participants with and without access to the Internet, we offered participants the same content via MMS, email and the Web. 277 participants enrolled in the campaign; 120 opted to receive the videos via mobile messaging, and 157 had Internet access and opted to receive videos via email or the Web. Campaign analytics reveal that all participants without Internet access successfully received the MMS video broadcasts, and significantly, one-third of participants with Internet access opted to receive the videos via MMS as well. We conclude with a discussion of why participants with Internet access may have chosen MMS over Internet-based alternatives. We also estimate the size of the market for MMS-based mobile education, and distinguish it from the person-to-person messaging market. This research is beneficial to educators targeting diverse demographics and education disparities, and to mobile commerce economists evaluating emerging markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adkins, S. S. (2013) The 2012-2017 worldwide mobile learning market. Ambient Insight. p. 65.

  2. Sinclair, A. (2011). Mobile education landscape report (p. 62). GSMA.

  3. Wu, W.-H., et al. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ocepek, U., et al. (2013). Exploring the relation between learning style models and preferred multimedia types. Computers & Education, 69, 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koumi, J. (2006). Designing video and multimedia for open and flexible learning. In F. Lockwood (Ed.). New York: Routledge.

  7. Tamim, R. M., et al. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chien, Y.-T., & Chang, C.-Y. (2012). Comparison of different instructional multimedia designs for improving student science-process skill learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heggestuen, J. (2013). Smartphone and tablet penetration. In BI intelligence. Business Insider.

  10. ITU. (2014). World telecommunication/ICT indicators database. International Telecommunication Union.

  11. Meeker, M. (2014). Internet trends. In: Code conference. Palos Verdes, CA: Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers.

  12. Gillet, J., & Hatt, T. (2013). Why emerging markets hold the key to smartphone success for MicrosoftNokia. In GSMA intelligence. Groupe Speciale Mobile Association.

  13. Ahonen, T. (2010). Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2010 mobile telecoms industry review. Hong Kong: TomiAhonen Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pew. (2012). September 2012: Health Tracking (prelim). Pew Internet and American Life.

  15. Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health Online 2013, P.R.C.s.I.A.L. Project, Editor. Washington, DC, p. 55.

  16. Fox, S. (2011). The social life of health information, 2011. In Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. p. 45.

  17. Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and m-learning project summary. In N. Sweeney (Ed.). London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.

  18. Déglise, C., Suggs, L. S., & Odermatt, P. (2012). Short Message Service (SMS) applications for disease prevention in developing countries. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(1), e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Favell, A. (2012). 2011 handset and smartphone sales statistics worldwide: The big picture. Mobithinking.

  20. Le Bodic, G. (2003). Multimedia Messaging Service: An engineering approach to MMS. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Baumer, E. P. S., et al. (2012). Prescriptive persuasion and open-ended social awareness: Expanding the design space of mobile health. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 475–484). Seattle, Washington: ACM.

  23. Elias, T. (2011). Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Portio. (2011). Mobile messaging futures 2011–2015; Analysis and growth forecasts for mobile messaging markets worldwide. Portio Research.

  25. Ahonen, T. (2014). Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2014 mobile telecoms industry review (p. 210). Hong Kong: TomiAhonen Consulting.

  26. CTIA. (2014). Wireless Industry Survey. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association.

  27. Smith, B. (2008). MMS expands… just not everywhere. In Wirelless week.

  28. Le Bodic, G. (2005). Mobile messaging technologies and services: SMS, EMS and MMS. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu, T. (2007). Wireless net neutrality: Cellular carterfone and consumer choice in mobile broadband. Washington, DC: The New America Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng, L.-C., & Sun, L.-M. (2012). Exploring consumer adoption of new services by analyzing the behavior of 3G subscribers: An empirical case study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pohjola, O. P., & Kilkki, K. (2005). What is wrong in multimedia messaging? In Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks, 2005. IEEE. Taormina.

  32. Bandera, C., Rosen, M., & Schmitt, P. (2010). Mobile outreach to underserved demographics. In New Learning Technologies Conference. Orlando, FL: Society for Applied Learning Technology

  33. Transparency Market Research. (2012). Premium Messaging Market - A2P SMS Market, P2A SMS Market: Global Analysis, Trends, Size and Forecast (2007–2017), T. M. Research (Ed.) (p. 90).

  34. Baglietto, P., et al. (2011). Telco service mashups in IMS networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Web APIs and Service Mashups (pp. 1–8). Lugano: ACM.

  35. Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2007). Understanding user acceptance of multimedia messaging services: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2066–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashdown, D. (2011). Mobile messaging markets. SMS, MMS, IM & Email Strategies 2011-2016. In Journal of Research (Ed.), Mobile content & applications (p. 142). Hampshire: Juniper Research Ltd.

  37. Bhattacharyya, S. S., Sivanand, G. (2011). Mobile telephony network value added services, quest for capturing the value created most: Answers from the concept of value network. Synergy (0973-8819), 9(2).

  38. Ahonen, T. (2013). Tomi Ahonen Almanac 2013 mobile telecoms industry review. Hong Kong: TomiAhonen Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  39. StrikeIron. (2014). Worldwide A2P SMS Markets 2014-2017. Portio Research, p. 54.

  40. Altschul, M. F., Guttman-McCabe, C., & Witanowski, K. L. (2012). Comments of CTIA—The Wireless Association. Hearings before the Federal Communications Commission, 2012 Nov 21 [cited CG Docket No. 02-278.

  41. MMA. (2012). U.S. consumer best practices for messaging (p. 46). Mobile Marketing Association.

  42. Pasqua, R., & Elkin, N. (2012). Mobile marketing: An hour a day. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  43. FCC. (2003). Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003. In Congress (Ed.), 15 U.S. Code 7701, t.

  44. FCC. (1991). Telephone Consumer Protection Act. In F. C. Commission (Ed.), 47 U.S. Code 227.

  45. Wood, P. (2011). November2011 Intelligence Report. Mountain View, CA: Symantec Corporation.

  46. Kharif, O. (2012). Mobile Spam Texts Hit 4.5 Billion Raising Consumer Ire. In T. Giles (Ed.), Bloomberg.

  47. Landesman, M. (2012). SMS spam overview—Preserving the value of SMS texting. Cloudmark. https://www.cloudmark.com/en/whitepapers/sms-spam-overview.

  48. Fierce Wireless. (2013). Grading the top U.S. carriers in the second quarter of 2013. 2013 Aug 12 [cited 2014 February 9]. http://www.fiercewireless.com/special-reports/grading-top-us-carriers-second-quarter-2013.

  49. GSMA Intelligence. (2014). Country Dashboards. G. Association (Ed.).

  50. Gandhi, V. (2012). U.S. mobile advertising and search market. Frost & Sullivan.

  51. Samanta, S., Woods, J., & Ghanbari, M. (2009). Special delivery: An increase in MMS adoption. IEEE Potentials, 28(1), 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Cheng, L. and A. Bruns. (2007). Cell phone SMS news in Chinese newspaper groups: A case study of Yunnan Daily Press Group. In Proceedings Mobile Media. Sydney.

  53. Mary Meeker, L.W. (2013). Internet Trends. In D11 Conference. Rancho Palos Verdes: Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers.

  54. Du, H., et al. (2012). An empirical study of consumer adoption on 3G value-added services in China. Nankai Business Review International, 3(3), 257–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Morgan Stanley Research. (2009). The mobile internet report. Morgan Stanley.

  56. Gan, T., Zheng, Y., & Chen, C. J. (2011). A study of user behaviors based on MMS. Advanced Materials Research, 219–220, 1233–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen, P.-T., & Cheng, J. Z. (2010). Unlocking the promise of mobile value-added services by applying new collaborative business models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(4), 678–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Jiehong, K., & Jianwen, L. (2006). The innovative business model behind the rapid growth of SMS in China. In 2006 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management. IEEE.

  59. Sondhi, S., et al. (2011). Mobile Value Added Services (MVAS): A vehicle to usher in inclusive growth and bridge the digital divide (p. 68). Deloitte.

  60. Kittl, C., Edegger, F., & Petrovic, O. (2009). Learning by pervasive gaming: An empirical study. In H. Ryu & D. Parsons (Eds.), Innovative mobile learning: Techniques and technologies (pp. 60–82). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  61. Byrne, P., & Tangney, B. (2009). Stop-motion animation and reviewing tool. In T. T. Goh (Ed.), Multiplatform E-learning systems and technologies: Mobile devices for Ubiquitous ICT-Based Education (pp. 229–243). Hershey PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Vico Vela, F. J., et al. (2007). Mobile just-in-time training application for emergency healthcare. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning. Lisbon, PT: International Association for Development of the Information Society.

  63. Yow, K.-C., & Seet, B.-C. (2010). Mobile interactive learning in large classes: Towards an integrated instructor-centric and peer-to-peer approach. In T. T. Goh (Ed.), Multiplatform E-learning systems and technologies: Mobile devices for Ubiquitous ICT-Based Education (pp. 260–272). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Lin, C. P., et al. (2010). A feasibility study of applying MMS for mobile learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In 18th International Conference on Computers in Education. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

  65. Burston, J. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994–2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157–224.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Liang, L. (2013). Community Outreach and Education Core. Retrieved March 15, 2013, from http://eohsi.rutgers.edu/ceed/community_outreach_education_core.

  67. Spak, G. T., Bandera, C., & Schmitt, P. (2011). m-outreach for engineering continuing education: A model for university-company collaboration. In American Society for Engineering Education.

  68. Bandera, C., Rosen, M., & Schlegel, B. (2007). Just-in-time training of deployed skilled support personnel via cell phone multimedia. In Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference. Orlando.

  69. Epatko, L. (2011). Text-messaging for health still has its challenges. In NewsHour, Pubic Broadcasting System.

  70. Book, C. (2008). MMS is dead. In Personal Blog.

  71. Chibex, E. (2014). Rant 103: MMS is dead ? In Personal blog.

  72. ITU. (2013). World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database. International Telecommunication Union.

  73. Kaufman, S. (2013). Global mobile market outlook: 2013–18. London: Ovum.

  74. Kumar, S., Goel, R., & White, J. (2012) Mobile messaging futures 2012-2016 (p. 376). Portio Research.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr. Robert Laumbach, Dr. Helmut Zarbl, and Dr. Elisa Bandera of the Rutgers Center for Environmental Exposures and Disease for serving as subject matter experts in this campaign. The author also thanks Dr. Peter Schmitt of Cell Podium for his technical support during the campaign. This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Grant 1R41ES019020-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Martin Tuchman School of Management, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA

    Cesar Bandera

Authors
  1. Cesar Bandera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesar Bandera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bandera, C. Value-added service providers for mobile education: empirical challenges and analytics. Electron Commer Res 17, 317–333 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9235-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9235-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation