Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing a teacher’s learning through cross-cultural collaboration: a praxeological perspective of mathematical knowledge for teaching

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teacher collaborative learning is key in teacher professional development. Yet, how teachers learn in cross-cultural professional development settings remains largely unexplored. This paper examines the case of a Chinese mathematics teacher who learned through addressing various challenges when teaching in an English school in a China-UK exchange program. A praxeological perspective was used to analyze the data, including lesson plans, classroom observation notes, and post-lesson meetings. Results showed that collaboration and adaptation helped the teacher address the obstacles generated by cultural differences. The analysis revealed the difficulties the teacher encountered and how the mathematical and didactic praxeologies implemented evolved and helped overcome these challenges, broadening her mathematics knowledge for teaching. Finally, the implications of the case study on teacher collaborative learning in cross-cultural settings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Yes

Code availability

No

References

  • Akkerman, S., & Baker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

  • Artigue, M., & Winsløw, C. (2010). International comparative studies on mathematics education: A viewpoint from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 31(1), 47–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & D. Potari, D. (2021, April 25), ICMI study 25 conference proceedings: Teachers of mathematics working and learning in collaborative groups. Lisbon, Portugal: University of Lisbon. Retrieved April 27, 2020, from http://icmistudy25.ie.ulisboa.pt/

  • Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2014). Introduction to the anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD). In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs & S. Prediger (Eds.), Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education (pp. 67–83). Springer.

  • Bosch, M., Chevallard, Y., García, F., & Monaghan. (2019). Working with the anthropological theory of the didactic in mathematics education: A comprehensive casebook (p. 2019). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Boylan, M., Maxwell, B., Wolstenholme, C., Jay, T., & Demack, S. (2018). The mathematics teacher exchange and ‘mastery’ in England: The evidence for the efficacy of component practices. Education in Science, 8(4), 202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, M., Wolstenholme, C., Demack, S., Maxwell, B., Jay, T., Adams, G., & Reaney, S. (2019, January 19). Longitudinal evaluation of the Mathematics teacher exchange: China-England-Final Report. Department for Education and Sheffield Hallam University. Retrieved May 7, 2020, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/773320/MTE_main_report.pdf

  • Bussi, M., Funghi, S., & Ramploud, A. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ cultural beliefs: The case of lesson study. In D. Potrai & O. Chapman (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Volume 1 (pp. 131–154). Koninklijke Brill NV.

  • Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the anthropological theory of the didactic: An attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard, Y., Bosch, M., & Kim, S. (2015). What is a theory according to the anthropological theory of the didactic? CERME 9 - Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2614–2620), Prague: Charles University and ERME.

  • Clapham, A., & Vickers, R. (2018). Neither a borrower nor a lender be: Exploring ‘teaching for mastery’ policy borrowing. Oxford Review of Education, 44(6), 787–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse University Press.

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2016). Studies in expansive learning: Learning what is not yet there. Cambridge University Press.

  • Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI study. Springer.

  • Fan, L., Chen, J., Zhu, Y., Qiu, X., & Hu, Q. (2004). Textbook use within and beyond mathematics classrooms: A study of 12 secondary schools in Kunming and Fuzhou of China. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese Learn Mathematics: Perspectives from Insiders (pp. 238–261). World Scientific.

  • García, F. J., Gascón, J., Ruiz Higueras, L., & Bosch, M. (2006). Mathematical modelling as a tool for the connection of school mathematics. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 38(3), 226–246.

  • Huang, J. (2018a). Shanghai primary mathematics textbook (Grade 3). Shanghai Educational Publishing House (In Chinese).

  • Huang, X. (2018b). I teach mathematics in England. East China Normal University Press (In Chinese).

  • Huang, X. (2020). A study on the expansive learning of a teacher in the UK-China mathematics teacher exchange programme. Journal of Comparative Education, 1, 110–117 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Takahashi, A., & da Ponte, J. (2019). Theory and practice of lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective. Springer.

  • Jaworski, B., & Huang, R. (2014). Teachers and didacticians: Key stakeholders in the processes of developing mathematics teaching. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 46, 173–188.

  • Jaworski, B., Chapman, O., Clark-Wilson, A., Cusi, A., Esteley, C., Goos, M., … Robutti, O. (2017). Mathematics teachers working and learning through collaboration. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 261–276). Springer.

  • Jensen, B., Sonnemann, J., Roberts-Hull, K., & Hunter, A. (2016). Beyond PD: Teacher professional learning in high-performing systems. National Center on Education and the Economy.

  • Jullien, F. (1993). Figures de l’immanence. Pour une lecture philosophique du Yi king. Le Classique du changement. Edition Grasset & Fasquelle.

  • Leung, F., Graf, K.-D., & Lopez-Real, F. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West. Springer Science.

  • Llody, G., & Chapman, O. (2020). International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Participants in mathematics teacher education (Second Edition). Koninklijke Brill NV.

  • Lundberg, A., & Kilhamn, C. (2016). Transposition of knowledge: Encountering proportionality in algebra task. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellone, M., Ramploud, A., Di Paola, B., & Martignone, F. (2019). Cultural transposition: Italian didactic experiences inspired by Chinese and Russian perspectives on whole number arithmetic. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 51, 199–212.

  • NCETM (2019, October 11). Primary teaching for mastery report. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from https://content.ncetm.org.uk/mastery/NCETM_Primary_Teachingformastery_Report_July2019.pdf

  • Ong, W. J. (2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Routledge.

  • Rasmussen, K. (2016). Lesson study in prospective mathematics teacher education: Didactic and paradidactic technology in the post-lesson reflection. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(4), 301–324.

  • Robutti, O., Cusi, A., Clark-Wilson, A., Jaworski, B., Chapman, O., Esteley, C., … Joubert, M. (2016). ICME international survey on teachers working and learning through collaboration: June 2016. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 48(5), 651–690.

  • Sarkar Arani, M. R., Shibata, Y., Sakamoto, M., Iksan, Z., Amirullah, A. H., & Lander, B. (2017). How teachers respond to students’ mistakes in lessons: A cross-cultural analysis of a mathematics lesson. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.

  • Sztajn, P., Borko, H., & Smith, T. (2017). Research on mathematics professional development. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 793–823). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Takeuchi, H., & Shinno, Y. (2019). Comparing the lower secondary textbooks of Japan and England: A praxeological analysis of symmetry and transformations in geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 791–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T., & Senk, S. (2011). The mathematics education of future primary and secondary teachers: Methods and findings from teacher education and development study in mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 121137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2005). Comparative studies on US and Chinese mathematics learning and the implications for standards-based mathematics teaching reform. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.

  • Yuan, H., & Huang, X. (2019). China-England mathematics teacher exchange and its impact. Frontiers of Education in China, 14, 480–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The China-England Mathematics Teacher Exchange Program (2014–2020) was supported by the Research Institute for International and Comparative Education. Project Q-Mundo (RTI2018-101153-B-C21) was supported by the Programa Estatal de I+D+i orientado a los Retos de la Sociedad (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingfeng Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Huang, R. & Bosch, M. Analyzing a teacher’s learning through cross-cultural collaboration: a praxeological perspective of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Educ Stud Math 107, 427–446 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10057-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10057-w

Keywords

Navigation