Skip to main content
Log in

Examining socio-mathematical norms related to problem posing: a case of a gifted and talented mathematics classroom

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 30 October 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this study, we propose the notion of a socio-mathematical norm to explore the affective aspects of a classroom in the context of problem posing. Our case is a gifted and talented mathematics classroom with twelve students. The primary source of data consists of forty-three mathematics lessons. Our theoretical stance defines two dimensions of a socio-mathematical norm: student and teacher. The findings revealed three socio-mathematical norms (reformulations of problems, generating new problems, evaluation and correction based on the sufficiency of the information) that reflect the classroom’s micro-culture, which involves problem posing. In addition to these basic norms, normative understanding related to “posing more challenging problems” allowed for challenging mathematical situations in the classroom, which is of particular importance for gifted and talented students. We discuss the teacher’s and students’ roles in problem posing activities. We also explore possible reasons for not observing socio-mathematical norms regarding the assessment of posed problems on a criterion that could support students for posing more original, more complex, and more realistic problems. The study suggests practical implications for the dynamics of a classroom where students engage in problem posing activities and theoretical implications regarding the two dimensions of a norm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 30 October 2020

    This article is intended for inclusion in the Special Issue on Affect in Mathematical Problem Posing: Conceptualization, Advances, and Future Directions of Research.

References

  • Bleijenbergh, I. (2010). Case selection. In A. J. Mills, G. Eurepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (volume 1) (pp. 61–63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Bonotto, C. (2010). Engaging students in mathematical modelling and problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(3), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonotto, C., & Baroni, M. (2008). Using maths in a daily context: experiences in Italian compulsory education. In H. W. Henn & S. Meier (Eds.), Planting mathematics. First Annual Publication of the Comenius-Network Developing Quality in Mathematics Education II-DQME II (pp. 19–47). TU Dortmund: Dortmund, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonotto, C., & Santo, L. D. (2015). On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving, and creativity in the primary school. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing from research to effective practice (pp. 103–123). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Cai, J., Chen, T., Li, X., Xu, R., Zhang, S., Hu, Y., … Song, N. (2019). Exploring the impact of a problem-posing workshop on elementary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions on problem posing and lesson design. International Journal of Educational Research, 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.004

  • Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2019). Learning to teach through mathematical problem posing: Theoretical considerations, methodology, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 101391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.001

  • Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing from research to effective practice (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Chen, L., Van Dooren, W., Chen, Q., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). An investigation on Chinese teachers’ realistic problem posing and solving ability and beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 919–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Van Dooren, W. V., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). Enhancing the development of Chinese fifth-graders’ problem-posing and problem-solving abilities, beliefs, and attitudes: A design experiment. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing from research to effective practice (pp. 309–328). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2011). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. In E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, & A. Sfard (Eds.), A journey in mathematics education research (pp. 117–163). London, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (2011). Introduction. In E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, & A. Sfard (Eds.), A journey in mathematics education research (pp. 33–40). London, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. (2015). A collection of problem-posing experiences for prospective mathematics teachers that make a difference. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing from research to effective practice (pp. 494–511). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children's made-up mathematics problems—a new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (1997). Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(3), 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Hoffmann, A. J., & Seah, W. T. (2003). Understanding mathematics learning and teaching through beliefs, values and norms. In 81st Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Research Pre session), April, San Antonio, TX.

  • Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2017). Creative reasoning and shifts of knowledge in the mathematics classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, R., & Ruthven, K. (2018). Operational, interpersonal, discussional and ideational dimensions of classroom norms for dialogic practice in school mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 44(3)496–514.

  • Kang, S. M., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Sociomathematical norms and the teacher’s mathematical belief: A case study from a Korean in-service elementary teacher. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(10), 2733–2751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, L. (2010). Problem posing from the foundations of mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 7(2), 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.

  • Kwek, M. L. (2015). Using problem posing as a formative assessment tool. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing from research to effective practice (pp. 273–292). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Leikin, R. (2018). Part IV: Commentary–characteristics of mathematical challenge in problem-based approach to teaching mathematics. In A. Kajander, J. Holm, & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning secondary school mathematics (pp. 413–418). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

  • Matsko, V. J., & Thomas, J. (2015). Beyond routine: fostering creativity in mathematics classrooms. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing from research to effective practice (pp. 125–139). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Moore-Russo, D., & Weiss, M. (2011). Practical rationality, the disciplinary obligation, and authentic mathematical work: a look at geometry. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 463–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, G. J., Tobias, J. M., Safi, F., & Dixon, J. K. (2014). Sustaining social and sociomathematical norms with prospective elementary teachers in a mathematics content course. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing students’ mathematical problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: new questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F.M., Sheffield, L.J., Freiman, V., & Brandl M. (2016). Research on and activities for mathematically gifted students. Icme-13 Topical Surveys. Hamburg, Germany: Springer.

  • Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), Studies in mathematical thinking and learning series. The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..

  • Wheatley, G. H. (1999). Effective learning environments for promising elementary and middle school students. In L. J. Sheffield (Ed.), Developing mathematically promising students (pp. 71–80). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Xie, J., & Masingila, J. O. (2017). Examining interactions between problem posing and problem solving with prospective primary teachers: a case of using fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B., Cai, J., Liu, Q., & Hwang, S. (2019). Teachers’ predictions of students’ mathematical thinking related to problem posing. International Journal of Educational Research, 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.005

  • Yackel, E. (2004). Theoretical perspectives for analyzing explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. Communications of Mathematical Education, 18(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Rasmussen, C. (2002). Beliefs and norms in the mathematics classroom. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 313–330). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editors of the special issue, Jinfa Cai and Roza Leikin, for their constructive comments and suggestions which helped us to improve our manuscript. This study is part of an on-going PhD thesis that will be submitted to the Institute of Educational Sciences at Marmara University, Turkey by the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hatice Akkoç.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çakır, A., Akkoç, H. Examining socio-mathematical norms related to problem posing: a case of a gifted and talented mathematics classroom. Educ Stud Math 105, 19–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09965-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09965-0

Keywords

Navigation