Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the way rational expressions trigger the use of “mental” brackets by primary school students

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When a number sentence includes more than one operation, students are taught to follow the rules for the order of operations to get the correct result. In this context, brackets are used to determine the operations that should be calculated first. However, it seems that the written format of an arithmetical expression has an impact on the way students evaluate this expression. It also seems that a connection exists between this way of evaluation and an understanding of structure. Both issues are examined in this paper. A number of arithmetical expressions in a rational form were given to primary school students from Greece and Sweden. The collected findings strengthen our hypothesis that this rational form of the arithmetical expressions was of critical importance for the students’ decision on how to evaluate these expressions. They temporarily put aside their knowledge about the rules for the order of operations. Instead, the way they evaluated the expressions indicates an implicit use of what we call in this paper “mental” brackets. It is very likely that the use of these “mental” brackets is closely connected with students’ structure sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bannerjee, R., & Subramaniam, K. (2005). Developing procedure and structure sense of arithmetic expressions. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 121–128). Melbourne, Australia: PME.

  • Blando, J. A., Kelly, A. E., Schneider, B. R., & Sleeman, D. (1989). Analyzing and modeling arithmetic errors. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 301–308.

  • Booth, L. R. (1988). Children’s difficulties in beginning algebra. In A. F. Coxford & A. P. Schulte (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K-12 (1988 yearbook) (pp. 20–32). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glidden, P. L. (2008). Prospective elementary teachers’ understanding of order of operations. School Science and Mathematics, 108(4), 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson, R., & Karlsson, A. (2015). Brackets and the structure sense. In O. Helenius, A. Engström, T. Meaney, P. Nilsson, E. Norén, J. Sayers & M. Österholm (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Swedish Mathematics Education Research Seminar (pp. 47–55). Umeå, Sweden: MADIF.

  • Gunnarsson, R., Sönnerhed, W. W., & Hernell, B. (2016). Does it help to use mathematically superfluous brackets when teaching the rules for the order of operations? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, D. (2005). Chinese whispers - algebra style: Grammatical, notational, mathematical and activity tensions. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 129–136). Melbourne: PME.

  • Hoch, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2004). Structure sense in high school algebra: The effect of brackets. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 49–56). Bergen, Norway: PME.

  • Hoch, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2005). Students’ difficulties with applying a familiar formula in an unfamiliar context. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 145–152). Melbourne, Australia: PME

  • Kieran, C. (1979). Children’s operational thinking within the context of bracketing and the order of operations. In D. Tall (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 128–133). Warwick, UK: PME.

  • Kieran, C. (1988). Two different approaches among algebra learners. In A. F. Coxford (ed.). The Ideas of Algebra. K-12 (pp. 91–96). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA; Lawence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ,

  • Kieran, C. (1989). The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (vol. 4, pp. 33–56). Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates and National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, D. (1989). The visual syntax of algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, D., & Goldstone R. L. (2007). The alignment of ordering and space in arithmetic computation. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 437–442). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

  • Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). Proximity and precedende in arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 1953–1968.

  • Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1994). Cognitive obstacles in pre-algebra. In J. Matos (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp.176–183). Lisbon, Portugal: PME

  • Linchevski, L., & Livneh, D. (1999). Structure sense: The relationship between algebraic and numerical contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linchevski, L., & Vinner, S. (1990). Embedded figures and structures of algebraic expressions. In G. Booker, P. Cobb, & T. N. Mendicuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 85–93). Mexico City, Mexico: PME.

  • Marchini, C., & Papadopoulos, I. (2011). Are useless brackets useful for teaching? In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 185–192). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klangenfurt, Germany: Beltz.

  • Papadopoulos, I., & Gunnarsson, R. (2018). The use of ‘mental’ brackets when calculating arithmetic expressions. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 451–458). Umeå, Sweden: PME

  • Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. (2007). “Order of operations” and other oddities in school mathematics. Retrieved from https://math.berkeley.edu/~wu/order5.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Papadopoulos.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papadopoulos, I., Gunnarsson, R. Exploring the way rational expressions trigger the use of “mental” brackets by primary school students. Educ Stud Math 103, 191–207 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09929-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09929-z

Keywords

Navigation