Abstract
Animal reproduction under stressful conditions is often reduced, with current survival and future reproduction being generally traded off against current reproductive activity. This study examines the impacts of physical and chemical stressors on the rates of asexual reproduction of the invasive planarian Girardia tigrina. 320 wild-caught planaria (mixed size class) were kept individually in Petri dishes such that their individual rates of fission through fragmentation could be easily monitored. Four treatment groups were compared, one chemical (5 mg/L ammonia) and one physical (decapitation), in comparison to a negative control (animals were starved of food) and a positive control where the animals were given an abundance of food. The two treatment groups immediately began reproducing asexually and accumulated the highest number of fissions over the course of the 12-day investigation period, while the positive control only began to fission after 7 days. We propose that the reproductive response observed here is an adaptive one to stressful conditions, whereby the likelihood of survival through numerical abundance is enhanced, although the size and vulnerability of resulting fragments may impose a balancing cost. The response may play a role in the invasiveness of G. tigrina by making it able to colonize environments where adverse conditions prevail.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The proximate and ultimate interactions between environmental stress and reproduction are significant in a wide diversity of contexts, including human and animal health, agriculture and species conservation (Schreck et al. 2001; Amat et al. 2016; Parajuli et al. 2019; Valsamakis et al. 2019). In animals, sexual reproduction under stressful conditions is often retarded, with current survival and future reproduction being traded off against current reproductive activity (Fielenbach and Antebi 2008; Schoech et al. 2009), thus, reproductive activity decreases. Normally, asexual or parthenogenetic animals show a directly induced decrease in reproductive rate as a response to environmental stress (Parish and Bale 1993; Haridevan et al. 2015; Zheng et al. 2017). Even in taxa with both sexual and asexual forms, sexual reproduction commonly replaces asexual reproduction under high stress conditions (Morran et al. 2009; Crummett et al. 2013). Rather few cases are documented where an increased reproductive rate is observed in an asexual animal in response to stress and still less where this is likely to be adaptive (Piranio et al. 1996). Aphids may increase their reproductive rate in response to moderate water stress in their host plants; however, this could be due to changes in plant nutrient availability to the aphids (Banfield-Zanin and Leather 2015); similarly budding in the sponge Cinachyrella cavernosa increases with temperature, interpreted as a stress response (Singh and Thakur 2015); however, within limits, as all ectotherms are known to increase activity with rising temperature.
Many phyla reproduce asexually, including annelids (Gibson and Harvey 2000; Kostyuchenko et al. 2016), echinoderms (Jaeckle 1994; Rubilar et al. 2005), cnidarians (Bell and Wolfe 1985; Lucas 2001), platyhelminthes (Saló 2006; Egger et al. 2007) and arthropods (Banfield-Zanin and Leather 2015; Gutekunst et al. 2018). Planarian asexual reproduction has been a well-documented phenomenon since the 1700s when well-known researchers such as Michael Faraday first recorded it (Hirshfeld 2006). Planarian asexual reproduction takes several forms including parthenogenesis and fission by fragmentation (Lentati 1970; Åkesson et al. 2001; Egger et al. 2007; Malinowski et al. 2017). Planarian fission by fragmentation is a product of a three-step process: waist formation, pulsation, and rupture. Waist formation narrows a portion of the body of an animal (typically behind the pharynx) thus allowing for increased localized strain. Pulsation then pulls the two ends of the animal apart increasing strain on the waist, until the body ruptures at roughly the waist, thus concluding the fission process (Malinowski et al. 2017). This process generates two sections of planarian tissue which will then regenerate the organs not already present in that tissue section, and thus two new planarians. This is made possible by the animal’s incredibly well developed regenerative capacity.
Girardia tigrina (Girard) displays both sexual and asexual reproduction, with the majority of European populations being obligately asexual through fission by fragmentation (Benazzi 1993). This North American planarian can be found in a wide array of freshwater ecosystems (Reynoldson and Young 2000) and is highly invasive, having colonized Europe over the course of the 20th century, and, more recently Japan and Morocco (Reynoldson 1956; Gourbault 1969; Sluys et al. 2010; Alonso and Camargo 2015; Kanana and Riutort 2019; Mabrouki et al. 2023). The invasion of G. tigrina is likely facilitated by ecological factors, such as greater foraging ability when compared to native species (Pickavance 1971a, b; Gee and Young 1993); however, numerical abundance as a product of asexual reproduction could also facilitate this. Motivated by our interest in the invasiveness of this species, we here examine the link between rates of asexual reproduction and stress in G. tigrina. We elected to compare the impacts of chronic ammonia toxicity, an ecologically relevant and previously studied chemical stressor (Alonso and Camargo 2015) to the physical injury of the animal (decapitation, easily repeatable and well studied). The effects of these two treatment groups were controlled for by both positive and negative controls: well-fed animals are known to increase their asexual reproduction, while an unfed group controlled for the starvation stress experienced by the animals in the other treatments.
Materials and methods
Animal material
G. tigrina specimens were collected from an invasive population of the Jeker River in Maastricht, The Netherlands (50.8438N, 5.6861E) in early-June 2017. The flatworms were collected off the bottom of rocks with soft paint brushes. When brought to the laboratory, the planarians were housed individually in 90 mm Petri dishes and maintained in a climate-controlled cabinet at 15 °C (same as river) with 85% humidity to reduce evaporation, and no light since, like many planarians, G. tigrina is photophobic (Hinrichsen et al. 2019; Fig. 1). The flatworms were exposed to a minimum of two hours of light per day during the regular observation and maintenance procedure, an important note as perpetual darkness increases the rate at which G. tigrina fissions (Morita and Best 1984). The same conditions were used throughout the experimental process. The Petri dishes were filled with non-carbonated bottled mineral water (Albert Heijn natural mineral water). Animals were acclimated to lab conditions two weeks before the start of the experiment, four days before the experiment the planarians were fed earthworm segments [Dendrobaena veneta (Rosa)] from worms that had been stored in a glass beaker with moist paper towels for three days. The storage period allowed for the majority of intestinal matter, containing potentially noxious material, to be egested by the earthworms. Asexuality of this population was determined after dissecting some individuals and not observing any reproductive organs. Moreover, the authors have previously kept this population captive for extended periods, under various conditions, no egg cocoons were ever observed.
Experimental process
The planaria (N = 320; mixed size class) were tested under three treatments and a control: the first treatment (Ammonia), where the animals were chronically exposed to sub-lethal levels of ammonia (5 mg/L), the second treatment (Injured), where the animals were injured via decapitation, the third treatment (Fed), where the animals were fed every other day, and the unpolluted, uninjured, unfed control maintained in only mineral water (Control; Fig. 2). The first two conditions represented two distinct forms of stress (the ammonia condition being chemical and decapitated being physical) and the third representing improved conditions over the control and acted as a positive control. All planarians were fasted for the duration of the experiment, with the exception of Fed treatment. As decapitated planarians do not show interest in food for several days (Shomrat and Levin 2013), and can survive for long periods without feeding (Newmark and Alvarado 2002), fasting all animals prevented differences in nutritional status confounding the results. Flatworm size was not recorded, but controlled for through sheer numerical abundance (starting length 8–21 mm; n = 80).
The concentration of 5 mg/L ammonia is naturally occurring and, in this population, sublethal to G. tigrina. currently unpublished results show 35% mortality at 15 mg/L after 14 days of chronic exposure for decapitated individuals (Tolkamp 1990; Rock et al. 2017, unpublished data). To treat the animals with ammonia, a 500 mg/L stock solution was prepared with ammonium chloride. When the water was changed on the ammonia treatment, the previously prepared stock solution was used diluted to reach 5 mg/L, then used for the water change rather than clean water. Injured flatworms were decapitated with a razor blade below the sensory lobes and heads removed from the dish (Fig. 2). The Fed group was allowed to feed on a section of D. veneta roughly three segments long, maintained as previously described, for one hour before the water change. For all treatments, water was changed every other day to maintain cleanliness as well as to ensure a constant level of ammonia in that treatment group. The Petri dishes were changed every four days. The experiment ran for 11 days, during which all instances of fission were recorded daily. When one animal fissioned more than once, each instance was counted independently. This allowed for a comparative analysis of the total number of fissions over time per condition, along with an investigation into the number of individuals that fissioned. Fissioned sections were left in the Petri dishes, no mortality was observed over the course of this study.
Statistical analysis
Chi-squared tests for heterogeneity were used to investigate differences in fission behavior between the four groups; these compared the number of overall fissions and the number of animals that fissioned. As a post-hoc analysis, Mann-Whitney U tests were run between treatments. The significance level was adjusted with a Bonferroni correction to account for multiple comparisons (six tests; significance level = 0.0084). A Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportions of multi-fissioning planaria to single-fissioning planaria between treatment groups. All analysis was performed with SPSS V28.
Results
Significant heterogeneity was recorded between the number of fissions in the different treatment groups (X2 = 66.309, df = 9, p < 0.0001). By the study endpoint, the injured group accumulated the highest number of fissions, followed thereafter by the ammonia treatment. The fed group initially remained identical to the control group but began to accumulate fissions after 7 days (Fig. 3). After 11 days, all treatment groups were significantly different from each other, with the exception of the ammonia and fed groups, which did not reach the adjusted significance level (p = 0.0322; Table 1).
The differences in total fissions between the groups was a result of significant heterogeneity between the number of individuals that fissioned within each treatment group (X2 = 62.334, df = 3, p < 0.0001). This followed the same pattern as before, where the injured treatment induced the highest number of planaria to fission, while the negative control treatment induced the fewest (Fig. 4). All treatment groups appeared significantly different from each other, with the exception of the fed group which was not statistically different from either the control group (p = 0.0398) or the ammonia group (p = 0.0086; Table 2) and the adjusted significance level.
As the number of planaria that fissioned increased, so did the number of planaria that fissioned multiple times (Fig. 4). The control group had no animals fission more than once, while the injured group had two instances of a planarian fissioning three times. The results of the Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact Test (p = 0.775) do not indicate a significant association between the treatment group and the number of animals that fissioned multiple times.
Discussion
The results of this study provide an intriguing insight into the relationship between asexual reproduction and the environment in G. tigrina, which may shed some light on this species invasiveness. The results of this study could benefit from further extension such as to other types of injury (e.g. incisions/holes), other potential stressors (e.g. other pollutants/salinity/light) as well as a longer experimental timeframe.
The stress conditions were chosen as samples of natural and realistic stressors. Many freshwater habits are eutrophic because of anthropogenic activity, therefore, G. tigrina can be exposed to high nitrogen levels. The concentration of ammonia used here was one third of that known to show mortality in G. tigrina, and has been shown to be toxic to some native Dutch flatworm species (Rock et al. 2017, unpublished data). As a result of their ability to regenerate, planarians are able to survive serious injury from predators; such as decapitation, which normally leads to death in most other taxa.
There are several known variables that determine the rate at which planarians fission, such as size of the animal, population density, and photoperiod (Child 1910; Best et al. 1969; Pigon et al. 1974; Morita and Best 1984). The higher rate of fission in the Fed group as opposed to the unfed control groups is likely a direct consequence of size, mediated by food availability. Flatworm growth was not recorded in this study, however the Fed group roughly doubled in size, if not more, over the course of the 11 days (personal observation). As the animals grew, they began to fission more rapidly. An effect that was seen in the second half of the experiment. Given that G. tigrina is successfully able to outcompete native planarian species in foraging ability, their broader resource spectrum likely allows the species to grow faster, and thus reproduce more when compared to the native varieties; a key factor in their invasive success (Pickavance 1971a, b).
The planarians in both of the stress conditions in this study increased their rate of fission over the control despite neither having an obvious direct effect. While the ammonia treatment increases allosteric strain on the animals, increasing the energy required for basic body maintenance, injury physically removes nutrient from the body. We, therefore, tentatively suggest that the animal is exhibiting an adaptive indirect response to stress. Asexual organisms can reach high population densities (Simon et al. 2010) and lineages can potentially persist through their sheer numerical abundance. Fission, in this case, could serve to accentuate the properties of asexual reproduction, i.e., a planarian could increase the likelihood of future survival through the production of as many clones as possible via the process of fission.
The heightened level of ammonia constitutes an existential threat to all aquatic organisms. Ammonia levels may fluctuate in water bodies over space and time (McColl 1974; Wurts 2003), and has been reported toxic to aquatic organisms from levels as low as 0.53 mg/L (EPA, USA 2013). A strategy to produce numerous clonal offspring would therefore increase the likelihood of survival through an adverse period. The level of ammonia chosen here did not result in any mortality to the animals in this study and was within natural levels for the river and previously defined toxic concentrations (Tolkamp 1990; EPA, USA 2013, Rock et al. 2017).
Injury to the animals via decapitation, on the other hand, has been previously shown to increase the rate of fission (Brondsted 1955; Morita and Best 1984; Hori and Kishida 1998), although such experiments have been focused on proximate physiological mechanisms rather than ultimate ones (Morita and Best 1984; Hori and Kishida 1998). As rates of fission also increase when the animals are in perpetual darkness, it has been proposed that these are mediated by the same mechanism, as with no head, there are no eyes to perceive light (Asano et al. 1998). We generally avoided this photoperiod effect by exposing the animals to light for at least two hours a day for maintenance and observation purposes, which is sufficient to abolish this effect (Morita and Best 1984). An argument could be made that the increased fission observed in the injured group was a result of the photoperiod effect rather than the injury itself. However, decapitated G. tigrina regenerates eyespots after 3 days of regeneration (López et al. 2019), which would have limited the effect to the first half of the study. As full head regeneration is generally assumed to take at least 6 days (Cebrià et al. 1997), the increase in fission could be mediated by some other structure not yet regenerated.
It is clear both in the case of ammonia and decapitation, that the products of fission are initially much smaller than the original planarian; they are also typically missing eyes and other essential organs, and are unable to feed. All these factors potentially act to reduce their fitness. The fissioning strategy would therefore have to offset these costs. Since the number of individuals is doubled by splitting into two, these costs would need to be relatively high. In light of the risk imposed, further research should examine the relative benefits of an increased rate of reproduction relative to the costs of small size and temporary loss of essential body parts, in addition to expanding this work to a wider range of stressors. If fission is adaptive this may help explain the invasiveness of G. tigrina relative to other flatworm species. The success with which this species has been able to invade new territory could be a consequence of anthropogenic effects on freshwater ecosystems, such as pollution, which increases stress on the organisms that live there. Future investigations should be conducted to confirm or refute this hypothesis.
References
Åkesson B, Gschwentner R, Hendelberg J, Ladurner P, Müller J, Rieger R (2001) Fission in Convolutriloba longifissura: asexual reproduction in acoelous turbellarians revisited. Acta Zool 82:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6395.2001.00084.x
Alonso Á, Camargo JA (2015) Ammonia toxicity to the freshwater planarian Polycelis felina: contrasting effects of continuous versus discontinuous exposures. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 68:689–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0129-8
Amat M, Camps T, Manteca X (2016) Stress in owned cats: behavioural changes and welfare implications. J Feline Med Surg 18:577–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X15590867
Asano Y, Nakamura S, Ishida S, Azuma K, Shinozawa T (1998) Rhodopsin-like proteins in planarian eye and auricle: detection and functional analysis. J Exp Biol 201:1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.201.9.1263
Banfield-Zanin JA, Leather SR (2015) Reproduction of an arboreal aphid pest, Elatobium abietinum, is altered under drought stress. J Appl Entomol 139:302–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12159
Bell G, Wolfe LM (1985) Sexual and asexual reproduction in a natural population of Hydra pseudoligactis. Can J Zool 63:851–856. https://doi.org/10.1139/z85-126
Benazzi M (1993) Occurrence of a sexual population of Dugesia (Girardia) tigrina, a freshwater planarian native to America, in a lake of southern Italy. Ital J Zool 60:129–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250009309355799
Best JB, Goodman AB, Pigon A (1969) Fissioning in planarians: control by the brain. Science 164:565–566. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3879.565
Best JB, Abelein M, Kreutzer E, Pigon A (1975) Cephalic mechanism for social control of fissioning in planarians: III. Central nervous system centers of facilitation and inhibition. J Comp Physiol Psychol 89:923–932. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077164
Brondsted HV (1955) Planarian regeneration. Biol. Rev./Cambridge Philos Soc 30(6):5–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1955.tb00649.x
Cebrià F, Vispo M, Newmark P, Bueno D, Romero R (1997) Myocyte differentiation and body wall muscle regeneration in the planarian Girardia tigrina. Dev Genes Evol 207:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004270050118
Child CM (1910) Physiological isolation of parts and fission in Planaria. Arch Entwickl Org 30:159–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02263808
Crummett LT, Sears BF, Lafon DC, Wayne ML (2013) Parthenogenetic populations of the freshwater snail Campeloma limum occupy habitats with fewer environmental stressors than their sexual counterparts. Freshw Biol 58:655–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12064
Egger B, Gschwentner R, Rieger R (2007) Free-living flatworms under the knife: past and present. Dev Genes Evol 217(2):89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-006-0120-5
EPA, USA (2013) Aquatic life: ambient water quality criteria for ammonia-freshwater, 2013. EPA-822-R-13-001
Fielenbach N, Antebi A (2008) C. elegans dauer formation and the molecular basis of plasticity. Genes Dev 22:2149–2165. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1701508
Gee H, Young JO (1993) The food niches of the invasive Dugesia tigrina (Girard) and indigenous Polycelis tennis Ijima and P. nigra (Müller) (Turbellaria; Tricladida) in a Welsh lake. Hydrobiologia 254:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014313
Gibson GD, Harvey JM (2000) Morphogenesis during asexual reproduction in Pygospio elegans Claparede (Annelida, Polychaeta). Biol Bull 199(1):41–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542705
Gourbault N (1969) Expansion de Dugesia tigrina (Girard), planaire Americaine introduite en Europe. Ann Limnol 5:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/1969006
Gutekunst J, Andriantsoa R, Falckenhayn C, Hanna K, Stein W, Rasamy J, Lyko F (2018) Clonal genome evolution and rapid invasive spread of the marbled crayfish. Nat Ecol Evol 2:567–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0467-9
Haridevan G, Jyothibabu R, Arunpandi N, Jagadeesan L, Biju A (2015) Influence of salinity on the life table demography of a rare Cladocera Latonopsis australis. Environ Monit Assess 187(643):15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4849-z. pp
Hinrichsen RD, Fabi JL, Craig SE, Rovins PS, Cerwensky AJ, Major RJ, Ruby CL (2019) Photoresponsivity and motility in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea vary diurnally. Chronobiol Int 36(12):1789–1793. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2019.1683023
Hirshfeld AW (2006) The electric life of Michael Faraday. Walker Books, London.
Hori I, Kishida Y (1998) A fine structural study of regeneration after fission in the planarian Dugesia japonica. Hydrobiologia 383:131–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003415105630
Jaeckle WB (1994) Multiple modes of asexual reproduction by tropical and subtropical sea star larvae: an unusual adaptation for genet dispersal and survival. Biol Bull 186:62–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542036
Kanana Y, Riutort M (2019) First record of freshwater planarian Girardia tigrina (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Continenticola) in Eastern Europe. Zootaxa 4624(4):zootaxa-4624. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4624.4.13
Kostyuchenko RP, Kozin VV, Kupriashova EE (2016) Regeneration and asexual reproduction in annelids: cells, genes, and evolution. Biol Bull 43:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359016030067
Lentati GB (1970) Gametogenesis and egg fertilization in planarians. Int Rev Cytol 27:101–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61247-4
López AMC, Sarmento RA, de Souza Saraiva A, Pereira RR, Soares AM, Pestana JL (2019) Exposure to Roundup® affects behaviour, head regeneration and reproduction of the freshwater planarian Girardia tigrina. Sci Tot Env 675:453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.234
Lucas CH (2001) Reproduction and life history strategies of the common jellyfish, Aurelia aurita, in relation to its ambient environment. In: Purcell, JE, Graham, WM, Dumont, HJ (eds) Jellyfish blooms: ecological and societal importance. Developments in hydrobiology, Springer, Dordrecht. 155, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0722-1_19
Mabrouki Y, Taybi AF, Vila-Farré M (2023) First record of the globally invasive planarian Girardia tigrina (Girard, 1850) sensu lato in Morocco. BioInv Rec 12(1):257–264. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2023.12.1.21
Malinowski PT, Cochet-Escartin O, Kaj KJ, Ronan E, Groisman A, Diamond PH, Collins EMS (2017) Mechanics dictate where and how freshwater planarians fission. Proc Nat Acad Sci 114(41):10888–10893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700762114
McColl RHS (1974) Self‐purification of small freshwater streams: phosphate, nitrate, and ammonia removal. NZ J Mar Freshw Res 8:375–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1974.9515512
Morita M, Best JB (1984) Effects of photoperiods and melatonin on planarian asexual reproduction. J Exp Zool 231:273–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402310212
Morran LT, Cappy BJ, Anderson JL, Phillips PC (2009) Sexual partners for the stressed: facultative outcrossing in the self-fertilizing nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Evol Int J Org Evol 63:1473–1482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00652.x
Newmark PA, Alvarado AS (2002) Not your father’s planarian: a classic model enters the era of functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 3:210–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg759
Parajuli R, Thoma G, Matlock MD (2019) Environmental sustainability of fruit and vegetable production supply chains in the face of climate change: a review. Sci Tot Environ 650:2863–2879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.019
Parish WEG, Bale JS (1993) Effects of brief exposures to low temperature on the development, longevity and fecundity of the grain aphid Sitobion auenae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Ann Appl Biol 122:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1993.tb04009.x
Pickavance JR (1971a) The diet of the immigrant planarian Dugesia tigrina (Girard): I. Feeding in the laboratory. J Anim Ecol 40:623–635. https://doi.org/10.2307/3441
Pickavance JR (1971b) The diet of the immigrant planarian Dugesia tigrina (Girard): II. Food in the wild and comparison with some British species. J Anim Ecol 40:637–650. https://doi.org/10.2307/3442
Pigon A, Morita M, Best JB (1974) Cephalic mechanism for social control of fissioning in planarians. II. Localization and identification of the receptors by electron micrographic and ablation studies. Dev Neurobiol 5:443–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.480050506
Piraino S, Boero F, Aeschbach B, Schmid V (1996) Reversing the life cycle: medusae transforming into polyps and cell transdifferentiation in Turritopsis nutricula (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). Biol Bull 190(3):302–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/1543022
Reynoldson TB (1956) The occurrence in Britain of the American triclad Dugesia tigrina (Girard) and the status of D. gonocephala (Dugès). J Nat Hist 9:102–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222935608655731
Reynoldson TB, Young JO (2000) A key to the freshwater triclads of Britain and Ireland with notes on their ecology. Freshwater Biological Assessment, Ambleside
Rock, S, Suthakaran S, Costa B, Kuerten F (2017) Comparing the differences in regenerative capacity of a native and invasive species of flatworm. Unpublished data
Rubilar T, Pastor de Ward CT, Díaz de Vivar ME (2005) Sexual and asexual reproduction of Allostichaster capensis (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in Golfo Nuevo. Mar Biol 146:1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1530-4
Saló E (2006) The power of regeneration and the stem‐cell kingdom: freshwater planarians (Platyhelminthes). Bioessays 28(5):546–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20416
Schoech SJ, Rensel MA, Bridge ES, Boughton RK, Wilcoxen TE (2009) Environment, glucocorticoids, and the timing of reproduction. Gen Comp Endocrinol 163:201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.09.009
Schreck CB, Contreras-Sanchez W, Fitzpatrick MS (2001) Effects of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny. Aquaculture 197:3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-50913-0.50005-9
Shomrat T, Levin M (2013) An automated training paradigm reveals long-term memory in planarians and its persistence through head regeneration. J Exp Biol 216(20):3799–3810. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.087809
Simon JC, Stoeckel S, Tagu D (2010) Evolutionary and functional insights into reproductive strategies of aphids. Comptes Rendus Biol 333:488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.03.003
Singh A, Thakur NL (2015) Field and laboratory investigations of budding in the tetillid sponge Cinachyrella cavernosa. Invert Biol 134:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12074
Sluys R, Kawakatsu M, Yamamoto K (2010) Exotic freshwater planarians currently known from Japan. Belg J Zool 140:103–109. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.334826
Tolkamp HH (1990) Ontwikkeling van de waterkwaliteit in de zuidlimburgse beken. Publ. Natuurhist. Gen. Limburg; Natuurhistorisch Maandblad. https://natuurtijdschriften.nl/pub/1005315/NAHM1990079003008.pdf
Valsamakis G, Chrousos G, Mastorakos G (2019) Stress, female reproduction and pregnancy. Psychoneuroendocrinology 100:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.031
Wurts WA (2003) Daily pH cycle and ammonia toxicity. World Aquacul 34:20–21
Zheng L, Pan L, Lin P, Miao J, Wang X, Lin Y, Wu J (2017) Evaluating the toxic effects of three priority hazardous and noxious substances (HNS) to rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:27277–27287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0298-2
Acknowledgements
We thank Tobie van Zwieten for assistance in the lab as well as Fokko Zandbergen and Paul Lemmens for technical assistance.
Funding
This work was supported by Maastricht University, Maastricht Science Programme. Open access funding provided by Karlstad University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SR and JS conceived of the general idea behind the study. SR, ZO, and JS primarily handled the statistical analysis and figure preparation. All authors, with the exception of JS contributed equally to both field and lab duties. SR primarily handled manuscript writing. SR, ZO and JS were primary manuscript editors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rock, S.L., Oudendijk, Z., Kürten, F.T. et al. The effect of stress on rates of asexual reproduction in an invasive planarian. Ecotoxicology 32, 1201–1208 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-023-02713-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-023-02713-z